The exorcist essay

Anonymous
timer Asked: Feb 5th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $10

Question Description

Upload one paragraph that you have been working on- it makes no difference if it is a body paragraph or if you want me to look at a revised intro- whichever you feel like uploading is completely fine with me. I also uploaded some outside sources you might need.

Thank you!

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1 RA paragraph Chapter six of the book exorcist continues with the story of a teenage girl possessed with demons. In this chapter, Blatty significantly shows the significance of religions in society. By showing the conversation between Father Damien Karass and Lieutenant William Kinderman, Blatty shows that religious leaders have a significant role in in the human community. While religion is opium, religious leaders have a substantial purpose of providing advice and guiding people. When the Lieutenant takes the initiative to look for the man of God while jogging, Blatty openly in show how important religious person can be "father Karass, Kinderman called to him hoarsely" (Blatty 1). The priest turned around and tearlessly nodded, squinting into the sunlight as he waited for the homicide detective to reach him." Blatty further shows the importance of religion in the society at the point where detective Kinderman opens up and confess a murder to Father Karras. He, however, tells the pries that this should be a secret between them "You mean murder? Yes, I enjoy it" (Blatty 2). Blatty also shows the role of religion in the society in the conversation where the detective question father Karras about witchcraft." listen, what do you know about witchcraft?" the detective asked (Blatty 3). Even though the detective suspects that a film director Burke Dennings died due to witchcraft, he does not understand what it is all about. By seeking more information about witchcraft from the priest, Blaty plainly shows that religion plays an essential role in explaining the spiritual world and matters of faith that people do not readily understand in real life. Through the rest of the chapter, Father Karras helps the detective to unfold unique stories that relate to demonic murders. RA PARAGRAPH 2 Work Cited Blatty, William P. Exorcist. London: Transworld Digital, 2011. 1 ePortfolio Introduction Between the world of religion and faith and that of superstition lies a dark place where demons and evil spirits exist. Head-spinning, pea-soup vomiting, and devilish-screaming demon Pazuzu is the stubborn possession that gets into the body of a teenager and only gets out in the self-sacrificial style of a priest who offers to carry the burden instead of the innocent young soul. The Exorcist is not only a scary novel but also a carefully-written story of possession and the strict difference between the medical and the spiritual world. Blatty’s intentions with this novel are multiple but one thing is for sure that he aimed to separate the spiritual world from the realism of normal life in medical and psychiatric terms. The novel itself offers a challenge to the reader regarding their faith and also their perception of evil and good and asks the central question; what is the purpose of evil in the world? Blatty works out to bring this point of view to the readers focus by looking into various discussions. For instance, he presents the purpose of possession as follows: “Yet I think the demon's target is not the possessed; it is us . . . the observers . . . every person in this house. And I think---I think the point is to make us despair; to reject our own humanity, Damien: to see ourselves as ultimately bestial; as ultimately vile and putrescent; without dignity; ugly; unworthy (Blatty 311). This section of the novel suggests that the evil surrounding us is meant to shake and test our will. Is the possession a way of testing Chris McNeil and the people around her? Coincidentally, Chris the mother of the possessed is an atheist. Overall, this argument focuses not only on the presentation of belief and faith in the novel but also on the perception of good and evil and the place of the two in the world of the readers. Father Merrin’s understanding of possessions introduces the reader to a religious perspective of trials and tribulations as humiliating the human soul and calling for a stronger 2 belief. Blatty’s novel questions the place of evil in the world and shows that it is indeed a way of providing a balance of nature. ISSN 1556-3723 (print) Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion __________________________________________________________________ Volume 5 2009 Article 6 __________________________________________________________________ The Folk Piety of William Peter Blatty: The Exorcist in the Context of Secularization Joseph Laycock* Doctoral Student Department of Religion and Theological Studies Boston University Boston, Massachusetts * joe.laycock@gmail.com Copyright © 2009 Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion is freely available on the World Wide Web at http://www.religjournal.com. The Folk Piety of William Peter Blatty: The Exorcist in the Context of Secularization Joseph Laycock Doctoral Student Department of Religion and Theological Studies Boston University Boston, Massachusetts Abstract William Peter Blatty‘s novel The Exorcist has been linked to changes in lived religion in the United States and to a popular revival of demonology and exorcism ministries. This article considers the historical context in which the novel was written and suggests that The Exorcist presents an early critique of the secularization narrative by referencing the folk piety of the American life-world. Peter Williams has described American religion as a dialectic between ecclesiastical religion and popular religion. With this in mind, I argue that The Exorcist represents a cultural moment in which the perceived decline of supernaturalism inspired a resurgence of folk piety. To audiences in the early 1970s, the medley of Catholic demonology, popular occultism, and parapsychology in The Exorcist came as an appealing antidote to rationalized religion and a secular social order. Laycock: The Folk Piety of William Peter Blatty 3 Film and literary critics have spent a great deal of ink attempting to explain the phenomenon surrounding William Peter Blatty‘s novel The Exorcist and the subsequent film adaptation. In 1971 and 1972, the novel spent fifty-five weeks on the New York Times bestseller lists (Winter 1996). The movie adaptation in 1974 was even more successful, and news accounts report lines as long as 5,000 people waiting to see the film (Time 1974). This sort of success for a horror film was unheard of at the time, particularly because horror was considered a ―ghettoized‖ genre (Hoppenstand 1994: 35). Numerous critics have interpreted Blatty‘s story as demonological metaphor used to address a variety of fears lurking in the American collective unconscious: fears of the counterculture of the 1960s, women, and youth, to name a few. However, The Exorcist has also attracted the attention of several scholars of contemporary religion. Douglas Cowan (2008) argues that The Exorcist inspires the reaction it does because of a deeply embedded cultural fear rooted in Christian demonology. Christopher Partridge (2006: 240) includes The Exorcist in his two-volume The Re-Enchantment of the West as an example of demonic ―occulture.‖ In her ethnographic study of media and the religious worlds of American teenagers, Lynn Schofield Clark (2003) found that a generation later, The Exorcist continues to influence popular ideas about the supernatural. Finally, in his ethnographic study of Christian exorcism, Michael Cuneo (2001) credits Blatty with a massive revival of popular demonology and exorcism ministries. I dissent from psychoanalytical readings of The Exorcist and argue that it is very much a story about religion. However, it is not, as some have claimed, an attempt to evangelize through horror. Many people know that Blatty based his story on actual events and that his character Father Karras, a Jesuit scientist suffering a crisis of faith, reflects Blatty‘s own experience of Catholicism. The Exorcist depicts Blatty‘s life-world, which, while heavily influenced by Catholic doctrine, is also shaped by religious pluralism, scientific positivism, and popular belief in the paranormal. The Exorcist is a depiction not of ecclesiastical Catholicism but of folk piety. Robert Wuthnow (1987: 187–188) describes folk piety as an ―ideological form‖ that, unlike formal religion, is extra-ecclesiastical. The symbols of folk piety are drawn from a variety of sources and incorporate beliefs about divine or supernatural intervention in the realm of everyday experience. Thus The Exorcist features the traditional Catholic symbols of demons and exorcism; however, it also features eclectic symbols such as psychic research, Ouija boards, and Asian ascetic practices. This eclecticism reflects not only Blatty‘s life-world, but also that of many Americans in the late 20th century. Peter Williams (1989) argues that American religion can be thought of as a sort of dialectic between formal religion and extra-ecclesiastical religion or folk piety. 4 Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion Vol. 5 (2009), Article 6 I argue that The Exorcist had such cultural significance because it portrayed contemporary American folk piety at a historical moment when a narrative of secularization had become a dominant cultural myth. A number of scholars have suggested that secularization theory has often functioned as a sort of myth or an ideology rather than an accurate model of religious trends (Cassanova 1994; Stark 1999; Swatos and Christiano 2000). When Blatty‘s novel was published, the decline of religion was a reigning paradigm not only for sociology, but also for the general public. The Exorcist was written in 1969, only three years after Time magazine ran its famous cover asking, ―Is God Dead?‖ A Gallup poll taken in January 1970 indicated that 75 percent of survey respondents thought that religion was losing influence. This is the highest percentage ever recorded since Gallup began this poll in 1957 (Saad 2009). I argue that The Exorcist came as a declaration of folk piety at a time when Americans were looking for an antidote to the narrative of universal secularization. Several scholars have cited a connection between The Exorcist and a resurgence of Christian demonology (Clark 2003; Cuneo 2001; Partridge 2006). This could be because The Exorcist presented supernaturalism and folk piety as a valid alternative to ecclesiastical religion, which had become rationalized, privatized, and disenchanted. As Partridge (2006: 238) puts it, the demonic has a unique ability to stir up ―the latent supernaturalism of a supposedly secular Western heart.‖ Cassanova (1994) helpfully points out that the secularization thesis takes two distinct forms: the decline of religion thesis and the privatization of religion thesis. The decline of religion thesis assumes that religion and particularly supernaturalism will gradually fade out of the modern world in favor of scientific rationalism. Interestingly, Gorski and Altinordu (2008) argue that attempts to measure this thesis have been biased by an effect they term pastoralism. That is, secularization is often measured by ―priestly standards of good and true religion‖ rather than deviant or popular religion. This bias is attributed to the fact that it was concerned churchmen who first began collecting religious data (Gorski and Altinordu 2008: 65). Because of this pastoralist bias, folk piety has become something of an Achilles‘ heel of the decline of religion thesis. Wuthnow (1987) argues that folk piety has defied predictions that it is incompatible with modernity. Similarly, Stark (1999: 268) cites an increase of ―highly magical‖ folk traditions in Asia as evidence against the secularization thesis. The Exorcist demonstrates that one does not need to travel to Asia to find a vital and magical folk tradition. Although few of Blatty‘s characters practice ―good and true‖ religion, it is difficult to conclude from this story that Americans had ceased to believe in the supernatural. In addition to being a story of possession, the United Laycock: The Folk Piety of William Peter Blatty 5 States of the Exorcist abounds with new religious movements, psychics, and popular occultism. The privatization of religion thesis argues that religion will become increasingly understood as subjective as it can no longer be integrated with alternative interpretations of life. Furthermore, religion will become depoliticized as it assumes a new place within the secular order. The Exorcist presents several challenges to this theory. First, the story reminds readers that claims of the supernatural are not subjective: The demon is real whether anyone believes in it or not. Furthermore, an extensive battery of scientific tests is unable to arrive at an alternative explanation. Second, Blatty‘s story points out that religion and science are not as differentiated as might be assumed. After all, Father Karras is both a priest and a psychiatrist. In seeking a ―scientific‖ explanation, Karras explores the possibility of parapsychological phenomena such as psychokinesis. Parapsychology, which played heavily in the case on which Blatty based his story, remains an interstitial sphere between religion and science. Finally, The Exorcist is deceptively political. Two chapters are preceded by pages of quotations that juxtapose passages from the gospels with news accounts describing the horrors of the 20th century. This device is a reminder that Americans continue to interpret political events not only through the lens of religion, but also often through the lens of supernaturalism. The message of The Exorcist was in a sense phenomenological. Some members of audiences viewing the film in 1973 experienced fainting, vomiting, and even nervous breakdowns. These reactions––which have been largely ignored by film critics––were not caused by some subconscious cultural fear but rather by a very conscious fear of demons and the supernatural. The fear itself was the indictment of the secularization narrative. THE EXORCIST PHENOMENON The Exorcist is considered to have paved the way for later best-selling horror writers. Stephen King allegedly once told Blatty, ―You know, in a way, you‘re my father‖ (Brock-Servais 2000: 50). However, in King‘s own book about the horror genre, he called The Exorcist part of the ―Humorless Thudding Tract School of horror writing‖ and expressed a wish that Blatty never write another novel (King 1981: 282). Blatty had originally been a comedy writer, but after The Exorcist, he wrote only thrillers with Catholic tropes. The Exorcist was a wildly successful novel, and in 1983, Blatty sued The New York Times for nine million dollars, claiming that it had negligently left his sequel Legion off the best-seller list (Brock-Servais 2000). 6 Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion Vol. 5 (2009), Article 6 The movie adaptation in 1973 was arguably even more successful than the novel. King (1981: 167) described the phenomenon surrounded the film as ―a two month possession jag.‖ A Time article from 1974 tells of 8:00 A.M. screenings of the film and lines 5,000 people long. One theater manager estimated that each screening of the film caused an average of four blackouts, six episodes of vomiting, and numerous early exits (Time 1974). The Guardian quoted another manager as saying, ―My janitors are going bananas wiping up the vomit‖ (Malcolm 1974). A report that appeared in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease in 1975 claimed that the film had induced in some viewers ―cases of traumatic neurosis and even psychosis‖ (Partridge 2006: 240). Descriptions of theater audiences for The Exorcist are somewhat reminiscent of Durkheim‘s (1995 [1912]) notion of ―collective effervescence‖ and perhaps point to an implicit religious function. Several accounts describe a sort of melting pot effect, in which the screening temporarily united diverse groups of people. The Time article commented, ―Most audiences, however, tend to be young and to contain a far higher than average proportion of blacks and, in some cities, people of Spanish origin. ‗Voodoo, you know,‘ a black file clerk said matter-of-factly‖ (Time 1974).1 Cosimo Urbano (2004: 33) quotes another review, which added: If the message doesn‘t pull people together, the experience of it does. I, for one, spoke to more Puerto Ricans during my two hour wait in front of a New York theatre than I did the entire two years I lived in New York. And the vomitsplattered bathroom after the show (you couldn‘t even get near the sink) may well be the closest the Melting Pot ever comes to blending literally. In fact, several scholars have described a screening of The Exorcist as a sort of rite––in some ways, a religious rite (Ingebretson 1996; Ursini and Silver 1994). The fact that The Exorcist could have this effect on an audience points to its quasi-religious function and supports a reading of the phenomenon as a manifestation of folk piety. After the 1970s, The Exorcist continued to be an influence on American film, American culture, and American religion. Priests and Catholic religious items were now de rigueur in horror films (Clark 2003; McDannell 2007). The longterm effect of The Exorcist on American culture became apparent in 1991, when Republican Senator Orrin Hatch read from the novel during Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas‘s televised confirmation hearings (Slovick 2009). 1 Joseph Baker (2008) does show data indicating a higher belief in religious evil among AfricanAmericans. However, he attributes this not to Afro-Atlantic religions but to the history of racism and oppression experienced by African-Americans in the United States, which has influenced the view of evil within black Protestantism. Laycock: The Folk Piety of William Peter Blatty 7 The Exorcist also created a moment in which the dialectic of ecclesiastical and extra-ecclesiastical religion as described by Williams (1989) was in serious flux. The church suddenly found itself confronting a resurgence of folk piety. Ursini and Silver (1994: 158) note that in the film‘s wake, few priests could escape the question ―Have you seen The Exorcist, father?‖ Cowan (2008: 172– 173) indicates that Gene Siskel saw the film with a priest who feared that it would start a rash of ―pseudo-possessions.‖ This in turn presented the church with an opportunity to reassess its relationship with supernaturalism. Many Catholics were opposed to The Exorcist phenomenon and wanted to continue a tradition of rationalist apologetics in which the demonic was understood as metaphorical. Speaking on Blatty‘s novel, Father Richard McBrien, chair of the theology department at the University of Notre Dame, dismissed the very notion of a personal devil as ―premodern and pre-critical‖ (Cuneo 2001: 60). Two reviewers from the Jesuit-run America magazine called The Exorcist ―sordid and sensationalistic‖ (Cuneo 2001: 60). The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops‘ Office for Film and Broad-casting rated it as A-IV (morally unobjectionable for adults, with reservations). On the other hand, many conservative Catholics embraced The Exorcist, apparently seeing it as an opportunity for evangelism. Catholic News, the official newspaper of the Archdiocese of New York, described the film as ―a deeply spiritual film‖ (Cuneo 2001: 11). The conservative Catholic journal Triumph and the official journal of the Vatican, Civilita Cattolica, also gave positive reviews. In March 1990, conservative Cardinal John O‘Connor actually read from the novel in St. Patrick‘s Cathedral and incorporated it into a homily (Cuneo 2001). H ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

henryprofessor
School: Boston College

Attached.

Before: Chapter six of the book exorcist continues with the story of a teenage girl possessed with
demons. In this chapter, Blatty significantly shows the significance of religions in society. By sh...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Good stuff. Would use again.

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors