PSy699 week 3 discussion 2 Virtual Conference: Call for Posters

Anonymous

Question Description

You have 17 days to do this paper I do not expect you to work on the holidays, but this paper is only two pages long. I am looking for something on the 26 of this month

Unformatted Attachment Preview

This is a graded discussion: 5 points possible due Jan 3, 2019 Week 3 - Discussion 2 No unread replies. 1 1 reply. Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated. Virtual Conference: Call for Posters Effective clinical innovations and the dissemination of research findings are key elements in the growth and development of the psychology profession. There are numerous avenues that enable authors to publish and present their work. Poster presentations at conferences are effective methods for communicating research findings and providing opportunities to meet with other researchers and clinicians to discuss the research being presented. Thus, these types of conference presentations play a key role in the proliferation of research. In this week’s discussion, you will be submitting your proposal for the Week Five Virtual Conference. You may utilize relevant assignments from previous courses in this program or suitable projects from your professional life. See the PSY699 Call for Student Poster (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Presentations document for specific parameters and instructions on how to create your proposal. Following the guidelines presented in the document, create your proposal and attach it to your initial post in the discussion forum. Evaluate the impact participating in conference presentations may have on potential work settings and/or doctoral programs and comment on the following questions in your initial post. • How are conference presentations professionally relevant? • What elements of the proposal process were most difficult for you, and why? • What positive outcomes do you anticipate will come from this process, which may be applied to potential work settings and/or doctoral programs? Guided Response: Review several of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion. In what ways did your colleague’s abstract meet the guidelines presented in the “Call for Student Poster Presentations”? If you were on the proposal review board, would you vote to include this poster presentation in the conference? Explain your rationale for inclusion or exclusion of your colleague’s work and provide suggestions for improvement where applicable. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

Kishnewt2017
School: Purdue University

Attached.

Running head: WEEK 3 DISCUSSION

1

Week 3 Discussion
Name
Institutional Affiliation

WEEK 3 DISCUSSION

2
Week 3 Discussion
Question 1

Conference presentations are professionally relevant because they assist in developing
scientific abilities in early career scientists, facilitates early distribution of information which
might pose a direct or indirect effect on clinical practice decisions, and helps in manuscript
preparations through organizing one’s thoughts, interpretations, as well as future research
directions (Deonandan et al., 2013). At the personal level, such presentations are important since
they assist in developing one’s national reputation, career networks, collaborations, as well as
career opportunities.
In addition, such conferences also provide the opportunities for people to present work to
a wider audience. In particular, poster prese...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Tutor went the extra mile to help me with this essay. Citations were a bit shaky but I appreciated how well he handled APA styles and how ok he was to change them even though I didnt specify. Got a B+ which is believable and acceptable.

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors