The crash that occurred at a family farm

timer Asked: Feb 4th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $60

Question Description

I have already essay, I just want you to make paraphrase as same subjects.

is that clear??

Unformatted Attachment Preview

The following is my Rule26 report based on a crash incident that took place at a family ranch when two sisters were driving a 2015 Polaris RZR XP 1000. The analysis and calculation done on the report is heavily based on the evidence and measurements given in the report and also primarily, on my education as a Mechanical Engineer. Also, calculations are done based on equations from the book Fundamentals of Traffic Crash Reconstruction by John Daily, Nathan Shigemura and Jeremy Daily. I reserve the right to edit this report if new, useful evidence becomes available. Description of Accident Two cousins, Susanne and Claire, were riding on a new 2015 Polaris RZR XP 1000 at a family ranch. The UTV had an aftermath lift kit correctly installed by Claire’s dad who was a master mechanic. They had set up a course which involved using a berm as a jump. Susanne, the younger cousin was driving the UTV of off a berm which had a takeoff angle of 5 degrees. After landing, they tried to take a left turn and under the circumstances, the Polaris rolled over. Susanne, the driver said she was wearing the seatbelt and her helmet and hence suffered no injuries. Claire however was sprawled on the ground with her helmet 10 feet away from her. She suffered a broken back and hence was paralyzed from the waist down. Susanne also claims she heard a loud bang, like something broke while she was turning after the jump. Upon further inspection, it was found that the upper control arm of the right rear suspension arm was separated and there was dirt logged in the rim of the right front wheel. A more detailed summary and information can be found in the measurements table. I have been given the assignment to give an opinion on the speed of the UTV going off the jump, the speed of the UTV just before the rollover, tipping angle in its original as well as lifted configuration, if the stock UTV would have rolled over in this scenario and finally give an opinion on the root cause of the crash. (i) A complete statement of opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them. *Note: In doing a crash analysis, there are bound to be discrepancies due to a variety of factors. To fully reconstruct what exactly happened on a crash site is impossible which would lead to uncertainties in values. Also, while measuring for these values, the equipment’s itself will have some uncertainty. I will try and incorporate these uncertainties while solving for my values. 1) The speed of the UTV going off the jump was calculated to be approximately 49.1 miles per hour using the equation derived on page 494 from the Fundamentals of Traffic Crash Reconstruction. The equation is π‘†π‘œ = 2.73𝑑 π‘π‘œπ‘ πœƒβˆšβ„Ž+π‘‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›πœƒ . In the above equation, β€˜So’ is the required velocity off the jump, β€˜d’ is the horizontal distance, β€˜h’ is vertical distance of the center of mass and ΞΈ being the angle of the ramp which in this case is the berm. 2) Before getting into the calculation for the speed of the UTV before rollover, it is important to know the velocity of the UTV while it was turning as it can give us an insight into what actually caused the crash. But, to know the speed when it was turning is quite challenging due to the lack of sufficient data such as the distance travelled by the UTV after the jump or physical evidence measurements collected at the crash site. I will get into the assumptions and calculations for this speed later on. This is where the field indicators sketches come in. From the attached exhibit, the critical speed yaw scuff marks have been provided. Ch 13: Critical Speed Yaw from Fundamentals of Traffic Crash Reconstruction from Dr. Daily’s book has some handy equations which help solve for these values. Equation 13.1 from the book states that 𝑆 = 3.86βˆšπ‘“π‘Ÿ where β€˜S’ is the Critical Speed yaw in mph, β€˜f’ is the drag factor and β€˜r’ is the radius of the center of mass path in feet’s. From the report we were given a range of 0.65-0.74 for the coefficient of friction. Radius of the center of mass path was calculated by equation 13.3 from Dr. Daily’s book. The equation is π‘Ÿ = 𝑐2 8π‘š + π‘š 2 where r’’ is the required radius, β€˜c’ is the chord measurement and β€˜m’ is the middle ordinate measurement. In the report β€˜c’ was given to be 30 feet and β€˜m’ was given to be 0.48 feet which in turn gave a value of roughly 235 feet for β€˜r'. Finally, plugging in the value of β€˜r’ and the range values for the friction factor in the equation to calculate Critical speed yaw gives a range of values from 53.4 to 60.7 miles per hour. These values and the equations used would be further discussed in the succeeding parts. 3) This section deals with the tip over angles for the UTV in its original as well as lifted configuration. Firstly, it is important to know when does a tip over happens. A tip over will take place when the center of mass of the object under consideration lies outside the last point of contact. In the given case, the UTV will tip over if its center of mass lies outside the last point of contact which is the Normal force exerted by the tires upwards. The angles can be found using basic geometry. A picture is shown below to show various steps used in calculating for the angles. Figure 1 UTV modeled as inclined to help solve for ΞΈ. πœ‹ In the above figure, ΞΈ = 2 βˆ’ Ξ² = 90 βˆ’ Ξ². From the above geometry, π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π›½ = β„Ž 𝑑𝑀 2 2β„Ž = 𝑑𝑀 . Now, solving 2h for Ξ² gives Ξ² = π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›βˆ’1 (𝑑𝑀). Finally, now incorporating ΞΈ gives two equations for the two values of the 2β„Ž angles necessary. In the UTV’s original configuration, ΞΈ = 90 βˆ’ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›βˆ’1 (𝑑𝑀) where β€˜h’ is the center of mass height in the original configuration which in this case is 2 feet and β€˜tw’ is the track width which in this case is 4.33 feet. Solving for ΞΈ approximately gives 47.3Β°. Now again, solving for ΞΈ for the lifted 2(β„Ž+β„Ž ) configuration is done by ΞΈ = 90 βˆ’ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›βˆ’1 [(𝑑𝑀+π‘‘π‘€π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘ )] where h+hadd = 2.83 feet and tw+twadd= 4.75 feet. π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘ The difference in the values is because of the center of mass height and track width increased in the lifted configuration. Solving for ΞΈ in the lifted configuration gives approximately 40Β°. The values of the two angles makes sense as when we consider the height increase from the lifted configuration, the tilt of the vehicle is more deeper which accounts for a lesser value for ΞΈ. 4) This section deals whether the broken suspension lead to the crash. Equation 20.1 from page 708 of Dr. Daily’s book is useful in determining whether the UTV tipped over because of the broken suspension. 𝑑𝑀 The equation 𝑓 = 2β„Ž π‘π‘œπ‘ π‘’ + 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒 is used to calculate the propensity to roll. β€˜tw’ is the track width, and β€˜e’ is the super elevation angle. Given in the report, β€˜e’ was said to be -3%. By using trigonometric function, β€˜e’ in terms of angle was found to be -1.72Β°. Plugging the required values in the propensity equation gives f to be 0.817 in the UTV’s lifted configuration which basically means that it would require 0.817 grams to make the UTV tip. For our given values of Β΅ between 0.65-0.74, if we consider Figure 1, where the UTV is at an incline and is about to tip over, there would be a force applied upwards due to the friction in the tires. In our case, even if we consider the maximum value of 0.74 for the coefficient of friction, it would mean it needs 0.74 grams to tip over which is still less than 0.817 calculated above. Now, calculating the propensity to roll over in the original stock configuration gives a value of f = 1.052. As in the lifted case, same theory is applied to the stock UTV in its original state. 0.74 grams is still less than the 1.052 grams. Therefore, from the above calculations and discussion, it is fair to say that the broken suspension was indeed responsible for the crash and not any external forces like speed. 5) Finally, this section deals with the root cause of the crash. To make the discussion easier, I have added a schematic at the end of this section. The initial velocity was found to be approximately 49.1 miles per hour. But for a moment, let us consider the velocity of the UTV when it was making the turn after jump. This is not to be confused with the speed just before the rollover. To do the calculations, a few equations come in handy. Let us treat the vehicle as a rigid body, so when it is making the turn, πΉπ‘“π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›= ma . Now, further saying that π‘Ž = 𝑉2 𝑅 where β€˜a’ is the centrifugal acceleration. Now, replacing β€˜a’ in the Friction equation and letting that equal to β€˜Β΅mg’, we get to the final equation thus solving for 𝑉 = βˆšπœ‡π‘…π‘” where Β΅ is the coefficient of friction between 0.65-0.74, β€˜R’ is the calculated radius of gyration which came out to be 235 feet and g is 32.2 feet/s2. We get a range of values for the velocity at the curve due to the coefficient of friction ranges given in the report. Solving for’ V’, we get the range to be between 47.8-51.3 miles per hour which keep in mind is less than the velocity range just before tipping over calculated in Section 2 to be between 53.4-60.7 miles per hour. Of course, the calculations done to find the velocity at the curve are a near approximate as it is impossible to know the exact velocity. The result was obtained by making assumptions and substituting values. But, nevertheless it does give us an insight into speed most near to. Considering, the range of values for the speed at the curve, are smaller than the range of values for speed calculated just before tipping over tells me that speed was not a factor based on the accident. All the above calculations and assumptions and opinions bring me to the final conclusion that it is the manufacturers fault in the UTV being tipping over. Figure 2 A schematic showing UTV’s various speeds at different location. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

School: New York University

Hello, please find the attached paraphrased document. Please let me know if you want me to edit anything.Thanks

Based on an incident of the crash that occurred at a family farm, below is my Rule26 report. The
crash took place when a 2015 Polaris RZR XP 1000 was driven by two sisters. On the report, the
calculation along with the analysis is heavily conducted grounded on the measurements and evidence
provided in the report, and also mainly, on my educational experience as a Mechanical Engineer.
Calculations are also conducted grounded on different equations from the textbook by Jeremy Daily,
Nathan Shigemura and John Daily, β€œFundamentals of Traffic Crash Reconstruction.” If useful, new
evidence becomes accessible I reserve the rights for editing this report.
Accident description
Claire and Susanne, two cousins, were riding at a family ranch on a newer 2015 Polaris RZR XP
1000. There was an aftermath lift kit in the UTV that was installed properly installed by the dad of Claire.
He was a master mechanic. A course was set up by them, which comprised using a berm as a jump.
With the 5 degrees takeoff angle, the UTV was driven off a berm by a younger cousin, Susanne. They
attempted for taking a left turn after landing, and the Polaris rolled over under the circumstances. The
driver, Susanne, said that she suffered no injuries because of the helmet and seatbelt. On the other
hand, the helmet of Claire was 10 feet away from her, and she fell down on the ground. Her back was
completely broken and therefore was paralyzed from the waist down. It was also claimed by Susanne
that a loud bang was heard by her when she was turning UTV after the jump as something broke. It was
found upon further inspection that the right rear suspension arm’s upper control arm was detached and
there was dirt noted in the right front wheel’s rim. In the table of measurements, a piece of more
thorough information and summary can be found.
This assignment is aimed at providing an opinion regarding the UTV’s speed going off the jump,
the UTV’s speed right prior to the rollover...

flag Report DMCA

Goes above and beyond expectations !

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors