Problem Set about scientific study of political science

User Generated

unzzre1111

Humanities

University of California Davis

Description

1. [30 Points] A researcher wishes to study the effect of voter I.D. laws on enthusiasm for participation in democratic elections in the United States. (a) Explain how the researcher could use temporal variation study this question with an N of at least two. (b) Explain how the researcher could use both spatial and temporal variation to increase the N beyond two. (c) Name two sources of qualitative data the researcher could potentially use or create to study enthusiasm for participation in democratic elections.

2. [40 points] A researcher hypothesizes that in “Country A,” prior liberal democracy was a necessary condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. Theyknow that the presence of a right-wing authoritarian political party in parliament is asufficient condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. With this in mind, they decide to conduct a process-tracing analysis to test if prior liberal democracy was indeed a necessary condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. (a) Given their pre-existing knowledge about this causal process, will they be conducting a “smoking-gun test” or a “hoop test?” (b) What happens to their hypothesis if a causal-process link is not shown? Do we consider their hypothesis proven if a causal-process link is shown? (c) Now assume they know that the presence of a right-wing authoritarian political party in parliament is a necessarycondition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. Given their pre- existing knowledge, would the process-tracing test they conduct be considered a “hoop test” or a “smoking-gun” test? What happens to their hypothesis if a causal process link is not shown? Do we consider their hypothesis proven if a causal-process link is shown?

3. [30 points] You are interested in how various factors motivate students to run for student government positions and what factors motivate students to help others campaign for student government positions. You’ve decided to conduct semi-structured interviews. Create (a) two open-ended direct questions, (b) two open-ended indirect questions, and (c) one “grand tour” question.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Problem Set #3 Due March 11th 1. [30 Points] A researcher wishes to study the effect of voter I.D. laws on enthusiasm for participation in democratic elections in the United States. (a) Explain how the researcher could use temporal variation study this question with an N of at least two. (b) Explain how the researcher could use both spatial and temporal variation to increase the N beyond two. (c) Name two sources of qualitative data the researcher could potentially use or create to study enthusiasm for participation in democratic elections. 2. [40 points] A researcher hypothesizes that in “Country A,” prior liberal democracy was a necessary condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. They know that the presence of a right-wing authoritarian political party in parliament is a sufficient condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. With this in mind, they decide to conduct a process-tracing analysis to test if prior liberal democracy was indeed a necessary condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. (a) Given their pre-existing knowledge about this causal process, will they be conducting a “smoking-gun test” or a “hoop test?” (b) What happens to their hypothesis if a causal-process link is not shown? Do we consider their hypothesis proven if a causal-process link is shown? (c) Now assume they know that the presence of a right-wing authoritarian political party in parliament is a necessary condition for the ascendance of a right-wing authoritarian government. Given their preexisting knowledge, would the process-tracing test they conduct be considered a “hoop test” or a “smoking-gun” test? What happens to their hypothesis if a causal process link is not shown? Do we consider their hypothesis proven if a causal-process link is shown? 3. [30 points] You are interested in how various factors motivate students to run for student government positions and what factors motivate students to help others campaign for student government positions. You’ve decided to conduct semi-structured interviews. Create (a) two open-ended direct questions, (b) two open-ended indirect questions, and (c) one “grand tour” question.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: POLITICAL SCIENCE

1

Problem Set about scientific study of political science
Student Name
Course Title
Date

POLITICAL SCIENCE

2

Explain how the researcher could use temporal variation study in this question with an N
of at least two.
More and more research has been showing an association of voter, I.D laws and their
participation in the United States democratic elections. For a researcher to obtain adequate,
useful data and a successful analysis, one important aspect to consider is the temporal variation
study. This aspect enables the researcher to retrieve data from different sites and make a
meaningful conclusion after analysis. In this case, the N, which is the population should be at
least two. The reason for using an N which is higher than two is mainly for comparison of the
results from different respondents or sites (Keith, 2012). The researcher can also determine the
correlation coefficients between two or more sample groups or different measurement periods. A
strong correlation will depict similarly in the data while a weak relationship will depict a
dissimilarity in the data obtained.
Explai...


Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags