Strategies for Decision Making - Week 2 Assignment Constructing Deductive and Inductive Arguments Arguments consist of premises and conclusions. Premises are structured so as to lend support to conclusions. The kind of support that a premise lends to a conclusion allows us to distinguish between deductive and inductive arguments. This week, you will be constructing both kinds of arguments. 1. In three premises each, construct one example of each following deductive argument form: Modus ponens Modus tollens Hypothetical syllogism Disjunctive syllogism Make sure your arguments are deductively valid and that your examples are your own. Here are two examples of the general format that your arguments should take: Modus ponens: 1. If it is raining, then it is pouring. 2. It is raining 3. Therefore, it is pouring. Modus tollens: 1. If Jack went to the grocery store, then he bought cookies. 2. Jack did not buy cookies. 3. Therefore, Jack did not go to the grocery store. 2. After you construct the preceding deductive argument forms, construct a three premise syllogism. For example: 1. All men are mortal. 2. Socrates is a man. 3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. 3. After you construct a three premise syllogism, construct one of each of the following inductive argument patterns: Induction by enumeration Reasoning by analogy Statistical induction Higher-level induction Your examples of inductive argument patterns should not be expressed in premise form. Rather, they should be informally expressed in writing. You should have one paragraph for each pattern. Be as detailed as possible. Finally, please remember to label your arguments. This makes it easier for them to be graded. Include your name, course section, and the date at the top of your assignment document. View your assignment rubric. Strategies for Decision Making - Week 2 Assignment Constructing Deductive and Inductive Arguments Arguments consist of premises and conclusions. Premises are structured so as to lend support to conclusions. The kind of support that a premise lends to a conclusion allows us to distinguish between deductive and inductive arguments. This week, you will be constructing both kinds of arguments. 1. In three premises each, construct one example of each following deductive argument form: Modus ponens Modus tollens Hypothetical syllogism Disjunctive syllogism Make sure your arguments are deductively valid and that your examples are your own. Here are two examples of the general format that your arguments should take: Modus ponens: 1. If it is raining, then it is pouring. 2. It is raining 3. Therefore, it is pouring. Modus tollens: 1. If Jack went to the grocery store, then he bought cookies. 2. Jack did not buy cookies. 3. Therefore, Jack did not go to the grocery store. 2. After you construct the preceding deductive argument forms, construct a three premise syllogism. For example: 1. All men are mortal. 2. Socrates is a man. 3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. 3. After you construct a three premise syllogism, construct one of each of the following inductive argument patterns: Induction by enumeration Reasoning by analogy Statistical induction Higher-level induction Your examples of inductive argument patterns should not be expressed in premise form. Rather, they should be informally expressed in writing. You should have one paragraph for each pattern. Be as detailed as possible. Finally, please remember to label your arguments. This makes it easier for them to be graded. Include your name, course section, and the date at the top of your assignment document. View your assignment rubric. Strategies for Decision Making - Week 3 Assignment Making Moral Arguments This week's lesson covered four different moral theories. In your assignment for this week, you will be working with a group to describe the four moral theories: Consider the following moral theories: Moral relativism Deontology Utilitarianism Natural law theory Each group will create a presentation of the four theories. You will be placed in groups by your instructor and provided a group discussion forum in which to discuss the project. With your group members, create a Google Slides document that allows for collaboration across the group. Each member of the group will be responsible for outlining and explaining one moral theory. Color code your individual contributions using slides with different colored backgrounds. Your slides should contain at least the following A description of the moral theory you have chosen. An explanation of the decision-making procedure that it describes. An application of the decision-making procedure to a specific moral issue of practical relevance (e.g. the morality of telling a lie). An evaluation of the merits or demerits of the moral theory. Does it offer a plausible account of right/wrong action? Are there any problems that it faces? What are these problems? You should be as detailed as possible when putting together your presentation. Your presentation should contain an introductory slide, which should contain the name of the group members and the details of their contributions. When turning in your presentations, each member of the group will submit the entire group's final presentation as a single document. View your assignment rubric. Strategies for Decision Making - Week 4 Assignment Evaluating Arguments Below is a series of five fallacious arguments. In one paragraph each, explain why each argument is fallacious and identify the fallacy being committed. In identifying the relevant fallacy, be sure to give an explanation of what that fallacy is. Be comprehensive in your explanations, and cite at least one source to support each explanation (in APA format). Argument 1 1. My algebra class is a nightmare. 2. Nightmares are bad dreams. 3. Therefore, my algebra class is a bad dream. Argument 2 We can trust the Andrew's testimony because Andrew himself said so, and Andrew is a trustworthy person. Argument 3 If we loosen the office dress code, soon everyone will start showing up naked! Therefore, we shouldn't loosen the office dress code. Argument 4 Nobody has disproven that there exists alien life. So, until proven otherwise, it's reasonable to conclude that alien life does exist. Argument 5 You shouldn't vote Republican because Republicans hate the poor, and you shouldn't vote Democrat because Democrats hate business owners. View your assignment rubric Strategies for Decision Making - Week 5 Assignment Misleading Statistics Statistics are powerful and convincing when used properly. This feature of statistical reasoning, however, also makes them liable to misuse. In this week's assignment, you will find a legitimate statistic and explain how it might be used to mislead an audience. Start by searching the internet for a reliable statistic. Make sure the statistic you find comes from an original or primary source – whether it be a peer-reviewed article, think-tank, or other organization. Do not use news articles that report the findings of a study, use the original study itself. Please remember to cite your source. After you locate your statistic, explain how it might be used to mislead an audience into embracing conclusions that the statistic does not support by playing the role of someone who is trying to lie with statistics. Design a fake advertisement or news story in which you will try to use the statistic in question to make a persuasive point. Your advertisement or story can consist of a written document, graphic, or video. o Whatever you decide to do, you should feature a depiction or description of the statistic and an explanation of how it might be used to support a misleading agenda. After creating your fake advertisement or news story, include a short one paragraph statement on why it is misleading and what can be done to avoid being misled by it. View your assignment rubric. . Strategies for Decision Making - Week 2 Assignment Constructing Deductive and Inductive Arguments Arguments consist of premises and conclusions. Premises are structured so as to lend support to conclusions. The kind of support that a premise lends to a conclusion allows us to distinguish between deductive and inductive arguments. This week, you will be constructing both kinds of arguments. 1. In three premises each, construct one example of each following deductive argument form: Modus ponens Modus tollens Hypothetical syllogism Disjunctive syllogism Make sure your arguments are deductively valid and that your examples are your own. Here are two examples of the general format that your arguments should take: Modus ponens: 1. If it is raining, then it is pouring. 2. It is raining 3. Therefore, it is pouring. Modus tollens: 1. If Jack went to the grocery store, then he bought cookies. 2. Jack did not buy cookies. 3. Therefore, Jack did not go to the grocery store. 2. After you construct the preceding deductive argument forms, construct a three premise syllogism. For example: 1. All men are mortal. 2. Socrates is a man. 3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. 3. After you construct a three premise syllogism, construct one of each of the following inductive argument patterns: Induction by enumeration Reasoning by analogy Statistical induction Higher-level induction Your examples of inductive argument patterns should not be expressed in premise form. Rather, they should be informally expressed in writing. You should have one paragraph for each pattern. Be as detailed as possible. Finally, please remember to label your arguments. This makes it easier for them to be graded. Include your name, course section, and the date at the top of your assignment document. View your assignment rubric. Strategies for Decision Making - Week 3 Assignment Making Moral Arguments This week's lesson covered four different moral theories. In your assignment for this week, you will be working with a group to describe the four moral theories: Consider the following moral theories: Moral relativism Deontology Utilitarianism Natural law theory Each group will create a presentation of the four theories. You will be placed in groups by your instructor and provided a group discussion forum in which to discuss the project. With your group members, create a Google Slides document that allows for collaboration across the group. Each member of the group will be responsible for outlining and explaining one moral theory. Color code your individual contributions using slides with different colored backgrounds. Your slides should contain at least the following A description of the moral theory you have chosen. An explanation of the decision-making procedure that it describes. An application of the decision-making procedure to a specific moral issue of practical relevance (e.g. the morality of telling a lie). An evaluation of the merits or demerits of the moral theory. Does it offer a plausible account of right/wrong action? Are there any problems that it faces? What are these problems? You should be as detailed as possible when putting together your presentation. Your presentation should contain an introductory slide, which should contain the name of the group members and the details of their contributions. When turning in your presentations, each member of the group will submit the entire group's final presentation as a single document. View your assignment rubric. Strategies for Decision Making - Week 2 Assignment Constructing Deductive and Inductive Arguments Arguments consist of premises and conclusions. Premises are structured so as to lend support to conclusions. The kind of support that a premise lends to a conclusion allows us to distinguish between deductive and inductive arguments. This week, you will be constructing both kinds of arguments. 1. In three premises each, construct one example of each following deductive argument form: Modus ponens Modus tollens Hypothetical syllogism Disjunctive syllogism Make sure your arguments are deductively valid and that your examples are your own. Here are two examples of the general format that your arguments should take: Modus ponens: 1. If it is raining, then it is pouring. 2. It is raining 3. Therefore, it is pouring. Modus tollens: 1. If Jack went to the grocery store, then he bought cookies. 2. Jack did not buy cookies. 3. Therefore, Jack did not go to the grocery store. 2. After you construct the preceding deductive argument forms, construct a three premise syllogism. For example: 1. All men are mortal. 2. Socrates is a man. 3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. 3. After you construct a three premise syllogism, construct one of each of the following inductive argument patterns: Induction by enumeration Reasoning by analogy Statistical induction Higher-level induction Your examples of inductive argument patterns should not be expressed in premise form. Rather, they should be informally expressed in writing. You should have one paragraph for each pattern. Be as detailed as possible. Finally, please remember to label your arguments. This makes it easier for them to be graded. Include your name, course section, and the date at the top of your assignment document. View your assignment rubric. Strategies for Decision Making - Week 4 Assignment Evaluating Arguments Below is a series of five fallacious arguments. In one paragraph each, explain why each argument is fallacious and identify the fallacy being committed. In identifying the relevant fallacy, be sure to give an explanation of what that fallacy is. Be comprehensive in your explanations, and cite at least one source to support each explanation (in APA format). Argument 1 1. My algebra class is a nightmare. 2. Nightmares are bad dreams. 3. Therefore, my algebra class is a bad dream. Argument 2 We can trust the Andrew's testimony because Andrew himself said so, and Andrew is a trustworthy person. Argument 3 If we loosen the office dress code, soon everyone will start showing up naked! Therefore, we shouldn't loosen the office dress code. Argument 4 Nobody has disproven that there exists alien life. So, until proven otherwise, it's reasonable to conclude that alien life does exist. Argument 5 You shouldn't vote Republican because Republicans hate the poor, and you shouldn't vote Democrat because Democrats hate business owners. View your assignment rubric Strategies for Decision Making - Week 5 Assignment Misleading Statistics Statistics are powerful and convincing when used properly. This feature of statistical reasoning, however, also makes them liable to misuse. In this week's assignment, you will find a legitimate statistic and explain how it might be used to mislead an audience. Start by searching the internet for a reliable statistic. Make sure the statistic you find comes from an original or primary source – whether it be a peer-reviewed article, think-tank, or other organization. Do not use news articles that report the findings of a study, use the original study itself. Please remember to cite your source. After you locate your statistic, explain how it might be used to mislead an audience into embracing conclusions that the statistic does not support by playing the role of someone who is trying to lie with statistics. Design a fake advertisement or news story in which you will try to use the statistic in question to make a persuasive point. Your advertisement or story can consist of a written document, graphic, or video. o Whatever you decide to do, you should feature a depiction or description of the statistic and an explanation of how it might be used to support a misleading agenda. After creating your fake advertisement or news story, include a short one paragraph statement on why it is misleading and what can be done to avoid being misled by it. View your assignment rubric. .
Purchase answer to see full attachment