Analysis of the Chilean Mine Rescue

User Generated

wfvzba7785

Writing

Description

Review the assigned article, "Leadership Lessons From the Chilean Mine Rescue."

Write a 500-750 word paper that analyzes the Chilean mine rescue. As a leader, you will be faced with responding immediately to solve issues. The Chilean mine rescue is an example of leadership under extreme circumstances. Reflect on this example to shape how you might apply the goal-path theory and the situational approach in an everyday, real-world situation.

Address the following questions and concepts:

  1. How did the leaders demonstrate flexibility and adaptability? Please provide examples.
  2. How did the leaders apply aspects of the path-goal theory to this situation? Provide examples.
  3. Did the leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved? How could communication have been improved?
  4. How well did the leaders follow the situational approach to leadership? Provide examples.
  5. How does this example shape how you might apply the goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real-world situation, in your content?

Include three to five references to support your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://searc...

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code LDR-600 Class Code LDR-600-O101 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Explanation of How the Case Study Demonstrates Flexibility and Adaptability 15.0% Explanation of How the Leaders in the Case Study Apply Aspects of the Path-Goal Theory 15.0% Explanation of How Leaders Communicate Effectively With All of the Stakeholders Involved and How Communication Could Be Improved 15.0% Explanation of How Well the Leaders Followed the Situational Approach to Leadership 15.0% Explanation of How the Case Study Shapes How To Apply Goal-Path Theory and The Situational Approach In A Real World Situation 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Analysis of the Chilean Mine Rescue Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Paper does not include an explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper does not include an explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Paper does not include an explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Paper does not include an explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Does not include explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. 29.0 Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the pathgoal theory. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient an explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) Paper provides an elemental explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Some subject knowledge is evident. Paper provides an elemental explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Some subject knowledge is evident. Paper provides an elemental explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Some subject knowledge is evident. Provides an elemental explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Some subject knowledge is evident. Provides an elemental explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Some subject knowledge is evident. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Paper provides an explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Paper provides an explanation of explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Paper provides an explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Provides an explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Provides an explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent. Thesis is clear and forecast the development of the paper. Thesis statement is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Comments Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the pathgoal theory. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper includes Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: CHILEAN MINE RESCUE LEADERSHIP LESSONS

Chilean Mine Rescue Leadership Lessons
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

1

CHILEAN MINE RESCUE LEADERSHIP LESSONS

2

Leadership Lessons from the Chilean Mine Rescue
Some years back (around eight), there was a collapse at the San Jose mine in Chile which
found 33 men underneath huge 700,000 metric tons of rock, where experts estimated that the
probability of the men coming out alive was 1%. However, after being underneath the rocks for
69 days, the men were hoisted up alive, safe and secure. The safeguard's group initiative is one
basic truth which assumed a part in their survival which was noteworthy. The various challenges
and difficulties confronted by the San Jose protect group's administration are similar to that of
directors and senior officials in the aggressive and turbulent world today where they are required
to set a few minutes aside, which to an unverifiable degree represent the moment choices for
deciding (Scandura et al., 2013) .
In the achievement of this mission to save the 33 men, flexibility and adaptability were
basic. The leader of the save group, Andre Sougarret, demonstrated the two attributes
monstrously. He demonstrated adaptability by generally giving an ear to all ideas given to him,
particularly from less experi...


Anonymous
Really useful study material!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags