Select an organization you have worked for or that you have researched to base your discussion on. Examine the pros and cons of that organization’s personal sources of power how it affects employee job satisfaction, organizational loyalty, and job performance, as well as how it impacts employees’ social, negotiating, and political styles. Provide the URL of the organization. Provide examples as well at least one scholarly source to support your thoughts. Requirements Include introduction and conclusion Discussion should be 3 to 4 paragraphs. Use at least two Peer Reviewed Journal Articles APA format is required and each reference must be cited in the paper. Use headings to organize the content in your work. Please no plagiarism and sources should not be older than 5 years

The Office of Risk Assessment has noted an increase in unusual activities in financial service businesses. The Office of Whistleblower received a call regarding Robert Jones using his business as a front for his book making and loan shark activities. You have been assigned to investigate this allegation and to prepare evidence and a presentation that could be used in court.Click here to see the Facts of the Case.Group Project TipsThe group leader will provide one PowerPoint presentation for the entire group, not one presentation per student. The presentation will be divided among the team members in the following way:Each individual will contribute 1–2 slides depending on the content.Slide(s) should include the name of the team member whom initially prepared and contributed to the PowerPoint Presentation.The individual will submit his or her PowerPoint slides to the group along with supporting research sources.Individuals should submit their portion of the report and the supporting references to a designated team member who will compile the documents into one report that will be submitted.Project Deliverables:PowerPoint presentation and group report.Determine any excess income using two separate methods:Net worth analysisBank deposit methodYour group should include complete analyses and review for each of the above methods. Your presentation should walk through the steps of your analyses and should identify the sources of evidence used for each step.Part 1Power Point Presentation8–10 slides covering the following:IntroductionNet worth methodBank deposit methodOther mattersConclusionReferencesPart 2Group report of the overview of indirect investigation and whistleblower rules.Length: 5–7 pagesPrepare a group paper briefly describing an overview of the steps you used for the indirect method as well as some of the following matters:Overview of indirect methods of proofRequirements for using the indirect methods of proofResearch on the extent of use and or give an examples from a actual court case using the indirect method of proofInformation on whistleblower rules and/or the effectiveness of use of whistleblower processes for identifying potential fraudsPart 3Group Evaluation FormClick here to download the Group Evaluation Form.Grading GuidelinesGroup PowerPoint 1/3Group Report 1/3Individual Participation 1/3*The peer evaluation form will also be used as a conformation of the instructor's observation of each members' participation in the small group.

- Word limit 1800-2200- Do not write conculusion or introduction - Discuss the questions and provide examples- Due 9th May 2021 (11:00PM)