Compensation Philosophy***Plagiarism report must be attached*** Each part numbered and labeled. Paragraphs MUST consist of a minimum of 5 complete sentences***Introduction and conclusion paragraph required along with 2 scholarly sources!!!!Follow all instructions****My Organization is the Military!!!! Evaluate the current compensation philosophy for your organization or an organization of your choosing (from a third-person perspective). Write a three-to-five page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper should be written in a scholarly third-person tone; it should be in APA format. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, your paper should address the following: Evaluate the organization’s current compensation philosophy and propose ways to enhance or revamp the current compensation philosophy to meet the changing needs of the organization and its employees. Examine key factors within the internal and external environment including the mission and strategic focus of the organization, as well as the financial and cultural aspects of your organization (i.e., they cannot have a compensation philosophy where they “lead” the market if the organization does not have the financial resources) that should influence this philosophy. The proposed philosophy itself should be no more than a short paragraph. Identify the key factors that should contribute to the organization’s development based on your proposed organizational philosophy. Remember to write from a third-person perspective. Do not include wording like “my company’s philosophy is …” Instead include wording like “XYZ Company Name’s philosophy is …” Remember to write about the company and the company’s philosophy; do not refer to you or your connection to the company.

6.Utilitarianism is a hedonistic theory of ethics.TrueFalse7.Ethical theories are primarily based on local traditions, rather than reasoned arguments.TrueFalse8.[answer1]'s theory of distributive justice relies on a thought experiment involving the 'veil of ignorance'.9.There are two types of Utilitarianism. The first type, [answer1] Utilitarianism, is concerned with the principles which guide our actions, while the second type, [answer2] Utilitarianism, is concerned with the specific actions an individual takes.10.The two main schools of moral theories are [answer1] and [answer2].

n this two-part assessment, you will write a  script for an  oral argument presentation from the perspective of the CapraTek defense  attorney in the case Capshaw v. CapraTek, as outlined in the multimedia  presentation. For the second part of the assessment, you will write a   script for an oral presentation by the head of HR at CapraTek  to explain the possible changes to HRM policies and practices to improve fairness, productivity, and worker morale as it relates to workplace  discrimination.  "I believe in the dignity of labor, whether with head or hand, that  the world owes no man a living but that it owes every man the  opportunity to make a living." —John D. Rockefeller, Jr. This assessment explores the tasks of constructing and presenting an  oral argument. Frequently, human resource professionals must present  case facts and fact patterns to executive managers and counselors  concerning internal investigation, hiring practice, or workplace issues.  How the HRM professional prepares and presents a case provides a  platform for employers and counsel to make informed and succinct  decisions concerning its viability. Key topic areas in this assessment  include information and research sources, use of legal language, case  mapping, building case strategy, partnering with counsel, and method for  oral presentation. Introduction In today's workplace climate, the sexual harassment case between  Joanna Capshaw and CapraTek is extremely relevant. It is likely that you  will face a similar situation some time in your HRM career and you will  need to be prepared to think legally about the facts of the case as  well as the arguments from both sides. Scenario CapraTek has a long history as a leader in the design and  manufacture of computer server components and continues to provide  innovative solutions to meet industry needs. They have met the demands  of the digital economy by offering a wide range of server products,  chassis, and server management tools. Despite their successes in the marketplace, however, CapraTek has  faced some internal challenges. One such challenge involved Joanna  Capshaw and her allegations of sexual harassment and her career at  CapraTek. Thoroughly listen or read through the multimedia presentation?  and analyze the issues and legal argument for both sides of the  dispute. Your Challenge For the first part of the assessment, you will be the attorney from  the CapraTek legal department representing the defendant (CapraTek) in  the case Capshaw v. CapraTek. You should prepare your opening oral  argument for the court proceeding to defend CapraTek. For the second part of the assessment, you will be the head of HR at  CapraTek who will report back to the HR and company leadership about  the changes to organizational practices and policies to address the  issues identified in this case. Instructions Analyze the legal issue(s) raised in the case Capshaw Versus CapraTek using the IRAC case analysis process. Watch CapraTek: Capshaw Versus CapraTek. Use LawNerds.com, Inc. (n.d.). The IRAC formula. Retrieved from http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html Part 1: Write a \script for an oral argument in defense of the organization. This should be solely from the perspective of an attorney for the organization. The following is the oral argument format that should be followed:      Facts: Analyze the facts involved in the case, from your side's perspective. Issues: Analyze facts or legal principles in dispute in the case. Rule(s): Identify the law or legislation related to the case that supports your side's perspective. Analysis: Apply the identified rule to the  issues in your case. Address the weaknesses in your side's case and  consider the opposite side of the case. Conclusion: Summarize and describe the logical outcome of the case. Relief Requested: What relief are you requesting from the court, and why? Part 2: Write a 2–3-page script for the head of HR to make an oral presentation for HR leadership. This should be solely from the perspective of the head of HR  regarding possible changes to HRM policies and organizational practices  that would improve fairness, productivity, and worker morale as it  relates to workplace discrimination. Describe the potential impact of a workplace discrimination charge levied at this organization. Identify related laws or legislation that supports this perspective. Summarize a logical case outcome.Academic Requirements   The deliverable for this assessment applies professional skills in  Human Resources Management (HRM) to workplace situations which you will  likely encounter in your day-to-day work in HRM. As part of your  learning, we focus on the development of effective professional  communication skills for the workplace.