Description
In "Under Attack" (handout), the editors of The Economist look at how free speech is being threatened by repressive governments, non-state actors, and a general idea that people have a right not to be offended. Do you think there are times it is right to censor speech to maintain order or to protect peoples' feelings? Do you agree with the editors' underlying premise that the protection of free speech is vital for a liberal democracy? Consider how key terms, such as "offence," "hate speech," and "incitement to violence" are defined. Please take a position in your essay and pay close attention to and quote from “Under Attack” and other relevant texts.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Explanation & Answer
In case of any further edits, please do not hesitate to let me know! See you soon! Would appreciate to work with you in the future! Goodbye
Name
Institution
Date
Professor
The attack on Freedom of Speech
I.
Paragraph 1: Introduction - Freedom of speech is achieved when people have the
right to express their opinions without restraint, censorship or legal penalty.
II.
Paragraph 2: It is important sometimes to censor freedom of speech because people
make defamatory speeches also known as bad speech with the aim of harming the
reputation of the targeted party(s) in their own eyes and the eyes of others members
of the society
III.
Paragraph 3-4: The reasons why it is free speech is vital for liberal democracy
a.
The freedom of expression and freedom of information are not luxuries
but the starting point for the development of a free and democratic society
b.
A government that protects the right of speech is a democratic
government.
c.
Democratic leaders and countries allow their citizens to express their
opinions on various things thus contributing to positive development.
Running head: THE ATTACK O...
