HCM420 M8 Project CSU Ethical Issues In Healthcare

Anonymous
timer Asked: Feb 2nd, 2019
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description

Select one of the following ethical issues in healthcare from the following choices:

  • Gender selection in human embryos
  • Stem cell transplants
  • Foregoing curative medical treatment due to religious beliefs
  • Futility of care
  • Abortion after six months.

If no topic listed here is of interest to you, contact your instructor for permission to consider a different topic.

Use the CSU Global Library and select Internet sources to conduct research on your chosen topic. Based on your research, provide the history of the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective. In your paper address the following questions:

  1. Do the consequences of actions always direct what is morally required?
  2. What should happen when two principles come into conflict? For example, should patient autonomy be considered more important than beneficence? Defend your position.
  3. Are moral and ethically rules always binding, or are they only guidelines to be assessed in each case? Defend your position.

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Be ten to twelve pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
  • Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of eight scholarly references - four of these references must be from outside sources and four may be from course readings, lectures, and textbooks. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
  • Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

HCM420 Mod 8 PP

HCM420 Mod 8 PP

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpecification of Topic

70.0 to >56.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The student clearly and thoroughly discusses the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective.

56.0 to >42.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The student discusses the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective but has some significant, but not major, flaws in definition, support, and articulation.

42.0 to >28.0 pts

Below Expectation

The student discusses the issue but has some major flaws and errors in definition, support, and articulation.

28.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The student's discussion has numerous major flaws and arguments are not defined, supported, and articulated.

70.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

70.0 to >56.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

56.0 to >42.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

42.0 to >28.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

28.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.

70.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

80.0 to >64.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Conforms to project requirements regarding the specifications for selecting a topic; providing a legal ethical, a moral perspective; and answering questions posed in the assignment.

64.0 to >48.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

48.0 to >32.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

32.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

80.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and Findings

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least eight credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates six credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates three or four credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates two, or fewer credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Applies critical thinking and reasoning skills for effective analysis.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in application of critical thinking skills.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in application of critical thinking skills.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Critical thinking and reasoning skills are absent or ineffective.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthics

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Prescribes actions to effectively address a variety of ethical situations that support social responsibility.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in prescribing actions to address ethical situations.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in prescribing actions to address ethical situations.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Prescription of actions to address ethical situations is absent or ineffective.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates effective leadership and teamwork skills.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills is absent or ineffective.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Selects current technology applications and applies to specific problems and challenges in the work place and professional skills.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

No more than small number of minor flaws or omissions in selection of current technology applications.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in selection of current technology applications.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Selection of current technology applications is absent or ineffective.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Essay or PowerPoint is clearly organized, well written, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all items listed on APA rubric and includes less than two APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Omits up to two items listed on APA rubric and includes less than four APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted with minor mistakes.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Omits up to four items listed on APA rubric and includes less than six APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page include numerous mistakes.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Omits five or more items listed on APA rubric and includes seven or more APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are incorrectly formatted.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 350.0

Tutor Answer

Chancellor_Ivy
School: Purdue University

At...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back!

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors