Chapter 18 of the text takes an aggressive adversarial role in accomplishing the human service agenda. Do you agree with the approach? Why or why not? If not, what approach do you suggest and why? Support your discussion with a minimum of one scholarly, peer-viewed source that was published within the last five years and cited according to APA guidelines.
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
The approach taken by an aggressive adversarial role in accomplishing human service agenda is not good. I really dont agree with how the accomplishment was undertaken. They didnt put into consideration the best ways to ensure respect for humanity.
Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.