HHS Public Access
Author manuscript
Author Manuscript
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Published in final edited form as:
Am J Crim Justice. 2016 December ; 41(4): 645–662. doi:10.1007/s12103-016-9342-x.
Highly Rated and most Frequent Stressors among Police
Officers: Gender Differences
John M. Violanti1, Desta Fekedulegn2, Tara A. Hartley2, Luenda E. Charles2, Michael E.
Andrew2, Claudia C. Ma2, and Cecil M. Burchfiel2
1Department
Author Manuscript
of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health
Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 270 Farber Hall, Buffalo, New
York, USA
2Biostatistics
and Epidemiology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV,
USA
Abstract
Author Manuscript
This descriptive study examined the top five most frequent and highly rated occupational stressors
from the Spielberger Police Stress Survey among 365 police officers enrolled in the Buffalo
Cardio-Metabolic Occupational Police Stress (BCOPS) Study (2004–2009). Prevalence,
frequency, and rating of stressors were compared across gender. Poisson regression was used to
estimate the prevalence and prevalence ratio (PR) of events. Analysis of variance was used to
compare mean frequency of occurrence and mean stress ratings by gender. Many reported
stressors dealt with violent situations. Responding to family disputes (83 %) was reported as the
most frequent stressor and exposure to battered children (27 %) was the most highly rated stressor
(mean rating: 67.6 ± 35.3). Killing someone in the line of duty (mean rating: 66.3 ± 43.0) and
experiencing a fellow officer being killed (mean rating: 65.3 ± 40.6) were highly rated but
infrequent (0.27 % and 3.6 %, respectively). Male officers tended to report more frequent stressors
which took away from their time off duty such as court appearances (PR = 1.26, 1.04–1.52) and
working second jobs (PR = 2.37, 1.57–3.57). In contrast, female officers reported experiencing a
37 % higher prevalence of lack of support from supervisor (PR = 0.63, 0.48–0.82) relative to male
officers. Results of the present study are discussed within the context of specific police stressors
and gender.
Author Manuscript
Keywords
Police; Stress; Ratings; Frequency; Gender differences
Correspondence to: John M. Violanti.
Disclaimer The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Violanti et al.
Page 2
Author Manuscript
Introduction
There is a general consensus that police work is an occupation replete with stress (Violanti
& Aron, 1995; Finn & Tornz, 2000; Deschamps, Paganon-Badinier, Marchand, & Merle,
2003; Collins & Gibbs, 2003; Kirshman, 2006; Marmar, et al., 2006; Weiss et al., 2002;
O’Toole, Vitello, & Palmer, 2014; Violanti, et al., 2006). Given this previous research
evidence, police officers and others who work in high stress occupations are appropriate
groups in which to study the effects of work stress.
Author Manuscript
Several sources of police work stressors have been identified: (1) the obvious inherent
aspect, which involves danger and job risk; (2) the police administrative organization; and
(3) lack of organizational support (Spielberger, Westberry, Grier, & Greenfield, 1981, 1982;
Martelli, Waters, & Martelli, 1989; Bonnar, 2000; Kop & Euwema, 2001; Patterson, 2002;
Patterson, 2003; Violanti, 2014). Of these, the police administrative organization appears to
be a frequently mentioned source of stress for officers. Administrative stressors include, job
demands, job insecurity, insufficient pay, and excessive paperwork (Violanti et al., 2014).
Author Manuscript
Despite previous research on police stressors, a question that needs further exploration is
how officers rate work stressors and the frequency at which these stressors occur. Frequency
could be an important aspect, as incidence of occurrence may strongly influence ratings. A
few studies have reported the self-rated stressfulness of police events but not their frequency.
For example, Violanti and Aron (1994, 1995) found that the top four of sixty most stressful
police work events were killing someone while on duty, witnessing a fellow officer killed,
being physically attacked, and seeing abused and battered children. O’Toole et al. (2014)
found that physical threats, lack of support, and organizational pressure were the highest
ranked stressors. Collins and Gibbs (2003) found that the police organizational culture and
an officer’s workload were the highest ranked stressors. These prior studies have often used
stressors that are highly rated because of the public attention that these events receive but
there is little or no information on prevalence of frequently occurring stressors and their
potential association with health outcomes. In addition, literature on the association between
frequency of occurrence and the rating of stressfulness is not available. Therefore, it is
worthwhile to examine events that occur frequently, even if they are not highly rated, along
with those that are highly rated but occur rarely.
Gender Issues
Author Manuscript
A host of prior studies conducted in the 1980s and 1990s Haarr, 1997; Martin, 1992; Wexler
and Logan, 1983) highlight some of the unique stressors female officers experienced. These
include negative attitudes of male officers towards female officers, the lack of acceptance by
police agencies, feeling the need to prove themselves, and experiencing sexual harassment.
While progress has been made to increase the number of female officers in U.S. police
agencies (Lonsway, 2007), many of these same stressors still persist. Morash, Kwak and
Haarr (2006) found that women officers reported significantly higher levels of harassment,
bias, underestimation of physical abilities, and lack of influence than their male
counterparts. Thompson, Kirk and Brown (2006) found that interpersonal stressors and lack
of support, contributed significantly to stress levels. Haarr (1997) and Shelley, Morabito &
Tobin-Gurley (2011) reported that women felt that men officers questioned their abilities to
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 3
Author Manuscript
do the job. Sexual harassment and discrimination are often mentioned as stressors among
women officers (Deschamps et al., 2003; Thompson et al., 2006; Chaiyavej & Morash,
2008).
Author Manuscript
A recent study (Kurtz, 2008) suggests that most research on police stress fails to address a
fundamental concern—that of gender. The results from this study suggests that stress and
burnout by police officers is not just simply a response to high stress environment, rather it is
embedded in the gender structure and process of policing. A few studies have focused on
gender differences in the relationship between police stress and health outcomes, yet
opportunities exist to expand our understanding. Among these, Hartley et al. (2011) reported
that police stressors were associated with the metabolic syndrome in female but not male
police officers. Yoo and Franke (2010) found that female police officers had higher levels of
stress than male police officers and higher levels of hypercholesterolemia and diabetes than
the general female population.
In the present paper, we add to past research on police stressors by describing by gender the
ranking, frequency, and prevalence of stressors based on the comprehensive listing found in
the 60-item Police Stress Survey (Spielberger et al., 1981). The Police Stress Survey allowed
an analysis of specific and unique work stressors found in policing. This instrument is
standardized and well-accepted in the literature. Here we will describe the standardized
appraisal of stressors and describe important differences between men and women officers in
the frequency, ratings, and prevalence of work stressors.
Method
Design and Study Participants
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Participants were police officers who were enrolled in the Buffalo Cardio-Metabolic
Occupational Police Stress (BCOPS) Study. The BCOPS Study was a cross-sectional
epidemiologic study conducted between 2004 and 2009 to examine the association between
workplace stress and subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Center for Health
Research, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at
Buffalo in Buffalo, NY served as the data collection site. At the initiation of the study in
2004, all 710 police officers working in the Buffalo Police Department were invited. Of the
710, 466 chose to participate but we excluded two pregnant officers, yielding 464 officers
who participated in the study. These 464 officers were examined once between the period
from 2004 to 2009. No specific inclusion criteria were used for the study, other than the
participant would be a sworn police officer and willing to participate in the study. The study
was approved by the University of New York at Buffalo Internal Review Board and the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Human Subjects Review Board. For
the current study we restricted the analyses to those officers who had data on the relevant
police stress survey items and have worked in the past month (n = 365).
Measures
The Spielberger Police Stress Survey is a 60-item instrument for assessing specific sources
of stress in police work (Spielberger, et al., 1981). For each item, the officer rates the
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 4
Author Manuscript
perceived stressfulness of experiencing the event from 0 to 100 (0 = no stress, 100 =
maximum stress), which creates a stress rating for each event. The officer also provides the
frequency of occurrence of each event over the past month (total frequency in past month)
and past year (total frequency in past year). The 60-item survey consists of three subscales:
administrative and organizational pressure (23 items-sample items: excessive paperwork,
negative attitudes toward police officers, insufficient manpower to adequately handle a job);
physical and psychological threat (24 items-sample items: dangerous situations and
experiences; and lack of support (13 items-sample items: political pressures and
relationships with supervisor and coworkers). The subscales have acceptable internal
consistency scores (Cronbach’s alpha >0.90). The Spielberger Police Stress Survey has no
standard or reference to use in rating the event’s stressfulness and, therefore, each item was
rated independently.
Author Manuscript
On the examination date of the BCOPS study, questionnaires were administered to collect
demographic and lifestyle characteristics including gender, race/ethnicity, years of
education, marital status, smoking status, rank, age, years of police service, body mass
index, alcohol consumption, sleep duration, and physical activity. Objective work history
records which contained a day-by-day account of activities, for each officer, were used to
determine shift work.
Statistical Analysis
Author Manuscript
Officers who had worked during the past month and had complete data on the Spielberger
Police Stress Survey were included in the current analyses (n = 365, 265 men and 100
women). Data from the work history records were used to verify whether each officer
worked in the past month or not. The chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA)
were used to describe and compare the demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study
participants by gender.
Author Manuscript
The top five police stressors (from the 60-item survey) were identified using two
approaches. In the first approach, the stressors were ranked using mean frequency of
occurrence in the past month. To minimize recall bias, we used frequency of occurrence in
the past month rather than frequency of occurrence in the past year. This approach yielded
the top five most frequently occurring events in the past month. In the second approach, the
stressors were ranked using mean stress rating (0–100) and the top five most stressful events
were selected. The two approaches were also used to select the top five stressors for each of
the three subscales of the Police Stress Scale - administrative and organizational pressure;
physical and psychological threat; and lack of support. To describe whether the top five
stressors differed by gender, separate ranking of the events were conducted for men and
women officers.
Prevalence was defined as occurrence of the event (stressor) at least once in the past month.
The prevalence of each of the top five stressors (overall prevalence as well as prevalence by
gender) and the prevalence ratio (PR) comparing prevalence in men relative to women were
estimated using the Poisson regression model. Unadjusted prevalence ratios and their 95 %
confidence intervals were estimated. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to
compare the mean frequency of occurrences and the mean stress ratings between men and
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 5
Author Manuscript
women. For all tests, statistical significance was assessed at the 5 % level and all analyses
were conducted using the SAS system, version 9.3. (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
The study sample (Table 1) consisted of 73 % males and the majority was white (78 %),
married (74 %), held the rank of patrol officer (72 %), and were never smokers (60 %). The
mean age was 41 years (SD = 6.6). Male officers had significantly higher body mass index
(BMI) and alcohol consumption compared to women (Table 1). Education, marital status,
and smoking status differed significantly across gender with female officers being more
educated, less likely to be married, and more likely to be a current or former smoker. In
addition, a significantly smaller percentage of women worked the night shift compared to
their male counter parts.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Table 2 presents the top five most frequently occurring stressors in the past month. These
included dealing with family disputes and crisis situations, responding to a felony in
progress, fellow officers not doing their job, making critical on-the-spot decisions, and
insufficient manpower to adequately handle a job. Overall 77 % to 83 % of the officers
experienced these stressors at least once in the past month but the prevalence of these events
did not differ between men and women. Three of the top five most frequent stressors
represented physical/psychological danger. Examination of the top five stressors for each of
the subscales shows that gender differences in prevalence were evident only for the
following three events: court appearances on day off or following night shift, inadequate or
poor quality equipment, and working a second job. Among men, the prevalence of court
appearances on day off or following night shift was 26 % higher compared to women
officers (PR = 1.26, 1.04–1.52). Working a second job was two times more prevalent in men
compared to women (PR = 2.37, 1.57–3.57). On the other hand, women officers experienced
higher prevalence of inadequate or poor quality equipment compared to men (unadjusted PR
= 0.82, 0.69–0.97).
Author Manuscript
Table 3 presents the five most highly rated stressful events. These included exposure to
battered or dead children, killing someone in the line of duty, fellow officer killed in the line
of duty, situations requiring use of force, and physical attack on one’s person. The
prevalence of these top five stressful events in the past month ranged from 0.3 % to 59 %;
killing someone in the line of duty (0.3 %) and fellow officer killed in the line of duty
(3.6 %) had the lowest prevalence, while situations requiring use of force (58.5 %) had the
highest prevalence in the past month. The prevalence of these top five stressors did not differ
by gender. Note that all the top five most stressful events represent physical/psychological
danger. The prevalence of the top five most stressful events from each of the Spielberger
police stress subscales did not differ by gender except for the following two stressors:
inadequate support by supervisor, and inadequate or poor quality equipment. The prevalence
of inadequate support by supervisor was 37 % higher in women compared to men (PR =
0.63, 0.48–0.82) while the prevalence of inadequate or poor quality equipment was 18 %
higher among women relative to men officers (PR = 0.82, 0.69–0.97).
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 6
Author Manuscript
Table 4 is a comparison of the mean frequency of occurrence in the past month between men
and women for the top five most frequently occurring stressors in the past month. Note that
this is an alternative approach to the data presented in Table 2. The data in Table 2 compares
prevalence (at least one occurrence in the past month) between men and women while Table
4 takes into account all occurrences of the event in the past month (initial plus recurrences).
The mean frequency of occurrence in the past month differed significantly by gender for the
following stressors: men reported higher recurrence than women for public criticism of
police (3.5 ± 3.3 vs. 2.6 ± 2.7, p = 0.028), court appearances on day off or following night
shift (3.5 ± 3.5 vs. 2.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.003), working a second job (2.6 ± 3.6 vs. 1.1 ± 2.4, p =
0.001), and political pressure from within department (1.6 ± 2.6 vs. 1.0 ± 2.0, p = 0.040);
women reported a higher recurrence than men for inadequate or poor quality equipment (2.1
± 3.0 vs. 2.9 ± 3.4, p = 0.031).
Author Manuscript
Table 5 presents the comparison of mean stress rating between men and women for the top
five most stressful stressors. The mean stress rating differed significantly between women
and men for the following five stressors with women reporting higher rating of stressfulness
compared to men: situations requiring use of force (65.6 vs. 57.4, p = 0.018), insufficient
manpower to adequately handle a job (59.4 vs. 50.0, p = 0.006), fellow officers not doing
their job (56.5 vs. 46.0, p = 0.013), inadequate support by supervisor (51.8 vs. 37.1, p =
0.001), and poor quality equipment (49.5 vs. 36.8, p = 0.001).
Discussion
Author Manuscript
This study described the five most frequent and highly rated police occupational stressors
from the Spielberger Police Stress Survey, which consists of 60 specific stressor events
grouped into three categories (1) administrative and organizational pressure; (2) physical and
psychological threat; (3) and lack of support. Results indicated that mean occurrences in the
past month for the top five most frequent stressors (dealing with family disputes, responding
to a felony in progress, fellow officers not doing their job, making critical on-the-spot
decisions, and insufficient personnel) were similar for both men and women. Overall 77 %
to 83 % of the officers experienced these stressors at least once in the past month. The top
five most highly rated police events included exposure to battered or dead children, killing
someone in the line of duty, fellow officer killed in the line of duty, situations requiring use
of force, and physical attack on one’s person. The prevalence of these stressful events in the
past month ranged from 0.3 % to 59 %.
Author Manuscript
Four of the five top rated stressors involved acts of violence, yet it was interesting that some
of these stressors had a high rating but low prevalence. Of these, exposure to battered or
dead children was ranked highest (Table 2). Involvement with child crimes is a difficult task
for police officers and it requires a special ability and social support system in order to avoid
traumatization. Organizational support and increased resiliency are factors which may help
(Violanti, 2014). Prior research regarding police investigations of children related crimes,
such as neglect, homicide, or sexual abuse suggest that officers are often at greater risk for
developing secondary traumatic stress (Krause, 2013; Chouliara, Hutchinson & Karatzias,
2009; Powell & Tomyn, 2011; Burns, Morley, Bradshaw & Domene, 2008; Violanti &
Gehrke, 2004), and depression and anxiety (Powell & Guadagno, 2013; Russ, Lonne &
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 7
Author Manuscript
Darlington, 2009). Powell and Guadagno (2013) also suggest that officers may be at higher
risk for vicarious traumatization, a cumulative effect of trauma upon one’s self. Wright,
Powell and Ridge (2006) found that the two key sources of negative work stress frequently
associated with child abuse investigation were heavy caseloads and unavailability of formal
coping mechanisms.
Author Manuscript
Experiencing a fellow officer killed in the line of duty was also highly rated but infrequent
(3.6 %). In 2014 in the United States, 61 officers were feloniously killed in the line of duty
(http://www.nleomf.org/facts/officer-fatalities-data/) out of an occupational group of
865,000 police officers. As indicated in our sample, despite the low number of such tragic
deaths, the occurrence of this event has a highly stressful effect on officers. Policing is a
cohesive occupation, and co-workers are generally personally close. The felonious death of
an officer has been perceived by other officers as similar to losing a family member (Violanti
& Paton, 2006).
Author Manuscript
Another highly rated but infrequent stressor was killing someone in the line of duty
(0.27 %). Similar to experiencing the death of a fellow officer, being involved in a shooting
and killing someone can be a very stressful and traumatic event for officers (Violanti, 2014;
Bond, Hartley, Sarkisian, Andrew, Charles, Andrew and Violanti, 2014. The aftermath of a
shooting can lead to scrutiny from the public, the police department, and the judicial system
concerning the legality of the shooting and the proper use of justifiable deadly physical force
by the officer. The officer may have to appear in court to determine whether his or her
actions were legally justifiable and be placed on suspension for work while the incident is
investigated. After such incidents it is important to have officers attend a post shooting
intervention with either peer supporters or a mental health professional to help defuse the
possibility of posttraumatic stress disorder (Trompetter, Corey, Schmidt & Tracy, 2013). It
follows from shooting incidents that the stress of “making critical on-the-spot decisions”
would also be high on the list of frequent stressors (78 %) among officers. Wheatcroft,
Alison, and McGrory (2012) comment that trusting supervision is a key factor in officer
decision making during critical incidents such as shootings. In our sample, the high reported
frequency of critical decision-making may be related to perceptions of lack of support from
the department (44 %).
Author Manuscript
Situations requiring use of force (58.5 %) was a frequent and highly rated stressor in the
present study. On average, over the last decade, there have been 58,930 assaults against law
enforcement each year, resulting in 15,404 officer injuries (National Law Enforcement
Officers Memorial Fund, 2014). According to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
data for 2011, there were a total of 54,774 assaults (2208 assaults were by firearm, 997 by
knife, 7808 by other dangerous weapons, and 43,761 by personal weapons) among a total
police force of 535,651. This equated to a rate of 10.2 assaults per 100 officers with 26.6 %
of the officers assaulted sustaining injuries (FBI, LEOKA, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/
cjis/ucr/leoka/2011/tables/table-70, 2014). Under such dangerous working conditions,
officers are highly likely to be required to use justifiable force.
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 8
Gender Differences
Author Manuscript
Although there were no reported gender differences overall among the top stressors, there
were some differences between men and women officers in the prevalence, frequency, and
rating of specific stressors. Recognizing this distinction is important as prior research
findings have been mixed. In a survey of employees from a county police department,
Pendergrass & Ostrove, (1984) reported that the perceived rating of job stress was higher
among sworn female officers compared to civilian females working in police departments. A
survey of workplace problems encountered by police officers (Morash and Haar, 1995)
concluded that although the gendered nature of police organizations causes unique stressors
for women, the level of reported stress did not significantly vary by gender. Yet most prior
research highlight gender differences in work-related events in policing (Kurtz, 2008).
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
In our study female officers rated stressors concerning fellow officers not doing their job,
inadequate support by supervisors, poor quality equipment, and situations requiring use of
force as more stressful than did men. Female officers experienced a 37 % higher prevalence
of inadequate support by their supervisor compared to male officers (PR = 0.63, 0.48–0.82).
Women officers in past research have reported higher levels of harassment, bias in hiring,
promotion and assignments, and an underestimation of their physical and psychological
abilities (Hartley, Mnatsakanova, Burchfiel & Violanti, 2014). Previous research suggests
that police work tends to take away important family time from women officers and
increases child care issues (Grennan, 1993). In our study, women officers rated having to use
force as significantly more stressful compared to men (mean stress rating of 65.6 vs. 57.4).
Previous research has shown that women rely on a policing style that uses less physical force
and is less confrontational than men officers. Police women are much less likely to use
excessive violence while performing their jobs (Horne, 2014). Kurtz (2008) found that
concern for making a violent arrest was significantly associated with increased stress among
women but not in men officers while emotional concern over knowing a victim or offender
was a significant stressor for men but not women officers.
Author Manuscript
In a study by Bartol et al. (1992), female officers reported that frequent exposure to tragedy
and the constant danger to themselves and colleagues as significantly more stressful than did
their male colleagues. This is consistent with our result where female officers reported
higher rating of stressfulness to events involving tragedy or danger. Compared to male
officers, female officers also reported that rumors about themselves, made by co-workers, to
be significantly more stressful. In contrast, male officers perceived their relationships with
colleagues, the size of the department, and the lack of proper training to be more stressful
compared to women. It is possible that these police specific stressful events may be
experienced to an even greater degree among police women of some minority groups.
Pogrebin et al. (2000) found that African-American police women experience persistent
sexual and racial discrimination from their white male supervisors and also from white
female and black male officers. The gender discrimination that they experience are often
related to professional abilities, job performance, and supervisory responsibilities, and the
racism is usually in the form of derogatory remarks and fewer opportunities in hiring and
promotion. This additional burden of workplace discrimination may exacerbate the effects of
the occupational stressors captured in the Spielberger Police Stress Survey. We were unable
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 9
Author Manuscript
to examine the frequency and ratings of stressors among ethnic groups due to small sample
sizes.
Author Manuscript
Stressors where men reported significantly higher mean occurrences in the past month
compared to women included public criticism of police, court appearances on day off or
following night shift, political pressure from within the department, and working a second
job. The prevalence of court appearances on a day off or after a night shift was 26 % higher
for men than women officers (PR = 1.26, 1.04–1.52). Working a second job was more than
twice as prevalent in men relative to women (PR = 2.37, 1.57–3.57). One possible
explanation for these results is that male officers seem to be attending court and working
second jobs more frequently than women and thus have less time away from work. In our
sample, self-reported overtime hours per week (3.6 vs. 2.1, p = 0.015), hours per week on
second job (5.4 vs. 2.0, p = 0.0001), court time hours per week (2.2 vs. 0.9, p < 0.001), and
proportion working the night or afternoon shift (58.5 % vs. 24 %, p < 0.001) were all
significantly higher for men officers compared to females. Overtime, shift work, court, and
the inability to enjoy life outside of policing are factors which lead to increased stress among
male officers (Vila & Kenney, 2002). Attending court after a night shift may impede the
opportunity for proper sleep (Akerstedt, 2003). Neylan et al. (2002) suggested that police
officers on both variable and stable shifts reported significantly worse sleep quality and more
frequent disturbances in sleep quality than officers on the day shift.
Limitations and Strengths
Author Manuscript
Limitations of this study include a cross-sectional study design, which precludes causal
inferences and concern for generalizability to other police departments. Although the
Spielberger police stress survey captures many stressors pertinent in policing, it does not
contain occupational stressors that would pertain particularly to female officers such as
sexual harassment. The responses to police stress survey items are based on self-report and
hence there is a potential for bias (e.g. for example recall bias when reporting frequency of
occurrence) and also ratings of stressfulness could be subject-dependent (e.g., two officers
may rate the same event differently). Future longitudinal designs would be beneficial to
better understand changes in perceptions of stressors over time and the factors associated
with such changes.
Author Manuscript
The present study has several strengths. The Spielberger Police Stress Survey is a well
standardized instrument designed to assess several different sources of police stress. The
stressor items are specific instead of general, allowing us to accurately assess their ratings
and frequency. Additionally, we limited recall of stressors to one month in an effort to
reduce recall bias. We had an overall large sample size available and a relatively large
sample of women officers enabling us to focus on gender differences.
Conclusions
In summary, the present study examined the five most frequent and highly rated police
occupational stressors from the 60-item Spielberger Police Stress Scale involving categories
of organizational pressure, physical and psychological threat, and lack of support. Many of
these stressors mention involvement with violence and traumatic incidents such as shootings,
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 10
Author Manuscript
assaults, domestic violence, and abused children. Responding to family disputes was the
most frequent stressor among officers (83 %). Killing someone in the line of duty and
experiencing a fellow officer killed in the line of duty were among the highest rated stressors
but among the lowest in frequency. Although there were no overall gender differences
among the top five stressors, there were some differences in prevalence, frequency, and
ratings. Male officers tended to report a higher prevalence of events which limited their time
away from work such as court appearances and working second jobs. Men also reported
frequent stress with the courts and judicial system, likely due to their more frequent contact
with the criminal justice system. Women officers reported a greater prevalence and a higher
mean stress rating regarding the lack of support by their supervisors and inadequate or poor
quality equipment than their male colleagues.
Author Manuscript
Of importance were results suggesting gender differences in work stressors. Our findings
suggest that women officers are generally more stressed than men by a lack of support, both
by male co-workers and the organization. Women officers experienced a 37 % higher
prevalence of inadequate support by their supervisor compared to male officers. The
percentage of women officers varies by type of police agency (state, county, city, and local)
and the size of the police department. In 2007 women accounted for about 15 % of the total
sworn law enforcement officers in large local police departments (http://www.bjs.gov/
content/pub/pdf/wle8708.pdf). Police organizations need to establish further policy on issues
of discrimination and training on the positive aspects of women in policing (Hartley et al.,
2014). Schuck and Rabe-Hemp (2007) for example suggested that women may be better at
policing than men due to fewer citizen complaints, excessive force liability lawsuits, and
allegations of excessive force. Johnson (1991) found that women felt having better
communication skills compensated for their lack of physical skills.
Author Manuscript
Questions remain for further research. It is important to understand whether the severity
(ranking) or frequency of a stressor has the most deleterious personal stress effect on police
officers. Our findings suggest that high ratings and low frequency of some stressors (for
example killings and shootings) may be more personally stressful. Secondly, the effect of the
interaction of frequency and ratings of stressors needs to be explored. Such a combination
may increase personal stress regardless of the type of stressor. Further research should
additionally consider examining the varying effects of stressors in association with perceived
stress and physiological outcomes. Lastly, issues of ratings and frequency aside, exposure to
events considered stressful by officers may result in debilitating psychological difficulties.
Psychological and organizational support is important to help both women and men officers
deal with stressful and traumatic events in this difficult occupation of policing.
Author Manuscript
Acknowledgments
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Sources of Funding This work was supported by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health contract
number 200–2003-01,580.
References
Akerstedt T. Shift work and disturbed sleep/wakefulness. Occupational Medicine. 2003; 55:89–94.
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 11
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Bartol CR, Bergen GT, Volckens JS, Knoras KM. Women in small-town policing: Job performance and
stress. Crim Just & Behav. 1992; 19(3):240–259.
Bond J, Hartley TA, Sarkisian K, Andrew ME, Charles LE, Andrew ME, Violanti JM. Association of
traumatic police event exposure with sleep quality and quantity in the BCOPS study cohort.
International Journal of Mental Health and Human Resilience. 2014; 15:255–266.
Bonnar A. Stress at work: The beliefs and experiences of police superintendents. International Journal
of Police Strategies and Management. 2000; 2:285–302.
Burns CM, Morley J, Bradshaw R, Domene J. The emotional impact on and coping strategies
employed by police teams investigating internet child exploitation. Traumatology. 2008; 14(2):20–
31.
Chaiyavej S, Morash M. Dynamics of sexual harassment for policewomen working alongside men.
Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. 2008; 31(3):485–498.
Chouliara Z, Hutchinson C, Karatzias T. Vicarious traumatization in practitioners who work with adult
survivors of sexual violence and child sexual abuse: Literature review and directions for future
research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2009; 9:47–56.
Collins PA, Gibbs CC. Stress in police officers: A study of origins, prevalence and severity of stress
related symptoms within a county police force. Occupational Medicine. 2003; 53:256–264. DOI:
10.1093/occmed/kqg061 [PubMed: 12815123]
Deschamps F, Paganon-Badinier I, Marchand AC, Merle C. Sources and assessment of occupational
stress in the police. Journal of Occupational Health. 2003; 45:358–364. [PubMed: 14676415]
FBI. [Accessed July 30] Law Enforcement Officers Killed or Assaulted. 2014. http://www.fbi.gov/
about-us/cjis/ucr/leoka/2011/tables/table-70
Finn P, Tornz JE. On-the-job stress in policing—Reducing it, preventing it. National Institute of Justice
Journal, NIJ. 2000; 180079:18–24.
Grennan, S. A perspective on women in policing. In: Muraskin, R., Alleman, T., editors. It’s a Crime:
Women and Justice. Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1993.
Haarr R. Patterns of interaction in a police bureau: Race and gender barriers to integration. Justice
Quarterly. 1997; 14:53–85.
Hartley TA, Burchfiel CM, Fekedulegn D, Andrew ME, Knox SS, Violanti JM. Associations between
police officer stress and the metabolic syndrome. International Journal of Emergency Mental
Health. 2011; 13(4):243–256. [PubMed: 22900458]
Hartley, TA., Mnatsakanova, A., Burchfiel, CM., Violanti, JM. Stressors and associated health effects
for women police officers. In: Violanti, JM., editor. Dying for the job: Police work exposure and
health. Charles C. Thomas; Springfield, IL: 2014.
Horne P. Policewomen: This first century and the new era. Police Chief. 2014 Jul.2014:1–10.
Johnson LB. Job strain among police officers: Gender comparisons. Police Studies: International
Review of Police Development. 1991; 14:12–16.
Kirshman, E. I Love a Cop That Police Families Need to know. New York: Guildford Press; 2006.
Kop N, Euwema M. Occupational stress and the use of force by Dutch police officers. Criminal Justice
and Behavior. 2001; 28:631–652. DOI: 10.1177/009385480102800505
Krause, M. In harm’s way: Duty of care for child exploitation and pornography investigators. In:
Territo, L., Sewell, JD., editors. Stress management in law enforcement. 3. Durham, NC: Carolina
Academic Press; 2013. p. 357-369.
Kurtz DL. Controlled burn: The gendering of stress and burnout in modern policing. Feminist
Criminology. 2008; 3(3):216–238. DOI: 10.1177/1557085108321672
Lonsway KA. Are we there yet? The progress of women in one large law enforcement agency. Women
and Criminal Justice. 2007; 18(1–2):1–48. DOI: 10.1300/J012v18n01_01
Marmar CR, McCaslin SE, Metzler TJ, Best S, Weiss DS, Fagan J, Liberman A, Pole N, Otte C,
Yehuda R, Mohr D, Neylan T. Predictors of posttraumatic stress in police officers and other first
responders. Annals New York Academy of Sciences. 2006; 1071:1–18.
Martelli TA, Waters LK, Martelli J. The police stress survey: Reliability and relation to job satisfaction
and organizational commitment. Psychological Reports. 1989; 64(1):267–273. [PubMed:
2928440]
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 12
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Martin, S. The changing status of women officers: Gender and power in police work. In: Moyer, LL.,
editor. The changing role of women in the criminal Justice System. Prospect Heights, IL:
Waveland; 1992. p. 281-304.
Morash M, Haarr NR. Gender, workplace problems, and stress in policing. Justice Quarterly. 1995;
12(1):113–140. DOI: 10.1080/07418829500092591
Morash M, Kwak DH, Haaar. Gender differences in the predictors of police stress. Policing. 2006;
29(3):541–563.
National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund. Preliminary Police fatalities as of July. 2014;
31:2014. [Accessed July 31, 2014] www.nleomf.com.
Neylan TC, Metzler TJ, Best SR, Weiss DS, Fagan JA, Liberman A, Rogers C, Vedantham K, Brunet
A, Lipsey TL, Marmar CR. Critical incident exposure and sleep quality in police officers.
Psychosomatic Medicine. 2002; 64(2):345–352. [PubMed: 11914452]
O’Toole, SK., Vitello, CJ., Palmer, S. Stress and law enforcement. 2014. https://www.facebook.com/
pages/Virginia-Coalition-of-Police-and-Deputy-Sheriffs/332099015589
Patterson GT. Reconceptualizing traumatic incidents experienced by law enforcement personnel.
Australasian Journal of Disaster Trauma Studies. 2002 online, 2001–2002.
Patterson GT. Examining the effects of coping and social support on work and life stress among police
officers. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2003; 31(3):215–226.
Pendergrass VE, Ostrove NM. A survey of stress in women in policing. Journal of Police Science and
Administration. 1984; 12(3):303–309.
Pogrebin M, Dodge M, Chatman H. Reflections of African-American women on their careers in urban
policing. Their experiences of racial and sexual discrimination. International Journal of the
Sociology Law. 2000; 28(4):311–326.
Powell MB, Guadagno BL. Workplace stressors for investigative interviewers of child abuse victims.
International Journal of Police Science and Management. 2013; 36(3):512–525.
Powell MB, Tomyn AJ. Life satisfaction amongst police officers working in the area of child abuse
investigation. International Journal of Police Science And Management. 2011; 13(2):187–194.
Russ E, Lonne B, Darlington Y. Using resilience to reconceptualize child protection workforce
capacity. Australian Social Work. 2009; 62(3):324–338.
Schuck AM, Rabe-Hemp C. Women police. Women & Criminal Justice. 2007; 16(4):91–117.
Shelley T, Morabito M, Tobin-Gurley J. Gendered institutions and gender roles: Understanding the
experience of women in policing. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and
Society. 2011; 24(4):351–367.
Spielberger, CD., Westberry, LG., Grier, KS., Greenfield, G. The Police Stress Survey: sources of
stress in law enforcement (Human Resources Institute Monograph Series Three, No. 6). Tampa,
FL: University of South Florida, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences; 1981.
Spielberger, C., Grier, K., Greenfield, G. Florida Fraternal Order of Police Journal. 1982 Spring. Major
dimensions of stress in law enforcement; p. 10-20.
Thompson BM, Kirk A, Brown D. Sources of stress in policewomen: A three factor model.
International Journal of Stress Management. 2006; 13(3):309–328.
Trompetter, PS., Corey, DM., Schmidt, WW., Tracy, D. Psychological factors after officer-involved
shootings: Addressing officer needs and agency responsibilities. In: Territo, L., Sewell, JD.,
editors. Stress management in law enforcement. 3. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press; 2013.
p. 669-709.
Vila B, Kenney DJ. Tired cops. National Institute of Justice Journal. 2002; 248:16–21.
Violanti JM. Introduction to special issue: Police stress and trauma: Recent perspectives. International
Journal of Mental Health and Human Resilience. 2014; 15:213–215.
Violanti JM, Aron F. Ranking police stressors. Psychological Reports. 1994; 73:824–826.
Violanti J, Aron F. Police stressors: Variations in perception among police personnel. Journal of
Criminal Justice. 1995; 23:287–294.
Violanti JM, Gehrke A. Police trauma encounters: Precursors of compassion fatigue. International
Journal of Emergency Mental Health. 2004; 6:75–80. [PubMed: 15298078]
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 13
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Violanti, JM., Paton, D. Issues of posttraumatic stress vulnerability. Springfield, IL: Charles. C.
Thomas; 2006. Who Gets PTSD?.
Violanti JM, Burchfiel CM, Miller DB, Andrew ME, Dorn J, Wactawski-Wende J, Beighley CM,
Pierino K, Joseph PN, Vena JE, Sharp DS, Trevisan M. The Buffalo cardio-metabolic occupational
Police stress (BCOPS) pilot study: Methods and participant characteristics. Annals of
Epidemiology. 2006; 16:148–156. [PubMed: 16165369]
Violanti JM, Mnatsakanova A, Andrew ME, Hartley TA, Fekedulegn D, Baughman &, Burchfiel CM.
Associations of stress, anxiety, and resiliency in police work. Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine. 2014; 71(Suppl 1):A3.doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.8
Weiss DS, Brunet A, Best SR, Metzler TJ, Liberman A, et al. Frequency and severity approaches to
indexing exposure to trauma: The critical incident history questionnaire for police officers. Journal
of Traumatic Stress. 2002; 23:734–743.
Wexler JG, Logan DD. Sources of stress among women police officers. Journal of Police Science and
Administration. 1983; 11(1):46–53.
Wheatcroft JM, Alison LA, McGrory D. The influence of trust on senior investigating officer’s
decision-making in high profile critical incidents. Police Quarterly. 2012; 15(4):386–413.
Wright R, Powell MB, Ridge D. Child abuse investigation: An in-depth analysis of how police officers
perceive and cope with daily work challenges. Policing: An International Journal of Police
Strategies and Management. 2006; 29:498–512. DOI: 10.1108/136395106106684728
Yoo H, Franke WD. Stress and cardiovascular disease risk in female law enforcement officers.
International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health. 2010; 84(3):279–286. DOI:
10.1007/s00420-010-0548-9 [PubMed: 20509032]
Biographies
John M. Violanti is a research professor in the department of Epidemiology &
Environmental Health, State University of NY at Buffalo, NY. His research focuses
primarily on police stress and trauma, health and suicide.
Author Manuscript
Desta Fekedulegn is a statistician at the Biostatistics and Epidemiology Branch in the
Health Effects Laboratory Division of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health at CDC. His research interests include analytic methods in epidemiology and
actigraphy based assessment of sleep and physical activity
Tara A. Hartley is an Epidemiologist in the Biostatistics and Epidemiology Branch, Health
Effects Laboratory Division of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Her research focuses on the association between workplace stress and subclinical
cardiovascular disease
Author Manuscript
Luenda E. Charles is an epidemiologist with the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Her research focuses on
occupational exposures with cardiovascular disease and several other health problems.
Michael E. Andrew serves as senior statistician for the Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Branch of the Health Effects Laboratory Division, of the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). His
research interests include cardiovascular disease epidemiology with recent focus on
associations of workplace stressors with autonomic dysfunction as measured by heart rate
variability, and protective factors related to workplace stressors.
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Violanti et al.
Page 14
Author Manuscript
Claudia C. Ma is an Epidemiologist in the Biostatistics and Epidemiology Branch, Health
Effects Laboratory Division at NIOSH. Her research focuses on occupational exposures and
the risks of cardio-metabolic outcomes, musculoskeletal disorders, and the potential role of
parental occupational exposures in autism in working population
Cecil M. Burchfiel is Chief of the Biostatistics and Epidemiology Branch in the Health
Effects Laboratory Division of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health at
CDC. His research focuses on cardiovascular disease epidemiology with emphasis on
associations of workplace stressors with subclinical cardiovascular and metabolic disorders
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Am J Crim Justice. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 December 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
206
118
College
Purchase answer to see full
attachment