The Addressing Bias assignment must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (MT) at the end of Week 3. This assignment is worth 12.5% of your overall grade. The details for this assignment are located and listed below. Please note that this assignment goes to Turnitin.Week 3: Addressing Bias (Links to an external site.)Click here for transcript (Links to an external site.)PurposeIn today’s current healthcare settings, the increasing diversity, globalization, and expanding technologies produce complex ethical pressures that influence nursing practice and practice outcomes. To be effective in a master’s-prepared advanced nurse practice role it is important to understand personal values, beliefs, strengths, and limitations. The purpose of this assessment is to promote introspective reflection related to implicit and/or explicit personal biases. Students will develop a plan to reduce bias and promote personal and professional growth.Course OutcomesCO 1: Examine roles and competencies of master’s-prepared nurses essential to performing as leaders and advocates of holistic, safe, and quality care. (PO 1-5)CO 2: Apply concepts of person-centered care to nursing practice situations. (PO 1, 2, 5)Total Points PossibleThis assessment is worth 125 points.Due DateSubmit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 3.Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:Monday = 10% of total possible point reductionTuesday = 20% of total possible point reductionWednesday = 30% of total possible point reductionIf the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:Monday = 10% of total possible point reductionTuesday = 20% of total possible point reductionWednesday = 30% of total possible point reductionRequirementsCriteria for ContentComplete a self-inventory on personal biases you hold. The biases might be implicit or explicit.In a one to two-page summary, address the following.Identify your selected specialty track (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).Discuss how biases can impact outcomes in selected nursing practice settings.Identify personal biases and attitudes toward people with various cultural, gender, sexual orientation, age, weight, and religions that are different than your own.Select one bias that you have.Develop one strategy to reduce this bias.Preparing the paperSubmission RequirementsApplication: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment. Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at maximum two pages.A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used. Make sure to use references that are current, no older than 5 years.Submission: Submit your files: Last name_First initial_Assessment 2_Addressing BiasBest Practices in Preparing the ProjectThe following are best practices in preparing this project.Review directions thoroughly.Follow submission requirements.Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.RubricWeek 3: Addressing Bias Guidelines with Scoring RubricWeek 3: Addressing Bias Guidelines with Scoring RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction12.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature11.0 ptsPresentation of information is superficial and includes all of the following elements. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature10.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature5.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature12.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of Bias (first person can be used)38.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature33.0 ptsPresentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature30.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature14.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature38.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Personal Bias (first person can be used)6.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies one personal bias • Identifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature4.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies one personal bias • Identifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature2.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • Identifies one personal bias • Identifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature0.0 ptsPresentation of information in both following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • Personal bias is not identified. • Nature of bias is not identified.6.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategy to Reduce Bias (first person can be used)19.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise • Develops one strategy to reduce bias15.0 ptsPresentation is minimally demonstrated • Develops one strategy to reduce bias0.0 ptsPresentation of information is missing • Strategy to reduce bias is not developed.19.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf-Reflection (first person can be used)32.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice28.0 ptsPresentation of information is good but superficial in places and includes all of the following elements. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice26.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice12.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice0.0 ptsPresentation of information in the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice32.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format12.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present11.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present10.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 4–5 APA errors are present5.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 6–7 APA errors are present0.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 8 or greater APA errors are present12.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics6.0 pts1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual5.0 pts3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual4.0 pts5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual2.0 pts7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual0.0 pts9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual6.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Page Length Note: Students are to use at least two (2) scholarly references current within 5 years. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least one but no more than two pages.0.0 pts2 Point Deduction Does not use at least two (2) current scholarly references and/or exceeds required page length.0.0 ptsNo deductions full points0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions0.0 pts0 pts lost - submission met deadline0.0 ptsstudent does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days)0.0 ptsTotal Points: 125.0PreviousNext

Your final project paper is broken down into 3 parts, worth a total of 600 points towards your final grade. This milestone is worth 100 points.For this piece of that assignment, you will write the introduction to your final portfolio project (3 pages), comprehensively describing the industry you are choosing to use in the paper and preliminary challenges with information governance that you have identified. Be sure to utilize 3-5 sources from the UC Library.Review the instructions in the Portfolio Project document first (attached here). Each milestone is a separate writing assignment, leading up to the final submission in week 7.Expectations are that it will be a scholarly work, using largely peer-reviewed resources, formatted to APA 7 style. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are significantly weighted. Any instance of plagiarism will result in a 0 on the activity (first offense) or failing the course (2nd offense).