Description
The New River Gorge bridge in West Virginia is a 518-m-long steel arch. How much will its length change between temperature extremes
−17°C
and 31°C?
cm
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Dear your question is under-progress, it would be available to you as soon as it completes within next few minutes.
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
GC Physiology Physiological Worksheet
1. Using at least one physiological example, explain the concept of homeostasis. 2. Explain and provide examples of specif ...
GC Physiology Physiological Worksheet
1. Using at least one physiological example, explain the concept of homeostasis. 2. Explain and provide examples of specificity, competition, and saturation in proteins. 3. Explain the concepts of specificity, competition, and saturation as they relate to enzymes. 4. Explain the fluid-mosaic model of the cell membrane. 5. Compare osmolarity and tonicity. 6. Compare simple diffusion, facilitated diffusion and active transport. 7. Explain why cells need both channel and carrier proteins. 8. Explain the concepts of specificity, competition, and saturation as they relate to carrier-mediated transport. 9. Briefly outline the major components of the core concept of flow-down gradients.10. Briefly outline the major components of the core concept of cell-to-cell chemical communication.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *When answering short answer questions, look at the way the question is worded. * For core concept questions, make sure you begin your response with a paragraph summarizing your understanding of the general core concept. Then use that information to answer the specific question. *Compare means tell me how things are similar and how they are different. I am really asking you to “compare and contrast.” I think it is better to point out similarities, then systematically point out differences. * For describe, explain, and compare questions, *THINK about what you want to write, OUTLINE your answer, and then write your answer. * If a series of paragraphs are needed, the first paragraph should be an introduction to your answer.Each paragraph should begin with a topic sentence, several sentences which support or elaborate on the topic sentence, and a transition or concluding sentence. . This document has hints and comments for some of the Short Answer questions. I chose a core concept question, a couple "specificity, competition, and saturation" questions, an explain question, and a compare question. This should allow you to see the general types of things I am looking for. You can use this document to check your answers. If you are checking off the items in the question, you are off to a great start. Organize your answer, write well, and present it in such a way that your information is easy to find. Your answers also need to be precise and concise. Some students add so much information (some of it relevant and some of it not) that it looks like they are throwing everything against the wall and hoping something sticks. This tells me you haven't really thought about your response, and that is a no-no. Remember whenever you see "homeostasis," flow-down-gradients,” or “cell-to-cell signaling,” think about our core concept and the bulleted items. For the “competition, saturation, and specificity” questions, while it is not required, it would be a good idea to have a standard general paragraph or two explaining the concepts which you can use for all of them. You would just need to add information about the specifics (proteins in general for question 2, enzymes for question 3, and carrier-mediated transport for question 7) to have a wonderful answer to those four questions. Finally, remember this is physiology so think about the function or "how" something occurs.
Policy at A Health Care Organization Related to Cost Controls Paper
Assignment ContentAll health care organizations must be aware of cost controls, regardless of nonprofit or for-profit stat ...
Policy at A Health Care Organization Related to Cost Controls Paper
Assignment ContentAll health care organizations must be aware of cost controls, regardless of nonprofit or for-profit status. Managing costs at all levels of the organization affects the bottom line, which has a direct effect on all aspects of the organization. This assignment is designed to help you analyze why organizational policies are put in place.Find a policy at a health care organization related to cost controls.Summarize the details of the policy:When was the policy put in place?Was it adopted system-wide, in one department, or multiple departments?What does the policy address?What are potential ramifications of not following the policy at the organizational level? Unit level? Individual level?Explain how the policy impacts fiscal aspects of the organization:How does the policy act as a cost control?Describe how the policy impacts the quality of patient care:Does the policy improve efficiency?Are the goals to improve care and reduce cost?Explore the unintended consequences:What secondary affects does the policy have on the organization? Unit? Staff? Patient?Does the policy need revision?Suggest alternatives to the policy:In your opinion, is the policy the best way to address the issue? Support your position by explaining why or why not.Cite at least three peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years in an APA-formatted reference page.Format your assignment as one of the following:875-word paper
Galileo Galilei
Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno were questioned for similar reasons. Galileo's trial ended with an abjuration. Bruno wa ...
Galileo Galilei
Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno were questioned for similar reasons. Galileo's trial ended with an abjuration. Bruno was declared a heretic, excommunicated, and burned at the stake. At his trial, Giordano listened to the verdict on his knees, then stood up and said: "Perhaps you, my judges, pronounce this sentence against me with greater fear than I receive it."Look for information about Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno and post your comments considering scientists' social and ethical responsibility. Below you can read Galileo's abjuration.-----------------------------------------------------------"I, Galileo, son of the late Vincenzo Galilei, Florentine, aged seventy years, arraigned personally before this tribunal, and kneeling before you, Most Eminent and Reverend Lord Cardinals, Inquisitors-General against heretical depravity throughout the entire Christian commonwealth, having before my eyes and touching with my hands, the Holy Gospels, swear that I have always believed, do believe, and by God's help will in the future believe, all that is held, preached, and taught by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. But whereas -- after an injunction had been judicially intimated to me by this Holy Office, to the effect that I must altogether abandon the false opinion that the sun is the center of the world and immovable, and that the earth is not the center of the world, and moves, and that I must not hold, defend, or teach in any way whatsoever, verbally or in writing, the said false doctrine, and after it had been notified to me that the said doctrine was contrary to Holy Scripture -- I wrote and printed a book in which I discuss this new doctrine already condemned, and adduce arguments of great cogency in its favor, without presenting any solution of these, and for this reason I have been pronounced by the Holy Office to be vehemently suspected of heresy, that is to say, of having held and believed that the Sun is the center of the world and immovable, and that the earth is not the center and moves:
Therefore, desiring to remove from the minds of your Eminences, and of all faithful Christians, this vehement suspicion, justly conceived against me, with sincere heart and unfeigned faith I abjure, curse, and detest the aforesaid errors and heresies, and generally every other error, heresy, and sect whatsoever contrary to the said Holy Church, and I swear that in the future I will never again say or assert, verbally or in writing, anything that might furnish occasion for a similar suspicion regarding me; but that should I know any heretic, or person suspected of heresy, I will denounce him to this Holy Office, or to the Inquisitor or Ordinary of the place where I may be. Further, I swear and promise to fulfill and observe in their integrity all penances that have been, or that shall be, imposed upon me by this Holy Office. And, in the event of my contravening, (which God forbid) any of these my promises and oaths, I submit myself to all the pains and penalties imposed and promulgated in the sacred canons and other constitutions, general and particular, against such delinquents. So help me God, and these His Holy Gospels, which I touch with my hands.I, the said Galileo Galilei, have abjured, sworn, promised, and bound myself as above; and in witness of the truth thereof I have with my own hand subscribed the present document of my abjuration, and recited it word for word at Rome, in the Convent of Minerva, this twenty-second day of June, 1633.I, Galileo Galilei, have abjured as above with my own hand."
University of Florida Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
1. Write a Quality Assurance guide for the analysis of one of the following samples; both samples are suspected of having ...
University of Florida Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
1. Write a Quality Assurance guide for the analysis of one of the following samples; both samples are suspected of having a drug, but have not undergone any testing as of yet:• A bag containing 100 grams of white powder suspected to contain a controlled substance (drug)OR100ml of human urine suspected to contain a controlled substance (drug)Please remember to address the following topics: scope, Terminology, Testing Facility, Personnel, QA Manual Documentation, Evidence Control, Chemical Reagents, Presumptive testing and confirmatory analytical Procedures, Validation, Equipment Maintenance and Calibration, Proficiency Testing, Audits, Deficiency of Analysis/Corrective Actions, and Health and Safety.Depending upon the analysis being performed, some items may not be applicable whereas other components may need to be added. Also, remember that you can reference a number of standard procedures (SOPs) by referring to established SOPs – you do not need to provide the specifics of the analysis but rather just an overview of the best practice to analyze the sample – which includes optimization of available resources such as analytical instruments and personnel. (20 points)The following FBI quality assurance guidelines summarize the essential goals and are helpful as a reference for this module as well as for the assignment:http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/jan2005/standards/2005standards15.htm (Links to an external site.)2. This following project involves the testing and comparison of quantitative results produced by two labs using two different analytical methods. A final report will need to be created following the completion of this project. Project Scenario: Two individual laboratories (Lab A and Lab B) were contracted to analyze 25 blood samples to determine the concentration of cocaine (and/or any metabolites) in each sample. Both labs used instrumentation that provided quantitative results, but each lab used a different method. Lab A utilized liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LCMS) and Lab B utilized gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS). For this project, each laboratory was tasked with analyzing the blood samples of 25 known cocaine users. As this project involved the comparison of Lab A with Lab B’s final results, each lab needed to analyze the same 25 samples. As these labs were located in different cities, two tubes of blood were drawn from each of the 25 subjects. One blood tube was sent to Lab A and the second was sent to Lab B so that each lab would have the same 25 samples to compare. Now that the testing has been completed, a final report needs to be created to address whether or not the results from the two laboratories are equivalent.For this assignment, you will need to write a brief outline for this project’s final report. This report should follow a clear structure and include all of the required components as described in the module’s reading. Be sure that the report you submit includes information on the two labs, the two different methods used, and 25 fictitious concentration results per lab. Additionally, be certain to include and explain all of the components that would be required for this final report as discussed in the reading. The concentration data must be included and a statistical analysis of that data must be included as a part of this report. Please consider the following when completing this assignment:* What does your fictional cocaine concentration data look like? You need to come up with your own fictional data for this assignment (the values for the concentrations should be in units of ng/mL). You must include the 25 concentration results for each lab as a part of the data as well as the results of the calculated statistics. You can simply present this concentration data in an Excel table or chart format* The statistical comparison needs to be calculated using either a student t-test or Wilcoxon. You must perform the statistical analysis on your fictional data and compare Lab A to Lab B. You must also provide a conclusion as to whether or not the two methods were comparable.Useful links:Cocaine analysis in various body fluids: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14750172_Cocaine_and_benzoylecgonine_in_saliva_serum_and_urine (Links to an external site.)Research report guidelines: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/research_report_guide.html (Links to an external site.) You may also have to refresh some knowledge of statistical testing since you will be comparing two groups. Here is some reading material:“An Introduction to Statistics”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Crosby M, J Accid Emerg Med, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725369/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Parametric comparison of two groups-1”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725552/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Parametric comparison of two groups-2”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725593/ (Links to an external site.) “An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Non-Parametric comparison of two groups-1”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725625/
Similar Content
Frankfurt University Chemical Reactions Kinetics Lab Questions
i have a lab which i need help forenough background in chemistry is needed.................. ...
GC Experiment Density Lab Report
Mass, Volume, and
Density
Background
Density
Chemistry 120 Grossmont College
mass
volume
D
m
V
Chemistry 120 Gross...
Florida University Geology Worksheet
PART 1 GEOLOGY
LAB REPORT 3 Plate Tectonics
1. The distribution of earthquakes defines the boundaries of which major Earth...
CHEM 232 San Diego State University Chemistry Question
Here is a review of the material. If you are familiar with these topics, we will be all good to go! ...
Cardiovascular System: Blood Vessels, and Circulation Discussion Forum, biology homework
1. Do you think that getting treatment for a stroke within the Golden Hour makes a difference in recovery? Why or why not?...
Need help to explain folding in my geology assignment
explain folding...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Tipping Point
by Malcolm Gladwell
Good Kids Bad City
by Kyle Swenson
Crime and Punishment
by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
You Are a Badass
by Jen Sincero
The Lost Man
by Jane Harper
Crippled America
by Donald J Trump
Hiroshima
by John Hersey
The Underground Railroad
by Colson Whitehead
The 48 Laws of Power
by Robert Greene
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
GC Physiology Physiological Worksheet
1. Using at least one physiological example, explain the concept of homeostasis. 2. Explain and provide examples of specif ...
GC Physiology Physiological Worksheet
1. Using at least one physiological example, explain the concept of homeostasis. 2. Explain and provide examples of specificity, competition, and saturation in proteins. 3. Explain the concepts of specificity, competition, and saturation as they relate to enzymes. 4. Explain the fluid-mosaic model of the cell membrane. 5. Compare osmolarity and tonicity. 6. Compare simple diffusion, facilitated diffusion and active transport. 7. Explain why cells need both channel and carrier proteins. 8. Explain the concepts of specificity, competition, and saturation as they relate to carrier-mediated transport. 9. Briefly outline the major components of the core concept of flow-down gradients.10. Briefly outline the major components of the core concept of cell-to-cell chemical communication.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. *When answering short answer questions, look at the way the question is worded. * For core concept questions, make sure you begin your response with a paragraph summarizing your understanding of the general core concept. Then use that information to answer the specific question. *Compare means tell me how things are similar and how they are different. I am really asking you to “compare and contrast.” I think it is better to point out similarities, then systematically point out differences. * For describe, explain, and compare questions, *THINK about what you want to write, OUTLINE your answer, and then write your answer. * If a series of paragraphs are needed, the first paragraph should be an introduction to your answer.Each paragraph should begin with a topic sentence, several sentences which support or elaborate on the topic sentence, and a transition or concluding sentence. . This document has hints and comments for some of the Short Answer questions. I chose a core concept question, a couple "specificity, competition, and saturation" questions, an explain question, and a compare question. This should allow you to see the general types of things I am looking for. You can use this document to check your answers. If you are checking off the items in the question, you are off to a great start. Organize your answer, write well, and present it in such a way that your information is easy to find. Your answers also need to be precise and concise. Some students add so much information (some of it relevant and some of it not) that it looks like they are throwing everything against the wall and hoping something sticks. This tells me you haven't really thought about your response, and that is a no-no. Remember whenever you see "homeostasis," flow-down-gradients,” or “cell-to-cell signaling,” think about our core concept and the bulleted items. For the “competition, saturation, and specificity” questions, while it is not required, it would be a good idea to have a standard general paragraph or two explaining the concepts which you can use for all of them. You would just need to add information about the specifics (proteins in general for question 2, enzymes for question 3, and carrier-mediated transport for question 7) to have a wonderful answer to those four questions. Finally, remember this is physiology so think about the function or "how" something occurs.
Policy at A Health Care Organization Related to Cost Controls Paper
Assignment ContentAll health care organizations must be aware of cost controls, regardless of nonprofit or for-profit stat ...
Policy at A Health Care Organization Related to Cost Controls Paper
Assignment ContentAll health care organizations must be aware of cost controls, regardless of nonprofit or for-profit status. Managing costs at all levels of the organization affects the bottom line, which has a direct effect on all aspects of the organization. This assignment is designed to help you analyze why organizational policies are put in place.Find a policy at a health care organization related to cost controls.Summarize the details of the policy:When was the policy put in place?Was it adopted system-wide, in one department, or multiple departments?What does the policy address?What are potential ramifications of not following the policy at the organizational level? Unit level? Individual level?Explain how the policy impacts fiscal aspects of the organization:How does the policy act as a cost control?Describe how the policy impacts the quality of patient care:Does the policy improve efficiency?Are the goals to improve care and reduce cost?Explore the unintended consequences:What secondary affects does the policy have on the organization? Unit? Staff? Patient?Does the policy need revision?Suggest alternatives to the policy:In your opinion, is the policy the best way to address the issue? Support your position by explaining why or why not.Cite at least three peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years in an APA-formatted reference page.Format your assignment as one of the following:875-word paper
Galileo Galilei
Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno were questioned for similar reasons. Galileo's trial ended with an abjuration. Bruno wa ...
Galileo Galilei
Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno were questioned for similar reasons. Galileo's trial ended with an abjuration. Bruno was declared a heretic, excommunicated, and burned at the stake. At his trial, Giordano listened to the verdict on his knees, then stood up and said: "Perhaps you, my judges, pronounce this sentence against me with greater fear than I receive it."Look for information about Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno and post your comments considering scientists' social and ethical responsibility. Below you can read Galileo's abjuration.-----------------------------------------------------------"I, Galileo, son of the late Vincenzo Galilei, Florentine, aged seventy years, arraigned personally before this tribunal, and kneeling before you, Most Eminent and Reverend Lord Cardinals, Inquisitors-General against heretical depravity throughout the entire Christian commonwealth, having before my eyes and touching with my hands, the Holy Gospels, swear that I have always believed, do believe, and by God's help will in the future believe, all that is held, preached, and taught by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. But whereas -- after an injunction had been judicially intimated to me by this Holy Office, to the effect that I must altogether abandon the false opinion that the sun is the center of the world and immovable, and that the earth is not the center of the world, and moves, and that I must not hold, defend, or teach in any way whatsoever, verbally or in writing, the said false doctrine, and after it had been notified to me that the said doctrine was contrary to Holy Scripture -- I wrote and printed a book in which I discuss this new doctrine already condemned, and adduce arguments of great cogency in its favor, without presenting any solution of these, and for this reason I have been pronounced by the Holy Office to be vehemently suspected of heresy, that is to say, of having held and believed that the Sun is the center of the world and immovable, and that the earth is not the center and moves:
Therefore, desiring to remove from the minds of your Eminences, and of all faithful Christians, this vehement suspicion, justly conceived against me, with sincere heart and unfeigned faith I abjure, curse, and detest the aforesaid errors and heresies, and generally every other error, heresy, and sect whatsoever contrary to the said Holy Church, and I swear that in the future I will never again say or assert, verbally or in writing, anything that might furnish occasion for a similar suspicion regarding me; but that should I know any heretic, or person suspected of heresy, I will denounce him to this Holy Office, or to the Inquisitor or Ordinary of the place where I may be. Further, I swear and promise to fulfill and observe in their integrity all penances that have been, or that shall be, imposed upon me by this Holy Office. And, in the event of my contravening, (which God forbid) any of these my promises and oaths, I submit myself to all the pains and penalties imposed and promulgated in the sacred canons and other constitutions, general and particular, against such delinquents. So help me God, and these His Holy Gospels, which I touch with my hands.I, the said Galileo Galilei, have abjured, sworn, promised, and bound myself as above; and in witness of the truth thereof I have with my own hand subscribed the present document of my abjuration, and recited it word for word at Rome, in the Convent of Minerva, this twenty-second day of June, 1633.I, Galileo Galilei, have abjured as above with my own hand."
University of Florida Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
1. Write a Quality Assurance guide for the analysis of one of the following samples; both samples are suspected of having ...
University of Florida Drug Controlled Substance Hypothesis Statistical Lab Report
1. Write a Quality Assurance guide for the analysis of one of the following samples; both samples are suspected of having a drug, but have not undergone any testing as of yet:• A bag containing 100 grams of white powder suspected to contain a controlled substance (drug)OR100ml of human urine suspected to contain a controlled substance (drug)Please remember to address the following topics: scope, Terminology, Testing Facility, Personnel, QA Manual Documentation, Evidence Control, Chemical Reagents, Presumptive testing and confirmatory analytical Procedures, Validation, Equipment Maintenance and Calibration, Proficiency Testing, Audits, Deficiency of Analysis/Corrective Actions, and Health and Safety.Depending upon the analysis being performed, some items may not be applicable whereas other components may need to be added. Also, remember that you can reference a number of standard procedures (SOPs) by referring to established SOPs – you do not need to provide the specifics of the analysis but rather just an overview of the best practice to analyze the sample – which includes optimization of available resources such as analytical instruments and personnel. (20 points)The following FBI quality assurance guidelines summarize the essential goals and are helpful as a reference for this module as well as for the assignment:http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/jan2005/standards/2005standards15.htm (Links to an external site.)2. This following project involves the testing and comparison of quantitative results produced by two labs using two different analytical methods. A final report will need to be created following the completion of this project. Project Scenario: Two individual laboratories (Lab A and Lab B) were contracted to analyze 25 blood samples to determine the concentration of cocaine (and/or any metabolites) in each sample. Both labs used instrumentation that provided quantitative results, but each lab used a different method. Lab A utilized liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LCMS) and Lab B utilized gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS). For this project, each laboratory was tasked with analyzing the blood samples of 25 known cocaine users. As this project involved the comparison of Lab A with Lab B’s final results, each lab needed to analyze the same 25 samples. As these labs were located in different cities, two tubes of blood were drawn from each of the 25 subjects. One blood tube was sent to Lab A and the second was sent to Lab B so that each lab would have the same 25 samples to compare. Now that the testing has been completed, a final report needs to be created to address whether or not the results from the two laboratories are equivalent.For this assignment, you will need to write a brief outline for this project’s final report. This report should follow a clear structure and include all of the required components as described in the module’s reading. Be sure that the report you submit includes information on the two labs, the two different methods used, and 25 fictitious concentration results per lab. Additionally, be certain to include and explain all of the components that would be required for this final report as discussed in the reading. The concentration data must be included and a statistical analysis of that data must be included as a part of this report. Please consider the following when completing this assignment:* What does your fictional cocaine concentration data look like? You need to come up with your own fictional data for this assignment (the values for the concentrations should be in units of ng/mL). You must include the 25 concentration results for each lab as a part of the data as well as the results of the calculated statistics. You can simply present this concentration data in an Excel table or chart format* The statistical comparison needs to be calculated using either a student t-test or Wilcoxon. You must perform the statistical analysis on your fictional data and compare Lab A to Lab B. You must also provide a conclusion as to whether or not the two methods were comparable.Useful links:Cocaine analysis in various body fluids: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14750172_Cocaine_and_benzoylecgonine_in_saliva_serum_and_urine (Links to an external site.)Research report guidelines: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/services/research_report_guide.html (Links to an external site.) You may also have to refresh some knowledge of statistical testing since you will be comparing two groups. Here is some reading material:“An Introduction to Statistics”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Crosby M, J Accid Emerg Med, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725369/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Parametric comparison of two groups-1”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725552/ (Links to an external site.)“An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Parametric comparison of two groups-2”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725593/ (Links to an external site.) “An Introduction to hypothesis testing. Non-Parametric comparison of two groups-1”, Driscoll P, Lecky F, Emerg Med J, 2001, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1725625/
Earn money selling
your Study Documents