Hello, just to inform you that i am working on the assignment. its nice working with you😇

Surname

1

Student’s Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course
Date:

The ethical situation that a real company faces
1. What stakeholders are involved in this situation and what are their interests?
The University Administration
Construction of the proposed Temple football stadium in the Northern Philadelphia area
has been struck with consistent conflicts between various stakeholders. University
administration, faculty, students and the community seems to have completely different views on
whether the university should construct the stadium in the proposed area. The administration,
since the earliest days, supported the idea due to financial complications that arose after their
lease at Lincoln Financial Field was doubled. The president of the university who proposed the
solution was replaced, and there was fear that the board of trustees would not support it (Jensen).
But the successor denied the doubts by pushing for the build claiming that not only will the
stadium be financially reasonable for the institution; it will also create harmony among the
students and help develop the community in its vicinity (Tanenbaum, What we learned).
The Surrounding Community
Members of the community, however, begged to differ. There were a number of concerns
raised by the residents of Northern Philadelphia on possible outcomes that might come as a result
of the construction of the stadium near their homes. First, there were concerns of road closure of
15th Street which would possibly create congestions that would cripple the lives of neighboring

Surname

2

residents. The noise and disruption, parking problems and other disruptive activities such as
tailgating that have been observed within areas closer to stadiums were also major concerns.
Rising of property costs and taxes slowly affecting the demographics as a result of the campus
growth were among the concerns of the residents who feared the cost would be too much for
them (Bailey). Residents wished the university could recall the proposal and refrain from
construction. They wanted peaceful negotiations because they feared outsiders came in,
disrupted talks and risked the chance that the university may not involve them in their decision
(Tanenbaum, What we learned).
The Faculty and Students
Third stakeholders included members of the faculty and students. In a survey, the latter
showed a distrust of the way the institution was handling the situation with regard to how it
affects the community. This feeling was shared by the members of the faculty. Therefore, a good
number of them did not support the construction of the new stadium. Members of the faculty
questioned the way the administration was consulting with the community. They were sceptical
if at all a genuine consultation with the real affected community was being done. Among their
other concerns were the financial rationale upon which the whole project was based on. They felt
it was a sham and proper methods of handling the whole issue should have been followed
(Tanenbaum, Most Temple students).
2. What stakeholder is most important in this case and why?
Given the structure and complexity of the situation concerning the Temper football
stadium proposal, the most important stakeholder is the community within which the structure
will be constructed in. In fact, the whole delays and complications of the project had been held
up by these misunderstandings. The reason behind this rationale considers that the administration

Su...