STAT 350 Purdue University Data analysis assignment using JMP

User Generated

qnexjnl30

Mathematics

STAT 350

Purdue University

Description

Generate all requested graphs and tables using JMP. follow the requirements in the document and answer the questions in it.

Attachment preview

1. Type your Name, STAT 350 with your correct section number (e.g. STAT 350-xxx) and Data Analysis Assignment #2 centered on the top of page 1 of your document. 

2. Number your pages across your entire solutions document. 

3. Your document should include the ANSWERS ONLY to the following FOUR questions with each answer labeled by its corresponding number and subpart. Keep the questions in order. Do NOT include the questions in your submitted document. 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Data Analysis Assignment #2 Spring 2019 STAT 350 Your submitted document should include the following items. Points will be deducted if the following are not included: 1. Type your Name, STAT 350 with your correct section number (e.g. STAT 350-xxx) and Data Analysis Assignment #2 centered on the top of page 1 of your document. 2. Number your pages across your entire solutions document. 3. Your document should include the ANSWERS ONLY to the following FOUR questions with each answer labeled by its corresponding number and subpart. Keep the questions in order. Do NOT include the questions in your submitted document. 4. Generate all requested graphs and tables using JMP. 5. Upload your document onto Blackboard as a Word or pdf document using the link provided by your instructor in Blackboard. Elements of good technical writing: Use complete and coherent sentences to answer the questions. Graphs must be appropriately titled and should refer to the context of the question. Graphical displays must include labels with units if appropriate for each axis. Units should always be included when referring to numerical values. When making a comparison you must use comparative language, such as “greater than”, “less than”, or “about the same as.” Ensure that all graphs and tables appear on one page and are not split across two pages. Use α = 0.05 for all hypothesis tests throughout this assignment. 1 Instructions All questions will require you to load the data sets posted on the Blackboard course site. 1. Sea Slugs, common on the coast of southern California, live on a particular type of seaweed known as vaucherian seaweed. The larvae from these sea slugs need to locate this type of seaweed to survive. A study was done to try to determine whether chemicals that leach out of the seaweed attract the larvae. Seawater was collected from an area with this type of seaweed at 5minute intervals as the tide was coming in and mixing with the chemicals. The idea was that as more seawater came in, the concentration of the chemicals was reduced. Each sample of water was then divided into 6 parts and larvae were introduced to each seawater part to see what percentage successfully metamorphosed. Researchers wanted to know if there was a difference in this percentage over the six time periods. The dataset SeaSlugs contains the results of the investigation (Percent) for each of the six times (Time column in minutes). Dataset: SeaSlugs 1a) State the null and alternative hypotheses for this researcher in the context of the question. 1b) Enter the appropriate variables into JMP using Analyze → Fit Y by X using ‘Percent’ for Y and ‘Time’ for X. Copy and paste the graphical display of the data into your document. 1c) Using the red triangle, select Unequal Variances to conduct Levene’s Test. Comment on your findings and include the relevant output in your document. 1d) Again, using the red triangle, select Means/Anova to conduct an analysis of variance on the data. Copy and paste the Analysis of Variance table into your document. 1e) Use your output from part 1d to make a decision concerning your hypotheses from part 1a. Justify your decision at the  = 0.05 level of significance. 1f) Now, using the red triangle, select Compare Means → Each Pair, Student’s t to determine which times, if any, differ. Include the relevant output in your document. 2 2. Iron-deficiency anemia is the most common form of malnutrition in developing countries, affecting about 50% of children and women and 25% of men. Iron pots for cooking foods had traditionally been used in many of these countries, but they have been largely replaced by aluminum pots, which are cheaper and lighter. Some research has suggested that food cooked in iron pots will contain more iron than food cooked in other type of pots. One study designed to investigate this issue compared the iron content of some Ethiopian foods cooked in aluminum, clay and iron pots. One of the foods was yesiga wet’, beef cut into small pieces with several Ethiopian spices. The iron content of four samples of yesiga wet’ cooked in each of the three types of pot is provided in the dataset, Iron1. Units are in mg of iron per 100 grams of cooked food. 2a) State the null and alternative hypotheses for the main effect in the context of the question. 2b) Use Analyze → Fit Y by X and copy and paste the graphical display of the data into your document. 2c) Using the red triangle, select Unequal Variances to conduct Levene’s Test. Report on your findings and include the relevant output in your document. 2d) Again, using the red triangle, select Means/Anova to conduct an analysis of variance on the data. Copy and paste the Analysis of Variance table into your document. 2e) Use your output from part 2d to make a decision concerning your hypotheses from part 2a. Justify your decision. 2f) Now, using the red triangle, select Compare Means → Each Pair, Student’s t to determine which pot types, if any, differ. Include the relevant output in your document. 3. The researchers then expanded their study by examining the iron content of shiro wet’, a legume-based mixture of chickpea flour and Ethiopian spiced pepper, and ye-atkilt allych’a, a lightly spiced vegetable casserole. In the dataset, Iron2, these three foods are labeled “meat”, “legumes”, and “vegetables.” Four samples of each food were cooked in each type of pot. The units are as in question #2. 3a) Create boxplots to display the results by using Graph → Graph Builder. Use Iron as the Y variable, Pot Type as the X variable and Food Type as the “Group X” variable, then select the boxplot icon at the top. Title your graph and copy it into your document. 3b) State the two null and alternative hypotheses for the main effects in the context of the question. 3c) State the null and alternative hypothesis for the test for interaction in the context of the question. 3 3d) Select Analyze → Fit Model and enter Iron in the Y box. Now highlight both FoodType and PotType before selecting Macros → Full Factorial. Now click Run. Copy and paste the Analysis of Variance and Effect Tests tables into your document. Make sure you select both FoodType and PotType before clicking macros 3e) Use your output from part 3d to make decisions concerning your hypotheses from part 3b-3c. Justify your decisions. 3f) Use the red triangle and select Factor Profiling → Interaction Plots. Copy and paste the plots into your document. 3g) Use the interaction plots and your results from part 3e to help the researchers make a recommendation for the people in these developing countries. 4 4. A student at a university in Australia noticed that ants often congregated on bits of sandwich that were dropped on the ground. She wondered what kind of sandwiches ants preferred to eat, so she set up an experiment. Among the factors she considered were the Filling of the sandwich (vegemite, peanut butter, ham and pickle) and the type of Bread (rye, whole wheat, multigrain, white) used. She prepared 4 sandwich pieces for each combination of Bread and Filling. Randomizing the order, she left a piece of sandwich near an anthill for 5 minutes, then trapped the ants with an inverted jar and counted how many were on the sandwich. After waiting for the ants to settle down the process was repeated on the next sandwich. The data in SandwichAnts are based on the counts she collected. Dataset: SandwichAnts 4a) State the two factors and their levels Factor A: __________________ Levels _____________________________________ Factor B: __________________ Levels _____________________________________ 4b) What is the observational unit? ____________________________________________ What is the response variable? ____________________________________________ 4c) How many total treatment groups are there in the experiment? ___________________ 4d) How many replications were conducted for each treatment group? ________________ 4e) How many total observations were conducted? _______________________________ 4f) State the two null and alternative hypotheses for the main effects in the context of the question. 4g) State the null and alternative hypothesis for the test for interaction in the context of the question. 4h) Select Analyze → Fit Model and enter Ants in the Y box. Now highlight both Bread and Filling before selecting Macros → Full Factorial. Now click Run. Copy and paste the Analysis of Variance and Effect Tests tables into your document. 4i) Use your output from part 4h to make decisions concerning your hypotheses from parts 4f-4g. Justify your decisions. 4j) Use the red triangle and select Factor Profiling → Interaction Plots. Copy and paste the plots into your document. Compare this plot to your decision concerning the interaction effect in part 4i. 4k) Use the red triangle by the Filling factor and select LS Means Student’s t to conduct a student’s t post hoc procedure on the filling main effect. Copy and paste only the Connecting Letters report into your document. 4l) Use the results from parts 4i and 4j, and your Connecting Letters report from part 4k to help the student make a conclusion from her study. 5
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

See attached

Name
STAT 350-xxx
Data Analysis Assignment #2

Question 1
a)
Ho: There is no difference in the percentage of successfully metamorphosed larvae over the six
time periods
Ha: There is a difference in the percentage of successfully metamorphosed larvae over the six
time periods
b)
Oneway Analysis of Percent By Time

c)
Test of variances Equal
Level

Count

Std Dev

MeanAbsDif

MeanAbsDif

to Mean

to Median

0

6

0.1687859

0.1071111

0.0943333

10

6

0.1238881

0.1035556

0.0886667

15

6

0.1470397

0.1222222

0.1120000

20

6

0.1383914

0.1045000

0.1045000

25

6

0.1484650

0.1138889

0.1020000

5

6

0.1423921

0.1173333

0.0991667

Test

F Ratio

DFNum

DFDen

Prob > F

O'Brien[.5]

0.1199

5

30

0.9869

Brown-Forsythe

0.0351

5

30

0.9993

Levene

0.0554

5

30

0.9978

Bartlett

0.0948

5

.

0.9930

The result of the Levene test gives a p value of 0.9978. The p value is greater than the 0.05
significance level. The p value indicates that there is no significant difference in the variances of
the six time periods.
d)

e)
Based on the one way ANOVA test that was conducted , the F ratio (5, 30) = 5.9648 and the p
value was equal to 0.0006. The p value is lower than the 0.05 significance level. We thus reject
the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence that there is a difference in the
percentage of successfully metamorphosed larvae over the six time periods.

f)

Based on the paired student’s t test, the times that are significantly different are only times z...


Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags