Juvenile justice policies Charlene Lupo USA Finland underage behaviors Fidelity integrity

timer Asked: Jan 4th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $5

Question description

  • Validate or refute your colleague’s evaluation of the juvenile justice policies.
  • Expand upon your colleague’s conclusion(s) with your own research.
  • Respond to Charlene as if you’re having a conversation with him. A few sentences and a question

Noted by authors Wilson and Petersilia, (2011), there are countless programs within the juvenile system that reduce juvenile delinquency and detention. To produce an effective evidence-based program, clinical trials need to be evaluated again on a specific program, ensure the fidelity and integrity of a proven program, and proof that the current program is consistent with other program outcomes through meta-analysis. With, the United States, just like the adult prison system, incarcerates more juveniles than five other countries such as Canada, Australia, Germany, UK, and Finland (Justice Policy Institute, 2011).

Comparing age of jurisdiction and social responsibility policies between the United States and Finland, there is much contradiction. The United States offers children as young as 16 years of age the opportunity to be accountable for their actions within the criminal justice system with most of the states holding at 17 years of age (Teigan, 2014). Contrary to the Finnish law, any child under the age of 15 shall not be arrested or remanded to custody (Marttunen, 2004).

Emphasizing social change rather than punishment is the major concept and policy between the United States Juvenile Justice System and the Finnish national law. The United States gave birth to the Juvenile Court System in the late 1900s hoping to rehabilitate juvenile delinquency outside of the adult criminal court system. To compare “apples to apples,” statistical data on age distribution between the two countries were needed to establish compatibility. Quite surprisingly, the United States only has 7% more population of individuals aged 15 to 24 than the country of Finland (Finland vs. United States: People Facts and Stats, n.d.). Finland national law does not constitute an offender under 15 years of age to enter prison. The crimes are dealt with in their juvenile punishment statue - where the child welfare and social policy organizations assume the responsibility for counseling, restitution programs, and rehabilitative programs (Ibid). Only crimes conditional for juvenile prison are for youth between the ages of 15 to 20. Whereas, in the United States, over 2,500 juveniles are in prison for life. Understanding that incarceration and imprisonment of juveniles do not offer determent or decreased recidivism, there are programs such as the Youth Reinvestment Grant and Fostering Success Funds sponsored by the National Center for Youth Law (National Center for Youth Law, n.d.) that will propose alternatives to imprisonment for youthful offenders. Of the allotted 40 million dollars to the state of California, local communities for diversion programs of delinquent youth,


Finland vs. United States: People Facts and Stats. (n.d.). Retrieved from


Marttunen, M. (2004). Finland / The basis of finnish juvenile criminal justice. Revue

Internationale de Droit pénal, vol. 75, (1), 315-335. doi:10.3917/ridp.751.0315.

National Center for Youth Law. (n.d.). Youth diversion funding available in 2019. Retrieved

from https://youthlaw.org/publication/youth-diversion-f...

Teigan, A. (2014). Juvenile age of jurisdiction and transfer to adult court laws. Retrieved from



Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J. (2011). Crime and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford

University Press.

Tutor Answer

School: Cornell University

Please find attached. Than you.




Juvenile justice policies


Juvenile justice policies
Hello Charlene, I validat...

flag Report DMCA

Thanks for the help.

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors