NURS BSN 422 American Sentinel Aurora Critical Evaluation of Research Study
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice. Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryStudy 4 - Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fractureSuggested ReadingSchreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428. Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867Chapter 6 (pp. 131-153), Chapter 7 (pp. 157-185), Chapter 8 (pp. 189-226) Chapter 12 (pp.323-350)& Chapter 13 (pp. 351-380) In Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett LearningQualitative Specific ResourcesHouser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 9, p. 229-252Chapter 14, p. 385-416Chapter 15, p. 419-442Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements.Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research
Study
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of research and its
utilization in practice.
Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2)
Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between
ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate
reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical
judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery
of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members
to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex
health care environments.
QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice
BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IX
Area Gold
Mastery
Silver
Proficient
Bronze
Acceptable
Acceptable
Mastery not
Demonstrated
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the components
of the
appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the components
of the
appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using most of the
components
(Greater than
3/4) of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using one-half of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using most of the
components of
the evaluation
(greater than ¾)
checklists in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using one-half of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using 3/4
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using 3/4
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
¾ of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
one-half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates the
literature review
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using ¾ of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using one-half of
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation sampling
strategy using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
3/4 of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
one-half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using 3/4
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using 3/4
of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
one-half of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
one-half of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using onefourth or less of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using onefourth or less of
the components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
Discusses study
results in general
but not how
Discusses EBP
in general but
does not relate to
Does not discuss
results or how