Mentoring, Coaching, Consulting and Counseling

Anonymous
timer Asked: Dec 27th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $10

Question description

Compare and contrast mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling in 1,000-1,250 words, do the following:

  1. Construct an example or case study (scenario about an individual with pertinent background information and issues being experience) to illustrate when each, mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling, would be used the most effectively.
  2. Define executive coaching in your own words. Use literature to support your definition.

Use three to five scholarly resources to support your findings.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Mentoring, Coaching, Consulting and Counseling - Rubric No of Criteria: 7 Achievement Levels: 5 Criteria Achievement Levels Description Percentage Unsatisfactory 0.00 % Less than Satisfactory 74.00 % Satisfactory 79.00 % Good 87.00 % Excellent 100.00 % Content 70.0 Construct an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling, would be used the most effectively. 35.0 Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is missing. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is vague or inconsistent. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is present and clear. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is clear and makes some connection to research. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is clear, concise and makes connections to current research. Define executive coaching in your own words. 35.0 Definition of executive coaching, in student's own words, is missing. Definition of executive coaching, in student's own words, is vague or inconsistent. Definition of executive coaching, in student's own words, is present and clear. Definition of executive coaching, in student's own words, is clear and makes some connection to research. Definition of executive coaching, in student's own words, is clear, concise and makes connections to current research. Organization and Effectiveness 20.0 Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0 Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction 8.0 Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0 Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Format 10.0 Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0 Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0 Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Percentage 100

Tutor Answer

stephanna
School: New York University

Attached.

Introduction:
Mentoring, coaching, counseling and consulting have been the back bone of many businesses. People in
leadership positions normally seek help from this people. The meaning of this different groups of people
afore mentioned has been used interchangeably and has brought a lot of confusion. This paper,
therefore, looks into this issue.
Purpose: The aim of this research is to compare and contrast mentoring, coaching, counseling and
consulting with supported evidence. It also focuses on executive coaching, what it is and how it can be
successfully implemented.
CASE STUDY OR EXAMPLE:
A high performing partner x was recently promoted to the level of assistant manager in a very
prestigious bank. She had no previous knowledge whatsoever of the roles of an assistant manager. In
her previous position she didn’t have time to worry about “management and admin”. She was very
confused as to whom to seek help from. She had her mentor. Her formal boss who previously held the
position. She knew a consultant. He studied banking and finance. She knew a life coach who she could
ask to help her with her difficulties. She knew a coach to whom she could meet to direct her on how to
handle the stress and pressure that came with the job. She organized a meeting with each of these
people. She performed very wonderfully and was asked how she did it.
Concepts:
Scholarly researches:
“coaching- according to the international coach federation coaching is defined as “ partnering with
clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and
professional potential the coach is the subject matter expert at coaching not necessarily the subject
matter expert of the client’s coaching topic. Example: according to the case study above high performing
individual x meets the coach, who directs her on how she can maximize her own productivity and skill.

Counseling: according to the coactive coaching, the boundary between coaching and counseling is not
defined by a set of absolute rules or terms. In general, counselors are trained to diagnose and help client
with emotional problems, the past or dysfunction while coaches are not. The coach’s domain is future
oriented- what does the client want? And then coaching client to get there. Example: the counselor
helps her to manage stress and pressure that are to come at work.

Mentoring- a mentor is a wise and trusted guide and advisor. The mentor is the teacher that shares their
experience while bringing the “mentee” up in the ranks. A coach is not necessarily the subject matter

expert in order to help develop from client. Example: the mentor show her how things are done in the
new level and the manner in which they are done.
Consulting- a consultant is an expert who is called on for professional ...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
10/10 would recommend. Responsive and helpful.

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors