Cognitive walk-throughs involve simulating a user’s problem-solving
process while pluralistic walk-throughs involve gathering users,
designers, and developers to step through scenarios. Compare and
contrast cognitive walk-through evaluations and pluralistic walk-through
evaluations in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Give an example
of a use for each type.
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
cognitive walk through stimulates the user problem solving and it is preferred for its satisfaction of the user. It is more effectiveve and efficiency because it is based on dealing with issues on ground directly whereas pluralistic gathers information from different users,designers and scenarios which takes more time hence less effective and inefficient compared to cognitive
Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.