Description
A machine that manufactures automobile parts produces defective parts of the time. If parts produced by this machine are randomly selected, what is the probability that at most of the parts are defective? round to Nearest hundred two decimal
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
P(A)=1-P(B)
P(B)=0,86^9+C(1,9)*0,14*0,86^8 =0.63
P(A)=0.37
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Ashworth College Environmental Pollution Survey & Data Analysis Presentation
Gather and Analyze DataYou have been charged with creating a survey for your community! The community is interested in hav ...
Ashworth College Environmental Pollution Survey & Data Analysis Presentation
Gather and Analyze DataYou have been charged with creating a survey for your community! The community is interested in having you create a survey and present the results at the next town hall meeting. In this project, students will: Learn about quantitative variables.Learn to analyze data for measures of central tendency (mean, median and mode)Learn to create an effective presentation with real-world conclusions. To complete this project you will: Think of a problem within your community or workplace. The problem needs to be something others will have an interest in solving or will want to share reactions to.Create a 10 question survey with quantitative variables (number) on a topic you are interested in. Think of questions where 0 is dislike there is a scale to 4- like. Another way to do this is using 0-never, 1 sometimes, 2 frequently, and 3 always.Administer the survey to a minimum of 10 people.Analyze your data for the mean, median, and mode of each questions.Create a visual from this chapter: bar graph, box and whisker plot, histogram, stem and leaf plot. etc.Compile the information into a slide presentation, of at least 5 slides, to present at the next town hall. The presentation should present: the mean, median, and mode of each question, the visual of the data, and conclusions based on the statistics you found in the survey.
Sampling statistics question
The
manager of a company wants to investigate job satisfaction among its employees.
One morning after a meeting, she tal ...
Sampling statistics question
The
manager of a company wants to investigate job satisfaction among its employees.
One morning after a meeting, she talks to all 25 employees who attended. Does
this sampling plan result in a random sample? What type of sample is it?
Explain.
12 pages
Algebra 2 Part 222 Final Exam Nc
Directions: Answer the questions below. Make sure to show your work and justify all your 1. Bradley dropped a ball from a ...
Algebra 2 Part 222 Final Exam Nc
Directions: Answer the questions below. Make sure to show your work and justify all your 1. Bradley dropped a ball from a roof 16 feet high. Each time ...
Walden University Multiple Regression Moderation in SPSS Reflection Discussion
Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing for your analysis, research question, and display of output.Title page ( ...
Walden University Multiple Regression Moderation in SPSS Reflection Discussion
Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing for your analysis, research question, and display of output.Title page (NO RUNNING HEAD, NO ABSTRACT)Text reporting the research question, which data set was used, how the analysis was done, results of any tests of assumptions, the results reported in APA format, brief interpretation of findings. Professor is a stickler for APA format. There are examples of what the results should look like for each assigned analysis in the Warner textbook. This does not have to be longer than 2 pages.Reference pageAppendix which includes SPSS syntax and SPSS outputLatin statistical symbols (e.g., N, M, SD, t, p) should be in italics.There should be a space on each side of equals (and inequality) signs.Never say Sig in the writeup. The correct symbol is p.Multiple Regression Moderation in SPSSTo prepareReview the datasets provided.Construct a research question based on one of those datasets.Use moderation in your multiple regression analysis to answer your research question.By Day 7The AssignmentBased on the research question you created, complete the following tasks:Fit a multiple regression model, testing whether a moderating variable partly or completely moderates the effect of an initial causal variable on an outcome variable. Think about whether or not the model will meet assumptions.Fit the model, testing for moderation between two key variables.Analyze the output, determining whether moderation was significant and how to interpret that result.Reflect on possible implications of social change.Write an analysis in APA format, including title page, references, and an appendix, that includes your data output and addresses each of the tasks listed above. The content should be 2–3 pages, including setup of the assignment, results, and interpretation of results. Your SPSS output should be included as an appendix.Early in your Assignment, when you relate which dataset you analyzed, please include the mean of the following variables. If you are using the Afrobarometer Dataset, report the mean of Q1 (Age). If you are using the General Social Survey Dataset, report the mean of Age. If you are using the HS Long Survey Dataset, report the mean of X1SES. See pages 683 and 684 in your Warner textbook for an excellent APA-compliant write-up of a mediation analysis
QMB 2100 Florida State College at Jacksonville Morningstar Mutual Funds Discussion
The Morningstar mutual-fund rating system ranks mutual funds, using one to five stars. The stars divide the mutual-fund pe ...
QMB 2100 Florida State College at Jacksonville Morningstar Mutual Funds Discussion
The Morningstar mutual-fund rating system ranks mutual funds, using one to five stars. The stars divide the mutual-fund performances into quintiles: that is, a mutual fund with a one-star rating is in the bottom 20% of mutual funds in its category, a mutual fund with two-stars is in between the 21st and 40th percentile, and so on. These data can be found at www.morningstar.com (Links to an external site.) or screen.yahoo.com/funds.html (Links to an external site.)Obtain a random sample of at least 15 mutual funds from each investment category. Determine the 3 years rate of return for each fund.Obtain a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean rates of return. Interpret the interval.You are going to write a report detailing which investment category seems superior.The report contains 4-5 paragraphs in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format with supporting data supporting your conclusion.Attach the Excel sheet used for the primary data source. You’ll submit both the Word document and the Excel file.SubmissionThis assignment requires a file upload submission (Links to an external site.). After you have reviewed the assignment instructions and rubric, as applicable, complete your submission by selecting the Submit Assignment button next to the assignment title.RubricProject RubricProject RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryAll required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into the assignment at the highest level. All key facts are clearly identified and completely addressed.26.0 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAll required elements are addressed and identified. Several key facts are identified and completely addressed.17.0 to >9.0 ptsDevelopingRequired elements are addressed, but further elaboration is needed. A few key facts are identified and addressed.9.0 to >0.0 ptsNoviceFew of the required elements are addressed. Little or no elaboration present.0.0 ptsNot AcceptableAssignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Source30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryOriginal data provided and summarized in appropriate tabular form and is presented in a neat and accurate way graphically or numerically26.0 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsOriginal data provided and summarized in tabular form, but with a minor error in tabulation or computation or presentation.17.0 to >9.0 ptsDevelopingOriginal data is provided, with quite a few errors when summarizing data either graphically or numerically or data is not appropriately tabulated.9.0 to >0.0 ptsNoviceOriginal data is provided, tabulated and summarized but with some major errors.0.0 ptsNot AcceptableOriginal data is not provided.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnical40.0 to >34.0 ptsExemplaryDemonstrates excellent problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods. All relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted. Composition is structured logically, focused, well organized, and flows well.34.0 to >27.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsDemonstrates good problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods.. All relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted. Composition is structured logically, focused, organized, yet minor errors in format exist.27.0 to >17.0 ptsDevelopingDemonstrates inadequate problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods.. Most of relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted. Composition is, generally, structured logically, focused, organized, and flows well with but a few errors in format exist.17.0 to >4.0 ptsNoviceDemonstrates poor problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods.. Most of relevant statistics reported yet incorrectly interpreted. Composition is, generally, structured logically, focused, organized, but major errors in format exist.4.0 to >0 ptsNot AcceptableConfusing explanation of statistical concepts.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Interpretation30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryThorough and accurate interpretation of the data26.0 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsCorrect and good interpretation of the data.17.0 to >9.0 ptsDevelopingCorrect and good interpretation of the data, except for minor errors or omissions.9.0 to >0.0 ptsNoviceInterpretation of the meaning of the data is provided, but with some major errors.0.0 ptsNot AcceptableNo data interpretation provided30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReport Writing30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryFollows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Communicates in a cohesive, logical style.26.0 to >19.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsMostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style.19.0 to >12.0 ptsDevelopingAPA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style are followed, but with minor errors. Mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style though at times ideas are unclear and confusing.12.0 to >5.0 ptsNoviceAPA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style are followed, but with major errors. Report is not communicated in a cohesive, logical style. Ideas are unclear and confusing.5.0 to >0 ptsNot AcceptableDoes not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style.30.0 ptsTotal Points: 160.0
Similar Content
STAT 415 Dummy Variables Statistics Worksheet
STAT 415/615
Miller
Assignment #10
Due: Wednesday April 15, 2020 by 5 PM EST
Guidelines for your submission:
•
•
�...
Lab work for Statistics for Decision-Making class
Lab work for Statistics for Decision-Making classAll the additional information is attached in files below. ...
MATH5070 Numerical Analysis
NUMERICAL
METHODS
NUMERICAL
METHODS
DESIGN, ANALYSIS, AND COMPUTER
IMPLEMENTATION OF ALGORITHMS
ANNE GREENBAUM
TIMOTH...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Joy Luck Club
by Amy Tan
Hidden Figures
by Margot Lee Shetterly
The Age of Innocence
by Edith Wharton
Normal People
by Sally Rooney
The Sixth Extinction An Unnatural History
by Elizabeth Kolbert
The Underground Railroad
by Colson Whitehead
Dune
by Frank Herbert
The Dispossessed
by Ursula Kroeber Le Guin
The Curious Case of the Dog in the Night Time
by Mark Haddon
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Ashworth College Environmental Pollution Survey & Data Analysis Presentation
Gather and Analyze DataYou have been charged with creating a survey for your community! The community is interested in hav ...
Ashworth College Environmental Pollution Survey & Data Analysis Presentation
Gather and Analyze DataYou have been charged with creating a survey for your community! The community is interested in having you create a survey and present the results at the next town hall meeting. In this project, students will: Learn about quantitative variables.Learn to analyze data for measures of central tendency (mean, median and mode)Learn to create an effective presentation with real-world conclusions. To complete this project you will: Think of a problem within your community or workplace. The problem needs to be something others will have an interest in solving or will want to share reactions to.Create a 10 question survey with quantitative variables (number) on a topic you are interested in. Think of questions where 0 is dislike there is a scale to 4- like. Another way to do this is using 0-never, 1 sometimes, 2 frequently, and 3 always.Administer the survey to a minimum of 10 people.Analyze your data for the mean, median, and mode of each questions.Create a visual from this chapter: bar graph, box and whisker plot, histogram, stem and leaf plot. etc.Compile the information into a slide presentation, of at least 5 slides, to present at the next town hall. The presentation should present: the mean, median, and mode of each question, the visual of the data, and conclusions based on the statistics you found in the survey.
Sampling statistics question
The
manager of a company wants to investigate job satisfaction among its employees.
One morning after a meeting, she tal ...
Sampling statistics question
The
manager of a company wants to investigate job satisfaction among its employees.
One morning after a meeting, she talks to all 25 employees who attended. Does
this sampling plan result in a random sample? What type of sample is it?
Explain.
12 pages
Algebra 2 Part 222 Final Exam Nc
Directions: Answer the questions below. Make sure to show your work and justify all your 1. Bradley dropped a ball from a ...
Algebra 2 Part 222 Final Exam Nc
Directions: Answer the questions below. Make sure to show your work and justify all your 1. Bradley dropped a ball from a roof 16 feet high. Each time ...
Walden University Multiple Regression Moderation in SPSS Reflection Discussion
Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing for your analysis, research question, and display of output.Title page ( ...
Walden University Multiple Regression Moderation in SPSS Reflection Discussion
Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing for your analysis, research question, and display of output.Title page (NO RUNNING HEAD, NO ABSTRACT)Text reporting the research question, which data set was used, how the analysis was done, results of any tests of assumptions, the results reported in APA format, brief interpretation of findings. Professor is a stickler for APA format. There are examples of what the results should look like for each assigned analysis in the Warner textbook. This does not have to be longer than 2 pages.Reference pageAppendix which includes SPSS syntax and SPSS outputLatin statistical symbols (e.g., N, M, SD, t, p) should be in italics.There should be a space on each side of equals (and inequality) signs.Never say Sig in the writeup. The correct symbol is p.Multiple Regression Moderation in SPSSTo prepareReview the datasets provided.Construct a research question based on one of those datasets.Use moderation in your multiple regression analysis to answer your research question.By Day 7The AssignmentBased on the research question you created, complete the following tasks:Fit a multiple regression model, testing whether a moderating variable partly or completely moderates the effect of an initial causal variable on an outcome variable. Think about whether or not the model will meet assumptions.Fit the model, testing for moderation between two key variables.Analyze the output, determining whether moderation was significant and how to interpret that result.Reflect on possible implications of social change.Write an analysis in APA format, including title page, references, and an appendix, that includes your data output and addresses each of the tasks listed above. The content should be 2–3 pages, including setup of the assignment, results, and interpretation of results. Your SPSS output should be included as an appendix.Early in your Assignment, when you relate which dataset you analyzed, please include the mean of the following variables. If you are using the Afrobarometer Dataset, report the mean of Q1 (Age). If you are using the General Social Survey Dataset, report the mean of Age. If you are using the HS Long Survey Dataset, report the mean of X1SES. See pages 683 and 684 in your Warner textbook for an excellent APA-compliant write-up of a mediation analysis
QMB 2100 Florida State College at Jacksonville Morningstar Mutual Funds Discussion
The Morningstar mutual-fund rating system ranks mutual funds, using one to five stars. The stars divide the mutual-fund pe ...
QMB 2100 Florida State College at Jacksonville Morningstar Mutual Funds Discussion
The Morningstar mutual-fund rating system ranks mutual funds, using one to five stars. The stars divide the mutual-fund performances into quintiles: that is, a mutual fund with a one-star rating is in the bottom 20% of mutual funds in its category, a mutual fund with two-stars is in between the 21st and 40th percentile, and so on. These data can be found at www.morningstar.com (Links to an external site.) or screen.yahoo.com/funds.html (Links to an external site.)Obtain a random sample of at least 15 mutual funds from each investment category. Determine the 3 years rate of return for each fund.Obtain a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean rates of return. Interpret the interval.You are going to write a report detailing which investment category seems superior.The report contains 4-5 paragraphs in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format with supporting data supporting your conclusion.Attach the Excel sheet used for the primary data source. You’ll submit both the Word document and the Excel file.SubmissionThis assignment requires a file upload submission (Links to an external site.). After you have reviewed the assignment instructions and rubric, as applicable, complete your submission by selecting the Submit Assignment button next to the assignment title.RubricProject RubricProject RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryAll required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into the assignment at the highest level. All key facts are clearly identified and completely addressed.26.0 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAll required elements are addressed and identified. Several key facts are identified and completely addressed.17.0 to >9.0 ptsDevelopingRequired elements are addressed, but further elaboration is needed. A few key facts are identified and addressed.9.0 to >0.0 ptsNoviceFew of the required elements are addressed. Little or no elaboration present.0.0 ptsNot AcceptableAssignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Source30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryOriginal data provided and summarized in appropriate tabular form and is presented in a neat and accurate way graphically or numerically26.0 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsOriginal data provided and summarized in tabular form, but with a minor error in tabulation or computation or presentation.17.0 to >9.0 ptsDevelopingOriginal data is provided, with quite a few errors when summarizing data either graphically or numerically or data is not appropriately tabulated.9.0 to >0.0 ptsNoviceOriginal data is provided, tabulated and summarized but with some major errors.0.0 ptsNot AcceptableOriginal data is not provided.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnical40.0 to >34.0 ptsExemplaryDemonstrates excellent problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods. All relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted. Composition is structured logically, focused, well organized, and flows well.34.0 to >27.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsDemonstrates good problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods.. All relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted. Composition is structured logically, focused, organized, yet minor errors in format exist.27.0 to >17.0 ptsDevelopingDemonstrates inadequate problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods.. Most of relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted. Composition is, generally, structured logically, focused, organized, and flows well with but a few errors in format exist.17.0 to >4.0 ptsNoviceDemonstrates poor problem solving competency using mathematics, quantitative reasoning and statistical analysis and methods.. Most of relevant statistics reported yet incorrectly interpreted. Composition is, generally, structured logically, focused, organized, but major errors in format exist.4.0 to >0 ptsNot AcceptableConfusing explanation of statistical concepts.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Interpretation30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryThorough and accurate interpretation of the data26.0 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsCorrect and good interpretation of the data.17.0 to >9.0 ptsDevelopingCorrect and good interpretation of the data, except for minor errors or omissions.9.0 to >0.0 ptsNoviceInterpretation of the meaning of the data is provided, but with some major errors.0.0 ptsNot AcceptableNo data interpretation provided30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReport Writing30.0 to >26.0 ptsExemplaryFollows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Communicates in a cohesive, logical style.26.0 to >19.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsMostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style.19.0 to >12.0 ptsDevelopingAPA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style are followed, but with minor errors. Mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style though at times ideas are unclear and confusing.12.0 to >5.0 ptsNoviceAPA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style are followed, but with major errors. Report is not communicated in a cohesive, logical style. Ideas are unclear and confusing.5.0 to >0 ptsNot AcceptableDoes not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style.30.0 ptsTotal Points: 160.0
Earn money selling
your Study Documents