Comparative Ethical Analysis

Anonymous
timer Asked: Dec 15th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $75

Question Description

Apply what you’ve learned in this course to an analysis that compares and contrasts a canon or code of ethics for a U.S. federal criminal justice agency and for an international law enforcement agency.

Include in your paper:

  • the name of the two agencies;
  • the mission statements of the two agencies;
  • your evaluation of how each agency might screen for ethical employees (i.e., background check, polygraph examinations, third-party contacts, psychological exams, etc.). Apply at least one ethical theory or approach covered in this course in your critical/evaluative response;
  • compare/contrast how the agencies might interact with each other or with similar criminal justice agencies; and
  • compare/contrast how the agencies might handle a) ethics governing police conduct (such as apprehension and control of suspects); b) solicitation of confessions, managing evidence, or related topics; and c) gifts, favors, gratuities, etc.

Submission Requirements:

  • Your well-written plan should be 10-12 pages in length, not including the required title or references pages. Headings and sub-headings may help you organize your work.
  • Include at least 10-12 academic or other legitimate sources to support your findings, not including your textbook. The CSU-Global Library can help you with finding quality resources.
  • Format your paper according to APA

Separate Assignment

I need the sources that are used to have an annotated bibliography on a separate assignment also in APA Format

BOOK for the course

Banks, C. (2017). Criminal justice ethics: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SagePublishing. ISBN- 13: 9781506326054

Tutor Answer

Professorjuliette
School: Boston College

Attached.

Running head: CODE OF ETHICS FOR LAW AGENCIES

Code of Ethics for US Department of Justice and International Police Program

Student’s Name
Institution Affiliation
Professor
Date

1

CODE OF ETHICS FOR LAW AGENCIES

2

Introduction
The paper explores the code of ethics for the US Department of Justice which is a federal
criminal justice agency and the International Police Program which is an international law
enforcement agency. It was after the end of the Civil war that the US Department of Justice
became active and focused on handling criminal prosecutions. The US Department of Justice
was created under the Judiciary Act of 1789 providing the office of the Attorney General. The
Attorney General was to prosecute and conduct most of the suits in the US Supreme Court
(Espanol, 2018). The International Police Program exposes law enforcement officers from the
US to those overseas. After the creation of the international police program, law enforcement
officers from Asia and Europe gets an opportunity to learn new police practices from the law
enforcement officers in the US. There is a code of ethics guiding both the international police
program and the US Department of Justice. For instance, officers from both agencies are
required to place loyalty to constitutional laws and maintain public trust (Stephens &
Downs, 2012). More so, employees from the agencies are required to avoid conflict while on the
line of duty. Therefore, the essay compares and contrasts the canon of ethics at the US
Department of Justice and the International Police Program.
Mission Statements of the US Department of Justice and the International Police Program
The mission statement of the US Department of Justice is to enforce the law and ensure
all the interests of public safety in the US are catered for. The agency also ensures all threats to
foreign and domestic security are prevented. Under the US Department of Justice, the Attorney
General of the United States ensures the impartial administration of justice applies to all

CODE OF ETHICS FOR LAW AGENCIES

3

Americans (Espanol, 2018). The US citizens guilty of unlawful behavior are punished as per the
guidelines of the US Department of Justice. The International Police Program’s mission
statement is to ensure Texas’ law enforcement officers professionally interact with the security
counterparts from Europe, Asia, and South America in resolving global policing issues (Rita,
2018). The agency also allows police officers under the agency to make visits to Korea, Italy,
China, and Germany to ensure they improve their hands-on experience in policing overseas.
Evaluation of how the US Department of Justice Might Screen for Ethical Employees
Background Check
The US Department of Justice should conduct a background check to evaluate ethical
employees. Background check verifies the academic accomplishments of the candidate and
indicates the prior work responsibilities of the officers seeking employment opportunities in the
US Department of Justice. Background check help in the implementation of internal controls
needed for agency's officials to act ethically. Information gained after conduction of background
check guide employers of the agency to make hiring decisions. Potential employees who comply
with the agency's working culture and who work to improve the agency's reputation are easily
identified after conduction of background check. The background check has guidelines which
when used might help employees of the US Department of Justice remain ethical as they work on
allocated duties. For instance, the background check requires employers to comply with the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, which screens for the criminal records of the employees (Mueller &
Frandsen, 2016). Thorough background check requires completion of a standardized personal
history forms. Also, questions are asked on past residences, previous employees, the education
level and the criminal convictions. Other ways of conducting a background check before hiring

CODE OF ETHICS FOR LAW AGENCIES

4

an officer to work with the US Department of Justice include addressing grounds that may deny
a potential employee from gaining a position.
A background check is purposed for securing the organization prior to employment,
certification or licensure which provides a hiring authority as a paramount resource which helps
in evaluating the applicants. These applicants are candidates for positions that require them to be
trusted by California’s most vulnerable dependent adults, elderly, citizenry and children. As such
it is important for the hiring authority to be aware of particular arrests and convictions. Hiring
applicants and entrusting them with these positions prior to a criminal background check
jeopardizes the safety and the workplace integrity as well. This can result in innocent individuals
being subjected to unnecessary harm. US Department of Justice may also face legal liability it
employs...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Excellent job

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors