Description Purpose  The purpose of this assignment is for students to:  -develop a genogram that provides an effective tool for gathering family data, -provide a visual portrayal of a patient’s family health history as the history pertains to the physical exam, -provide healthcare providers with a clearer picture of a patient’s non-modifiable risk factors, and -discuss their understanding of the patient’s genomic profile and the relationship to current health concerns.  Overview  A genogram is a visual and written representation of a history and physical. This genogram will be based on information obtained from the Shadow Health patient named Tina. As you are completing the Shadow Health: Health History assignment (see below), you will be able to ask Tina questions in order to gather information for the genogram. Consult Chapter 5, the Family History section and Figure 5-3, in the text for an example.  Directions Develop a three-generation family medical tree for the Shadow Health patient Tina.  -The three generations must include the patient, parents, and grandparents in order to receive full credit. -Identify family members, ages, relationships, and significant health history with identification of risk factors. -Identify deceased, divorced, or estranged family members and ages and causes of death of family members.   

Take a moment to review the details of this assignment below and gather any necessary files. Once you're ready to submit your assignment, move on to Step 2.Assessment DescriptionPrepare a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation, with speaker notes, that examines the significance of an organization's culture and values. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the Topic Materials for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning, and an additional slide for References at the end.Outline the purpose of an organization's mission, vision, and values.Explain why an organization's mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes.Explain what factors lead to conflict in a professional practice. Describe how organizational values and culture can influence the way conflict is addressed.Discuss effective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration.Discuss how organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes. Describe how these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective.ou are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice. While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.RubricsPurpose of Organizational Mission, Vision, and Values10.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionPurpose of Organizational Mission, Vision, and Values5. Excellent10.4 pointsPurpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is accurate and clearly outlined.4. Good9.26 pointsPurpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is outlined. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.3. Satisfactory8.22 pointsPurpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies.2. Less than Satisfactory7.8 pointsPurpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is partially summarized. There are omissions and inaccuracies.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsPurpose of organizational mission, vision, and values is omitted.collapse Significance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes assessmentSignificance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes10.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionSignificance of Mission, Vision, and Values on Nurse Engagement and Patient Outcomes5. Excellent10.4 pointsA detailed explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. Sound rationale is provided for support. The significance is clearly established.4. Good9.26 pointsAn explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. Some rationale or information is needed for support. The significance is generally established.3. Satisfactory8.22 pointsA summary of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. More information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies. The significance is partially established.2. Less than Satisfactory7.8 pointsAn incomplete explanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is presented. There are omissions and inaccuracies. The significance is not established.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsExplanation of why organizational mission, vision, and values are significant to nurse engagement and patient outcomes is omitted.collapse Factors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice assessmentFactors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice10.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionFactors Leading to Conflict in Professional Practice and Influence of Organizational Values and Culture in Addressing Conflict5. Excellent10.4 pointsAn explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is clearly presented. How organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is described in detail. Strong rationale and evidence are provided for support.4. Good9.26 pointsAn explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is presented. How organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is described. Some information or rationale is needed for support.3. Satisfactory8.22 pointsA general explanation of factors leading to conflict in a professional practice is presented. A summary of how organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is presented. Some aspects are unclear. More information and rationale are needed.2. Less than Satisfactory7.8 pointsFactors leading to conflict in a professional practice are partially presented. A vague summary of how organizational values and culture influence the way conflict is addressed is presented. There are significant omissions.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsFactors leading to conflict in a professional practice are omitted.collapse Effective Strategies for Resolving Conflict assessmentEffective Strategies for Resolving Conflict10.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionEffective Strategies for Resolving Workplace Conflict and Encouraging Interprofessional Collaboration5. Excellent10.4 pointsEffective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration is discussed. Strong support and rationale are provided to support each strategy.4. Good9.26 pointsEffective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration is discussed. Some detail or rationale is needed for clarity or support.3. Satisfactory8.22 pointsStrategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are generally discussed. The proposed strategies are relevant and would be generally effective for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration. More evidence and rationale are needed.2. Less than Satisfactory7.8 pointsStrategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are partially discussed. It is unclear how the proposed strategies would be effective; the proposed strategies are not relevant.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsEffective strategies for resolving workplace conflict and encouraging interprofessional collaboration are omitted.collapse Influence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes assessmentInfluence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes10.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionInfluence of Organizational Needs and Culture of Health Care on Organizational Outcomes5. Excellent10.4 pointsHow organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is clearly discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is described in detail. The relationship among these is established. Rationale and evidence is provided for support.4. Good9.26 pointsHow organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is described. The relationship among these is generally established. Some information or rationale is needed.3. Satisfactory8.22 pointsHow organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is generally discussed. How these relate to health promotion and disease prevention from a community health perspective is summarized. The relationship among these is not clearly established. More information is needed. There are some inaccuracies.2. Less than Satisfactory7.8 pointsHow organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is partially presented. There are major omissions and inaccuracies.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsHow organizational needs and the culture of health care influence organizational outcomes is not discussed.collapse Presentation of Content assessmentPresentation of Content52 pointsCriteria DescriptionPresentation of Content5. Excellent52 pointsThe content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.4. Good46.28 pointsThe content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.3. Satisfactory41.08 pointsThe presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.2. Less than Satisfactory39 pointsThe content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.collapse Layout assessmentLayout6.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionLayout5. Excellent6.5 pointsThe layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.4. Good5.79 pointsThe layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.3. Satisfactory5.14 pointsThe layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.2. Less than Satisfactory4.88 pointsThe layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.collapse Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) assessmentLanguage Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)6.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionLanguage Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)5. Excellent6.5 pointsThe writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.4. Good5.79 pointsThe writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.3. Satisfactory5.14 pointsLanguage is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.2. Less than Satisfactory4.88 pointsSome distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsInappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessmentMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)6.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5. Excellent6.5 pointsWriter is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.4. Good5.79 pointsSlides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.3. Satisfactory5.14 pointsSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.2. Less than Satisfactory4.88 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsSlide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.collapse Documentation of Sources assessmentDocumentation of Sources6.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDocumentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5. Excellent6.5 pointsSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.4. Good5.79 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.3. Satisfactory5.14 pointsSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.2. Less than Satisfactory4.88 pointsDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsSources are not documented.

PRACTICUM ORGANIZATION: Connect For Health located in Rhode Island Reflection of Your Practicum Experience In a 1,000-1,250 words, address the following: Summarize your practicum experience. Describe how you have applied theory or knowledge from your course work into practice during your practicum experience (provide specific examples). What are the most important things you have learned from this practicum experience and how will you apply them to your public health career? How has this experience helped develop professionalism skills, such as networking, team building, communication, and professional competencies in public health? What servant leadership, from the perspective of the Christian Worldview, qualities do you possess that would help you apply your faith and spirituality to your public health career?   Articulate a personal mission, a set of core values, and vision regarding your role in public health. How will your core values help guide your ethical decision making in public health? Include two or three scholarly sources to support your narrative. General Requirements You are required to cite at least FIVE sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required. While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct. PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS IN PARAGRAPHS AND MAKE IT COHESIVE AND TRY TO INCORPORATE THE READINGS BELOW PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format. https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe... Read "Theoretical Models and Operational Frameworks in Public Health Ethics," by Petrini, from International Journal of Environmental Research in Public Health (2010). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819784/ Read "Public Health Ethics Theory: Review and Path to Convergence," by Lee, from Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics (2012). URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00648.x   Read "Global Health Ethics: An Introduction to Prominent Theories and Relevant Topics," by Stapleton, Schröder-Bäck, Laaser, Meershoek, and Popa, from Global Health Action (2014). URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/gha.v7.23569 Read "Ethics Codes and Reflective Practice in Public Health," by Jennings, from Journal of Public Health (2018). URL: https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdy140/5077245?redirectedFrom=fulltext   MUST haveat least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.  Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources. It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them. To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors. REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED. References American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.