Those are 3 directions to respond. Avoid plagiarism. The due date is on Dec 2 ( SUNDAY AT NOON)

timer Asked: Nov 29th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $20

Question description

1. Rachels points out that Socrates and many other thinkers who believe in God have shown that even if one accepts a religious picture of the world, rightness or wrongness of our actions cannot be understood merely in terms of conformity to divine commands. The same is true for sacred religious texts.

What is your understanding of how these religious thinkers arrived at the conclusion that we can understand right and wrong without the help of a divine being or reference to religious texts?

What reasons can be offered for the rightness or wrongness of an action that do not make reference to a divine being or command?

2. Read the NPR article “A Girl Gets Her Period and Is Banished to the Shed” and then answer the following questions: How would a cultural relativist respond to this practice? What reasons would a cultural relativist offer for his or her response? If you look at this practice from the perspective of the culture-neutral standard (discussed in Chapter 11), how is your response different from that of the cultural relativist? What reasons, from the perspective of the culture-neutral standard, could be offered against the view of the cultural relativist?

Works Linked/Cited:

Greenhalgh, Jane. A Girl Gets Her Period and is Banished to The Shed: #15Girls. NPR. 17 Oct 2015. Accessed 30 April 2018.

3. In Chapter 12, you learned about utilitarianism, which claims that we should always try to produce the greatest possible benefit for everyone who will be affected by our action, including nonhuman animals. Additionally, utilitarians argue that we should be impartial, that we have a moral duty toward others regardless of their relationship or proximity to us. Peter Singer, is a contemporary utilitarian, who argues that we should use our disposable income to help others, including the poor in countries other than our own. Watch the below video of Peter Singer discussing the movement known as ‘effective altruism’ and respond to the following questions: do you agree with the utilitarian view that we are obligated to help others regardless of their geographic location? Do you agree with the utilitarian view that we are morally obligated to reduce the suffering of animals (utilitarians argue in favor of veganism)? Provide reasons to defend your responses.

Peter Singer - Effective Altruism, an Introduction. YouTube video file. [4:38]. Science, Technology & the Future. 2014, Aug 28.

Works Linked/Cited:

Singer, Peter. About Peter Singer. Accessed 30 April 2018.

Tutor Answer

School: UC Berkeley


flag Report DMCA

Awesome! Exactly what I wanted.

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors