BUS319 Wk6 Strayer Acquiring Contract With Navy

Anonymous
timer Asked: Feb 5th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $60

Question Description

Based on the same scenario as in Assignments 1 and 2, you are ready to begin considering the factors needed for your proposal based on RFP #123456789, dated 07/14/2014. Remember that another local competitor intends to submit a proposal as well.

Before beginning this assignment, review FAR Subpart 19.5—Set-Asides for Small Business.

Additional factors to consider are:

  1. Both your company and your competitor’s company will qualify under the HUBZone Act (FAR 19.5).
  2. Based upon the scope of work required, your initial estimates for the contract will exceed $150,000. Therefore, you are willing to offer incentives to the Navy.
  3. Your competitor intends to submit a proposal for a one (1) year contract.

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

  1. Examine two (2) reasons why your business would qualify under the basic concepts of the HUBZone Set-Aside Procedures. Provide a rationale for your response.
  2. Analyze the primary way(s) in which a multiyear contract would benefit both the Navy and your business.
  3. Determine whether your bid proposal should be based on a fixed-price, a cost-reimbursement, or a time-and-materials type of contract. Provide a rationale for your response.
  4. Determine the category of incentives that you are willing to offer (i.e., cost, schedule, or performance). Provide a rationale for your response.
  5. Determine whether your bid proposal should be a technical, management, or cost proposal. Provide a rationale for your response.
  6. Speculate on five (5) potential risk factors that you will need to consider if your company is awarded the contract. Provide a rationale for your response.
  7. Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • This course requires use of new Student Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Interpret the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as it relates to small-business programs.
  • Describe the various types of contracts and considerations for their use.
  • Outline and explain the process for developing competitive proposals and source selection.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in federal acquisition and contract management.
  • Write clearly and concisely about federal acquisition and contract management using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills. Click here to access the rubric for this assignment.

Tutor Answer

Proff_White
School: University of Maryland

Attached.

Running head: ACQUIRING CONTRACT WITH THE NAVY

Acquiring Contract with the Navy

Student’s name:
Institutional affiliation:

1

ACQUIRING CONTRACT WITH NAVY

2

Acquiring Contract with the Navy
Introduction
From the outlined Department of Defense (DoD) regulations, small business enterprises
are entitled a set-aside Act that protects them from competition with other bigger and established
institutions. However, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 19.5 lacks an outline on
the elimination strategies where two companies are considered to submit their contract proposals.
Through considerations on the HUBZone Act, a company may draft a competitive proposal to
win the supply tender over competitors. This paper will evaluate reasons why First Name Last
Name Inc. would submit a qualifying proposal under the HUBZone Act, analyze benefits of the
multiyear contract, and determine the terms of the contract as well as the category of providing
incentive from the provided budget, the technical management and an overview on the
unforeseen risks that may affect contract delivery.
Qualifications under HUBZone set-aside procedures.
Although the contract entails two companies that are considered according to the FAR,
analysis on HUBZone set-aside procedures places First Name Last Name Inc. at a strategic
position of qualification upon the submission of the business proposal as compared to True
Value Interior Designs. Firstly, the subpart of the procedures allows the contracting officer to set
aside an acquisition exceeding the micro-purchase threshold that is to address competition within
the small business. Taking a review on set aside estimate required for the work, the allocation
exceeds the stated maximum limit. This places the company in a position to offer incentives to
the navy as compared to the competitor who is operating within the exactly required working
capital. Thus, reviewing the HUBZone set-aside procedures of competitor elimination among
small business entity, First Name Last Name Inc. will stand a chance to submit a competitive

ACQUIRING CONTRACT WITH NAVY

3

proposal
From reviewing part c of the procedures, the contracting officer is required to consider
the acceptability of the offer and the qualification requirements. Upon attainment of the outlined
requirements, the contracting officer shall make the award based on the acceptability of the offer.
The formation and management have been in line with the FAR and DoD requirements thus
placing the organization at the position to qu...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back!

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors