Microsoft engaged in anti-competitive conduct

Law
Tutor: None Selected Time limit: 1 Day

Microsoft engaged in anti-competitive conduct because it wanted to be as dominate in the Internet browser market as it was in the software and operating systems markets.  Do you think that Microsoft needed to engage in this conduct to beat Netscape and other browsers?  Would they have been successful if they hadn't engaged in anti-competitive conduct, based on the same skill and innovation that they employed in the operating system and software products?

Jun 17th, 2015

Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!

Microsoft wouldn't  have engaged in anti-competitive conduct to dominate internet browser market. They would have employed the principle of fair-play to allow Netscape and other browsers to compete favorably in the market.They were supposed to come up with better ways to find their space in the market.

Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.
Jun 17th, 2015

Did you know? You can earn $20 for every friend you invite to Studypool!
Click here to
Refer a Friend
...
Jun 17th, 2015
...
Jun 17th, 2015
May 25th, 2017
check_circle
Mark as Final Answer
check_circle
Unmark as Final Answer
check_circle
Final Answer

Secure Information

Content will be erased after question is completed.

check_circle
Final Answer