Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsYour quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.To Prepare:Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Use APA for all references and include at least 2 references.Confidentiality, integrity, and availability or the CIA triad of security is introduced in this session. These three dimensions of security may often conflict. Confidentiality and integrity often limit availability. So, a system should provide only what is truly needed. This means that a security expert has to carefully analyze what is more important among these three dimensions of security in a system or application. Please provide an example (and justification) where the confidentiality of a system is more important than the integrity or availability of that system in In a minimum of 250. Then provide an example where the integrity of a system is more important than the confidentiality or availability of that system. Finally, provide an example of a system where the availability of a system is more important than the confidentiality or integrity of that system. For example, you might say availability is more important than integrity and confidentiality in a cell telephone system since one must be able to reach their loved ones in an emergency. Someone else might argue confidentiality/privacy is more important in such a system. 2. In a minimum of 250 words, share you reasons for seeking to expand your knowledge as a Health Informatics & Information Management Professional or explain your reasons why you have decided to change careers and enroll in Health Informatics Administration program. Discuss your future career goals and aspirations in the profession.

The balanced scorecard (BSC), which was first introduced by Kaplan and Norton in 1992 has been gradually adopted by health care organizations (HCOs) as a tool to drive performance (Kaplan & Norton, 1992). This balanced approach takes into account the multiple variables that determine an HCO's success without placing a greater emphasis on any one variable.Complete the following for this assignment in a 3-4 page paper, excluding cover page, abstract page, and reference page:Write a paper evaluating the value of the balanced scorecard as a tool for assessing and improving organizational performance in a health care organization.Discuss the concept of balancing performance across the BSC components to achieve the health care organization’s mission and strategic objectives.After your review of the literature, indicate whether you agree with this approach. Explain your response.Note: Use APA style to cite at least 5 scholarly sources from the last 5 years.