Initial Post Instructions After reviewing the case below, choose two perspectives (neuroscience, humanistic, cognitive, psychodynamic or behavioral) to create a short dialogue between two psychologists discussing Sara's behavior. Feel free to be creative in your dialogue! Define your two chosen perspectives and briefly discuss the differences of each approach. What was one missing in your dialogue from the case that the other helped to explain?

The Module Assessment in Week 8 is a personality theory case study analysis that will be developed during Weeks 2 - 8. The Module Assessment is based on a case study found in your Learning Resources, "The Case of Mrs. C."This week you examined personality theories from the neo-psychoanalytic and behavioral theoretical orientations. Supported by the information you gathered in your Personality Theory Matrix, analyze the case of Mrs. C based on one theory from the neo-psychoanalytic orientation and one theory from the behavioral orientation examined this week. The case study analysis considers Mrs. C’s symptoms (including cultural considerations) and offers relevant assessments and interventions for her case. Additionally, it must be supported by scholarly materials from research of reputable sources.To Prepare Review the Learning Resource, "The Case of Mrs. C."Review the Personality Theory Matrix information about the neo-psychoanalytic and behavioral theoretical orientations and their corresponding related theories.Assignment (2 pages - 1 page per theory)Based on the information you gain from the personality case study, “The Case of Mrs. C,” complete the following case study analyses:Neo-Psychoanalytic Theory Case Study Analysis:Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of a key idea from a theorist that you identified from the neo-psychoanalytic theoretical orientation.Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of a key idea from a theorist that you identified from the neo-psychoanalytictheoretical orientation.Trait Theory Case Study Analysis:Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of a key idea from a theorist that you identified from the behavioral theoretical orientation.Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of a key idea from a theorist that you identified from the behavioral theoretical orientation.Integrate Resources and scholarly materials in your analyses and provide citations and references in APA format. References should be combined in one list at the end of the document.References:Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2019). Personality: Theory and research (14th ed.). Wiley.Chapter 4, “Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory: Applications, Related Theoretical Conceptions, and Contemporary Research” (pp. 85–126) Estey, A. J., Coolidge, F. L., Segal, D. L., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2013). Empirical Evidence for the Heritability of Karen Horney’s Three Core Neurotic Trends. Empirical Evidence for the Heritability of Karen Horney’s Three Core Neurotic Trends.Phelps, B. (2015). Behavioral Perspectives on Personality and Self. Psychological Record, 65(3), 557–565. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1007/s40...Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (2000). Conditioned Emotional Reactions. American Psychologist, 55(3), 313. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/000...

OverviewThis week, you were introduced to the purpose statement in a research study. In the last two weeks, we’ve also focused on ethical conduct in research and the introduction to research.This assignment focuses on building a second research matrix similar to the one from Week 3. This matrix you will create includes research concepts that can be found and connected to the same five research articles related to the topic of first-generation college students and resilience at a four-year university.Assignment InstructionsFill out this provided Research Concepts Research Matrix Week 6 [DOCX] with research concepts that can be found and connected to these five articles related to the topic of first-generation college students and resilience at a four-year university. The first article has been completed for you as an example.Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253–263.Johnson, S. R., & Stage, F. K. (2018). Academic engagement and student success: Do high-impact practices mean higher graduation rates? Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 753-781.Olive, T. (2014). Desire for higher education in first-generation Hispanic college students enrolled in a graduate counseling program. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 45(1), 72–91.Schelbe, L., Swanbrow Becker, M., Spinelli, C., & McCray, D. (2019). First generation college students perceptions of an academic retention program. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(5), 61–76.Smith, K. J., Emerson, D. J., Haight, T. D., Mauldin, S., & Wood, B. G. (2019). An examination of the psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale - 10 (CD-RISC10) among accounting and business students. Journal of Accounting Education, 47, 48–62. Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:Competency 1: Analyze the methodology used in scientific research.Identify the purpose of the study.Identify the statement of the problem.Competency 2: Evaluate the characteristics, purposes, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses of research methods.Explain the limitations/implications of the study.Provide the future research possibilities.Competency 3: Evaluate ethical issues in research studies.Describe the ethical considerations in the chosen research.Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members in the identified field of study.Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting.