# The Apportionment Problem

Anonymous
account_balance_wallet \$50

## Assignment 1: LASA 2: The Apportionment Problem

You are a census officer in a newly democratic nation and you have been charged with using the census data from the table below to determine how 100 congressional seats should be divided among the 10 states of the union.

 State Population 1 15475 2 35644 3 98756 4 88346 5 369 6 85663 7 43427 8 84311 9 54730 10 25467

Being a fan of United States history, you are familiar with the many methods of apportionment applied to this problem to achieve fair representation in the US House of Representatives. You decide that apportionment (chapter 11, sections 1-4 in your textbook) is the best approach to solving this problem, but need to compare several methods and then determine which is actually fair.

1. Using the Hamilton method of apportionment, determine the number of seats each state should receive.
2. Using the numbers you just calculated from applying the Hamilton method, determine the average constituency for each state. Explain your decision making process for allocating the remaining seats.
3. Calculate the absolute and relative unfairness of this apportionment.
4. Explain how changes in state boundaries or populations could affect the balance of representation in this congress. Provide an example using the results above.
5. How and why could an Alabama Paradox occur?
6. Explain how applying the Huntington-Hill apportionment method helps to avoid an Alabama Paradox.
7. Based upon your experience in solving this problem, do you feel apportionment is the best way to achieve fair representation? Be sure to support your answer.
8. Suggest another strategy that could be applied to achieve fair representation either using apportionment methods or a method of your choosing.

You may perform your own calculations or use either the Excel spreadsheet or the Excel 2013 Spreadsheet to assist you. You must show some calculations in your document to demonstrate that you know how to perform these tasks. Be sure to compile your work in a Word document and submit it to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

 Assignment 1 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Assignment Components Application of Hamilton and Huntington-Hill formulas to determine number of seats for each state.Analysis of those results to determine state average constituency. 44 Analysis of results from above to determine if Alabama paradox occurred. 44 Analysis of state boundaries and population effects on representational balance. 48 Evaluation of the apportionment methods. 48 Proposed solution to achieve fair representation. 48 Writing Components Organization—Introduction,Thesis,Transitions,Conclusion 20 Usage and Mechanics—Grammar, Spelling, Sentence structure 32 APA Elements—Attribution, Paraphrasing, Quotations 8 Style—Audience, Word Choice 8 Total: 300

## Attachments

Robert__F
School: University of Virginia

Report: the apportionment problem

the apportionment problem
by HAL

General metrics
5,970

934

61

3 min 44 sec

7 min 11 sec

characters

words

sentences

time

speaking
time

Writing Issues
No issues found

Plagiarism
This text seems 100% original. Grammarly found no matching text on
the Internet or in ProQuest’s databases.

Report was generated on Monday, Jan 28, 2019, 3:24 PM

Page 1 of 2

Report: the apportionment problem

Unique Words

28%

Measures vocabulary diversity by calculating the
percentage of words used only once in your
document

unique words

Rare Words

32%

Measures depth of vocabulary by identifying words
that are not among the 5,000 most common English
words.

rare words

Word Length

4.9

Measures average word length

characters per word

Sentence Length

15.3

Measures average sentence length

words per sentence

Report was generated on Monday, Jan 28, 2019, 3:24 PM

Page 2 of 2

the apportionment problem
by HAL Lab

Submission date: 28-Jan-2019 06:22AM (UT C-0800)
Submission ID: 1067442607
File name: the_apportionment_problem.edited.docx (42.46K)
Word count: 926
Character count: 5771

the apportionment problem
ORIGINALITY REPORT

4

%

SIMILARIT Y INDEX

0%

0%

4%

INT E...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Excellent job

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors