Activity 7: Ethos and Comics Instructions: In class we discussed the differences between propositions of fact, value, and policy, and how to effectively incorporate each of these types of propositions into a persuasive argument. For this activity, you will analyze the cartoon Calvin and Hobbes in terms of the main argument of the comic strip and whether this argument reflects a proposition of fact, value, or policy. Refer to class notes from Unit 6 (Ethos & Source Credibility) as well as the Herrick (2011) reading from Unit 1 to help you complete this activity. For EACH of the three comic strips (A-C), respond to the following: 1. Summarize the main argument of the comic strip in one sentence. 2. Based on your answer to 1, is this argument a proposition of fact, value, or policy? How do you know this (defend your answer)? Additionally, answer the following general question about propositions of fact, value, and policy: 3. What is the importance of identifying whether an argument (either your own or a speaker’s) is a proposition of fact, value, or policy? On teaching: On relying on experts: On the First Amendment: This activity must be submitted to eCampus as either a text submission or an attached file no later than 11:59pm. Incherse and decreased ethos by using fear on intial ethos Eest walls (depending المهاراال 777 77 1. Rhetorical choices on the ethos T Incheuses ethos by using evidence, organization, delivery, sincerity, using humor and establishing a common ground b. Humor e thash small long tel affects ethos c. Establishing a common ground - High ethos Tord d. Fear ) او ا قام ديو الابا نیل مه لى أوما ان لوب جوت انار End Terminal Ethos Creditability to the speaker after th comm, acto s Don't burn bridges may have speak to this aut again lathe Future ΤΟ 1 η η η η η η η η η η Π Π مادر ما حفر النار مع مرور الورد لذالك ليا للدر Long-term Effects of Ethos 8 high ethos sources lose impact over times may need to remind later on Latge: immediate effects -ethos, credibility influrce many psychological, congnitive affective and come outcome 9. Ethos and Power & Power is the capability to influnce someone to do or people belive something, * In thetorical communication we are thying to influence People which is an attempt to exercise poner a. French and Raven Bases of Power دوو جام اذا أتر هنری Coercive Punishment Perception that a source will punish if they do not confira.. an indo Reward - tesefi قارون يك ما أدرا کر . – Source will be rewaded if they confirm. صال ب اكتراکترددت الم they strong because of ii. Legitimate assigned bole Heine Students body i ولا الاهی حتلون انهم اعوا لا أريم امویا و به خانه دررازم نثق مره کی را خرج ماكو تجدني President, dean instructor. ( مجال الملكات اعر iv. Expert-competence knowldge of the topic I have Ponch because of who I am! I know this 48 * building helationship Fulda vel v. Referent identification Just wherd Perceived positive relationship betw. source and receiver. والعمل b. Ethos and power graphed: Reward الي يكاما) الجهي Refent دايم تتنبه لها سازه Power Credibility (A) Power antisocial PJ Prosocial whissle 10. Communication Behaviors That Improve Credibility 1- Clarity Reucvance 2- organization inmediary Handling a well facing the And - eye contact mmm mm mm MM 3-Fluent delivery 49 11. Evaluate Trustworthiness of a Source * Experiends in the topic? الكاد يخون مرة ادارترینا up-to-date? * unbiased? * Truthful? & Acting fu accord wlaud interest? A supports his, het claim well? / 5 - لحمة بالاعتمادملي ع المال و نار حرمم Proposition محارم نکاه A 12. Pre-invention . polisliistul Apositional Statment أود ماد controversial issue, (6) (b. Proposition of fact ما من أي whether something Tort, exists or does not exists, بامح باحا happened or did not happenen Proposition of value whether something is favorable/ unfavorable, morarsimmoted, fall/ unfair, better I worse. E I 3 d. Proposition of policy- whether someone should I should not do or believe in something 50
Purchase answer to see full attachment