Assignment – BA&SR Section IV. System Recommendation and Summary & Conclusion The first step is to incorporate the all previous feedback you received on your Stage 1, 2 and 3 assignments (if you haven’t already), making any needed corrections or adjustments.Part of the grading criteria for this final stage includes addressing previous feedback to improve the final report. For this assignment, you will add Section IV as outlined below to Sections I, II and III.Section IV of the Business Analysis and System Recommendation Report will explain how the selected system helps MTC achieve its strategy, improve its hiring process, and meet its system requirements, and you will explain how each implementation area might be addressed to help ensure a successful implementation of the technology solution. Using the case study, assignment instructions, vendor brochure, Course readings (in particular, Implementing a SaaS Solution and Developing a System Proposal) and external research, develop your Section IV. System Recommendation.Approximate lengths for each section are provided as a guideline; be sure to provide all pertinent information.As you review the case study, use the assignment instructions to take notes to assist in your analysis; in addition, review information provided in earlier stages of this report to identify where the proposed solution can address the needs and requirements. Use the outline format and headings provided and follow all formatting instructions below.Review final report for incorporation of previous grading content feedback and any format changes needed.

books :Theology: The Basics, 4th Edition (Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), Alister E. McGrath. ISBN-13: 9781119158080 The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity and Diversity, 2nd Edition (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016), Roger E. Olson.ISBN-13: 978-0830851256; ISBN-10: 0830851259.Objective Salvation Paper. You must write and submit an original paper of 1200 to 1500 words on the thesis, “The Objective Benefits of Salvation.” In your paper, discuss the meaning of the terms sacrifice, substitute, and Christus Victor concerning salvation through Jesus Christ. Demonstrate what these terms mean for the work of salvation, and the results or benefits that come to the Christian believer through these truths. Follow the instructions below and the instructions on style that follow. You must use your textbooks and at least three other scholarly sources outside of your textbooks in your paper. Write your paper in the following pattern: First, discuss the meaning of each one of the terms above for Christian salvation through Jesus Christ.Second, discuss the results or the benefits that come to the believing Christian, and describe what changes occur for the Christian believer because of them.Conclude in your paper by summarizing the benefits that objective salvation brings to the Christian through the sacrifice, substitution, and conquering victory of Jesus Christ. In your conclusion, include a separate section of application that answers the following question: “How do the benefits of objective salvation change the way a Believer must live individually and within secular society?” Instructions on Style. Your paper may be written in proper MLA, APHA, APA, or Turabian style. Use the style that is appropriate to the major you intend to pursue. In all cases, whether the style calls for it or not, your paper must include: A title page with a title, your name, the class and semester, and your professor’s name.Reference notes. These can be in-text citations or footnotes. Do not use endnotes.A bibliography of works cited in the paper. Use the appropriate bibliography format for the style you adopt in writing the paper. Do not forget that your paper must use both textbooks and at least three other scholarly sources. Stay within the assigned word count. Use the word count function in your word processor. Papers should not go under the assigned word count, nor over the word count by more than 10 per cent. Papers that violate the word count will receive a penalty. Papers will be graded according to the following rubric: Activity Exemplary Good Fair Poor Thesis or Organizing Principle (10 points possible) The essay includes a focused, polished thesis or solid organizing principle that demonstrates impressive conceptual clarity and precision pertaining to the stated position. 9-10 points The essay includes a focused thesis or organizing principle that demonstrates good conceptual clarity pertaining to the stated position. 7-8 points The essay includes a thesis or organizing principle that demonstrates adequate conceptual comprehension pertaining to the stated position. 5-6 points The essay lacks a clear thesis or organizing principle and fails to demonstrate conceptual apprehension pertaining to the stated position. 0-4 points Comments: Organization, Development, Integration, and Support (25 points possible) The essay demonstrates exceptional critical thinking skills and includes well-chosen and effective supporting information, sound cumulative learning integration, and appropriate evidence for every point. This evidence is organized and presented persuasively, coherently, and logically, with smooth transitions between points. 21-25 points The essay demonstrates strong critical thinking skills and includes good supporting information, cumulative learning integration, and appropriate evidence for virtually every point. This evidence is organized and presented coherently and logically, with appropriate organization. 17-20 points The essay demonstrates basic critical thinking skills and includes adequate supporting information, learning integration, and evidence for most points. This evidence is organized and presented logically, with passable organization. There may be logical fallacies or points un(der)developed. 12-16 points The essay fails to demonstrate adequate critical thinking skills or include sufficient supporting information, learning integration, and evidence for most points. This evidence is presented illogically or disorderly. 0-11 points Comments: Quality/Breadth of Content (25 points possible) The essay demonstrates first-rate knowledge, understanding, and breadth of the topic discussed. This includes outstanding analysis of multiple perspectives, key contributions, evident limitations, and overall significance of these perspectives. 21-25 points The essay demonstrates competent knowledge, understanding, and breadth of the topic discussed. This includes good analysis of multiple perspectives, key contributions, limitations, and significance of these perspectives. 17-20 points The essay demonstrates basic knowledge, understanding of the topic discussed. This includes satisfactory-yet-limited analysis of perspectives, contributions, and significance of these perspectives. 12-16 points The essay demonstrates limited knowledge and/or understanding of the topic discussed. It fails to present sufficient analysis of perspectives, contributions, and significance of these perspectives. 0-11 points Comments: Application (10 points possible) The essay demonstrates advanced comprehension and insights relevant to the interrelation of faith and theology, presenting a markedly well-reasoned Christian perspective and application. 9-10 points The essay demonstrates good comprehension and insights relevant to the interrelation of faith and theology, presenting a well-reasoned Christian perspective and application. 7-8 points The essay demonstrates basic comprehension and insights relevant to the interrelation of faith and theology, presenting an adequate Christian perspective and application. 5-6 points The essay demonstrates minimal comprehension and insights relevant to the interrelation of faith and theology, failing to present an adequate Christian perspective and application. 0-4 points Comments: Research, Documentation, and Formatting (15 points possible) The essay demonstrates exceptional academic credibility and polished formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.). If outside sources are used, these sources are well chosen through excellent research skills and flawlessly integrated into the essay. 14-15 points The essay demonstrates good academic credibility and effective formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.). If outside sources are used, these sources are well chosen through good research skills and effectively integrated into the essay. 11-13 points The essay demonstrates basic academic credibility and suitable formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.). If outside sources are used, these sources are appropriate and suitably integrated into the essay, although there may be errors in documentation or less than thorough research. 8-10 points The essay fails to demonstrate academic credibility and/or suitable formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.) If outside sources are used, these sources are inappropriate to the essay and/or insufficiently documented or researched. 0-7 points Comments: Style/Mechanics (15 points possible) The essay demonstrates a polished and effective writing style. The tone and vocabulary are most appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose. The essay conveys an effective, distinct author’s voice. The essay is free of errors in the convention of the English language. 14-15 points The essay demonstrates an effective writing style. The tone and vocabulary are appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose. The essay conveys an effective, author’s voice. The essay is mostly free of errors in the convention of the English language. 11-13 points The essay demonstrates an adequate writing style. The tone and vocabulary are appropriate for the audience, topic and purpose. The essay gives the reader some sense of the author’s voice. Although the essay may contain some errors in the convention of the English language, it will be free of egregious grammatical errors. 8-10 points The essay fails to demonstrate an effective writing style. The tone and vocabulary are inappropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose. The essay fails to give the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay includes multiple errors in the convention of the English language, and some of these errors are egregious. 0-7 points