Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice. Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryStudy 4 - Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fractureSuggested ReadingSchreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428. Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867Chapter 6 (pp. 131-153), Chapter 7 (pp. 157-185), Chapter 8 (pp. 189-226) Chapter 12 (pp.323-350)& Chapter 13 (pp. 351-380) In Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett LearningQualitative Specific ResourcesHouser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 9, p. 229-252Chapter 14, p. 385-416Chapter 15, p. 419-442Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements.Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of research and its utilization in practice. Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments. QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IX Area Gold Mastery Silver Proficient Bronze Acceptable Acceptable Mastery not Demonstrated Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates credibility of research article using most of the components (Greater than 3/4) of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates credibility of research article using one-half of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the problem statement and research design using most of the components of the evaluation (greater than ¾) checklists in Houser (2018) Evaluates the problem statement and research design using one-half of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018). Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the Evaluates the purpose statement using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the purpose statement using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the purpose statement using ¾ of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the purpose statement using one-half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Evaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the literature review using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the literature review using ¾ of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the literature review using one-half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation sampling strategy using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates the sampling strategy using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates the sampling strategy using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates the sampling strategy using one-half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser (2018). Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser (2018). Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using 3/4 of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using 3/4 of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one-half of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one-half of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using onefourth or less of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using onefourth or less of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be Discusses study results in general but not how Discusses EBP in general but does not relate to Does not discuss results or how

What does survival of the fittest mean in reference to natural selection and evolution? Why do you think the fossil record could be considered incomplete? What types of organisms might be most underrepresented in the fossil record? Why? Week 1 Critical Thinking Exercise questions. Your response to the exercise questions should be a minimum of 5 sentences. Going over the minimum sentence requirement is acceptable; however, I am not looking for an essay. No plagarism