1 page discussion with two references maximumstextbook link: https://we.tl/t-w7tkIO7ng1This week’s discussion will focus on management control using the case study “Brief Integrative Case 3.1: Google in China: Protecting Property Rights” (p. 415) in International Management: Culture, Strategy, and Behavior.Decision-making and controlling are two vital, and often interlinked, functions of international management. Strategic evaluation and control is the process of determining the effectiveness of a given strategy in achieving the organizational objectives and taking corrective actions whenever required. Control can be exercised through formulation of contingency strategies and a crisis management team.Using the Decision-Making Process (stages 1-9) outlined in the textbook (Fig 11-1) and this module’s content, what are your thoughts on each step in the process using the Google in China case study as it relates to the strategic evaluation and control process definition above?For example:Stage 1: What is the problem perception in the case?Stage 2: What is the problem identification in the case?Repeat for stages 3-9.What overall assumptions can you make using this decision-making process?Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories, which require supporting citations along with two scholarly peer-reviewed references supporting your answer. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references.Be sure to support your statements with logic and argument, citing all sources referenced. Post your initial response early and check back often to continue the discussion. Be sure to respond to your peers’ posts as well.Answer all questions posted by students and your professor. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies, but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.

This discussion will directly support your executive summary, providing you with the opportunity to discuss the ethical and legal aspects that will have an impact on your final project.In your initial post, discuss the following questions:What are the ethical and professional standards that apply to your mobile marketing campaign?What are the current state or federal regulations that need to be considered when implementing your campaign plan?How will you address these considerations in your campaign?Your answers to these questions will help you formulate Industry Standards and Regulations (part b) in the Execution section of your executive summary.In responding to your peers, give feedback on their initial posts. Compare the ethical and legal issues of the company you selected with your peers’ companies. Are the violations the same or different? Include suggestions for improvement, as this will be the only opportunity for your peers to receive feedback regarding the Industry Standards and Regulations section prior to the final submission in Module Seven.Refer to the Module Six Discussion Rubric for directions on completing these discussions.

Primer on Case Study Analysis(2).pdf; 19e_Section7_TN_Case14.pdf Case Study Directions Read the Case Study, Apple Inc. in 2012 (Case #14) in Part Two of your textbook (Thompson; Peteraf, Gamble, Strickland, Crafting & Executing Strategy, The Quest for Competitive Advantage 19e).  Complete a written Case Analysis of this company by using the required Case Study Format as described in your text on page CA1 through CA11. From the instructor: Cases Analysis I wanted to clarify expectations for the case analyses in this course. Please read the following carefully as, moving forward, I will direct questions regarding case analyses to this post. 1. You must thoroughly address ALL of the required “criteria” listed in the attached case study scoring guides. For every case analysis you submit, I carefully check to be sure that each one of these areas has been thoroughly addressed. Miss a required criterion and you miss points. Period. These criteria must include: a) The historical perspective is described. b) The current situation is described including its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. c) The central issues are described. d) The alternatives and solution are described and evaluated. e) An implementation plan is developed. 2. A good way to ensure a better score on your case analyses is to include headings for each of the required criteria listed in the attached case study scoring guides. Also, carefully review the attached Primer on Case Study Analysis. 3. You may either write your case in outline format or in narrative (written paper) format. However, again, ALL of the required criteria listed in the attached case study scoring guides must be thoroughly addressed. As a general rule, you should plan to write at least 3-5 pages for each case (single-spaced if using outline format; double-spaced if using a narrative format). 4. I do not require APA format for case analyses. However, I DO require that you cite references using whatever method you are comfortable with. 5. The most common oversight I see in case analysis is that many students do a good job recapping the case. However, their alternative solutions and implementation plan are either severely lacking in depth or they simply skip the alternative solutions and implementation plan altogether. 6. There are usually no “right” answers for case analyses. What we look for is the quality and depth of your logical analysis.