Business Finance
Police Interrogation and Application of Miranda Rights Discussion

Question Description

Introduction

Because police interrogation of a suspect has the potential for compulsory self-incrimination, it is subject to limitations imposed by the Fifth Amendment. Determining what constitutes an interrogation and whether the individual was in custody are key inquiries that impact procedural parameters.

Let's put this into action. Police received a phone call from someone who claimed he had just planted a bomb in a nearby high school and that it would go off in forty-five minutes. Police officers, including the bomb squad, rushed to the scene as the school was being evacuated. While surveying the area outside the school, an officer came upon a young man perched in a tree who appeared to be observing the scene with a pair of binoculars. The officer demanded that the man come down from the tree. As he was climbing down, a cell phone fell from his pocket. The officer picked up the phone and pushed the button to display the call history, which showed that the last number called was the police station. The officer, with three other officers, surrounded the man and asked, "Where's the bomb?" The man replied that there was no bomb and that the whole thing had been a prank. The man was arrested on a charge of making a false bomb threat. In a pretrial motion, his attorney moved to suppress the statements made by the suspect in response to the officer's questions.

For your main response, address the following:

  1. Explain how Miranda requirements apply, if at all, to the scenario based on Fifth Amendment rights as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court.
  2. Determine whether you think the pretrial motion will be granted based on the application of Miranda.
  3. Evaluate the voluntariness of, or lack thereof, the statement made by the defendant based on court interpretation of the Fifth Amendment.
  4. Propose best practices that should be implemented by the police department to ensure Fifth Amendment procedural and substantive compliance.

Post must be at least 300 words. Please include references

Final Answer

Attached.

Running Head: “POLICE INTERROGATION AND APPLICATION OF MIRANDA RIGHTS”
1

“Police Interrogation and Application of Miranda Rights”
Name of student
Name of professor
Name of course
Name of institution
Date

“POLICE INTERROGATION AND APPLICATION OF MIRANDA RIGHTS”

2
A set of instructions required to be given to a suspect of a particular criminal offense who is taken
into custody before he/she undergoes police interrogation is known as Miranda rights. The
Miranda rights serve a purpose of ensuring that such individuals are enlightened of their power not
to any incriminating statement on themselves and their right to have an attorney (Grisso, 1998). In
our scenario, the defendant...

Lincolvin (11851)
Purdue University

Anonymous
Thanks for the help.

Anonymous
Outstanding. Studypool always delivers quality work.

Anonymous
Tutor was very helpful and took the time to explain concepts to me. Very responsive, managed to get replies within the hour.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors