Demonstration of critical thinking (socio-historically and/or using Native American perspective) and reflective responses (taking in course content and rethinking one's view of the information) to the course content, as well as accurate conveyance of course content (do not misquote or misinterpret course content). Writing of quality papers. Learning and utilizing American Sociological Association's (ASA) style and formatting.***Required course content for RP3: Online Lecture(s) and/or Required Reading(s): RP3 (Spirituality and Well-being) must use the following course content from Module 3.*** “Spiritual Hucksterism (Plastic Medicine Man) vs. Traditional Native healers”: LECTURE Parris Butler: Incantation to dispel new age dogma:152. Susan Lobo, Steve Talbot and Traci L. Morris: VII The Sacred: Spirituality and SacredGeography:296-301. John (Fire) Lame Deer and Richard Erdoes: Alone on the hilltop:304-306.NOTE: If other (incorrect) course content is used, the paper will be graded for half points. Instructions:Write your thoughtful (reflective) responses to what you are learning from the online lectures and/or the content of the required readings. The above section specifies what course content you will base your reflective responses upon for Response Paper Assignment. You do not have to response to all of the above content. Focus your reflective responses to a central concept/idea and/or data within the lectures/required readings that have been particularly interesting to you. Think about and analyze this course content. The best papers critically discuss one concept in a thorough manner.Move beyond simplistic responses (e.g. “I enjoyed the online lectures”, or “The readings were hard”). Instead, demonstrate reflective thought in your paper. Explain why you enjoyed the readings or the lecture content with specificity. The goal for Response/Reflection papers is to demonstrate reflective analysis of the course content; to take in knowledge and reflect upon it. The exercise of critical thinking skills is a necessary component of this assignment. This does not mean to only find flaws and judge harshly. Instead, critical thinking "... is that mode of thinking - about any subject, content, or problem - in which the thinker improves the quality of his or her thinking by skillfully taking charge of the structures inherent in thinking and imposing intellectual standards upon them” (Paul and Elder 2008:1).Do not summarize the above-required readings/lecture content, this is nota report paper. Do not fill your paper with numerous and/or overly long quotes. Use two references in your course content section: one medium to short (less than 50 words) quote (remember to use quotation marks if you using the exact words from the readings and/or lecture material); and one paraphrased reference (remember to cite in ASA style when paraphrasing/using ideas from the readings and/or lectures). To access an Excerpt Example based on RP1: Doctrine of Discovery Course Content, go to Module 3. FormattingYour paper must be a Word document using Times New Roman 12 point font. Save your document with the following name: Last name underscore First name initial underscore RP3 underscore Soc underscore 315 underscore F19. For example (using my information): Willeto_A_RP3_Soc_315_F19. (Word will add the extension ‘docx’ to your file). Students are required to use the American Sociological Association’s Guidelines (ASA) style: 1.25 (1- 1/4) inch margins on all sides of the paper, double-spaced throughout. For a quick style guide of the ASA, go to: 'Soc 315 Home Page' and click on the link to 'ASA Quick Style Guide Fourth Edition'. Title Page: For your paper, use a cover page that includes the following information. Title, bolded and centered: Assignment: Response Paper 3 on Spirituality and Well-being; [insert a blank double-space] Course Content (numerically list the lectures and/or readings) that you’re actually responding to: For example: 1. Forbes “The Urban Tradition Among Native Americans” (2016:398-409). 2. Willeto (2019) ‘The Doctrine of Discovery and the Americas Before Columbus – LECTURE’. Then, [insert some blank double-spaces] your full name, course information (Soc. 315, Fall2019), Northern Arizona University, and the assignment due date (see course schedule in the syllabus). Finally, use of running heads, word count or an abstract are unnecessary for Response Papers. Main Body of Response Papers Beginning on page two, the main body of your paper should be double-spaced with 1.25" (1-1/4”) margins on all sides of the paper. Also ‘level 1 headings’ for the title, course content and discussion (see the excerpt example in Module 3). Use an italicized ‘level 2 heading’ for 'My Reflective Responses” (see the excerpt example). Turning in incomplete work will result in lower scores. I also suggest that you proofread and run the spell-checker before turning in your work. The Reflective Response Paper is worth 100 points; see the course schedule in the syllabus for due dates; and use the Response Paper submission link in the Assignments & Exams folder to submit your work (as an attachment in Word). You must use Word, any other type of document will be returned ungraded since I cannot access your document. You are expected to do your own work and do not plagiarize (see the syllabus for more information on plagiarism). Use of properly cited materials in the author/date style is required. Append the full citations for the references to the end of the paper. Soc 315 Response Paper Instructions: 2 Your full paper should be seven pages: Page 1 = Title Page; Page 2 = Introduction, Course Content, and Discussion of Reflective Responses [Main Body of Paper]; Page 3 = Discussion of Reflective Responses [Main Body of Paper];Page 4 = Discussion of Reflective Responses [Main Body of Paper];Page 5 = Discussion of Reflective Responses [Main Body of Paper];Page 6 = Discussion of Reflective Responses [Main Body of Paper] and Conclusion; Page 7 = List of Full References in alphabetical order using ASA style. Reference: Spiritual Hucksterism (Plastic Medicine Man) vs. Traditional Native healers- LECTURE

Use the document "Online Dating Profile" to complete the assignment.Use two to three scholarly resources to support your explanations.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

DirectionsFamilies have been with us for a very long time. It is probably true that the family is changing faster than any other social institution (Bianchi and Spain, 1996). U.S. families are changing in response to a higher divorce rate, a fast growing blended family structure, and the desire for women to have more career options and to provide better lives for their children.Television is a powerful medium that has continually reinvented images of the American family over the past sixty years. Arguably, television has created an idealized image of the American family and not always a realistic depiction of what the typical family structure looks like. Obviously, media is a powerful agent of socialization that often dictates what we 'think we should be doing.' However, as times have changed, so have the images of family on television. This assignment will explore some of those changes and ask you to reflect on the evolution of the American family as portrayed in television.The assignment begins with "Father Knows Best" (1954-1963). Here is the website for the show "Father Knows Best" (Links to an external site.) that gives a lot of information about the show, its characters, and content. I want you to read one of the magazine articles on this website from TV Guide that was published during the time the show was syndicated. You will want to make some notes about what you learned about the show including audience reception, characters, and the content of the show.Next, you will watch a full-length episode of the show (these can be found on the "Father Knows Best" website (Links to an external site.) or on YouTube (Links to an external site.)). You will then begin a content analysis of the show and you will do this for two other shows as well.Here is what you will be looking for in the episode(s):Gender roles and family structure (mother, father, children)Parents as figures of authorityChildren (manners, obedience to authority)Content of the show (what message was the show trying to send to the audience?) How is the content reflective of the average American family at the time? (or not)Choose one sit-com episode from the following list of sit-coms from 70s and 80s, watch in its entirety, and follow the same episode guideline questions above:One Day at a Time (1975)All in the FamilyGood TimesCosby ShowFamily TiesGrowing PainsMarried with ChildrenFinally, choose one of the following contemporary shows from the 2000s to view, following episode guideline questions:Modern Family,ParenthoodGilmore GirlsFamily GuyBlackishOne Day at a Time (2017)This is UsThe Haves and the Have NotsNow, you will synthesize all of the analysis you have done from the TV Guide article and three episodes of tv from different decades into a 2-3 page paper.