Description
Read this court case very carefully: Bertha Siliezar v. East Jefferson General Hospital and Dr. Joseph Tamimie. No. 04-CA-939. Decided: January 11, 2005. (See: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1094597.html). What do you think about the court ruling regarding the adequacy of verbal consent prior to surgery? Do you think that the clinicians in this case acted reasonably? Ethically? If the plaintiff was your family member how would you feel about this situation?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Samuel Merritt University Nursing Vaginal Discharge SOAP Notes
CC: 16 year old female c/o of vaginal discharge X 3 days.
LMP- 2 weeks ago, currently sexually active with multiple partne ...
Samuel Merritt University Nursing Vaginal Discharge SOAP Notes
CC: 16 year old female c/o of vaginal discharge X 3 days.
LMP- 2 weeks ago, currently sexually active with multiple partners and not using any birth control method. Smokes 10 cigs a day with marijuana on weekends.
1.Write a hypothetical SOAP note based on the above chief complain.
2. How would you use mnemonic HEEADSSS in history taking with this patient.
3. Document external, internal, bimanual, and rectovaginal PE findings on your SOAP note( See Seidel's guide page 472, sample documentation).
4. Document Wet Mount result including normal saline and KOH preparation on your SOAP note( See Seidel's guide page 457).
5. Write a substantive response to a minimum of two different students. Is objective and subjective data included in the right format? Please be specific to information related to the SOAP note format.
Would you agree with your peers differentials listed? Are there any diffs you would add/remove, if so explain your rationale.
Does HPI have relevant information related to CC?
Medication listed with right timing, dosing, and number of tablets specified? Any red flags with medication list?
PMH, FH, and SH has all the appropriate information?
Does information in ROS correlate to CC?
Is there any information lacking in physical exam documentation of CC (Students often get confused between ROS and objective findings)?
Includes assessment, plan, follow up information, and patient education?
See sample SOAP Note: Sample_ SOAP_ Note
20 points will be deducted for combining subjective and objective information. Please see example below:
ROS:
Example 1.
General: Alert and oriented, denies fatigue and chills.
( subjective and objective information is combined above. " Alert and oriented" is part of PE general and not ROS.
Example 2.
ROS:
Resp: denies cough, wheezing, lungs sounds CTA bilaterally.
( subjective and objective is combined above;" lungs sounds CTA bilaterally" is part of PE
PE:
Example 1:
PE: Denies fatigue and chills. Alert and oriented.
" Denies fatigue and chills" is part of ROS and not PE.
Example 2:
PE: Bowel sounds present all quadrants. Denies abdominal pain.
" Denies abdominal pain" is part of ROS and not PE
3 pages
Immunization
This week’s Discussion will focus on sharing experiences that you have encountered so far in your pediatric clinical rot ...
Immunization
This week’s Discussion will focus on sharing experiences that you have encountered so far in your pediatric clinical rotation, specifically with ...
NVCC Pathophysiological Changes and Abnormal Findings Paper
Describe some of the more common pathophysiological changes and abnormal findings associated with musculoskeletal, metabol ...
NVCC Pathophysiological Changes and Abnormal Findings Paper
Describe some of the more common pathophysiological changes and abnormal findings associated with musculoskeletal, metabolic, and multisystem health dysfunctions. Explain what symptoms are associated with the findings and how these affect patient function.
NURS 6050 Walden University Healthcare Program & Policy Evaluation Worksheet
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcome ...
NURS 6050 Walden University Healthcare Program & Policy Evaluation Worksheet
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.To Prepare:Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.The Assignment: (2–3 pages)Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.How was the success of the program or policy measured?How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.ASSIGNMENT RUBRICPROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATIONBASED ON THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION YOU SEELCTED, COMPLETE THE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATION ANALYSIS TEMPLATE. BE SURE TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:· DESCRIBE THE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM OR POLICY OUTCOMES.· HOW WAS THE SUCCESS OF THE PROGRAM OR POLICY MEASURED?· HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE REACHED BY THE PROGRAM OR POLICY SELECTED? HOW MUCH OF AN IMPACT WAS REALIZED WITH THE PROGRAM OR POLICY SELECTED?· AT WHAT POINT IN TIME IN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION WAS THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION CONDUCTED?--EXCELLENT 32 (32%) - 35 (35%)Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy. Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.GOOD 28 (28%) - 31 (31%)Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy. Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.FAIR 25 (25%) - 27 (27%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate. Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.POOR 0 (0%) - 24 (24%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.REPORTING OF PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATIONS· WHAT DATA WAS USED TO CONDUCT THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION?· WHAT SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES WAS IDENTIFIED?· WHAT STAKEHOLDERS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAM OR POLICY? WHO WOULD BENEFIT THE MOST FROM THE RESULTS AND REPORTING OF THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION? BE SPECIFIC AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES.· DID THE PROGRAM OR POLICY MEET THE ORIGINAL INTENT AND OBJECTIVES? WHY OR WHY NOT?· WOULD YOU RECOMMEND IMPLEMENTING THIS PROGRAM OR POLICY IN YOUR PLACE OF WORK? WHY OR WHY NOT?· IDENTIFY AT LEAST TWO WAYS THAT YOU, AS A NURSE ADVOCATE, COULD BECOME INVOLVED IN EVALUATING A PROGRAM OR POLICY AFTER 1 YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION.--EXCELLENT 45 (45%) - 50 (50%)Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.GOOD 40 (40%) - 44 (44%)Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation. Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.FAIR 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete. Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.POOR 0 (0%) - 34 (34%)Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING - PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION:PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS THAT SUPPORT WELL DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED--NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED CRITERIA.--EXCELLENT 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.GOOD 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.FAIR 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.POOR 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING - ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS:CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION--EXCELLENT 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.GOOD 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.FAIR 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.POOR 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING - THE PAPER FOLLOWS CORRECT APA FORMAT FOR TITLE PAGE, HEADINGS, FONT, SPACING, MARGINS, INDENTATIONS, PAGE NUMBERS, PARENTHETICAL/IN-TEXT CITATIONS, AND REFERENCE LIST.--EXCELLENT 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.GOOD 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.FAIR 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.POOR 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
7 pages
Cost Containment
Containing the health care costs can be beneficial to the household budget, employers, and the government, but on the othe ...
Cost Containment
Containing the health care costs can be beneficial to the household budget, employers, and the government, but on the other side may have a ...
7 pages
Psy3738 Making Contacts For The Future
Social media is undoubtedly a force that has changed how people interact. Establishing a social network is necessary for f ...
Psy3738 Making Contacts For The Future
Social media is undoubtedly a force that has changed how people interact. Establishing a social network is necessary for finding success in one’s ...
Similar Content
can you help me with this. really important
During your interview, relate the answers given by a healthcare leader at your organization to the “Ten Concepts for Eff...
Bainbridge College Quality Improvement in Healthcare Paper
You will complete a full sentence Outline for the second part of the Research Project. INSTRUCTIONSThe Outline must includ...
For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing to critique.
Research Problem/Purpose
State the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.Have the investigators placed the s...
juvenile scleroderma, health and medicine homework help
juvenile scleroderma...
RMM Violence Problems In Nursing Fields Research Paper
Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing. Examine a problem you have seen in nursing. Provide a...
NURS 6512 SDSU Skin Conditions Nursing Worksheet
PREPARE
Review the Skin Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select one condition to c...
Discussion Question4
Essentially, the chosen population for this discussion question is African-Americans, otherwise referred to as the black c...
Replies
Hello Deana Mattison, I do agree with you on implanting a new system to boost employees’ productivity. However, I would ...
Models Of Practice And Conceptual Theory
Application of the Synergy Professional Practice Model to Advanced Nursing Roles. Based on the Conceptual Model Framework ...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Trial
by Franz Kafka
The Secret Garden
by Frances Hodgson Burnett
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
by Stieg Larsson
The Book Thief
by Markus Zusak
Good Kids Bad City
by Kyle Swenson
The Iliad
by Homer
Invisible Man
by Ralph Ellison
12 Rules for Life
by Jordan Peterson
Underground A Human History of the Worlds Beneath our Feet
by Will Hunt
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Samuel Merritt University Nursing Vaginal Discharge SOAP Notes
CC: 16 year old female c/o of vaginal discharge X 3 days.
LMP- 2 weeks ago, currently sexually active with multiple partne ...
Samuel Merritt University Nursing Vaginal Discharge SOAP Notes
CC: 16 year old female c/o of vaginal discharge X 3 days.
LMP- 2 weeks ago, currently sexually active with multiple partners and not using any birth control method. Smokes 10 cigs a day with marijuana on weekends.
1.Write a hypothetical SOAP note based on the above chief complain.
2. How would you use mnemonic HEEADSSS in history taking with this patient.
3. Document external, internal, bimanual, and rectovaginal PE findings on your SOAP note( See Seidel's guide page 472, sample documentation).
4. Document Wet Mount result including normal saline and KOH preparation on your SOAP note( See Seidel's guide page 457).
5. Write a substantive response to a minimum of two different students. Is objective and subjective data included in the right format? Please be specific to information related to the SOAP note format.
Would you agree with your peers differentials listed? Are there any diffs you would add/remove, if so explain your rationale.
Does HPI have relevant information related to CC?
Medication listed with right timing, dosing, and number of tablets specified? Any red flags with medication list?
PMH, FH, and SH has all the appropriate information?
Does information in ROS correlate to CC?
Is there any information lacking in physical exam documentation of CC (Students often get confused between ROS and objective findings)?
Includes assessment, plan, follow up information, and patient education?
See sample SOAP Note: Sample_ SOAP_ Note
20 points will be deducted for combining subjective and objective information. Please see example below:
ROS:
Example 1.
General: Alert and oriented, denies fatigue and chills.
( subjective and objective information is combined above. " Alert and oriented" is part of PE general and not ROS.
Example 2.
ROS:
Resp: denies cough, wheezing, lungs sounds CTA bilaterally.
( subjective and objective is combined above;" lungs sounds CTA bilaterally" is part of PE
PE:
Example 1:
PE: Denies fatigue and chills. Alert and oriented.
" Denies fatigue and chills" is part of ROS and not PE.
Example 2:
PE: Bowel sounds present all quadrants. Denies abdominal pain.
" Denies abdominal pain" is part of ROS and not PE
3 pages
Immunization
This week’s Discussion will focus on sharing experiences that you have encountered so far in your pediatric clinical rot ...
Immunization
This week’s Discussion will focus on sharing experiences that you have encountered so far in your pediatric clinical rotation, specifically with ...
NVCC Pathophysiological Changes and Abnormal Findings Paper
Describe some of the more common pathophysiological changes and abnormal findings associated with musculoskeletal, metabol ...
NVCC Pathophysiological Changes and Abnormal Findings Paper
Describe some of the more common pathophysiological changes and abnormal findings associated with musculoskeletal, metabolic, and multisystem health dysfunctions. Explain what symptoms are associated with the findings and how these affect patient function.
NURS 6050 Walden University Healthcare Program & Policy Evaluation Worksheet
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcome ...
NURS 6050 Walden University Healthcare Program & Policy Evaluation Worksheet
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.To Prepare:Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.The Assignment: (2–3 pages)Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.How was the success of the program or policy measured?How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.ASSIGNMENT RUBRICPROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATIONBASED ON THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION YOU SEELCTED, COMPLETE THE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATION ANALYSIS TEMPLATE. BE SURE TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:· DESCRIBE THE HEALTHCARE PROGRAM OR POLICY OUTCOMES.· HOW WAS THE SUCCESS OF THE PROGRAM OR POLICY MEASURED?· HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE REACHED BY THE PROGRAM OR POLICY SELECTED? HOW MUCH OF AN IMPACT WAS REALIZED WITH THE PROGRAM OR POLICY SELECTED?· AT WHAT POINT IN TIME IN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION WAS THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION CONDUCTED?--EXCELLENT 32 (32%) - 35 (35%)Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy. Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.GOOD 28 (28%) - 31 (31%)Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy. Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.FAIR 25 (25%) - 27 (27%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate. Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.POOR 0 (0%) - 24 (24%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.REPORTING OF PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATIONS· WHAT DATA WAS USED TO CONDUCT THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION?· WHAT SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES WAS IDENTIFIED?· WHAT STAKEHOLDERS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAM OR POLICY? WHO WOULD BENEFIT THE MOST FROM THE RESULTS AND REPORTING OF THE PROGRAM OR POLICY EVALUATION? BE SPECIFIC AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES.· DID THE PROGRAM OR POLICY MEET THE ORIGINAL INTENT AND OBJECTIVES? WHY OR WHY NOT?· WOULD YOU RECOMMEND IMPLEMENTING THIS PROGRAM OR POLICY IN YOUR PLACE OF WORK? WHY OR WHY NOT?· IDENTIFY AT LEAST TWO WAYS THAT YOU, AS A NURSE ADVOCATE, COULD BECOME INVOLVED IN EVALUATING A PROGRAM OR POLICY AFTER 1 YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION.--EXCELLENT 45 (45%) - 50 (50%)Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.GOOD 40 (40%) - 44 (44%)Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation. Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.FAIR 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete. Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.POOR 0 (0%) - 34 (34%)Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING - PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION:PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS THAT SUPPORT WELL DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED--NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED CRITERIA.--EXCELLENT 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.GOOD 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.FAIR 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.POOR 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING - ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS:CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION--EXCELLENT 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.GOOD 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.FAIR 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.POOR 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING - THE PAPER FOLLOWS CORRECT APA FORMAT FOR TITLE PAGE, HEADINGS, FONT, SPACING, MARGINS, INDENTATIONS, PAGE NUMBERS, PARENTHETICAL/IN-TEXT CITATIONS, AND REFERENCE LIST.--EXCELLENT 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.GOOD 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.FAIR 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.POOR 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
7 pages
Cost Containment
Containing the health care costs can be beneficial to the household budget, employers, and the government, but on the othe ...
Cost Containment
Containing the health care costs can be beneficial to the household budget, employers, and the government, but on the other side may have a ...
7 pages
Psy3738 Making Contacts For The Future
Social media is undoubtedly a force that has changed how people interact. Establishing a social network is necessary for f ...
Psy3738 Making Contacts For The Future
Social media is undoubtedly a force that has changed how people interact. Establishing a social network is necessary for finding success in one’s ...
Earn money selling
your Study Documents