SOX Act Questions Audit


label Accounting
account_circle Unassigned
schedule 1 Day
account_balance_wallet $5

Sarbanes-Oxley Act made changes in the way audit and investment firms conduct business. 

Do you think the changes are sufficient to deter corporate fraud in the future? 
Discuss three reasons why you do or do not feel Sarbanes-Oxley is sufficient to deter fraud.
Aug 2nd, 2015

Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!

In steps Sarbanes-Oxley, the 2002 legislation that was supposed to protect investors from fraud by requiring companies to be more diligent in creating and maintaining internal controls and by forcing public company auditors to work harder. Tangible benefits from the legislation are elusive. People would like to think that the legislation has forced companies to have better internal controls, and therefore fraud risks are reduced. Yet there is no real evidence that fraud risk or actual fraud has been reduced because of Sarbanes-Oxley.

Secondly Companies with dishonest or incompetent executives will have fraud problems no matter what the legislation says.

Thirdly the bad management is also a key role

Bad management will be bad management no matter what the regulations say. Good management will be good in spite of regulations as well. Invest in companies in which honesty is at the forefront of their business model and is demonstrated each day as they conduct business.


Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.
Aug 2nd, 2015

Studypool's Notebank makes it easy to buy and sell old notes, study guides, reviews, etc.
Click to visit
The Notebank
...
Aug 2nd, 2015
...
Aug 2nd, 2015
Nov 23rd, 2017
check_circle
Mark as Final Answer
check_circle
Unmark as Final Answer
check_circle
Final Answer

Secure Information

Content will be erased after question is completed.

check_circle
Final Answer