Description
Which president did
NOT declare martial law on U.S. soil to place military authorities in
charge of state actions, instead of civilians?
(Points : 1)
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
10 pages
The Battle Of Gettysburg
• The Battle of Gettysburg was fought on July 1-3 in 1863 in around the town of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania. It was a sig ...
The Battle Of Gettysburg
• The Battle of Gettysburg was fought on July 1-3 in 1863 in around the town of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania. It was a significant battle of the civil ...
University of California San Diego Critical Thinking Process in Business Essay
This writing project includes a comprehensive application of the elements of critical reasoning that we are studying in t ...
University of California San Diego Critical Thinking Process in Business Essay
This writing project includes a comprehensive application of the elements of critical reasoning that we are studying in this course. The main objective is to use the critical thinking strategies described in the course to analyze and evaluate contrasting arguments. You can preview the requirements for the final paper in the Week 8 assignment below.
This is not an opinion piece or persuasive essay. The goal is to present contrasting arguments using information from credible sources and to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these positions using content from the course.
As you put this together, are you following the critical analysis process that we emphasize in critical reasoning? This means fairly considering all research equally before reaching a conclusion.
Your rough draft should include 1–2 paragraphs for each of the following elements:
Introduction: Identify the issue/topic. Provide the necessary background and important recent developments. Define key terms and concepts.
Arguments and Counterarguments: Summarize the best arguments on both sides of the issue. Include relevant research from credible sources used to support each conclusion.
Evaluation of Critical Thinking: Assess the strength of the arguments and the quality of thinking surrounding this issue.
Identify weaknesses in critical thinking such as fallacies, rhetorical devices, vague language, and cognitive biases. Provide specific examples of how these weaknesses appear in arguments, using terminology and definitions from the course
Evaluate the quality of scientific and anecdotal evidence using the standards of inductive and deductive reasoning described in the course. Consider the quality of causal relationship, analogies, generalizations, and/or moral reasoning.
Conclusion: Analyze the totality of research and offer a critical thinker’s response to the issue. Identify your own position and experience with the issue and explain how your thinking of the subject has evolved as a result of your analysis.
You must use a minimum of 5 research references in APA Style and include in-text citations in your paragraphs. Include a minimum of 3 academic peer-reviewed books or journal articles. Other sources may be used as supplemental sources, such as journalistic, government, web-based, or media sources. Sources should not include dictionaries, encyclopedias, or general information websites like Wikipedia. Consult your instructor regarding any source of which you unsure.
American College of California ANOVA Statistical Analysis Approach Paper
1 - Review the four "ANOVA" videos in the Calculations section of the "Statistics Visual Learner" media piece. https://lc. ...
American College of California ANOVA Statistical Analysis Approach Paper
1 - Review the four "ANOVA" videos in the Calculations section of the "Statistics Visual Learner" media piece. https://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt362v/the-visual-learner...Explain
the major differences between analyzing a one-way ANOVA versus a
two-factor ANOVA, and explain why factorial designs with two or more
independent variables (or factors) can become very difficult to
interpret.2 - Explain how the ANOVA technique avoids the problem of the inflated
probability of making Type I error that would arise using the
alternative method of comparing groups two at a time using the t-test
for independent groups.3 -Intwo-way ANOVA test, how many sets of hypotheses do we test? Provide anexample of two-way ANOVA test and set up appropriate hypotheses.
Identify the reasons for this shift, and then discuss at least one artist whose work embodied these new qualities.
In the late 19th century, the arts were associated with refinement and femininity. In the early 20th century, these associ ...
Identify the reasons for this shift, and then discuss at least one artist whose work embodied these new qualities.
In the late 19th century, the arts were associated with refinement and femininity. In the early 20th century, these associations were replaced by a focus on virility and masculinity. Identify the reasons for this shift, and then discuss at least one artist whose work embodied these new qualities.
Philosophy Fallacies of Reasoning Questions
QUESTION 1Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you favor a strong national defense, or ...
Philosophy Fallacies of Reasoning Questions
QUESTION 1Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you favor a strong national defense, or you favor allowing other nations to dictate our foreign policy.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 2Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Each part of the show, from the special effect to the acting is a masterpiece.ii. So the whole show is a masterpiece.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 3Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. All politicians are snakes. ii. No snake has legs. iii. So, no politician has legs. (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.aB.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 4Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Molecules are in constant random motion. ii. The Statue of Liberty is composed of molecules. iii. So the Statue of Liberty is in constant random motion. (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 5Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either I keep smoking or I will get fat.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 6Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Doctor: I can’t find the cause of your illness, but frankly I think it’s due to drinking. Patient: Then I’ll come back when you are sober.”(a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Amphiboly(d) Equivocation(e) Fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 7Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “If you do not support Barack Obama then you are a racist.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 8Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. A feather is light.ii. What is light cannot be dark.iii. Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 9Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Bill lives in a large building.ii. So, his apartment must be large.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 10Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Cars are heavy.ii. So all parts of cars are heavy.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 11Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you get a college degree or you will live your life in poverty.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 12Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” -- George W. Bush, Sept. 20, 2001, in an address to Congress(a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Equivocation (d) Fallacy of Composition(e) Fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 13Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “It is wrong to kill innocent human beings. Fetuses are innocent human beings. Therefore, it is wrong to kill fetuses.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 14Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Dear Friend, a man who has studied law to its highest degree is a brilliant lawyer, for a brilliant lawyer has studied law to its highest degree.” -- Oscar Wilde, De Profundis(a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Equivocation (d) Fallacy of Composition(e) Fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 15Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either archaeological puzzles such as the Pyramids must remain mysteries, or we must postulate visits to earth by space men.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 16Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you agree with me or you are an idiot.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of composition(e) fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 17Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Allison is pleasant to be around, and her husband is pleasant to be around.ii. So they must be pleasant to be around as a couple.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 18Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Affirmative action can never be fair or just. You cannot remedy an injustice by committing another.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 19Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Sodium chloride (table salt) may be safely eaten.ii. Therefore, sodium and chloride may be safely eaten.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 20Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Functioning brains think.ii. Functioning brains are nothing but the neurons that they comprise.iii. So the individual neurons think.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 21Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “If one doesn’t believe in God, anything goes.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 22Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either God created the universe or it came into being out of nothing.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 23Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Scientists talk about the pursuit of truth, but like most people, they are self-interested: the professional activities of most scientists are directed toward personal career enhancement, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth. Hence, the activities of the scientific community are directed toward enhancing the status of that community as a whole, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 24Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Murder is morally wrong.ii. The death penalty is an act of murder.iii. Therefore, the death penalty is morally wrong. (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 25Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “In the Meditations, Descartes argues that we need to prove God’s existence in order to establish the conclusion that what we perceive ‘clearly and distinctly’ is true. But the proof that he gives of God’s existence relies on the fact that what we perceive ‘clearly and distinctly’ is true.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.
Crime Uniform For Justice Correlation & Sampling
Inferences: Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeFrom the South University Online Library, read the following article:Trends in Alcoho ...
Crime Uniform For Justice Correlation & Sampling
Inferences: Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeFrom the South University Online Library, read the following article:Trends in Alcohol Use, Cocaine Use, and Crime: 1989–1998 (Also available as a PDF).On the basis of your readings, address the following questions:How did the authors study the correlation between drugs, alcohol, and crime? What sampling techniques were used to identify subjects for this study?What were the authors’ findings and conclusions? How did the sampling methods impact the generalizability of the study? How did this article improve your knowledge of drugs, alcohol, and crime?Identify two issues with the methodology that might limit the use of this study to direct public policy concerning drugs and crime.Note: The journal article describes a model; you are requested to assess the viability and practicality of that model in other contexts.
Similar Content
Unit 8: Reader Response
Assignment: A “reader response” essay is simply a way for you, as a reader, to respond in writing to a specific issue ...
POLITICAL SCIENCE term paper
Instructions for Term PaperSpecifications1. Font = Times New Roman2. Font Size = 123. Page Length 3 – 54. Use the Headin...
Help me write 4 page history paper
Using all of the 6primary sources listed above, answer the following questions: What was life like in the 19thcentury fo...
The Citadel Lack of Adequate Knowledge & Disaster Communication Discussion
Reply to the 2 posts below 200 words each - DISASTER COMMUNICATION COURSE Ask a probing questionShare an insight from havi...
writing assignment
Using either “Yours, Mine, or Ours? Perrault, the Brothers Grimm, and the Ownership of Fairy Tales” 435 or “Breaking...
In which continent did the ostrich originate?
In which continent did the ostrich originate?...
Coca Cola Final
This podcast tells the story of the most iconic American drink that has become part of people’s daily routines far beyon...
POL201 Ashford New Jersey Plan and The Three Branches of Government Quiz
The plan introduced at the Constitutional Convention that provided for a federal government that would be a combination of...
Attachment 6
Introduction: Prejudice towards a certain group is a practice deeply rooted in society today. It is typical for people to ...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Pachinko
by Min Jin Lee
Night
by Elie Wiesel
The Metamorphosis
by Franz Kafka
Homo Deus
by Yuval Noah Harari
The Fault in Our Stars
by John Green
The Old Man and the Sea
by Ernest Hemmingway
And Then There Were None
by Agatha Christie
The Elegant Universe
by Brian Greene
Moby Dick
by Herman Melville
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
10 pages
The Battle Of Gettysburg
• The Battle of Gettysburg was fought on July 1-3 in 1863 in around the town of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania. It was a sig ...
The Battle Of Gettysburg
• The Battle of Gettysburg was fought on July 1-3 in 1863 in around the town of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania. It was a significant battle of the civil ...
University of California San Diego Critical Thinking Process in Business Essay
This writing project includes a comprehensive application of the elements of critical reasoning that we are studying in t ...
University of California San Diego Critical Thinking Process in Business Essay
This writing project includes a comprehensive application of the elements of critical reasoning that we are studying in this course. The main objective is to use the critical thinking strategies described in the course to analyze and evaluate contrasting arguments. You can preview the requirements for the final paper in the Week 8 assignment below.
This is not an opinion piece or persuasive essay. The goal is to present contrasting arguments using information from credible sources and to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these positions using content from the course.
As you put this together, are you following the critical analysis process that we emphasize in critical reasoning? This means fairly considering all research equally before reaching a conclusion.
Your rough draft should include 1–2 paragraphs for each of the following elements:
Introduction: Identify the issue/topic. Provide the necessary background and important recent developments. Define key terms and concepts.
Arguments and Counterarguments: Summarize the best arguments on both sides of the issue. Include relevant research from credible sources used to support each conclusion.
Evaluation of Critical Thinking: Assess the strength of the arguments and the quality of thinking surrounding this issue.
Identify weaknesses in critical thinking such as fallacies, rhetorical devices, vague language, and cognitive biases. Provide specific examples of how these weaknesses appear in arguments, using terminology and definitions from the course
Evaluate the quality of scientific and anecdotal evidence using the standards of inductive and deductive reasoning described in the course. Consider the quality of causal relationship, analogies, generalizations, and/or moral reasoning.
Conclusion: Analyze the totality of research and offer a critical thinker’s response to the issue. Identify your own position and experience with the issue and explain how your thinking of the subject has evolved as a result of your analysis.
You must use a minimum of 5 research references in APA Style and include in-text citations in your paragraphs. Include a minimum of 3 academic peer-reviewed books or journal articles. Other sources may be used as supplemental sources, such as journalistic, government, web-based, or media sources. Sources should not include dictionaries, encyclopedias, or general information websites like Wikipedia. Consult your instructor regarding any source of which you unsure.
American College of California ANOVA Statistical Analysis Approach Paper
1 - Review the four "ANOVA" videos in the Calculations section of the "Statistics Visual Learner" media piece. https://lc. ...
American College of California ANOVA Statistical Analysis Approach Paper
1 - Review the four "ANOVA" videos in the Calculations section of the "Statistics Visual Learner" media piece. https://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt362v/the-visual-learner...Explain
the major differences between analyzing a one-way ANOVA versus a
two-factor ANOVA, and explain why factorial designs with two or more
independent variables (or factors) can become very difficult to
interpret.2 - Explain how the ANOVA technique avoids the problem of the inflated
probability of making Type I error that would arise using the
alternative method of comparing groups two at a time using the t-test
for independent groups.3 -Intwo-way ANOVA test, how many sets of hypotheses do we test? Provide anexample of two-way ANOVA test and set up appropriate hypotheses.
Identify the reasons for this shift, and then discuss at least one artist whose work embodied these new qualities.
In the late 19th century, the arts were associated with refinement and femininity. In the early 20th century, these associ ...
Identify the reasons for this shift, and then discuss at least one artist whose work embodied these new qualities.
In the late 19th century, the arts were associated with refinement and femininity. In the early 20th century, these associations were replaced by a focus on virility and masculinity. Identify the reasons for this shift, and then discuss at least one artist whose work embodied these new qualities.
Philosophy Fallacies of Reasoning Questions
QUESTION 1Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you favor a strong national defense, or ...
Philosophy Fallacies of Reasoning Questions
QUESTION 1Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you favor a strong national defense, or you favor allowing other nations to dictate our foreign policy.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 2Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Each part of the show, from the special effect to the acting is a masterpiece.ii. So the whole show is a masterpiece.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 3Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. All politicians are snakes. ii. No snake has legs. iii. So, no politician has legs. (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.aB.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 4Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Molecules are in constant random motion. ii. The Statue of Liberty is composed of molecules. iii. So the Statue of Liberty is in constant random motion. (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 5Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either I keep smoking or I will get fat.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 6Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Doctor: I can’t find the cause of your illness, but frankly I think it’s due to drinking. Patient: Then I’ll come back when you are sober.”(a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Amphiboly(d) Equivocation(e) Fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 7Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “If you do not support Barack Obama then you are a racist.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 8Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. A feather is light.ii. What is light cannot be dark.iii. Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 9Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Bill lives in a large building.ii. So, his apartment must be large.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 10Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Cars are heavy.ii. So all parts of cars are heavy.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 11Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you get a college degree or you will live your life in poverty.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) amphiboly(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 12Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” -- George W. Bush, Sept. 20, 2001, in an address to Congress(a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Equivocation (d) Fallacy of Composition(e) Fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 13Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “It is wrong to kill innocent human beings. Fetuses are innocent human beings. Therefore, it is wrong to kill fetuses.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 14Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Dear Friend, a man who has studied law to its highest degree is a brilliant lawyer, for a brilliant lawyer has studied law to its highest degree.” -- Oscar Wilde, De Profundis(a) Begging the question (b) False dichotomy (c) Equivocation (d) Fallacy of Composition(e) Fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 15Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either archaeological puzzles such as the Pyramids must remain mysteries, or we must postulate visits to earth by space men.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 16Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either you agree with me or you are an idiot.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of composition(e) fallacy of divisionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 17Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Allison is pleasant to be around, and her husband is pleasant to be around.ii. So they must be pleasant to be around as a couple.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 18Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Affirmative action can never be fair or just. You cannot remedy an injustice by committing another.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 19Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Sodium chloride (table salt) may be safely eaten.ii. Therefore, sodium and chloride may be safely eaten.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 20Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Functioning brains think.ii. Functioning brains are nothing but the neurons that they comprise.iii. So the individual neurons think.(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 21Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “If one doesn’t believe in God, anything goes.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 22Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Either God created the universe or it came into being out of nothing.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 23Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “Scientists talk about the pursuit of truth, but like most people, they are self-interested: the professional activities of most scientists are directed toward personal career enhancement, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth. Hence, the activities of the scientific community are directed toward enhancing the status of that community as a whole, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth.”(a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 24Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit:i. Murder is morally wrong.ii. The death penalty is an act of murder.iii. Therefore, the death penalty is morally wrong. (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.1 points QUESTION 25Which fallacy does the following statement or argument commit: “In the Meditations, Descartes argues that we need to prove God’s existence in order to establish the conclusion that what we perceive ‘clearly and distinctly’ is true. But the proof that he gives of God’s existence relies on the fact that what we perceive ‘clearly and distinctly’ is true.” (a) begging the question(b) false dichotomy(c) equivocation(d) fallacy of division(e) fallacy of compositionA.B.C.D.E.
Crime Uniform For Justice Correlation & Sampling
Inferences: Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeFrom the South University Online Library, read the following article:Trends in Alcoho ...
Crime Uniform For Justice Correlation & Sampling
Inferences: Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeFrom the South University Online Library, read the following article:Trends in Alcohol Use, Cocaine Use, and Crime: 1989–1998 (Also available as a PDF).On the basis of your readings, address the following questions:How did the authors study the correlation between drugs, alcohol, and crime? What sampling techniques were used to identify subjects for this study?What were the authors’ findings and conclusions? How did the sampling methods impact the generalizability of the study? How did this article improve your knowledge of drugs, alcohol, and crime?Identify two issues with the methodology that might limit the use of this study to direct public policy concerning drugs and crime.Note: The journal article describes a model; you are requested to assess the viability and practicality of that model in other contexts.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents