Assignment 4: Disaster Recovery (DR) TeamDue Week 8 and worth 75 points Consider a scenario where the contingency planning management team (CPMT) of your organization has designated you as the disaster recovery team leader, and the preparation and planning of this component of the security program is now under your purview with a team of 11 employees including yourself. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: Detail the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented, and construct an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.Describe the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.Draft an executive summary to the DR plan and explain the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.Include charts or diagrams created in Visio or Dia. The completed diagrams / charts must be imported into the Word document before the paper is submitted.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Develop a disaster recovery plan for an organization.Compare and contrast the methods of disaster recovery and business continuity.Develop techniques for different disaster scenarios. Use technology and information resources to research issues in disaster recovery.Write clearly and concisely about disaster recovery topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.Points: 75Assignment 4: Disaster Recovery (DR) TeamCriteria UnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% D Fair70-79% C Proficient80-89% B Exemplary90-100% A1. Detail the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented and construct an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.Weight: 35%Did not submit or incompletely detailed the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented and did not submit or incompletely constructed an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.Insufficiently detailed the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented and insufficiently constructed an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.Partially detailed the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented and partially constructed an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.Satisfactorily detailed the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented and satisfactorily constructed an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.Thoroughly detailed the DR team roles, responsibilities, and sub teams that would be implemented and thoroughly constructed an organizational chart for the team through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.2. Describe the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.Weight: 25%Did not submit or incompletely described the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.Insufficiently described the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.Partially described the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.Satisfactorily described the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.Thoroughly described the proper procedures and policies that would be implemented specific to the DR team personnel as well as special equipment that would be required.3. Draft an executive summary to the DR plan and explain the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.Weight: 25%Did not submit or incompletely drafted an executive summary to the DR plan and did not submit or incompletely explained the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.Insufficiently drafted an executive summary to the DR plan and insufficiently explained the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.Partially drafted an executive summary to the DR plan and partially explained the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.Satisfactorily drafted an executive summary to the DR plan and satisfactorily explained the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.Thoroughly drafted an executive summary to the DR plan and thoroughly explained the purpose of the plan and high-level specifics for upper management.4. 3 referencesWeight: 5%No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirementsWeight: 10%More than 8 errors present7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors present

W2PA1-1Go back through the business press ( Fortune, The Economist, BusinessWeek, etc. and any other LIRN-based articles) and find at least three articles related to either downsizing, implementation of a new technology, or a merger or acquisition. In a 2 page, APA formatted in single spaceRequirements:In about 2 pages Needs to be done strongly ORIGINAL work:In APA 6th edition  format a mustCitations and reference list a must (please use MS Word’s “References” tab to insert Citation)Answers all questions need to be completely demonstrating knowledge and understanding of key concepts, ability to think critically, and has included original examples in response.It is required that the textbook and/or scholarly research be included to justify and/or solidify any argument or reasoningTextbook info: International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace 2016, 11th edition, by Charles W.L. Hill G. Tomas M HultWrite a 2-page paper in single space in response to a case study or similar assignment provided by your professor. Answers are to be clear, well-organized, and specific. Provide a concise, cogent argument and include details to support your response. Follow  following requirements:o Content  rich, all questions and their parts have been answered and communicates substantive, accurate, and evidence-based analysis and critical thought.o Effective in supporting the student's argument. The student provides supporting evidence for the argumento Well organized with a logical flow, contains correct grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.o Follow all formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements.o The student is able to effectively demonstrate the ability to draw logical and valid conclusions based on the supporting researched based evidence presented.o Use at least 5 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) outside of the textbook to support your argument.Here questions:1. What were the key frontline experiences listed in relation to your chosen change?2. How do they relate to those listed in Chapter 4?   2.1. Did you identify new ones confronting change managers?3. How would you prioritize these experiences?    3.1. Do any stand out as "deal breakers”?    3.2. Why?4. What new insights into implementing this type of change emerges  from this?

Answer the following IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Respond to each of the following in a minimum of 175 words each. It will be run thru a checker, thanks.Complete the case study exercise, Communicating Value(attached).Consider what you learned in the experience and respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words each:1.Based on what you learned, how would you facilitate cross-team collaboration between the marketing management function and R&D teams at Lenovo?2.How would you communicate about new features to customers?3.How would you measure the success of the team?****there is no additional info, thanks****