Description
Unit VIII Assignment
Unit VIII Assignment Open
- Weight: 13% of course grade
- Grading Rubric
Instructions
Compensation Purpose and Strategy Document The purpose of this assignment is to choose a compensation philosophy that is appropriate for your chosen firm and articulate a rationale for this selection. There are two aspects to this assignment. First, describe the risks and benefits with leading, meeting, and lagging the market in overall compensation and benefits. Next, choose the appropriate strategy (lead, meet, or lag) for your firm, and provide rationale about why this is appropriate. There is a minimum requirement of 500 words for the compensation purpose and strategy document. Consider some of the following factors in your assignment:- Payroll expenses are usually the highest expense at most firms. If you lead the market, this expense can be taxing.
- If you are pursuing top talent in human capital rich industries (e.g., software engineering), lagging the market may keep you from competing for market share against your competitors.
- If you meet the market, paying average will generally not attract top talent, and in addition, you will not have the labor-cost savings of a lag-the-market strategy.
- Please ensure the following textbook is used: Stewart, G. L., & Brown, K. G. (2015). Human resource management: Linking strategy to practice (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
RC MOD 8 Dynamic Process of Clinical Reasoning Discussion
Describe a clinical situation where you applied an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning to select what you consid ...
RC MOD 8 Dynamic Process of Clinical Reasoning Discussion
Describe a clinical situation where you applied an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning to select what you considered the "best" client intervention based on information available.
Include the context of the situation
Include relevant external and internal cues supporting at least three priority hypotheses with a brief explanation of how you arrived at the "best" client intervention based on the situation
Discuss the outcomes based, iterative cycle of clinical reasoning you applied after the initial intervention to select the next "best" interventions appropriate for the particular situation based on client needs.
Include at least one goal and strategy for evaluation for the "best" intervention
Rationales and evidence-based findings were included to support choices for the next "best" interventions.
Cultural Competence- Assignment:
Read instruction carefully. PowerPoint presentation on the topic, a sign-in sheet, and a quiz to assess employee understan ...
Cultural Competence- Assignment:
Read instruction carefully. PowerPoint presentation on the topic, a sign-in sheet, and a quiz to assess employee understanding of the topic. Your presentation must address the following areas: What is diversity? The eight dimensions of diversity; Importance of cultural competence awareness; Impact of cultural competence in healthcare cost and quality; Diversity awareness; Regulations affecting cultural diversity.
4 pages
Middle Range Theory Or Grand Theory Applied To Research
Theories of the middle-range are concrete and narrow. They comprise of a limited scope of propositions and concepts writte ...
Middle Range Theory Or Grand Theory Applied To Research
Theories of the middle-range are concrete and narrow. They comprise of a limited scope of propositions and concepts written at a specific and concrete ...
17 pages
The American Red Cross
The American Red Cross is a humanitarian organization that deals with taking care of the disasters that affect people in t ...
The American Red Cross
The American Red Cross is a humanitarian organization that deals with taking care of the disasters that affect people in the American society. The ...
Patient Experience Data Self-Assessment
As a current or future health care executive leader, you are responsible for the patient's experience in your health care ...
Patient Experience Data Self-Assessment
As a current or future health care executive leader, you are responsible for the patient's experience in your health care organization. Whether you are overseeing a health system, hospital, clinic, or other health care organization, the patient's experience will be one of your top three priorities (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2016). Understanding the data involved in measuring the patient experience is an important part of what you will be undertaking.Interpreting patient experience data can quickly become overwhelming and confusing to anyone trying to use the data for improvement. The Patient Experience Data Self-Assessment challenges knowledge and common assumptions about what the data actually means. It can be used to expand your current knowledge on effectively using patient experience data.For this Assignment, in word 1 or 2 pages reflect on your most recent experience as a patient receiving health care services in a health care organization. Review the IHI patient experience data in the resources for this week. Consider how you might complete this self-assessment of the patient experience. https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U... attach assessment. Be sure to avoid writing in first person in scholarly writing.Resources:Dempsey, C. (2016). The evolution of the patient experience. In The Society for Healthcare Strategy and Market Development of the American Hospital Association (Ed.), Futurescan healthcare trends and implications: 2016–2021 (pp. 6–10). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.Groene, O., Arah, O. A., Klazinga, N. S., Wagner, C., Bartels, P. D., Kristensen, S., … Sunol, R. (2015). Patient experience shows little relationship with hospital quality management strategies. PLoS One, 10(7), 1–15.Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U...
HC310 Herzing Week 3 Assignment 1 Patient Communication Presentation
Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationRe-submit AssignmentDue Mar 24 by 11:59pm Points 50Submitting a text entry box, ...
HC310 Herzing Week 3 Assignment 1 Patient Communication Presentation
Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationRe-submit AssignmentDue Mar 24 by 11:59pm Points 50Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructions:The way health care providers communicate with patients is continually evolving. In today's society, patients demand timely information that is easily accessible. As a manager, you may play a role in the decision to modify how you and your staff communicate with your patient population.Assume the role of practice manager for a large, multi-specialty group practice. It has been proposed that you begin using email for patient communication. Develop a presentation using Prezi or PowerPoint, addressing the following:Audience: Physicians and office managersAdvantages and disadvantages of using e-mail communication for patient careProtection of privacy and confidentiality of patient informationConduct additional research to determine the preference of both health care providers, and patients, regarding e-mail or other forms of electronic communication. What does the research say?A minimum of three scholarly sources should be included in APA format.Submit Patient Communication Presentation - either PowerPoint (.ppt) or Prezi.If you use Prezi, a presentation link should be uploaded within a Word document, with your name, date, and course ID.Estimated time to complete: 3 hoursRubricHC310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationHC310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge10.0 ptsLevel 5Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.9.0 ptsLevel 4Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.7.0 ptsLevel 2Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.6.0 ptsLevel 1There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content10.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.9.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.7.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.6.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research10.0 ptsLevel 5Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.9.0 ptsLevel 4Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.8.0 ptsLevel 3Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.7.0 ptsLevel 2Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.6.0 ptsLevel 1Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes10.0 ptsLevel 5Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.9.0 ptsLevel 4Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.8.0 ptsLevel 3Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.7.0 ptsLevel 2Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).6.0 ptsLevel 1Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.0.0 ptsLevel 0Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0PreviousNex
Similar Content
Historical epidemiological event - Cholera outbreak , health & medical homework help
How might such an event (Cholera)have an impact on the goals and objectives of Healthy People 2020?...
Medication Treatment Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychosis Disorders Study Guide
Create a study guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents. Your study guide should be in the form of an outlin...
Advanced Directives
Even if you have done everything to communicate your own end-of-life wishes, you may find yourself in a situation where yo...
Academy Education Services Resting Heart Rate Worksheet
Distinguish an objective for this class. (PE class)
Then write your goals that will assist you in attaining that objectiv...
Miami Dade College Health Equity and Social Justice Paper
1. Discuss the role social justice and health equity play in community and public health nursing.2. Explain what the purpo...
Lesson Analysis and Evaluation
Develop a five-point narrative rubric for one of the lessons you reviewed in this class. THROWING a ballInclude the follow...
Self Reflection Paper
The healthcare system is an organization that drives the industry as well as its important aspects. In this case, the syst...
Cd55
Child A was holding a doll while staring outside the window - Child B sat on the floor in front of the TV and seemed distr...
Death Dying In The 21st Century
I chose Dr. Peter Saul's TED talk, Let's Talk about Dying and Grace Pastine's Death with Dignity. Dr. Saul highlights an u...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Shattered - Inside Hillary Clintons Doomed Campaign
by Amie Parnes and Jonathan Allen
The Red Badge of Courage
by Stephen Crane
The Bell Jar
by Sylvia Plath
Things That Matter
by Charles Krauthammer
Milkweed
by Jerry Spinelli
The Trial
by Franz Kafka
The King Must Die
by Mary Renault
The Outsiders
by S.E. Hinton
Alice in Wonderland
by Lewis Carroll
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
RC MOD 8 Dynamic Process of Clinical Reasoning Discussion
Describe a clinical situation where you applied an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning to select what you consid ...
RC MOD 8 Dynamic Process of Clinical Reasoning Discussion
Describe a clinical situation where you applied an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning to select what you considered the "best" client intervention based on information available.
Include the context of the situation
Include relevant external and internal cues supporting at least three priority hypotheses with a brief explanation of how you arrived at the "best" client intervention based on the situation
Discuss the outcomes based, iterative cycle of clinical reasoning you applied after the initial intervention to select the next "best" interventions appropriate for the particular situation based on client needs.
Include at least one goal and strategy for evaluation for the "best" intervention
Rationales and evidence-based findings were included to support choices for the next "best" interventions.
Cultural Competence- Assignment:
Read instruction carefully. PowerPoint presentation on the topic, a sign-in sheet, and a quiz to assess employee understan ...
Cultural Competence- Assignment:
Read instruction carefully. PowerPoint presentation on the topic, a sign-in sheet, and a quiz to assess employee understanding of the topic. Your presentation must address the following areas: What is diversity? The eight dimensions of diversity; Importance of cultural competence awareness; Impact of cultural competence in healthcare cost and quality; Diversity awareness; Regulations affecting cultural diversity.
4 pages
Middle Range Theory Or Grand Theory Applied To Research
Theories of the middle-range are concrete and narrow. They comprise of a limited scope of propositions and concepts writte ...
Middle Range Theory Or Grand Theory Applied To Research
Theories of the middle-range are concrete and narrow. They comprise of a limited scope of propositions and concepts written at a specific and concrete ...
17 pages
The American Red Cross
The American Red Cross is a humanitarian organization that deals with taking care of the disasters that affect people in t ...
The American Red Cross
The American Red Cross is a humanitarian organization that deals with taking care of the disasters that affect people in the American society. The ...
Patient Experience Data Self-Assessment
As a current or future health care executive leader, you are responsible for the patient's experience in your health care ...
Patient Experience Data Self-Assessment
As a current or future health care executive leader, you are responsible for the patient's experience in your health care organization. Whether you are overseeing a health system, hospital, clinic, or other health care organization, the patient's experience will be one of your top three priorities (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2016). Understanding the data involved in measuring the patient experience is an important part of what you will be undertaking.Interpreting patient experience data can quickly become overwhelming and confusing to anyone trying to use the data for improvement. The Patient Experience Data Self-Assessment challenges knowledge and common assumptions about what the data actually means. It can be used to expand your current knowledge on effectively using patient experience data.For this Assignment, in word 1 or 2 pages reflect on your most recent experience as a patient receiving health care services in a health care organization. Review the IHI patient experience data in the resources for this week. Consider how you might complete this self-assessment of the patient experience. https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U... attach assessment. Be sure to avoid writing in first person in scholarly writing.Resources:Dempsey, C. (2016). The evolution of the patient experience. In The Society for Healthcare Strategy and Market Development of the American Hospital Association (Ed.), Futurescan healthcare trends and implications: 2016–2021 (pp. 6–10). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.Groene, O., Arah, O. A., Klazinga, N. S., Wagner, C., Bartels, P. D., Kristensen, S., … Sunol, R. (2015). Patient experience shows little relationship with hospital quality management strategies. PLoS One, 10(7), 1–15.Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U...
HC310 Herzing Week 3 Assignment 1 Patient Communication Presentation
Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationRe-submit AssignmentDue Mar 24 by 11:59pm Points 50Submitting a text entry box, ...
HC310 Herzing Week 3 Assignment 1 Patient Communication Presentation
Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationRe-submit AssignmentDue Mar 24 by 11:59pm Points 50Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructions:The way health care providers communicate with patients is continually evolving. In today's society, patients demand timely information that is easily accessible. As a manager, you may play a role in the decision to modify how you and your staff communicate with your patient population.Assume the role of practice manager for a large, multi-specialty group practice. It has been proposed that you begin using email for patient communication. Develop a presentation using Prezi or PowerPoint, addressing the following:Audience: Physicians and office managersAdvantages and disadvantages of using e-mail communication for patient careProtection of privacy and confidentiality of patient informationConduct additional research to determine the preference of both health care providers, and patients, regarding e-mail or other forms of electronic communication. What does the research say?A minimum of three scholarly sources should be included in APA format.Submit Patient Communication Presentation - either PowerPoint (.ppt) or Prezi.If you use Prezi, a presentation link should be uploaded within a Word document, with your name, date, and course ID.Estimated time to complete: 3 hoursRubricHC310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationHC310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Patient CommunicationCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge10.0 ptsLevel 5Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.9.0 ptsLevel 4Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.7.0 ptsLevel 2Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.6.0 ptsLevel 1There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content10.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.9.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.7.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.6.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research10.0 ptsLevel 5Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.9.0 ptsLevel 4Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.8.0 ptsLevel 3Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.7.0 ptsLevel 2Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.6.0 ptsLevel 1Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes10.0 ptsLevel 5Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.9.0 ptsLevel 4Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.8.0 ptsLevel 3Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.7.0 ptsLevel 2Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).6.0 ptsLevel 1Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.0.0 ptsLevel 0Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0PreviousNex
Earn money selling
your Study Documents