In two paragraphs (roughly 400-600 words), complete a focused rhetorical analysis of either William Cronon’s “The Trouble with Wilderness” or Michel Montaigne’s “On the Cannibals.” You will analyze one specific piece of evidence.

Anonymous
timer Asked: Feb 5th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $35

Question Description

  • In two paragraphs (roughly 400-600 words), complete a focused rhetorical analysis of either William Cronon’s “The Trouble with Wilderness” or Michel Montaigne’s “On the Cannibals.” You will analyze one specific piece of evidence (10 on 1) to support your thesis.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Short Writing 2: Analysis Total Points: 60 Description: A rhetorical analysis of an essay Format: MLA format, typed, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman Font Due Date: Wednesday, February 6th Task • In two paragraphs (roughly 400-600 words), complete a focused rhetorical analysis of either William Cronon’s “The Trouble with Wilderness” or Michel Montaigne’s “On the Cannibals.” You will analyze one specific piece of evidence (10 on 1) to support your thesis. o The first paragraph should be a brief and independent summary of the article in question (keeping in mind the CABIN criteria/your summary training). o End the first paragraph with your specific, unobvious, and non-list thesis. Your thesis ought to have two parts: 1. Recognize an important implicit (unstated) element in the essay (for example, a rhetorical strategy or assumption that you wish to examine). 2. Suggest one specific, important way the unstated element contributes to the function of the essay or the advancement of the author’s argument. o Remember the distinction between content and design. This analysis is about what the author does to design the argument and reasoning as to a key consequence of that design to the rhetorical function of the essay. It may help to include the author’s intended audience in your thesis (however, this is not a requirement; if you do include the audience in your thesis, be sure to specify precisely who the audience is). o After you compose your thesis and CABIN summary, follow up with a second paragraph that defends your thesis by examining one key piece of evidence from the essay (10 on 1). Your goal here is to give the reader a better understanding of the essay through this piece of evidence. Examine specific parts of the evidence to illustrate your thesis. Be sure to defend both parts of your thesis—after recognizing the role of an implicit element in the author’s argument, reason as to a key consequence of this implicit element to the essay’s function. o Use a topic sentence for the second paragraph. Rely on attributive tags and transitions where appropriate throughout. o Remember to link evidence and claims by providing adequate explanation. Connect the dots. At least half of the second paragraph should be your words explaining the evidence in service to your thesis. Do not give me two paragraphs of summary. o Cite all paraphrases and quotes. o Refrain from personal judgement. Pursue rational analysis of the evidence. o Give the exact word count at the end. Objectives • To recognize implicit rhetorical strategies • To defend a thesis • To quote and paraphrase accurately and gracefully • To lay the foundation for writing effective responses to civic and academic debates Criteria for Evaluation • • • • • Complete: Does the analysis offer all the necessary parts of the assignment (thesis, CABIN summary, evidence, analysis of the evidence in light of the thesis, etc.)? Accurate: Does the essay accurately represent the material? Brief: Does the analysis use language precisely and economically to say as much as possible in the allotted space? Independent: Would the analysis make sense to readers who have not read the essay? Clarity and Design: Is the analysis well-written, easy to understand, and easy to follow? Does it have an effective structure and an appropriate style? Are sources properly documented? Are transitions and attributive tags used well? Is it organized and coherent? Editing Skills: Is the analysis free of grammatical and mechanical errors? Grade Range • • • • • A - Model paper. One or maybe two minor errors and no major errors. B - A few minor errors and perhaps one major error counterbalanced by better than average execution. C - Complete assignment. One or more major errors accompanied by several minor errors. On balance, however, the paper does fair work satisfying the requirements. A “C” paper is a successful paper. D - A medley of major and minor errors. Usually an incomplete assignment. Often times “D” papers demonstrate reading and assignment comprehension issues or are a product of student sloppiness and laziness. F - Failure. Major Errors: Result in the loss of anywhere between 6-15 points, depending on the severity. These errors usually involve issues related to accuracy and misrepresentation, the thesis, independence, citation, evidence/analysis, and completion. Minor Errors: Result in the loss of anywhere between 1-5 points, depending on the severity. These errors usually involve issues related to grammar and editing, organization, clarity, and neutrality. However, sometimes a problem with accuracy, the thesis, independence, evidence/analysis, or citation is insignificant enough to fall under this category. Keep in mind that minor errors can snowball and cause major errors. For instance, minor errors in organization could conceivably make a paper very difficult to follow overall, giving rise to a work that lacks independence and clarity. 1:31 . On the Cannibals 31. On the Cannibals [The cannibals mentioned in this chapter lived on the coasts of Braz il. Montaigne had read many accounts of the conqiust of the New World, including Girolamo Benzoni's Historia de! mondo novo (Venice, 1565) in the French translation by Urbain Chauveton, the very title of which emphasizes the dreadful treatment of the natives by the Conquistadores: A New History of the New World containing all that Spaniards have done up to the present in the West Indies, and the harsh treatment which they have meted out to those peoples yonder .. . Together with a short History of a Massacre committed by the Spaniards on some Frenchmen in Florida (two editions in 1579). Montaigne's 'primitivism' (his respect for barbarous peoples and his admiration for much of their conduct, once their motives are understood) has little in common with the 'noble savages' of later centuries. These peoples are indeed cruel: but so are we . Their simple ways have much to teach us: they can ser~e as a standard by which we can judge Plato's Republic, the myth of the Golden Age, the cruelty, the corruption and the culture of Europe, and show up that European insularity which condemns peoples as barbarous merely because their manners and their dress are different. J [A] When King Pyrrhus crossed into Italy, after noting the excellent formation of the army which the Romans had sent ahead towards him he said, 'I do not know what kind of Barbarians these are' (for the Greeks called all foreigners Barbarians) 'but there is nothing barbarous about the ordering of the army which I can see!' The Greeks said the same about the army which Flaminius brought over to their country, [C] as did Philip when he saw from a hill-top in his kingdom the order and plan of the Roman encampment under Publius Sulpicius Galba.1 [A] We should be similarly wary of accepting common opinions; we should judge them by the ways of reason not by popular vote. I have long had a man with me who stayed some ten or twelve years in that other world which was discovered in our century when Villegaignon made his landfall and named it La France Antartique. 2 This discovery of a 1. Plutarch, Life of Pyrrhus and Life of Flaminius. 2. Durand de Villegagnon struck land, in Brazil, in 1557. Cf. Lettres sur la navigation du chevalier de Villegaignon es terres de l'Amerique, Paris, 1557, by an author who calls himself simply N .B. 229 boundless territory seems to me worthy of reflection. I am by no means sure that some other land may not be discovered in the future, since so many persons, [CJ greater than we are, [A] were wrong about this one! I fear that our eyes are bigger than our bellies, our curiosity more 3 than we can stomach. We grasp at everything but clasp nothing but wind. Plato brings in Solon to relate that he had learned from the priests of the town of Sai's in Egypt how, long ago before the Flood, there was a vast island called Atlantis right at the mouth of the Straits of Gibraltar, occupying an area greater than Asia an~ Africa combined; the kings of that country, who not only possessed that island but had spread on to the mainland across the bre;idth of Africa as far as Egypt and the length of Europe as far as Tuscany, planned to stride over into Asia and subdue all the peoples bordering on the Mediterranean as far as the Black Sea. To this end they had traversed Spain, Gaul and Italy and had reached as far as Greece when the Athenians withstood them; but soon afterwards those Athenians, as well as the people of Atlantis and their island, were engulfed in that Flood.• It is most likely that that vast inundation should have produced strange changes to the inhabitable areas of the world; it is maintained that it was then that the sea cut off Sicily from Italy [BJ Hax loca, vi quondam et vasta convulsa ruina, Dissiluisse ferunt, cum protinus utraque tellus Unaforet. [Those places, they say, were once wrenched apart by a violent convulsion, whereas they had formerly been one single land.)' [A] as well as Cyprus from Syria, and the island of Negropontus from the Boeotian mainland, while elsewhere lands once separated were j oined together by filling in the trenches between them with mud and sand: sterilisque diu palus aptaque remis Vicinas urbes alit, et grave sentit aratrum . 3. '80: our bellies, as they say, applying it to those whose appetite and hunger make them desire more meat than they can manage: I fear that we too have curiosity far more ... 4. Plato, Timaeus, 24E etc., and Girolamo Benzoni, Historia del mondo novo, Venice 1565. Cf. also Plato, Critias, 113 A ff. 5. Virgil, Aeneid, lll, 414-17. 230 1:31. On the Cannibals 1:31. On the Cannibals (Barren swamps which you could row a boat through now feed neighbouring cities and bear the heavy plough. )6 emigrated with their wives and children and started living there. The Carthaginian lords, seeing that their country was being gradually depopulated, expressly forbade any more to go there on pain of death and drove out those new settlers, fearing it is said that they would in time increase so greatly that they would supplant them and bring down their State. But that account in Aristotle cannot apply to these new lands either. That man of mine was a simple, rough fellow - qualities which make for a good witness: those clever chaps notice more things more carefully but are always adding glosses; they cannot help changing their story a little in order to make their views triumph and be more persuasive; they never show you anything purely as it is: they bend it and disguise it to fit in with their own views. To make their judgement more credible and to win you over they emphasize their own side, amplify it and extend it. So you need either a very trustworthy man or else a man so simple that he has nothing in him on which to build such false discoveries or make them plausible; and he must be wedded to no cause. Such was my man; moreover on various occasions he showed me several seamen and merchants whom he knew on that voyage. So I am content with what he told me, without inquiring what the cosmographers have to say about it. What we need is topographers who would make detailed accounts of the places which they had actually been to. But because they have the advantage of visiting Palestine, they want to enjoy the right of telling us tales about all the rest of the world! I wish everyone would write only about what he knows - not in this matter only but in all others. A man may well have detailed knowledge or experience· of the nature of one particular river or stream, yet about all the others he knows only what everyone else does; but in order to trot out his little scrap of knowledge he will write a book on the whole of physics! From this vice many great inconveniences arise. Now to get back to the subject, I find (from what has been told me) that there is nothing savage or barbarous about those peoples, but that every man calls barbarous anything he is not accustomed to; it is indeed the case that we have no other criterion of truth or right-reason than the example and form of the opinions and customs of our own country. There we always find the perfect religion, the perfect polity, the most developed and perfect way of doing anything! Those 'savages' are only wild in the sense that we call fruits wild when they are produced by Nature in her ordinary course: whereas it is fruit which we have artificially perverted and misled from the common order which we ought to call savage. It is in the first Yet there is little likelihood of that island's being the New World which we have recently discovered, for it was virtually touching Spain; it would be unbelievable for a flood to force it back more than twelve hundred leagues to where it is now; besides our modern seamen have already all but discovered that it is not an island at all but a mainland, contiguous on one side with the East Indies and on others with lands lying beneath both the Poles - or that if it is separated from them, it is by straits so narrow that it does not deserve the name of'island' on that account. [B] It seems that large bodies such as these are subject, as are our own, to changes, [C] some natural, some [B] feverish.' When I consider how my local river the Dordogne has, during my own lifetime, been encroaching on the right-hand bank going downstream and has taken over so much land that it has robbed many buildings of their foundation, I realize that it has been suffering from some unusual upset: for if it had always gone on like this or were to do so in the future, the whole face of the world would be distorted. But their moods change: sometimes they incline one way, then another: and sometimes they restrain themselves. I am not discussing those sudden floodings whose causes we know. By the coast-line in Medoc, my brother the Sieur d' Arsac can see lands of his lying buried under sand spewed up by the sea: the tops of some of the buildings are still visible: his rents and arable fields have been changed into very sparse grazing. The locals say that the sea has been thrusting so hard against them for some time now that they have lost four leagues of land. These sands are the sea's pioneer-corps: [C] and we can see those huge shifting sanddunes marching a half-league ahead in the vanguard, capturing territory. [A] The other testimony from Antiquity which some would make relevant to this discovery is in Aristotle - if that little book about unheard wonders is really his. 8 He tells how some Carthaginians struck out across the Atlantic beyond the Straits of Gibraltar, sailed for a long time and finally discovered a large fertile island entirely clothed in woodlands and watered by great deep rivers but very far from any mainland; they and others after them, attracted by the richness and fertility of the soil, 6. Horace, Ars poetica, 65-6. 7. '88: changes sickly and feverish. When ... 8. The Secreta secretorum is supposititious. Montaigne is following Girolamo Benzoni. 231 232 1:31. On the Cannibals 1:31. On the Cannibals kind that we find their true, vigorous, living, most natural and most useful properties and virtues, which we have bastardized in the other kind by merely adapting them to our corrupt tastes. [C] Moreover, there is a delicious savour which even our taste finds excellent in a variety of fruits produced in those countries without cultivation: they rival our own. [A] It is not sensible that artifice should be reverenced more than Nature, our great and powerful Mother. We have so overloaded the richness and beauty of her products by our own ingenuity that we have smothered her entirely. Yet wherever her pure light does shine, she wondrously shames our vain and frivolous enterprises: solder. I would tell Plato that those people have no trade of any kind, no acquaintance with writing, no knowledge of numbers, no terms for governor or political superior, no practice of subordination or of riches or poverty, no contracts, no inheritances, no divided estates, no occupation but leisure, no concern for kinship - except such as is common to them all - no clothing, no agriculture, no metals, no use of wine or corn. Among them you hear no words for treachery, lying, cheating, avarice, envy, backbiting or forgiveness. How remote from such perfection would Plato find that Republic which he thought up - [C] 'viri a diis recentes' (men fresh from the gods]. 12 [BJ Et veniunt ederc~ sponte sua melius, Surgit et in so/is formosior arbutus antris, Et volucres nulla dulcius arte canunt. [Ivy grows best when left untended; the strawberry tree flourishes more beautifully in lonely grottoes, and birds sing the sweeter for their artlessness. ]9 [A] All our strivings cannot even manage to reproduce the nest of the smallest little bird, with its beauty and appropriateness to its purpose; we cannot even reproduce the web of the wretched spider. [C] Plato says that all things are produced by nature, fortune or art, the greatest and fairest by the first two, the lesser and least perfect by the last. 10 [A] Those peoples, then, seem to me to be barbarous only in that they have been hardly fashioned by the mind of man, still remaining close neighbours to their original state of nature. They are still governed by the laws of Nature and are only very slightly bastardized by ours; but theirpurity is such that I am sometimes seized with irritation at their not having been discovered earlier, in times when there were men who could have appreciated them better than we do. It irritates me that neither Lycurgus nor Plato had any knowledge of them, for it seems to me that what experience has taught us about those peoples surpasses not only all the descriptions with which poetry has beautifully painted the Age of Gold" and all its ingenious fictions about Man's blessed early state, but also the very conceptions and yearnings of philosophy. They could not even imagine a state of nature so simple and so pure as the one we have learned about from experience; they could not even believe that societies of men could be maintained with so little artifice, so little in the way of human 9. Propertius, I, ii, 10-12. 10. Plato, Laws, X, 888A-B. 11. Cf. Elizabeth Armstrong, Ronsard and the Age of Gold, Cambridge, 1968. [BJ 233 Hos natura modos primum dedit. [These are the ways which Nature first ordained.]" (A] In addition they inhabit a land with a most delightful countryside and a temperate climate, so that, from what I have been told by my sources, it is rare to find anyone ill there;" I have been assured that they never saw a single man bent with age, toothless, blear-eyed or tottering. They dwell along the sea-shore, shut in to landwards by great lofty mountains, on a stretch of land some hundred leagues in width. They have fish and flesh in abundance which bear no resemblance to ours; these they eat simply cooked. They were so horror-struck by the first man who brought a horse there and rode it that they killed him with their arrows before they could recognize him, even though he had had dealings with them on several previous voyages. Their dwellings are immensely long, big enough to hold two or three hundred souls; they are covered with the bark of tall trees which are fixed into the earth, leaning against each other in support at the top, like some of our barns where the cladding reaches down to the ground and acts as a side. They have a kind of wood so hard that they use it to cut with, making their swords from it as well as grills to cook their meat. Their beds are woven from cotton and slung from the roof like hammocks on our ships; each has his own, since wives sleep apart from their husbands. They get up at sunrise and have their meal for the day as soon as they do so; they have no other meal but that one. They drink 12. Seneca, Epist. moral., XC, 44. (This epistle is a major defence of the inn ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

EngDuke1993
School: Cornell University

Attached.

A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF MICHEL MONTAIGNE’S “ON THE CANNIBALS.”
OUTLINE:


Summary/Thesis:



Body Paragraph with 10 on 1



Word Count



References


Surname 1
Student’s Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course:
Date:
A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF MICHEL MONTAIGNE’S “ON THE CANNIBALS.”
In “On the Cannibals” by Michel Montaigne, the author argues that every man
considers anything he is not familiar with to be barbarous (231). In recognizing the horrific
barbarity among the practices of the Scythians, Montaigne is saddened not by the way we notice
their evils and judge them rightly, but how we ignore our wrong-doings (235). Montaigne then
continues to support his claim by exploring our...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
awesome work thanks

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors