Write a 750-1,000 word review of a website about ADD or ADHD. You will write this review for the general public, so you might target a particular publication, such as a student or local newspaper or one of the national magazines. This will help you anticipate what your readers already know, what they value, and what criteria they accept as a basis of evaluation. Complete the following: Develop a set of criteria that the general public would see as acceptable for a website about diseases and disorders (like ADHD).Describe the website you have chosen, and then explain how it does (or does not) perform the criteria you established above. Use at least two scholarly sources outside of class texts to augment your understanding and perspective on these facts and elements. Use the GCU library for sources. Include this research in the paper in an appropriate scholarly manner

Health Psychology Annotated BibliographyInstructions and Grading RubricPlease find three (3) journal articles related to health psychology to comprise an annotated bibliography that includes three annotations. Information and instructions for completing annotated bibliographies, along with examples, are contained in a document published by Purdue OWL. Please note the following when completing your annotations:You must use APA styleYou must include three (3) annotations (one annotation per journal article) All annotations must be from scientific journalsYour annotations must be research articles (i.e., describe an original research study).Your annotations must reflect articles published within the past ten years.You must include the articles with your submissionYour annotations must summarize, assess, and reflect (see Purdue OWL document)Your annotated bibliography must be typed and double-spaced with one-inch marginsWhile there is no specific page limit on each annotation, the annotations must fully meet each rubric requirement. Full credit will only be awarded for thoughtful and accurate responses. (1-2 pages per annotation are usually an indication of a well-considered response.)Your annotated bibliography is due no later than Sunday, July 7, 2019.Video resources to help polish your annotation skills. These are highly recommended viewing. They are short (3-9 min) but powerful.Play media comment.Play media comment.Play media comment.Play media comment.Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsAnnotation 1:APA style citationFull Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors0.1 ptsNo Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 1: From scientific journalFull Marks = Article from a scientific journal0.1 ptsNo Marks = Article from any other source0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 1: Current (within 10 years)Full Marks = Article published within 10 years0.1 ptsNo Marks = Article not within 10 years0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 1: SummarizesFull Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings0.3 ptsNo Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 1: AssessesFull Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.0.3 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 1: ReflectsFull Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.0.3 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 2: APA style citationFull Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors0.1 ptsNo Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 2: From scientific journalFull Marks = Article from a scientific journal0.1 ptsNo Marks = Article from any other source0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 2: Current (within 10 years)Full Marks = Article published within 10 years0.1 ptsNo Marks = Article not within 10 years0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 2: SummarizesFull Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings0.3 ptsNo Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 2: AssessesFull Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.0.3 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 2: ReflectsFull Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.0.3 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 3: APA style citationFull Marks = APA citation with no errors0.2 pts.1 credit = APA style citation with 1-2 errors0.1 ptsNo Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors0.0 pts0.2 ptsAnnotation 3: From scientific journalFull Marks = Article from a scientific journal0.1 ptsNo Marks = Article from any other source0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 3: Current (within 10 years)Full Marks = Article published within 10 years0.1 ptsNo Marks = Article not within 10 years0.0 pts0.1 ptsAnnotation 3: SummarizesFull Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings0.3 ptsNo Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 3: AssessesFull Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.0.3 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.0.0 pts1.0 ptsAnnotation 3: ReflectsFull Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?1.0 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.0.6 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.0.3 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.0.0 pts1.0 ptsTotal Points: 10.0RubricAnnotated BibliographyAnnotated BibliographyCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1:APA style citation0.1 ptsFull Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors0.0 ptsNo Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: From scientific journal0.1 ptsFull Marks = Article from a scientific journal0.0 ptsNo Marks = Article from any other source0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Current (within 10 years)0.1 ptsFull Marks = Article published within 10 years0.0 ptsNo Marks = Article not within 10 years0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Summarizes1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings0.0 ptsNo Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Assesses1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.0.0 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 1: Reflects1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.0.0 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: APA style citation0.1 ptsFull Marks = APA citation with < 3 errors0.0 ptsNo Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: From scientific journal0.1 ptsFull Marks = Article from a scientific journal0.0 ptsNo Marks = Article from any other source0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Current (within 10 years)0.1 ptsFull Marks = Article published within 10 years0.0 ptsNo Marks = Article not within 10 years0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Summarizes1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings0.0 ptsNo Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Assesses1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.0.0 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 2: Reflects1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.0.0 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: APA style citation0.2 ptsFull Marks = APA citation with no errors0.1 pts.1 credit = APA style citation with 1-2 errors0.0 ptsNo Marks= not APA style or 3 + errors0.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: From scientific journal0.1 ptsFull Marks = Article from a scientific journal0.0 ptsNo Marks = Article from any other source0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Current (within 10 years)0.1 ptsFull Marks = Article published within 10 years0.0 ptsNo Marks = Article not within 10 years0.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Summarizes1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes accurate and comprehensive, yet succinct, summary that describes the purpose of the article and the findings0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation is lacking important details or contains inaccuracies in its summary0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation does not accurately describe the purpose of the article and/or the findings0.0 ptsNo Marks = Summary not included or is plagiarized1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Assesses1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article including answers to at three of the following questions: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only two of the questions outlined above.0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes an evaluation of the article but includes answers to only one of the questions outlined above.0.0 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include an evaluation of the article.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 3: Reflects1.0 ptsFull Marks = Annotation includes reflection including answers to all three of the following questions: How does the article fit into your overall research on the topic? Was this source helpful to you with regard to increasing your understanding of the topic? How did the source confirm or change how you think about the topic?0.6 pts.6 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least two of the questions outlined above.0.3 pts.3 credit = Annotation includes reflection including answers to at least one of the questions outlined above.0.0 ptsNo Marks = Annotation does not include reflection.1.0 ptsTotal Points: 10.0PreviousNext