PROMPT: added >>> You are writing a research paper on a controversial topic. It must be something that requires you form an opinion, then back up you opinion with reliable sources. These sources will give you information that back up your opinion. One or two of them may be used to introduce opposing points of view on your topic so you can illustrate what is controversial about it. Be sure to counter these opposing points of view by explaining why they are weak or wrong. Choose your issue from one of the readings in our textbook or a class handout. This should be an exigency you wish to learn more about. It is important that you choose something that interests you. You will spend the rest of the semester researching it and then write a well-sourced argumentative research paper that (1) explores what others are saying about the issue and (2) works to support your clearly stated assertion about the issue. Choose an issue that really interests you. Decide what your opinion on this issue is. Be sure your opinion is one that not all your readers will agree with. If yours is an opinion that everyone already agrees with, it is not yet suitable for an argument research paper. Keep thinking of ways to view the issue until you come up with an opinion that is debatable, controversial, and above all, discussable. REQUIREMENTS: 6-8 pages, typed in MLA format A correctly formatted Works Cited page listing documentation information for all your sources. Use 6 sources, some that agree or in some way back up your opinion, and some that disagree or represent an alternative point of view on the issue. Added >>> Create an annotated bibliography entry for each source.Turn in all 6 Annotated Bibliography Entries on time (see the handout for directions and due dates for these).You must cite all sources in your essay (parenthetical citations). You must include a Works Cited page. This page does not count toward the minimum length requirement. NOTE: Part of your grade on the research paper is to attend your writing conference with me. You will sign up for a time slot. See the course schedule for conference dates. Your paper MUST be submitted to Vericite for a plagiarism check.Please NOTE: I will not accept or grade any papers that have not been submitted to Vericite for a plagiarism check.

Imagine that you were auditing accounts receivable balances to confirm sales and found significant discrepancies between the recorded account balances and returned confirmations from customers. Recommend an alternative approach to confirming sales revenue. Provide rationale for your recommendation.Using the case as a reference and from the e-Activity, discuss the improper recognition treatment you researched, and make a recommendation regarding the type of analytical procedure that should have detected the improper accounting transactions. Propose the internal control activities or audit plan that might have detected the improper transactions. Be specific with your recommendation.

GRADING RUBRIC FOR A CRIMNAL JUSTICE/Police Role—out of 100 pointstotalCATEGORY20 points15 points10 points3 pointsIntroduction/Thesis____exceptional introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic.thesis is exceptionally clear, well-developed, and a definitive statement.proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic.thesis is clear and arguable statement of position.basic introduction that states topic but lacks interest.thesis is somewhat clear and arguable.weak or no introduction of topic.paper’s purpose is unclear/thesis is weak or missing.Content knowledge: Quality of Research ____paper is exceptionally researched, contains 3 peer reviewed articles, the 3 articles relate to the thesis argument in a logical manner. References are correctly citedinformation relates to the main topic.Paper is well-researched in detail and from 3 good sources. References are correctly citedinformation relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Shows a limited variety of sources. References are not cited correctlyinformation has little or nothing to do with the thesis.information has weak or no connection to the thesis. References are not cited correctly.Content application: Support of Thesis and Analysis____exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis.excellent analysis. consistent connections made between evidence and thesisgood analysis.some connections made between evidence and thesis.some analysis.limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis.lack of analysis.Conclusion____excellent summary of thesis argument with concluding ideas that impact reader.introduces no new information.good summary of topic with clear concluding ideas.introduces no new information.basic summary of topic with some final concluding ideas.introduces no new information.lack of summary of topic.Writing____Writing is clear and relevant, with no grammatical and/or spelling errors – polished and professional. Reference section properly formatted.Most ideas are stated clearly and are related to the topic, with only minor grammatical and/or spelling errors. Reference section adequate.Many ideas require clarification and/or are off-topic or have marginal relevance to the assignment. Many grammatical and/or spellings errors throughout the paper. The paper is very challenging to read due to poor writing flow. Improper reference section.Paper does not meet the criteria for the assignment (too short or incomplete, too long, and/or completely off-topic). Reference section missing.Topic Ideas Community Policing vs, Traditional Policing Pro and ConsRequirements-4 to 6 pages paper typedAt least 3 references cited APA styleDue the last day of class. Must print and hand in.Make sure your work is original and if using a source, it is properly cited in your paper.