Assignment: Annotated BibliographySubmit: Annotated BibliographyThis week, you will submit the annotated bibliography introduced in Week 3.An annotated bibliography is a document containing selected sources accompanied by a respective annotation. Each annotation consists of a summary, analysis, and application for the purpose of conveying the relevance and value of the selected source. As such, annotations demonstrate a writer’s critical thinking about and authority on the topic represented in the sources.In preparation for your own future research, an annotated bibliography provides a background for understanding a portion of the existing literature on a particular topic. It is also a useful precursor for gathering sources in preparation for writing a subsequent literature review.By Day 7Locate six articles on a research topic of your interest—two quantitative research articles, two qualitative research articles, and two mixed methods research articles—published in peer-reviewed journals.Prepare an annotated bibliography that includes the following: A one-paragraph introduction that provides context for why you selected the research articles you did.A reference list entry in APA Style for each of the six articles that follows proper formatting. Follow each reference list entry with a three-paragraph annotation that includes: A summaryAn analysisAn application as illustrated in this exampleA one-paragraph conclusion that presents a synthesis of the six articles.Format your annotated bibliography in Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced. A separate References list page is not needed for this assignment.Submit your Annotated Bibliography.Submission and Grading InformationTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Qualitative interviewing is more than a collection of techniques, technologies, questions and answers. Rubin and Rubin (2012) noted that it has the potential to change the interviewer into a more patient, tolerant, and engaged human being. “It makes you aware of what you haven’t seen before, and it enables you to pull meaningful information out of buzzing confusion” (p. 234). For this Discussion, you will reflect on your interview experience from last week. Perhaps you have noticed how well (or how poorly) you paid attention; or that something the interviewee said astonished you; or how quickly (or slowly) the time went by. To prepare for this Discussion: Review this week’s Learning Resources related to      qualitative interviewing. Consider the phone interview you conducted in Week 7. Listen to your recording       2–3 times. Review the notes you took during       and after the interview. Consider how this       experience is different or similar to a conventional conversation. A reflection and analysis on what you learned about interviewing. Include in your reflection and analysis: At least two things you would do differently and why Something new and surprising that you learned A reflection about the value of interviewing as a data      collection tool Be sure to support your main post and response post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA style. Learning Resources Required Readings Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 1, “An Introduction to Codes and Coding (pp. 1–42) (previously read in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Chapter 2, “Writing Analytic Memos About Narrative and Visual Data” (pp. 43–65) (previously read in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological (2nd ed.) Sage Publications. Chapter 5, “Methods of Data Collection” (pp. 124–163) (previously read in Week 7) Chapter 8, “An Integrative Approach to Data Analysis” (pp. 233–252) Chapter 9, “Methods and Processes of Data Analysis (pp. 254–294) Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 12, “Data Analysis in the Responsive Interviewing Model” (pp. 189–211) (previously read in Weeks 5, 6, and 7) Chapter 14, “Personal Reflections on Responsive Interviewing” Document: Excel Video Coding Document Template (Excel spreadsheet) Review this Excel template as you view this week’s media program related to coding. Also, you will use this template for reorganizing and reanalyzing data. Required Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Second cycle coding [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 6 minutes. In this media program, Dr. Susan Marcus, Core Research Faculty with the School of Psychology at Walden University, introduces second cycle coding. She discusses the purpose of reorganizing and reanalyzing data from first cycle coding. She will also demonstrate using this method.

Under the federal constitution everyone charged with a crime where their liberty is at stake (possibility of jail or prison) is entitled to a lawyer and a jury trial. Class C misdemeanors (for example: speeding, public intoxication, disorderly conduct) are not included in this because the judge can only assess a fine. In Texas, someone charged with a class C misdemeanor does not have a right to a court-appointed attorney, but Texas does allow for jury trials on class C misdemeanors. More than half of the other states do not allow someone to request a jury trial for these minor offenses - any trial would be heard only by a judge.The question this week: Should Texas get rid of jury trials for class C misdemeanors? Trials to the judge save time and money, but are citizens rights at stake? Is it worth your time as a citizen to sit as a juror on one of these cases just in case you might want to have a jury trial on a class C misdemeanor one day?1. Your answer needs to be no less than 300 words and no more than 400 words.2. Students then must post thoughtful replies to two other student's posts asking questions or adding more thoughts to their material (100 word minimums).Remember Inappropriate comments will cause students to lose credit for the assignment.REPLY BACK TO OTHER RESPONSES BELOW (100 word minimums).1)Jacqueline S Prior to this assignment, I wasn’t aware that Texas residents could request a jury trial for a class C misdemeanor case. I was under the impression that all misdemeanor cases were bench trials by default. While I recognize that a jury trial is more costly and time-consuming than a bench trial, I believe the increased potential cost of this option is a reasonable expense to ensure that all citizens feel as though their rights are protected. I could see the expense being an issue if a jury trial was the default option in class C cases, but as long as they continue to be an option that has to be requested, I think jury trials should remain available. One thing I find interesting is that Texas doesn’t guarantee a court-appointed attorney for those charged with a Class C Misdemeanor, even in cases where a jury trial is requested. I would think that requesting a jury trial when you aren’t able to afford representation could likely backfire on the charged citizen. I wonder if a citizen’s rights are better protected by being assigned a court-appointed attorney in all cases that involve a jury. I know that the common conception about jury duty is that it’s a waste of time, and most citizens dread getting a jury summons in the mail, but I have always wanted to serve on a jury. I think the action of serving on a jury is a worthwhile and critical aspect of maintaining our freedoms. If I ever needed a jury to make a decision about my future, I would hope the participants would be unbiased, engaged, and invested in finding out the truth of the situation. Overall, I’m of the belief that the system as it stands seems to be working, and that our time would be better spent finding other, more pressing issues to take on than changing how class C misdemeanor cases are handled.2) Deziree SI believe Texas should keep jury trials for class c misdemeanors. I would rather my fate be in the hands of multiple jurors rather than one judge, when it could be a simple case. All kinds of different people, with different views and backgrounds sit on the jury and may see the crime differently from one another. I had the pleasure to be selected last year and sit on the jury, it wasn’t for a misdemeanor case but family court. If you know your rights and the case is clean cut it won’t even go for more than a day or hours at that. I didn’t think it was a waste of time because it’s our duty as citizens to potentially get selected every four years and after you go and sit in the room, maybe answer some questions and more times than other not even get selected. After all that is said and done selected or not you don’t have to do it again for another four years. Misdemeanor cases would be a lot easier to decide on rather than a murder trial in my opinion. If we’re talking about a speeding ticket, the guns radar or red-light cameras are around to show actual proof of the crime. when it comes to public intoxication, most officers are wearing body cameras so it’ll show the events taking place, or on the other hand most people will pull out a cell phone to record making evidence is clear for the jury. I don’t believe citizen’s rights are at stake, if you did the crime you do the time (or pay the fine).