Please put discussion on (2) different pages.Discussion 1:In this discussion topic, we will explore some resources that are designed to help students understand the concept of a literature review. Please browse these resources and then complete the discussion post below.the article by Ted Zorn and Nittaya Campbell, "Improving the Writing of Literature Reviews through Literature Integration Exercise" -- this article is available in the e-reserves section of this class. To access the article, please take the following steps:click Contentselect Class Resourcesselect eReservesselect the icon for eReserves in the middle of your page.in the list of items that appears, locate this article and download it.the tutorial from The University of North Carolina on writing literature reviews. It is linked to at the top of the Content for this week.the tutorial from UMGC's Effective Writing Center on writing the literature review. It is linked to at the top of the Content for this week.Task:After reviewing the material on the Literature Review posted above, please return to your annotated bibliography, or your last assignment, and begin developing "categories" to help you to organize your sources. Post one category below and list several sources that might fill that category. Remember that some sources may fall into more than one category. Please feel free to post questions or concerns because your instructor wants to help you. Please respond generously to at least two of your fellow classmates.Discussion 2:You can use a spider diagram to help you to structure your discussion of sources for writing assignment #4, the synthesis of sources essay (literature review). The spider diagram can also help in coming up with gaps and unanswered questions that you found as a result of writing it.A spider diagram is a visual tool usually used for planning your writing. However, you can also use it for evaluating and thinking about a topic in detail.To use the spider diagram, please print out your draft of your last assignment. Then place a piece of paper in front of you and complete the tasks listed below.For more information on the Spider Diagram, please visit the link in the Resources to Review at the top of this week's Content, Spider Diagrams.Task :Write your idea/title/topic/thesis in the center of a piece of paper. Draw a circle around it. For the purposes of this exercise, you will use the topic of your Literature Review.Draw a "leg" from the central "body" of your Literature Review topic towards the top right hand corner of the page. Label this "leg" with the first topic/category that you dealt with in your Review.Add more legs moving clockwise around the page until all the sections have been included, with the final one being somewhere near the top left of the page.Now divide each "leg" up into smaller "legs" with all the points that you made in each section. (Again work clockwise from the top left so that the sequence of ideas is maintained).Finally, please be sure that one section is devoted to identifying any gaps or niches in the research literature in your synthesis of sources essay (literature review), or WA#3.You may have to redraw your spider diagram several times until you find a structure that works for you. Make sure that you find a proposal structure that suits the needs of your Niches and Gaps paper. Please post your spider diagram below.Respond to this discussion topic with one paragraph describing how this task might have helped you or why it did not help you in organizing your thoughts for WA#3.

Read Mitroff, chapters one through five. Write an approximate 1200-word reaction paper on the concepts. Include in your discussion: -What lessons from historical crisis management scenarios and case studies are most important to consider in crisis action planning? -Why is it important to consider the abnormal to be normal? How did we come to be a crisis society? -How did conventional thinking fail Rural Books? How could conventional thinking fail your organization? -How do Crisis Management, Risk Management, and Continuity of Operations Planning differ? Why are the differences important? -Discuss denial, trauma, and betrayal. -In crisis action planning, why is it necessary: To be a troublemaker? To think ‘out of the box’? To question authority? -How was Rural Books’ business model and system impact more complex than they thought it was? How is your organization’s business model and system impact more complex than you and management think it is? -What are the four distinct styles of thinking? Why is recognition of these distinctive styles important to crisis action planning? (This question leads directly into the discussion in forum five - six) -What are the ‘outmoded assumptions’ and ‘counter assumptions’ that characterize the author’s evolution from his old perception of crisis management to his new one? (1) Provide an introduction that gives the background, purpose, and overview of the topic that you are reviewing, so the reader will understand what they're reading and why. (2) Provide a body with a discussion of the topics organized with headings. (3).Provide a conclusion wrapping up the paper. APA Format and no less than 4 peer reviewed sources in addition to the Required reading from Mitroff, chapters one through five. Mitroff, I. (2005). Why some companies emerge stronger and better from a crisis: 7 essential lessons for surviving disaster. Kindle Edition: New York. View the TED talk: Peter Haas: A disaster of engineering Watch this clip from the author: Ian Mitroff Then read Mitroff, chapters one through five.

Describe in what ways biomedicine constitutes its own culture, with its own social norms, practices, and rules of engagements. Give examples that elucidate the particularity of U.S. biomedicine in contradistinction to:how biomedicine is practiced elsewherewider social norms and expectations in U.S. culturethe norms of American medicine before the consolidation of modern scientific medicine in the 19th centuryWord Count: 400-500I've attached the 4 reading materials below, which includes 3 pdf and one website link:Hanson, Isabel and Safdar Ahmed, 2019. “Healing Alone” The Guardian June 14. (Links to an external site.)