Description
I want someone how can paraphrase the article.
Also, if you understand the article you can make change and clear.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
"work shop writing The seminar was about the writing center, this is the first time I heard about it. I
learned how to improve my writing skills when writing. For example, if the content is really hard to
read, you may need to read your writing aloud or someone reading your work. If it sounds very
repetitive you may have to cut or rewrite some of the writing Rods, starting with the last item, and then
slowly ending the first page of the read the page aloud. As you move toward the Center for Excellence
in Writing (CWE), touch each word with a pencil. I also used how I tested myself in writing without
erroneously applying the above rules, and also benefited the position and joints of the points. With the
experience of the professor, very good and very useful. I hope to attend the seminar again to use the
script more because the time is not enough, and the score is very important and very good.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Surname 1
Name of student
Professor’s name
Course title
Date
Paraphrasing
I heard about the workshop seminar for the first time when I attended it to learn about
writing. Through the seminar, I was able ...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great study resource, helped me a lot.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Document Analysis
Like your first paper assignment, this is a document analysis--you are analyzing President Lyndon Johnson's Speech to Howa ...
Document Analysis
Like your first paper assignment, this is a document analysis--you are analyzing President Lyndon Johnson's Speech to Howard University in June 1965. Unlike your first paper, you are not directly comparing it to another document. A document analysis requires you to go beyond summarizing what the author (in this case speak) write or says but rather to analyze WHY and SO WHAT. Your thesis/argument should answer why and so what question about the document, essentially: what was LBJ's argument, WHY was he making it at that time, and why is this important. This is why I am NOT a fan of one sentence thesis-statements. It takes a few sentences to lay out your argument. Then in the BODY of your paper, you support the argument you already laid out in detail in your introduction. Please make sure you are up to date with your lectures, especially on the New Deal and the Civil Right's Movement (there's a hint about the context). To help you get started I have formulated some guiding questions that should help you arrive at a thesis/argument. 1.What is the context for this speech and what did Johnson mean when he asserted “freedom isn’t enough.”2.Besides the students and faculty of Howard University, who do you think was Johnson’s intended audience?3.What did he mean when he said that the Voting Rights Act was “not the end of the road.” Be specific.4.What is his argument about the “widening gap?”(Define it) Where did it come from and how can it be addressed?5.How did he define justice?Your paper should be around 1000 words (3-4 pages double spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font). Please make sure you are not just summarizing the document and really engage with the document--what did he MEAN and WHY. Papers are due Sunday December 2nd at midnight. Late papers will be subject to my late paper policy as stated in the syllabus. The following content is partner provided
Reaction Paper Discussion
Write a 1-page reaction paper on the provided reading. The reaction could be about: how the piece made you feel, what inte ...
Reaction Paper Discussion
Write a 1-page reaction paper on the provided reading. The reaction could be about: how the piece made you feel, what interested you, something it reminded you of, a brief summary, and/or something related to the piece, etc.
SOWK 350 Strayer University Spiritual Self Assessment
Self-Assessment: Part 1 Instructions You will complete the Self-Assessment in 2 parts: Part 1: An eco-map and spiritual ...
SOWK 350 Strayer University Spiritual Self Assessment
Self-Assessment: Part 1 Instructions You will complete the Self-Assessment in 2 parts: Part 1: An eco-map and spiritual life-mapPart 2: A genogram and culture gram.Part 1: An eco-map and spiritual life-mapPart 2: A genogram and culturegram. For Part 1, you will complete a spiritual life map and an eco-map. Your Self-Assessment: Part 1 paper must contain 2 pages of narrative content, 2 diagrams which are not included in the 2 pages of narrative, and title and reference pages. You must include at least 1–2 sources, such as the course texts, the Bible, relevant journal articles and/or websites. The paper must be in current APA format. 1. For the diagrams and images: Use the Hodge text, as well as online sources found through the Jerry Falwell Library, to help you with your assessment. When drawing your diagrams, consider looking at yourself from up close and from a distance. Look for patterns, values, positive and negative dynamics, and themes. For the spiritual life map, be creative with your picture and color. What does your spiritual journey look like? What events have shaped your spiritual self? Have you included all facets of your life in the eco-map? Are there enough details to get a good sense from the picture as to what shapes your time and energy? Do not forget to create a key for the ecomap. You can scan or take photos of each of your maps and attach them in the assignment portal with your paper.For the paper, organize using headings.Intro (1 paragraph), then about 1 page each:Outside sources must be used to help you with creating the diagrams or interpreting them. Bible verses, such as key life verses, can be used as they relate to the content. EcogramSpiritual Life Map Self-Assessment: Part 2 Instructions You will complete the Self-Assessment in 2 parts: For Part 2, you will complete a narrative paper that includes a genogram and culturegram, as well as a conclusion of all 4 assessment tools. Your Self-Assessment: Part 2 paper must contain 3 pages of narrative content, 2 diagrams which are not included in the 3 pages of narrative, and title and reference pages. You must include at least 3 sources, such as the course texts, the Bible, relevant journal articles and/or websites. The paper must be in current APA format. GenoPro.com is one recommended website that you can use for the genogram. Also, use your Hodge text and online sources found through the Jerry Falwell Library to help you with your assessment. While creating your diagrams, consider looking at yourself from up close and from a distance. Look for patterns, values, positive and negative dynamics, and themes. For example, is there a pattern of addiction with family members in the genogram? What about education? Is this a value that you see throughout the family, or are you the 1st generation to go to college? With the culture gram, consider your family beliefs and background. What is important in your family culture? What about family rules? Consider the part of the country you grew up in, and how that influences your family culture. Do not forget to create akey for the genogram.For the paper, organize using headings.Intro (1 paragraph), then about 1 page each: GenogramCulturegramConclusion Outside sources must be used to help you with creating the diagrams or interpreting them. Bible verses, such as key life verses, can be used as they relate to the content
Lynn University Cultural Discourse of Fatherhood Essay
Identify an important cultural discourse within the first season of Friday Night Lights. Describe how that discourse (not ...
Lynn University Cultural Discourse of Fatherhood Essay
Identify an important cultural discourse within the first season of Friday Night Lights. Describe how that discourse (not merely the plot) is built through narrative, genre, and formal elements like camera style, mise-en-scene, character coding and performance, etc. You may use one or two episodes that exemplify your arguments, or pull from the entire season. Be sure to make an argument about how the form of the show participates in a broader cultural discourse. Examples of cultural discourse might include: ideas about gender, race, class, ethnicity, ability and/or ideas about cultural ideologies like meritocracy, the American Dream, etc.IN THIS CASE, your textual analysis should address the question: How does Friday Night Lights reiterate or contest dominant cultural discourses?Textual Analyses should be 1,500-2,000 words (4-5 double spaced pages).
Week 1 Project - 3-5 references
Two officers were patrolling a high-crime area of a town known for its high incidence of drug dealing. They noticed a man ...
Week 1 Project - 3-5 references
Two officers were patrolling a high-crime area of a town known for its high incidence of drug dealing. They noticed a man standing by a car speaking to the driver and passenger. He handed them an object and walked away.
According to the officers, when the driver and his passenger spotted the police, they got out of the car quickly and began walking away while glancing back at the officers nervously. The officers stopped the two men and asked them a few questions. During questioning, the officers detected what they believed was the smell of marijuana on the men.
The officers then performed a pat-down search and one of them noticed a bulge in the pocket of the driver's jacket. The bulge felt like a bag of pills, so the officer reached into the man's jacket and pulled out what was actually a bag of marijuana. The officers arrested the driver and searched the car. They found more marijuana under both seats of the car. They then arrested the passenger.
Was the stop of the two men by the officers legal with reference to the case of Illinois v. Gates (1983)? Why?
Was the search of the two men legal with reference to the case Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)? Why?
Was the seizure of the marijuana from the driver a violation of the protection guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment? Why?
Was the officers' search of the car legal? Why?
Was the arrest of the passenger legal? Why?
COMM 120 Grossmont College Communication Skills Report
COMM 120 Observation PaperAssignment DescriptionStudying communication and the various theories that apply to human intera ...
COMM 120 Grossmont College Communication Skills Report
COMM 120 Observation PaperAssignment DescriptionStudying communication and the various theories that apply to human interaction can be a valuable asset in your personal and professional lives. If used properly you can improve your relationships, your ability to persuade others, your chances at career advancement, and a host of other benefits that becoming a better communicator provides. In order for you to gain a deeper understanding of these concepts, it will be important for you to begin applying them. Theory without application will not allow you to use what you’ve learned and thus, you are less likely to benefit from it. Therefore, this assignment is designed to give you a hands-on experience with going out into a natural setting and using some of what you have learned in class.To aid you in this process you will be required to choose a setting in which others are communicating with one another. The form of communication you choose to observe depends on your own preference. You can observe people interacting directly through conversation, playing sports, working together, etc. or you can observe examples of indirect communication such as strangers in crowded places, intimate partners spending time with each other without actually speaking to one another, or someone reacting to something they have witnessed.You will observe the people interacting in this setting, and provide your analysis regarding what you thought to be significant about the communication that took place, in the form of a term paper. To aid you in your writing you will need to choose three specific course conceptsor theories that relates to your observations. Examples include: Selection – what forms of stimuli were present in the situation and how did the communicators respond or negotiate those stimuli? Social Roles – what social roles did you pick up on and what was it about the interaction that communicated those roles? Nonverbal Communication – Repeating: did you notice any particular gestures that the communicators used to reinforce what they were saying verbally? Once you have selected the concepts to work with and explained how they functioned in the situation you observed, you will then need to provide an analysis of what you learned from this experience. For example: what are your thoughts about what you witnessed? Did it confirm or disconfirm any of your assumptions about communication? Was there anything that surprised you? If so, what was it and why did it surprise you? Since you will be choosing a textbook concept for this assignment, you will need to provide a reference page including in-text citations in APA style. Your paper will be judged according to the following criteria:1. Your ability to support your analysis through the use of relevant examples2. Your ability to connect classroom learning to your observations3. The application of appropriate communication concepts and/or terminology from lecture or the textbook4. The demonstrated ability to think critically about what you observed (quality of your writing/insights)5. Proper grammar, spelling, and overall formatLearning ObjectivesThis assignment is designed to help you:1. Apply interpersonal communication concepts to real-world scenarios and personal observations2. Organize information and facts into a cohesive, coherent essay3. Improve your critical thinking and writing skillsAssignment RequirementsPage limit: 3-5 pages, double-spaced, typed, 12-point font, with APA-style referencesPoints: 100 pointsLearning ObjectivesThis assignment is designed to help you:1. Apply interpersonal communication concepts to real-world scenarios and personal observations2. Organize information and facts into a cohesive, coherent essay3. Improve your critical thinking and writing skillsAssignment RequirementsPage limit: 3-5 pages, double-spaced, typed, 12-point font, with APA-style refere\TEACHES example Running head: LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION1Listening in CommunicationStudent NameCuyamaca CollegeLISTENING IN COMMUNICATION2One cannot underestimate the importance of listening in communication; without this ability, there is the likelihood of misunderstanding the message. As a result, the information exchange might break down, and the sender can quickly become irritated or frustrated. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), listening is the process of actively creating meaning out of another person's spoken message. However, it should not be confused with hearing, which is simply the stimulus of the eardrum; also, interpreting and reading nonverbal communication does not count as listening (Adler & Proctor, 2006). For this paper, I decided to dwell on the listening quality of communication by assessing the first presidential debate 2020 footage between President Trump and Former Vice President Joe Biden. From the exchange, I identified some concepts that fall under ways of listening and the barriers to listening.While I would have preferred to observe a real-life situation, I did not get such a chance due to time limits and the challenges resulting from the ongoing pandemic. However, I stumbled upon the video of the first presidential debate 2020 on YouTube since I did not get the chance to stream it in real-time. The debate's expectation was for each candidate to present their views on various issues, including political, social, and economic, by answering questions from a neutral moderator, Chris Wallace. From my perspective, there was a lot to observe from the exchanges of all the three communicators involved: President Donald J Trump and Former VC Joe Biden as candidates and moderator Chris Wallace. Considering that they were communicating to millions of people across the country, it was expected that each party would bring out the best of their communication skills, including their listening ability.First, both candidates were involved in mindless listening when bombarded with a lot of information, as evidenced by their little investment in the messages directed to them. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), mindless listening occurs when one reacts to the others' messages LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION3automatically and routinely; it involves low-level information processing. In my opinion, the two speakers did that sometimes to save energy, considering the amount of information directed to them by the other two, simultaneously. However, it came out negatively where one of the speakers, for instance, would be asked a question and gave a completely different response from the expected. While this can be forgiven considering it was a contest, it was still imperative to pay attention to the sender's statements before giving the feedback. That way, it would qualify as mindful listening, which means careful thought and attention to the messages received, especially when they are important (Adler & Proctor, 2006).As usual, in a political contest, speakers do not always agree, which was evident in many instances throughout the debate. However, some actions from the candidates served as barriers to proper communication, consequently impacting the presentation's intended quality. In the textbook, Adler & Proctor (2006) address interruption as one barrier to successful communication; it is defined as speaking when it is not one's turn or cutting off someone. Indeed, there is no way the speaker can be articulate when bringing a point home if the other person keeps on interfering as they talk. For instance, President Trump did this many times, and it was evident that Joe Biden also engaged in a lot of interrupting as well. Thus, neither candidate was ever allowed to deliver his views smoothly without disruptions. Although it could be forgiven considering it was a political contest, it was unfair to fight the speaker not through arguments but by suppressing the delivery of their opinions.Other than interruptions, the debate was marred with rebuttal tendency, a barrier to listening. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), rebuttal tendency is defined as "the propensity to debate a speaker's point and formulate a reply while they are speaking." Unfortunately, both the participants crossed that line where they spoke even when the moderator was directly talking to LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION3automatically and routinely; it involves low-level information processing. In my opinion, the two speakers did that sometimes to save energy, considering the amount of information directed to them by the other two, simultaneously. However, it came out negatively where one of the speakers, for instance, would be asked a question and gave a completely different response from the expected. While this can be forgiven considering it was a contest, it was still imperative to pay attention to the sender's statements before giving the feedback. That way, it would qualify as mindful listening, which means careful thought and attention to the messages received, especially when they are important (Adler & Proctor, 2006).As usual, in a political contest, speakers do not always agree, which was evident in many instances throughout the debate. However, some actions from the candidates served as barriers to proper communication, consequently impacting the presentation's intended quality. In the textbook, Adler & Proctor (2006) address interruption as one barrier to successful communication; it is defined as speaking when it is not one's turn or cutting off someone. Indeed, there is no way the speaker can be articulate when bringing a point home if the other person keeps on interfering as they talk. For instance, President Trump did this many times, and it was evident that Joe Biden also engaged in a lot of interrupting as well. Thus, neither candidate was ever allowed to deliver his views smoothly without disruptions. Although it could be forgiven considering it was a political contest, it was unfair to fight the speaker not through arguments but by suppressing the delivery of their opinions.Other than interruptions, the debate was marred with rebuttal tendency, a barrier to listening. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), rebuttal tendency is defined as "the propensity to debate a speaker's point and formulate a reply while they are speaking." Unfortunately, both the participants crossed that line where they spoke even when the moderator was directly talking to LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION4them. One particular case is when Joe Biden begins to respond even before the moderator finishes talking, though he apologizes. Besides, the President did this to Joe Biden and Chris Wallace to an extent and he had to be told by the moderator to stop his behavior. From my observation, whether the speakers did it consciously or unconsciously, the action affected the interaction and eventually undermined the debate's purpose. The fact is, the audience expected to hear what both candidates have to offer when they are elected as President, but how would they make a definite conclusion when participants did not have sufficient opportunity of expressing themselves? For a fact, communication can be found everywhere where people interact with each other; one only requires to pay attention to what is happening. After watching the debate, I learned a lot about listening and how it impacts the communication process's success. The activity also helped me understand the ways of listening, which includes mindful listening and mindless listening. Previously, I would have rebuked mindless listening because it sounds negative. Upon reflecting on our class lectures and following through the debate, I realized how necessary it is in a conversation; it all depends on the set-up. Having strong listening skills is a plus in wooing many people to your side; politically speaking, you need to convince people to support you. However, I realized that people want to be listened to, and a good listener should leverage that to win their hearts. For example, although I am not slamming President Trump, he did not come out strong in his listening skills and Joe Biden, on the other hand, appeared to join the President's bandwagon at some point and was no better. In a nutshell, listening is paramount in any communication; I advocate for mindful listening because it allows the recipient to pay attention to the current message and provide polished feedback. The truth is one cannot supply a well-informed answer to a question when LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION5they have not comprehended it in the first place. It is also crucial to know the difference between hearing and listening because some people use the actions interchangeably. Other than that, I discovered interruption and rebuttal tendency leads to communication barriers, which is evident from the debate. The reason being, honestly speaking, from whatever I have learned as a communication student, I can conclude that the discussion that took place during the 2020 presidential debate failed to meet the expectations of many people, including me.LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION5they have not comprehended it in the first place. It is also crucial to know the difference between hearing and listening because some people use the actions interchangeably. Other than that, I discovered interruption and rebuttal tendency leads to communication barriers, which is evident from the debate. The reason being, honestly speaking, from whatever I have learned as a communication student, I can conclude that the discussion that took place during the 2020 presidential debate failed to meet the expectations of many people, including me.LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION6ReferencesPBS NewsHour, 2020. WATCH: The First 2020 Presidential Debate. [video] Available at: <> [Accessed 2 October 2020].Adler, R., & Proctor, R. (2006). Looking out looking in. (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Similar Content
Broward College Role of Government Discussion
1) Research the history of public health nursing. What role does the government play in the health of its citizens? How in...
COVID 19 Health Promotion on COVID 19 Patients Discussion
Health promotion and patient teaching topics for COVID-positive patients
3. Find at least two current scholarly articl...
BUS 435 SU Guanzhou Management & Growth in Entrepreneurship Case Study
Describe the nature of the growth problems for Guanzhou Construction.Discuss which of the five growing pains described in ...
SPC Economic Burden of Healthcare in The United States Paper
You will write a 25-page research paper in current APA format that focuses on an applied topic
of your choosing related t...
Irvine Valley College Attitude of US towards Taiwan Issue Memo
A policy memo is designed as a real-world, real-time exercise in providing policy analysis and prescription (1000 words). ...
ENGL120 Grossmont College Extend Death Penalty Question
Hello again, You did Death Penalty essay for me, but I missed to add the annotated bibliography as it's written below. Can...
Service Learning Ideas
https://www.plasticmakers.com/?gclid=CjwKCAjwvZv0BRA8EiwAD9T2VavpHx2A9G 7bXF9UG0gOfZ8Qe78-HGXwwTs_lxGybiTQ0mG9Dd4ZrxoCfK4Q...
Proffessionalism
Notwithstanding the way that there are a couple of differences in definitions, social specialists see a calling as a get-t...
Attachment 62
Economic growth is the measure of increase or decrease in the production of goods and services for a specified time in com...
Related Tags
Book Guides
American Gods
by Neil Gaiman
One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest
by Ken Kesey
I Cant Make This Up - Life Lessons
by Kevin Hart
The Eyes Were Watching God
by Zora Neale Hurston
The Glass Palace
by Amitav Ghosh
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
by Stieg Larsson
Tess of the DUrbervilles
by Thomas Hardy
Hiroshima
by John Hersey
You Are a Badass
by Jen Sincero
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Document Analysis
Like your first paper assignment, this is a document analysis--you are analyzing President Lyndon Johnson's Speech to Howa ...
Document Analysis
Like your first paper assignment, this is a document analysis--you are analyzing President Lyndon Johnson's Speech to Howard University in June 1965. Unlike your first paper, you are not directly comparing it to another document. A document analysis requires you to go beyond summarizing what the author (in this case speak) write or says but rather to analyze WHY and SO WHAT. Your thesis/argument should answer why and so what question about the document, essentially: what was LBJ's argument, WHY was he making it at that time, and why is this important. This is why I am NOT a fan of one sentence thesis-statements. It takes a few sentences to lay out your argument. Then in the BODY of your paper, you support the argument you already laid out in detail in your introduction. Please make sure you are up to date with your lectures, especially on the New Deal and the Civil Right's Movement (there's a hint about the context). To help you get started I have formulated some guiding questions that should help you arrive at a thesis/argument. 1.What is the context for this speech and what did Johnson mean when he asserted “freedom isn’t enough.”2.Besides the students and faculty of Howard University, who do you think was Johnson’s intended audience?3.What did he mean when he said that the Voting Rights Act was “not the end of the road.” Be specific.4.What is his argument about the “widening gap?”(Define it) Where did it come from and how can it be addressed?5.How did he define justice?Your paper should be around 1000 words (3-4 pages double spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font). Please make sure you are not just summarizing the document and really engage with the document--what did he MEAN and WHY. Papers are due Sunday December 2nd at midnight. Late papers will be subject to my late paper policy as stated in the syllabus. The following content is partner provided
Reaction Paper Discussion
Write a 1-page reaction paper on the provided reading. The reaction could be about: how the piece made you feel, what inte ...
Reaction Paper Discussion
Write a 1-page reaction paper on the provided reading. The reaction could be about: how the piece made you feel, what interested you, something it reminded you of, a brief summary, and/or something related to the piece, etc.
SOWK 350 Strayer University Spiritual Self Assessment
Self-Assessment: Part 1 Instructions You will complete the Self-Assessment in 2 parts: Part 1: An eco-map and spiritual ...
SOWK 350 Strayer University Spiritual Self Assessment
Self-Assessment: Part 1 Instructions You will complete the Self-Assessment in 2 parts: Part 1: An eco-map and spiritual life-mapPart 2: A genogram and culture gram.Part 1: An eco-map and spiritual life-mapPart 2: A genogram and culturegram. For Part 1, you will complete a spiritual life map and an eco-map. Your Self-Assessment: Part 1 paper must contain 2 pages of narrative content, 2 diagrams which are not included in the 2 pages of narrative, and title and reference pages. You must include at least 1–2 sources, such as the course texts, the Bible, relevant journal articles and/or websites. The paper must be in current APA format. 1. For the diagrams and images: Use the Hodge text, as well as online sources found through the Jerry Falwell Library, to help you with your assessment. When drawing your diagrams, consider looking at yourself from up close and from a distance. Look for patterns, values, positive and negative dynamics, and themes. For the spiritual life map, be creative with your picture and color. What does your spiritual journey look like? What events have shaped your spiritual self? Have you included all facets of your life in the eco-map? Are there enough details to get a good sense from the picture as to what shapes your time and energy? Do not forget to create a key for the ecomap. You can scan or take photos of each of your maps and attach them in the assignment portal with your paper.For the paper, organize using headings.Intro (1 paragraph), then about 1 page each:Outside sources must be used to help you with creating the diagrams or interpreting them. Bible verses, such as key life verses, can be used as they relate to the content. EcogramSpiritual Life Map Self-Assessment: Part 2 Instructions You will complete the Self-Assessment in 2 parts: For Part 2, you will complete a narrative paper that includes a genogram and culturegram, as well as a conclusion of all 4 assessment tools. Your Self-Assessment: Part 2 paper must contain 3 pages of narrative content, 2 diagrams which are not included in the 3 pages of narrative, and title and reference pages. You must include at least 3 sources, such as the course texts, the Bible, relevant journal articles and/or websites. The paper must be in current APA format. GenoPro.com is one recommended website that you can use for the genogram. Also, use your Hodge text and online sources found through the Jerry Falwell Library to help you with your assessment. While creating your diagrams, consider looking at yourself from up close and from a distance. Look for patterns, values, positive and negative dynamics, and themes. For example, is there a pattern of addiction with family members in the genogram? What about education? Is this a value that you see throughout the family, or are you the 1st generation to go to college? With the culture gram, consider your family beliefs and background. What is important in your family culture? What about family rules? Consider the part of the country you grew up in, and how that influences your family culture. Do not forget to create akey for the genogram.For the paper, organize using headings.Intro (1 paragraph), then about 1 page each: GenogramCulturegramConclusion Outside sources must be used to help you with creating the diagrams or interpreting them. Bible verses, such as key life verses, can be used as they relate to the content
Lynn University Cultural Discourse of Fatherhood Essay
Identify an important cultural discourse within the first season of Friday Night Lights. Describe how that discourse (not ...
Lynn University Cultural Discourse of Fatherhood Essay
Identify an important cultural discourse within the first season of Friday Night Lights. Describe how that discourse (not merely the plot) is built through narrative, genre, and formal elements like camera style, mise-en-scene, character coding and performance, etc. You may use one or two episodes that exemplify your arguments, or pull from the entire season. Be sure to make an argument about how the form of the show participates in a broader cultural discourse. Examples of cultural discourse might include: ideas about gender, race, class, ethnicity, ability and/or ideas about cultural ideologies like meritocracy, the American Dream, etc.IN THIS CASE, your textual analysis should address the question: How does Friday Night Lights reiterate or contest dominant cultural discourses?Textual Analyses should be 1,500-2,000 words (4-5 double spaced pages).
Week 1 Project - 3-5 references
Two officers were patrolling a high-crime area of a town known for its high incidence of drug dealing. They noticed a man ...
Week 1 Project - 3-5 references
Two officers were patrolling a high-crime area of a town known for its high incidence of drug dealing. They noticed a man standing by a car speaking to the driver and passenger. He handed them an object and walked away.
According to the officers, when the driver and his passenger spotted the police, they got out of the car quickly and began walking away while glancing back at the officers nervously. The officers stopped the two men and asked them a few questions. During questioning, the officers detected what they believed was the smell of marijuana on the men.
The officers then performed a pat-down search and one of them noticed a bulge in the pocket of the driver's jacket. The bulge felt like a bag of pills, so the officer reached into the man's jacket and pulled out what was actually a bag of marijuana. The officers arrested the driver and searched the car. They found more marijuana under both seats of the car. They then arrested the passenger.
Was the stop of the two men by the officers legal with reference to the case of Illinois v. Gates (1983)? Why?
Was the search of the two men legal with reference to the case Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)? Why?
Was the seizure of the marijuana from the driver a violation of the protection guaranteed under the Fourth Amendment? Why?
Was the officers' search of the car legal? Why?
Was the arrest of the passenger legal? Why?
COMM 120 Grossmont College Communication Skills Report
COMM 120 Observation PaperAssignment DescriptionStudying communication and the various theories that apply to human intera ...
COMM 120 Grossmont College Communication Skills Report
COMM 120 Observation PaperAssignment DescriptionStudying communication and the various theories that apply to human interaction can be a valuable asset in your personal and professional lives. If used properly you can improve your relationships, your ability to persuade others, your chances at career advancement, and a host of other benefits that becoming a better communicator provides. In order for you to gain a deeper understanding of these concepts, it will be important for you to begin applying them. Theory without application will not allow you to use what you’ve learned and thus, you are less likely to benefit from it. Therefore, this assignment is designed to give you a hands-on experience with going out into a natural setting and using some of what you have learned in class.To aid you in this process you will be required to choose a setting in which others are communicating with one another. The form of communication you choose to observe depends on your own preference. You can observe people interacting directly through conversation, playing sports, working together, etc. or you can observe examples of indirect communication such as strangers in crowded places, intimate partners spending time with each other without actually speaking to one another, or someone reacting to something they have witnessed.You will observe the people interacting in this setting, and provide your analysis regarding what you thought to be significant about the communication that took place, in the form of a term paper. To aid you in your writing you will need to choose three specific course conceptsor theories that relates to your observations. Examples include: Selection – what forms of stimuli were present in the situation and how did the communicators respond or negotiate those stimuli? Social Roles – what social roles did you pick up on and what was it about the interaction that communicated those roles? Nonverbal Communication – Repeating: did you notice any particular gestures that the communicators used to reinforce what they were saying verbally? Once you have selected the concepts to work with and explained how they functioned in the situation you observed, you will then need to provide an analysis of what you learned from this experience. For example: what are your thoughts about what you witnessed? Did it confirm or disconfirm any of your assumptions about communication? Was there anything that surprised you? If so, what was it and why did it surprise you? Since you will be choosing a textbook concept for this assignment, you will need to provide a reference page including in-text citations in APA style. Your paper will be judged according to the following criteria:1. Your ability to support your analysis through the use of relevant examples2. Your ability to connect classroom learning to your observations3. The application of appropriate communication concepts and/or terminology from lecture or the textbook4. The demonstrated ability to think critically about what you observed (quality of your writing/insights)5. Proper grammar, spelling, and overall formatLearning ObjectivesThis assignment is designed to help you:1. Apply interpersonal communication concepts to real-world scenarios and personal observations2. Organize information and facts into a cohesive, coherent essay3. Improve your critical thinking and writing skillsAssignment RequirementsPage limit: 3-5 pages, double-spaced, typed, 12-point font, with APA-style referencesPoints: 100 pointsLearning ObjectivesThis assignment is designed to help you:1. Apply interpersonal communication concepts to real-world scenarios and personal observations2. Organize information and facts into a cohesive, coherent essay3. Improve your critical thinking and writing skillsAssignment RequirementsPage limit: 3-5 pages, double-spaced, typed, 12-point font, with APA-style refere\TEACHES example Running head: LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION1Listening in CommunicationStudent NameCuyamaca CollegeLISTENING IN COMMUNICATION2One cannot underestimate the importance of listening in communication; without this ability, there is the likelihood of misunderstanding the message. As a result, the information exchange might break down, and the sender can quickly become irritated or frustrated. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), listening is the process of actively creating meaning out of another person's spoken message. However, it should not be confused with hearing, which is simply the stimulus of the eardrum; also, interpreting and reading nonverbal communication does not count as listening (Adler & Proctor, 2006). For this paper, I decided to dwell on the listening quality of communication by assessing the first presidential debate 2020 footage between President Trump and Former Vice President Joe Biden. From the exchange, I identified some concepts that fall under ways of listening and the barriers to listening.While I would have preferred to observe a real-life situation, I did not get such a chance due to time limits and the challenges resulting from the ongoing pandemic. However, I stumbled upon the video of the first presidential debate 2020 on YouTube since I did not get the chance to stream it in real-time. The debate's expectation was for each candidate to present their views on various issues, including political, social, and economic, by answering questions from a neutral moderator, Chris Wallace. From my perspective, there was a lot to observe from the exchanges of all the three communicators involved: President Donald J Trump and Former VC Joe Biden as candidates and moderator Chris Wallace. Considering that they were communicating to millions of people across the country, it was expected that each party would bring out the best of their communication skills, including their listening ability.First, both candidates were involved in mindless listening when bombarded with a lot of information, as evidenced by their little investment in the messages directed to them. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), mindless listening occurs when one reacts to the others' messages LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION3automatically and routinely; it involves low-level information processing. In my opinion, the two speakers did that sometimes to save energy, considering the amount of information directed to them by the other two, simultaneously. However, it came out negatively where one of the speakers, for instance, would be asked a question and gave a completely different response from the expected. While this can be forgiven considering it was a contest, it was still imperative to pay attention to the sender's statements before giving the feedback. That way, it would qualify as mindful listening, which means careful thought and attention to the messages received, especially when they are important (Adler & Proctor, 2006).As usual, in a political contest, speakers do not always agree, which was evident in many instances throughout the debate. However, some actions from the candidates served as barriers to proper communication, consequently impacting the presentation's intended quality. In the textbook, Adler & Proctor (2006) address interruption as one barrier to successful communication; it is defined as speaking when it is not one's turn or cutting off someone. Indeed, there is no way the speaker can be articulate when bringing a point home if the other person keeps on interfering as they talk. For instance, President Trump did this many times, and it was evident that Joe Biden also engaged in a lot of interrupting as well. Thus, neither candidate was ever allowed to deliver his views smoothly without disruptions. Although it could be forgiven considering it was a political contest, it was unfair to fight the speaker not through arguments but by suppressing the delivery of their opinions.Other than interruptions, the debate was marred with rebuttal tendency, a barrier to listening. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), rebuttal tendency is defined as "the propensity to debate a speaker's point and formulate a reply while they are speaking." Unfortunately, both the participants crossed that line where they spoke even when the moderator was directly talking to LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION3automatically and routinely; it involves low-level information processing. In my opinion, the two speakers did that sometimes to save energy, considering the amount of information directed to them by the other two, simultaneously. However, it came out negatively where one of the speakers, for instance, would be asked a question and gave a completely different response from the expected. While this can be forgiven considering it was a contest, it was still imperative to pay attention to the sender's statements before giving the feedback. That way, it would qualify as mindful listening, which means careful thought and attention to the messages received, especially when they are important (Adler & Proctor, 2006).As usual, in a political contest, speakers do not always agree, which was evident in many instances throughout the debate. However, some actions from the candidates served as barriers to proper communication, consequently impacting the presentation's intended quality. In the textbook, Adler & Proctor (2006) address interruption as one barrier to successful communication; it is defined as speaking when it is not one's turn or cutting off someone. Indeed, there is no way the speaker can be articulate when bringing a point home if the other person keeps on interfering as they talk. For instance, President Trump did this many times, and it was evident that Joe Biden also engaged in a lot of interrupting as well. Thus, neither candidate was ever allowed to deliver his views smoothly without disruptions. Although it could be forgiven considering it was a political contest, it was unfair to fight the speaker not through arguments but by suppressing the delivery of their opinions.Other than interruptions, the debate was marred with rebuttal tendency, a barrier to listening. According to Adler & Proctor (2006), rebuttal tendency is defined as "the propensity to debate a speaker's point and formulate a reply while they are speaking." Unfortunately, both the participants crossed that line where they spoke even when the moderator was directly talking to LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION4them. One particular case is when Joe Biden begins to respond even before the moderator finishes talking, though he apologizes. Besides, the President did this to Joe Biden and Chris Wallace to an extent and he had to be told by the moderator to stop his behavior. From my observation, whether the speakers did it consciously or unconsciously, the action affected the interaction and eventually undermined the debate's purpose. The fact is, the audience expected to hear what both candidates have to offer when they are elected as President, but how would they make a definite conclusion when participants did not have sufficient opportunity of expressing themselves? For a fact, communication can be found everywhere where people interact with each other; one only requires to pay attention to what is happening. After watching the debate, I learned a lot about listening and how it impacts the communication process's success. The activity also helped me understand the ways of listening, which includes mindful listening and mindless listening. Previously, I would have rebuked mindless listening because it sounds negative. Upon reflecting on our class lectures and following through the debate, I realized how necessary it is in a conversation; it all depends on the set-up. Having strong listening skills is a plus in wooing many people to your side; politically speaking, you need to convince people to support you. However, I realized that people want to be listened to, and a good listener should leverage that to win their hearts. For example, although I am not slamming President Trump, he did not come out strong in his listening skills and Joe Biden, on the other hand, appeared to join the President's bandwagon at some point and was no better. In a nutshell, listening is paramount in any communication; I advocate for mindful listening because it allows the recipient to pay attention to the current message and provide polished feedback. The truth is one cannot supply a well-informed answer to a question when LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION5they have not comprehended it in the first place. It is also crucial to know the difference between hearing and listening because some people use the actions interchangeably. Other than that, I discovered interruption and rebuttal tendency leads to communication barriers, which is evident from the debate. The reason being, honestly speaking, from whatever I have learned as a communication student, I can conclude that the discussion that took place during the 2020 presidential debate failed to meet the expectations of many people, including me.LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION5they have not comprehended it in the first place. It is also crucial to know the difference between hearing and listening because some people use the actions interchangeably. Other than that, I discovered interruption and rebuttal tendency leads to communication barriers, which is evident from the debate. The reason being, honestly speaking, from whatever I have learned as a communication student, I can conclude that the discussion that took place during the 2020 presidential debate failed to meet the expectations of many people, including me.LISTENING IN COMMUNICATION6ReferencesPBS NewsHour, 2020. WATCH: The First 2020 Presidential Debate. [video] Available at: <> [Accessed 2 October 2020].Adler, R., & Proctor, R. (2006). Looking out looking in. (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents