NUR 699 GCU Evidence-based practice proposal

Content Type

User Generated

User

XrivaFnintr

Subject

Health Medical

Course

NUR 699

School

GRAN CANYON UNIVERSITY

Description

Throughout this course you will be developing a formal, evidence-based practice proposal.

The proposal is the plan for an evidence-based practice project designed to address a problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Although several types of evidence can be used to support a proposed solution, a sufficient and compelling base of support from valid research studies is required as the major component of that evidence. Proposals are submitted in a format suitable for obtaining formal approval in the work setting. Proposals will vary in length depending upon the problem or issue addressed; they can be between 3,500 and 5,000 words. The cover sheet, abstract, references page, and appendices are not included in the word limit.

Section headings and letters for each section component are required. Responses are addressed in narrative form in relation to that number. Evaluation of the proposal in all sections is based upon the extent to which the depth of content reflects graduate-level critical-thinking skills.

This project contains seven formal sections:

Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
Section B: Problem Description
Section C: Literature Support
Section D: Solution Description
Section E: Change Model
Section F: Implementation Plan
Section G: Evaluation of Process

Each section (A-G) will be submitted as separate assignments so your instructor can provide feedback (refer to applicable modules for further descriptions of each section).

The final paper will consist of the completed project (with revisions to all sections), title page, abstract, reference list, and appendices. Appendices will include a conceptual model for the project, handouts, data and evaluation collection tools, a budget, a timeline, resource lists, and approval forms.

Use the "NUR-699 EBP Implementation Plan Guide" and "NUR-699 Evidence-Based Practice Project Student Example" to assist you. Also refer to "NUR-699 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Format."

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Attachments

NUR699.R.Evidence-BasedPracticeProjectProposalFormat_student.docx

NUR699.R.EBPimplementationPlanGuide_student.docx

NUR699.R.EBPStudentExample_Student.docx

NUR699.R.EvidenceBasedPracticeProposalFinalPaperOverview_student.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code NUR-699 Class Code NUR-699-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 55.0% Abstract Presents a complete, concise overview of all phases of the proposed project. 10.0% Project / Content Comprehension 25.0% Sections A-G Synthesis 20.0% Organization and Effectiveness 30.0% Appendices 15.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 15.0% Format 15.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 15.0% Total Weightage 100% Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper No Submissions (71.00%) None None None None None None 250.0 Unsatisfactory (75.00%) No abstract Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject. The main sections are not easily identified; some of the subconcepts do not successfully integrate to form a cohesive whole. Within section revisions methods and strategies are described poorly. Basic descriptions, connections, and alignment are not clearly presented. Logic flow is random, not easily understood. Several of the appendices are missing. Designs are not neat or organized, and do not include all required elements. Unprofessionally developed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Less Than Satisfactory (83.00%) Abstract minimally written, clearly not sufficient to provide the reader with an understanding of the project. Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles. Within section revisions components may be missing details, only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete. The main sections are somewhat identified; some of the subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. Basic descriptions, connections, and alignment as well as a clear logic flow are somewhat fragmented, not easily understood. Several of the appendices are missing. Design detracts from purpose. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. Limited understanding of the topic is present as evidenced by the design. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (88.00%) Abstract provides overview of part of the project, but does not cover each section. Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. The major sections have had revisions but some components may be missing details. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, All of the main sections are easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. Recognizes links among sections; however, some connections may be ambiguous. Basic descriptions, connections and alignment as well as basic logic flow are understandable, but are somewhat lacking in a clear progression. All of the appendices have been provided. Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Appearance is general, and major elements are missing. Provides minimal details. Appropriate for the audience and the content but some of the development of the material is inadequate. Basic understanding of the topic is present as evidenced by the Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (92.00%) Abstract provides a quick or too brief overview of all phases of the proposed project. Contains project title, project director's name, and affiliation. Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. All of the major sections have been revised based upon logical feedback, conclusions, and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and All of the main sections are easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. Descriptions, connections, and alignments are provided. Logic flow is smooth and easily understood, facilitating a thorough understanding of the various sections as they interrelate. All of the appendices have been provided. Designs are appropriate and present quality products. Appearance is neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. Provides details with accuracy. Reveals a solid understanding of the topic as evidenced by design. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) Abstract provides a complete concise overview of all phases of the proposed project and flows well with the rest of the paper. Contains project title, project director's name, and affiliation. Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented throughout the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits process of creative thinking and All main sections are easily identified, and sub concepts branch appropriately from main sections. Descriptions, connections, and alignments are obvious and well supported. Logic flow is smooth and easily understood, facilitating a thorough understanding of various sections as they interrelate. Connection to extraneous materials are well All of the appendices have been provided. They are effective and functional. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Gives sufficient detail with precision and specificity. Reveals a solid understanding of the topic as evidenced by the design. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Comments Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Outline

Introduction
Body
Conclusion
References

Running head: RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Compiling Evidence-Based Practice
Student’s Name
Institution Affiliate

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

2

Table of Contents
Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment ........................................................................ 3
Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3
Diffusion of Innovation Theory of Roger ....................................................................................... 4
Concemptional Model for the Human Factors that Encourage Roger's Diffusion of Innovation5
Problem Description ....................................................................................................................... 7
Foreground question .................................................................................................................... 8
Review of Evidence and Synthesis of Literature ............................................................................ 9
Change Model ............................................................................................................................... 12
International Outreach Nursing Program ...................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
Implementation plan ..................................................................................................................... 15
Evaluation plan ............................................................................................................................. 15
Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 16
Conception Model ..................................................................................................................... 17
International Outreach Nursing Program .................................................................................. 17
References ..................................................................................................................................... 19

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

3

Compiling Evidence-Based Practice
Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
Introduction
A proposal is a plan for an evidence-based practice project designed to address a
problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Although several types of evidence
can be used to support a proposed solution, a sufficient and compelling base of support from
valid research studies is required as a significant component of that evidence. Proposals are
submitted in a format suitable for obtaining formal approval in the work setting. Evidence-Based
Practice is the use of clinical study to address a specific issue accompanied by decision making
cycle. It entails the composition of ideas collected from client respond and clinical professionals
to elaborate on health matters concerning the quality of care that will add value to the treatment
methods preferred by the patients. The aim of applying the evidence-based practice in the
medical field is to create an effective treatment process which is safe and quality guaranteed to
the patients. The EBP reduces clinical risks by introducing efficient ways of caring for the
patient within the healing environment.
This practice increases intervention between the nurse and patient hence retain the
interrelationship process. This clinical, ethical practice reduces the over cost and potential risks.
The procedural of Evidence-Based Practice involves problem identification, confirming the
common literature regarding the issue, analyzing the matter thoroughly, applying the findings in
practice and keep monitoring the practice for effectiveness. The exercise develops under several
models that are available within the clinical environment. Health workers apply these theories to
achieve the objectives subjected to evidence-based practice.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

4

Diffusion of Innovation Theory of Roger
This theory is among the aspects that lead the evidence-based practice into successes
process. It involves all the practice bordered by overtime changes according to social science
perspective. The theory explains that an applied idea, overtime or outcome of evidence become
familiar within the practice environment then it distributes thoroughly in the entire population. A
persistence in evidence-based practice shows effective acceptance by both the nurses and the
patients in the health care system hence it becomes the possible application method of treatment.
Although the ideas that base their views on the diffusion of innovation are raw, its effectiveness
is demo after a time of approved credibility of adoption (Clark, 2014). The process diffuses from
the initial to become new proved and more beneficial practice functionality if it is credible
enough to show meaningful changes.
Evidence-based practice relies on researching for a solution through looking for the
effective treatment changes those can make the long-lasting changes in clinical practice. If the
answer is actively showing the potential value of quality to the care of the customers, then the
clinicians apply it in treatment practice. Roger’s theory of Diffusion of Innovation is useful in
this application because it is procedural from acceptance measures and finally the patients and
the caring society accepts it (Clark, 2014). The reaso...