A Debate on the Causes of Depression

User Generated

svnancrerm7

Humanities

Description

A Debate on the Causes of Depression

Before beginning, please read the complete instructions for this debate.

Statement of the Problem

A single cause of depression has not been identified; however, there is evidence to suggest the potential for a variety of causes stemming from different psychological perspectives. For example, the biological perspective suggests that depression is a result of family history (that is, a genetic link), a chemical imbalance in the brain (for example, depletion of the neurotransmitter serotonin), a specific medical condition (for example, underactive thyroid), or even increased levels of hormones (for example, cortisol—a stress hormone). The cognitive-behavioral perspective suggests that depression is directly influenced by faulty thinking such as low self-esteem, negative outlook on the world and the future, learned helplessness (that is, a perceived lack of control that leads to giving up), and influences based on one's gender, race, socioeconomic status, levels of social support and stress, or other environmental events (for example, divorce).

Based on your research into the causes of depression from your assigned perspective, debate the following:

  • Which comes first: Does a biochemical imbalance, medical condition, or change in hormone level cause changes in mood and faulty thinking, which leads to depression? Or do changes in mood and faulty thinking cause a biochemical imbalance, which then leads to depression?

Discussion Instructions

For this debate, you will:

  1. Post your original position statement.
  1. Respond with counterarguments to the original postings of two other learners.
  1. Respond with a rebuttal to each counterargument offered to your position statement.

Each time you post, you are expected to support your position, counterargument, or rebuttal with evidence from research. Remember to use APA citations and references to give proper credit to authors of information used to support your arguments.

Discussion Standards

In order to keep the discussion focused and clear, everyone will adopt a specific standard for their responses as follows:

  • Position statement: Position statements should include a discussion of the issue, a detailed description of the perspective, and three individual arguments you have developed to support your position. The standard for posting your position statement is as follows:
  • Subject line: Position Statement – Your Name.
  • Message box:
  • Describe the issue.
  • Describe the perspective you are championing.
  • Describe three arguments with evidence from research to support arguments for your perspective.
  • Counterargument: Post at least two counterarguments to opposing learners' positions. Each argument should include at least one piece of evidence to support it. The standard for posting your counterargument is as follows:
  • Subject line: Counterargument – Your Name.
  • Message:
  • Describe your counterargument to the stated position.
  • Provide at least one piece of evidence to support your counterargument.
  • Rebuttals: After you have posted counterarguments to the opposing perspective, go back to your original post and see who has posted counterarguments to your position and arguments. Provide a rebuttal to each counterargument posed by your classmates. The standard for posting your rebuttal is as follows:
  • Subject: Rebuttal – Your Name
  • Message:
  • Details of your refutation (rebuttal) to the counterargument.
  • Provide at least one piece of evidence to support your rebuttal.

To understand how this discussion will be graded, review the scoring guide.

Resources

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Learner Name: Debate Preparation and Summary Worksheet To prepare for the debate in Unit 5, use this worksheet to synthesize what you have learned from your research on the causes of depression. Complete Section 1 Debate Preparation to organize your position, arguments, and evidence for the debate. You will then complete Section 2 Debate Summary following the debate, and will turn the full worksheet in at the end of the Unit 6 for grading as a summary of the debate. Section 1 - Debate Preparation • Your Position Statement In the space below, construct a position statement that reflects your perspective on the cause of depression. Your position should include the following: • A description of the perspective you are taking (either biological or cognitive behavioral). • Write your position statement. • A brief summary of each argument that you will present to support your position (you should construct three arguments for your position). • Your Summary of the Arguments that Support Your Position and the Evidence From Research to Support Those Arguments. (Please include appropriate in-text citations for your evidence and then include the full reference in the reference list - #5 below). Include evidence from research for each argument. Supporting Argument 1: Evidence, example, illustration 1: Evidence, example, illustration 2: Evidence, example, illustration 3: Supporting Argument 2: Evidence, example, illustration 1: Evidence, example, illustration 2: Evidence, example, illustration 3: Supporting Argument 3: Evidence, example, illustration 1: Evidence, example, illustration 2: Evidence, example, illustration 3: Add additional supporting arguments as needed. (If you have more than three arguments, place them in the same format as the others here): Section 2 - Debate Summary • Counter Arguments to Your Position and Your Rebuttals – With what counter arguments did others challenge your position? How did you reply to challenge their counter arguments (these are your rebuttals). What opponents said to counter your arguments (paraphrase your understanding of their counter arguments—do not copy and paste them). Your rebuttals to the counter arguments that they made to you or could have made to you based on their positions. (Please cite any sources you used): Note: If you did not receive any counter arguments directly to your post, think about counter arguments presented to your peers that could also apply to yours. You may also use counter arguments that you have read in the literature. • Summary and Conclusion Section (use this section as a way to summarize the debate) • From the information from above, in one or two well-developed paragraphs, summarize in your own words the counter arguments opposing your position: • In one or two well-developed paragraphs, summarize your rebuttals to the counter arguments that opposed your position: • Write a statement and conclusion of why your position is the most valid and reasonable: • APA Reference List – Journal articles go in the following format: Author last name, initials of first and middle names (if provided). (Year of publication). Title of the article. Title of the Journal, volume(issue), page numbers. doi number if the article has one. Example of a reference for a journal article: Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150–165. doi: 10.1037/a0026253 Use this area below to format the references you used in the debate. References Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2013, Vol. 122, No. 2, 339 –352 © 2013 American Psychological Association 0021-843X/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0031994 Rumination as a Mechanism Linking Stressful Life Events to Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Longitudinal Evidence in Early Adolescents and Adults Louisa C. Michl and Katie A. McLaughlin Kathrine Shepherd Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Kent State University This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema Yale University Rumination is a well-established risk factor for the onset of major depression and anxiety symptomatology in both adolescents and adults. Despite the robust associations between rumination and internalizing psychopathology, there is a dearth of research examining factors that might lead to a ruminative response style. In the current study, we examined whether social environmental experiences were associated with rumination. Specifically, we evaluated whether self-reported exposure to stressful life events predicted subsequent increases in rumination. We also investigated whether rumination served as a mechanism underlying the longitudinal association between self-reported stressful life events and internalizing symptoms. Self-reported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of depression and anxiety were assessed in 2 separate longitudinal samples. A sample of early adolescents (N ⫽ 1,065) was assessed at 3 time points spanning 7 months. A sample of adults (N ⫽ 1,132) was assessed at 2 time points spanning 12 months. In both samples, self-reported exposure to stressful life events was associated longitudinally with increased engagement in rumination. In addition, rumination mediated the longitudinal relationship between self-reported stressors and symptoms of anxiety in both samples and the relationship between self-reported life events and symptoms of depression in the adult sample. Identifying the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms that explain a greater propensity for rumination following stressors remains an important goal for future research. This study provides novel evidence for the role of stressful life events in shaping characteristic responses to distress, specifically engagement in rumination, highlighting potentially useful targets for interventions aimed at preventing the onset of depression and anxiety. Keywords: rumination, stress, internalizing symptoms, depression, anxiety & Frederickson, 1993; Nolen-Hoeksema, Parker, & Larson, 1994), heightened risk for new onsets of major depression (Abela & Hankin, 2011; Just & Alloy, 1997; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000; Robinson & Alloy, 2003), and greater chronicity of depressive episodes (Robinson & Alloy, 2003). Rumination is also associated with elevated risk for anxiety symptomology (Fresco, Frankel, Mennin, Turk, & Heimberg, 2002; Harrington & Blankenship, 2002; Mellings & Alden, 2000; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000; NolenHoeksema & Morrow, 1991). In addition, experimentally inducing rumination in distressed individuals prolongs both depressed and anxious mood compared with inducing distraction (Blagden & Craske, 1996; McLaughlin, Borkovec, & Sibrava, 2007; NolenHoeksema et al., 1993). Despite the fact that rumination is among the most robust risk factors for depression and anxiety (Aldao, Nolen-Hoeksema, & Schweizer, 2010), we know very little about the factors that predict the development of a ruminative response style. Identifying such factors would not only improve our understanding of the etiology of a ruminative response style but also have important implications for designing preventive interventions. One factor that may increase engagement in rumination is the experience of stress, that is, social and environmental circumstances that require psychological Rumination involves repetitive and passive focus on the causes and consequences of one’s symptoms of distress without engagement in active coping or problem solving to alleviate dysphoric mood (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991). Numerous studies suggest that the tendency to ruminate is associated prospectively with increases in depressive symptoms (Nolen-Hoeksema & Davis, 1999; NolenHoeksema, Larson, & Grayson, 1999; Nolen-Hoeksema, Morrow, Louisa C. Michl, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Katie A. McLaughlin, Department of Pediatrics & Psychiatry, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Kathrine Shepherd, Department of Psychology, Kent State University; Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, Department of Psychology, Yale University. Louisa C. Michl is now at the Department of Psychology, University of Rochester. We are deeply saddened that Susan Nolen-Hoeksema passed away before this article went to press. In addition to being a tremendous scholar, she was an inspiring, generous, and insightful collaborator. We will miss her terribly. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Katie A. McLaughlin, 21 Autumn Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: katie .mclaughlin@childrens.harvard.edu 339 This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 340 MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA and physiological adaptation over time by the organism (Monroe, 2008). The stress process involves a dynamic interaction between the organism and environment that changes over time in response to external challenges, perceptions of those challenges, and the coping resources that are activated following social and environmental challenges (Monroe, 2008). Conceptual models regarding the etiology of rumination argue that the experience of stressful life events might lead to rumination not only about those events but also about many areas of an individual’s life (NolenHoeksema, 1994; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1999). The current report examines this possibility. Control theories (Carver & Scheier, 1981; Martin & Tesser, 1996) provide the most direct explanation for how stressful experiences might lead to rumination (cf. Watkins, 2008). Negative events can create discrepancies between goals or desired states and one’s current state and lead to rumination about how to reduce such discrepancies (Carver & Scheier, 1981; Martin & Tesser, 1996). For example, receiving an unexpectedly low grade on a term paper may create a discrepancy with a student’s goal of doing well in a course, which in turn leads to rumination about this discrepancy. If the rumination leads to resolution of the discrepancy (e.g., the student decides the course is too difficult and decides to drop it), then the rumination will stop. If the discrepancy cannot be resolved, the individual may continue to ruminate about it. Uncontrollable or chronic stressors may be especially likely to lead to rumination because they create discrepancies between the individual’s current state and his or her goals or desired states (e.g., happiness) that cannot be resolved (Watkins, 2008). Indeed, one study of bereaved adults found that those who reported greater chronic stress showed increased rumination over time (NolenHoeksema et al., 1994). Similarly, in an experience sampling study of individuals facing stigma-related stressors due to race or sexual orientation, engagement in rumination was higher on days when stigma-related stressors were experienced (Hatzenbuehler, NolenHoeksema, & Dovidio, 2009). Stress may also induce rumination by undermining selfregulation, or the capacity to engage in self-control over one’s behavior (Baumeister, Gailliot, DeWall, & Oaten, 2006; Inzlicht, McKay, & Aronson, 2006). Limited regulatory abilities may impair an individual’s ability to engage in problem solving or active coping and increase the likelihood of engagement in rumination. Indeed, various studies have shown that active coping strategies such as problem solving are negatively correlated with rumination (see review by Nolen-Hoeksema, Wisco, & Lyubomirsky, 2008). A variety of other cognitive mechanisms might also increase the likelihood of rumination following stressful life events, including attention to negative thoughts and feelings, autobiographical memory for previous negative events, and negative self-schema activation (Scher, Ingram, & Segal, 2005; Segal & Ingram, 1994). Slavich’s psychobiological theory of depression (Slavich, O’Donovan, Epel, & Kemeny, 2010) provides an additional conceptual framework linking experiences of stress—particularly interpersonal stressors involving social rejection—to engagement in rumination. This theory proposes that social rejection stressors elicit a coordinated pattern of cognitive, emotional, and neurobiological responses that culminate in heightened risk for depression (Slavich, O’Donovan, et al., 2010). In particular, social rejection is associated with activa- tion in brain regions involved in emotional awareness and emotion regulation (Beauregard, Lévesque, & Bourgouin, 2001; Lane et al., 1998; Ochsner & Gross, 2005; Slavich, Way, Eisenberger, & Taylor, 2010; Somerville, Heatherton, & Kelley, 2006) that are activated during self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2006). Thus, brain regions that are sensitive to social rejection stressors are also centrally involved in the core selfreflective process that underlies rumination, suggesting a potential neurobiological mechanism linking interpersonal stressors to increased engagement in rumination. Like rumination, stressful life events consistently predict the onset of major depression and anxiety disorders (Brown, 1993; Hammen, 2005; Kendler, Hettema, Butera, Gardner, & Prescott, 2003; Kendler, Karkowski, & Prescott, 1999), and it is possible that rumination represents a mechanism that explains the relationship between stress exposure and the onset of internalizing psychopathology. Early studies with individuals who had experienced stressors such as a natural disaster (Nolen-Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991) or bereavement (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1994) found that those who were prone to ruminate had more severe and longer periods of negative mood following these events than those not prone to ruminate. However, these studies did not directly examine rumination as a mechanism linking stress to internalizing symptoms. More recently, evidence from an experience sampling study suggested that engagement in rumination partially mediates the association between negative life events and negative affect (Moberly & Watkins, 2008). Similarly, rumination was found to mediate the relationship between stigma-related stressors and psychological distress (Hatzenbuehler et al., 2009). Yet, the extent to which rumination explains the association between stressful events and symptoms of psychopathology is not well understood. The purpose of the current study was twofold: (a) to examine the role of self-reported stressful life events as a predictor of changes in rumination over time, and (b) to determine whether rumination is a mechanism linking self-reported stressful life events to subsequent increases in symptoms of depression and anxiety. We expected that self-reported stress exposure would be associated prospectively with increases in rumination, such that individuals reporting greater stress exposure would show greater increases in rumination over time than those reporting less stress exposure. We additionally predicted that increases in rumination following self-reported exposure to stress would mediate the relationship between reported stressful life events and increases in symptoms of depression and anxiety over time. To evaluate these hypotheses, we examined the association between self-reported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in two longitudinal studies: one using a school-based sample of early adolescents and one based on a community sample of adults. Finally, given substantial gender differences in rumination (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991) and in the prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety beginning in adolescence (Hankin et al., 1998; NolenHoeksema & Girgus, 1994; Twenge & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2002), we examined whether the relationships between self-reported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of depression and anxiety varied by gender. STRESS AND RUMINATION Study 1 This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. Method Participants and procedure. Adolescents were recruited from the total enrollment of two middle schools (Grades 6 – 8) in central Connecticut that agreed to participate in the study, excluding students in self-contained special education classrooms and technical programs who did not attend school for the majority of the day. The schools were located in a small urban community (metropolitan population of 71,538). Schools were selected for the study on the basis of demographic characteristics of the school district and their willingness to participate. The parents of all eligible children (N ⫽ 1,567) in the participating middle schools were asked to provide active consent for their children to participate in the study. Parents who did not return written consent forms to the school were contacted by telephone. Twenty-two percent of parents did not return consent forms and could not be reached to obtain consent, and 6% of parents declined to provide consent. Adolescent participants provided written assent. The overall participation rate in the study at baseline was 72%. The baseline sample included 51.2% (n ⫽ 545) boys and 48.8% (n ⫽ 520) girls. Participants were evenly distributed across grade level (mean age ⫽ 12.2 years, SD ⫽ 1.0). The race/ethnicity composition of the sample was as follows: 13.2% (n ⫽ 141) non-Hispanic White, 11.8% (n ⫽ 126) non-Hispanic Black, 57.3% (n ⫽ 610) Hispanic/Latino, 2.3% (n ⫽ 24) Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.2% (n ⫽ 2) Native American, 0.8% (n ⫽ 9) Middle Eastern, 9.4% (n ⫽ 100) biracial/multiracial, and 4.2% (n ⫽ 45) other racial/ethnic groups. Several students (n ⫽ 8, 0.8%) did not provide information on race/ethnicity. Twenty-seven percent (n ⫽ 293) of participants reported living in single-parent households. The participating middle schools reside in a predominantly lower socioeconomic status community, with a per capita income of $18,404 (Connecticut Department of Education, 2006, based on data from 2001). School records indicated that 62.3% of students qualified for free or reduced lunch in the 2004 –2005 school year. There were no differences across the two schools in demographic variables. Two additional assessments took place after the baseline assessment. Of the participants who were present at baseline, 221 (20.8%) did not participate at the Time 2 assessment, and 217 (20.4%) did not participate at the Time 3 assessment, largely due to transient student enrollment in the district. Over the 4-year period from 2000 to 2004, 22.7% of students had left the school district (Connecticut Department of Education, 2006). Participants who completed the baseline but not both follow-up assessments (n ⫽ 1,065) were more likely to be girls, ␹2(1) ⫽ 6.85, p ⬍ .01, but did not differ in grade level, race/ethnicity, or being from a single-parent household (ps ⬎ .10). Participants who did not complete at least one of the follow-up assessments did not differ from participants who completed all three assessments on levels of rumination or symptoms of depression or anxiety symptoms at baseline (ps ⬎ .10). Participants completed study questionnaires during their homeroom period. All questionnaires used in the present analyses were administered at Time 1 and Time 3, and the rumination measure was additionally administered at Time 2. Four months elapsed 341 between the Time 1 (November 2005) and Time 2 (March 2006) assessments, and 3 months elapsed between Time 2 and Time 3 (June 2006) assessments. This timeframe was chosen to allow the maximum time between assessments to observe changes in internalizing symptoms while also ensuring that all assessments occurred within the same academic year to avoid high attrition. Participants were assured of the confidentiality of their responses and the voluntary nature of their participation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Yale University. Measures. Self-reported stressful life events. The Life Events Scale for Children (Coddington, 1972) is composed of 25 items, each of which represents a stressful life event (e.g., “Your parents got divorced” and “You got suspended from school”). Participants are asked to indicate which events they had experienced in the prior 6 months. Life events checklists are the most commonly used instruments to assess adolescent stress (Grant, Compas, Thurm, & McMahon, 2004). Good test–retest reliability over 1- to 2-week intervals has been reported for life event checklists in adolescents (Cohen, Burt, & Bjork, 1987; Compas, 1987), as well as convergent validity with maternal reports of exposure to stressful life events in young adolescents (Cohen et al., 1987) and roommate reports in older adolescents (Compas, 1987). Rumination. The Children’s Response Styles Questionnaire (CRSQ; Abela, Brozina, & Haigh, 2002) is a 25-item scale that assesses the extent to which children respond to sad feelings with rumination (defined as self-focused thought concerning the causes and consequences of depressed mood), distraction, or problem solving. The measure is modeled after the Response Styles Questionnaire (Nolen-Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991) that was developed for adults. For each item, youths are asked to rate how often they respond in that way when they feel sad on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always). The Rumination subscale includes 13 items that are summed to generate a score ranging from 13 to 42. Sample items include “Think about a recent situation wishing it had gone better” and “Think ‘Why can’t I handle things better?’” The reliability and validity of the CRSQ have been demonstrated in samples of early adolescents (Abela et al., 2002). The CRSQ rumination scale demonstrated good reliability in this study (␣ ⫽ .86). Depressive symptoms. The Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI; Kovacs, 1992) is a widely used self-report measure of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. The CDI includes 27 items consisting of three statements (e.g., “I am sad once in a while,” “I am sad many times,” “I am sad all the time”) representing different levels of severity of a specific symptom of depression. The CDI has sound psychometric properties, including internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and discriminant validity (Kovacs, 1992; Reynolds, 1994). The item pertaining to suicidal ideation was removed from the measure at the request of school officials and the human subjects committee. The 26 remaining items were summed to create a total score ranging from 0 to 52. The CDI demonstrated good reliability in this sample (␣ ⫽ .82). Anxiety symptoms. The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC; March, Parker, Sullivan, Stallings, & Conners, 1997) is a 39-item measure of child anxiety. The MASC assesses physical symptoms of anxiety, harm avoidance, social anxiety, and separation anxiety and is appropriate for children ages 8 to 19 years. Each item presents a symptom of anxiety, and participants MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 342 indicate how true each item is for them on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never true) to 3 (very true). A total score, ranging from 0 to 117, is generated by summing all items. The MASC has high internal consistency and test–retest reliability across 3-month intervals and established convergent and divergent validity (Muris, Merckelbach, Ollendick, King, & Bogie, 2002). The MASC demonstrated good reliability in this sample (␣ ⫽ .88). Data analysis. Structural equation modeling was used to perform all analyses in MPlus software (Muthén & Muthén, 1998). Analyses were conducted using the full information maximum likelihood estimation method, which estimates means and intercepts to handle missing data. Multiply indicated latent variables were created for depression, anxiety, and rumination using three methods: (1) including scale items as observed variables; (2) creating parcels of items using the domain representative approach, such that each parcel included items from each of the subscales of the relevant measures (Little, Cunningham, Shahar, & Widaman, 2002); and (3) creating parcels of items using the within-domain approach, such that each parcel included items from one and only one of the subscales of each measure. We compared these three methods because the value of using parcels to model constructs as latent factors remains debated. Although using parcels as opposed to an observed variable representing a total scale score confers a number of psychometric advantages including greater reliability, reduced error variance, and increased efficiency (Coffman & MacCallum, 2005; Kishton & Widaman, 1994; Little et al., 2002), there are also limitations to parceling. Drawbacks include the possibility of model misspecification if constructs are multidimensional and items load onto an additional latent factor that is not included in the model and reduced interpretability of scales that have established norms (Little et al., 2002). Because the field has not reached consensus regarding the use of parcels or the most advantageous method for constructing parcels, we compared these three approaches to determine which provided the best fit to our data. Subscales used to create parcels were drawn from the established lower order factors of each construct based on prior research and exploratory factor analysis in our data. Subscales of rumination included brooding, reflection, and dysphoria (Treynor, Gonzalez, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2003); subscales of depressive symptoms included internalizing (dysphoria, self-deprecation, and social problems) and externalizing (school problems and aggression/disobedience) dimensions (Craighead, Smucker, Craighead, & Ilardi, 1998); and subscales of anxiety symptoms included physical symptoms, social anxiety, harm avoidance, and separation anxiety (March et al., 1997). After comparing the three measurement models, each of which included all latent constructs modeled simultaneously, we conducted analyses to examine the role of rumination as a mediator of the longitudinal associations between self-reported stressful life event exposure and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Standard tests of statistical mediation were employed. We first examined each of the steps in the mediation pathway: (1) the association between Time 1 self-reported life events and Time 3 symptoms of depression and anxiety, controlling for symptom levels at Time 1; (2) the association between self-reported life events at Time 1 and rumination at Time 2, controlling for Time 1 rumination; (3) the association between Time 2 rumination and Time 3 symptoms, controlling for Time 1 symptoms and rumination; and (4) the attenuation in the association between self-reported stressful life events at Time 1 and symptoms at Time 3 after accounting for changes in rumination from Time 1 to Time 2. We tested the significance of the mediator using a bootstrapping approach that provides confidence intervals around the indirect effect (Preacher & Hayes, 2008). Confidence intervals that do not include zero indicate significant mediation. This analysis provides a stringent test of mediation, which allowed us to investigate whether Time 1 self-reported stressful life events predicted changes in rumination and whether those changes predicted subsequent increases in Table 1 Means and Standard Deviations of Stressful Life Events, Rumination, and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Total sample Measure Adolescent sample Stressful life events Time 1 CRSQ rumination Time 1 CDI depression Time 1 MASC anxiety Time 2 CRSQ rumination Time 3 CRSQ rumination Time 3 CDI depression Time 3 MASC anxiety Adult sample Stressful life events Time 1 RSQ rumination Time 1 BDI depression Time 1 BAI anxiety Time 2 RSQ rumination Time 2 BDI depression Time 2 BAI anxiety Males Females Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Gender difference t 5.10 10.94 9.67 40.19 10.84 10.18 10.63 34.80 3.33 7.65 6.44 15.39 7.65 8.07 8.15 18.05 5.09 9.40 9.11 36.67 8.72 8.25 9.70 31.64 3.47 7.12 6.37 14.98 6.66 7.31 8.18 18.51 5.12 12.53 10.25 43.95 12.24 11.43 10.73 37.49 3.19 7.84 6.47 14.95 8.17 8.35 7.74 17.22 t(999)⫽0.15 t(1045)⫽6.77ⴱ t(1052)⫽2.87ⴱ t(1058)⫽7.92ⴱ t(835)⫽6.85ⴱ t(830)⫽5.83ⴱ t(852)⫽1.90ⴱ t(853)⫽4.79ⴱ 1.98 1.88 4.58 0.33 38.81 3.97 0.30 1.77 0.48 4.35 0.35 10.23 4.08 0.32 1.85 1.82 4.11 0.29 37.35 3.51 0.25 1.73 0.45 4.0 0.32 9.51 3.83 0.29 2.09 1.91 5.0 0.37 40.05 4.35 0.34 1.79 0.49 4.60 0.38 10.65 4.25 0.35 t(1325)⫽2.55ⴱ t(1325)⫽3.65ⴱ t(1325)⫽3.74ⴱ t(1241)⫽4.00ⴱ t(1130)⫽4.47ⴱ t(1131)⫽3.50ⴱ t(1131)⫽5.00ⴱ Note. CRSQ ⫽ Children’s Response Styles Questionnaire; CDI ⫽ Children’s Depression Inventory; MASC ⫽ Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; RSQ ⫽ Response Styles Questionnaire; BDI ⫽ Beck Depression Inventory; BAI ⫽ Beck Anxiety Inventory. ⴱⴱ Significant at the .01 level, 2-sided test. STRESS AND RUMINATION (RMSEA) ⫽ .05 (90% CI [.04, .06]). The model constructed using within-domain parcels (three parcels for rumination, two for depression, and four for anxiety) did not fit the data well, ␹2(24) ⫽ 332.0, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .99; TLI ⫽ .99; RMSEA ⫽ .10 (90% CI [.90, .10]), nor did the model constructed using observed variables, ␹2(2846) ⫽ 8480.7, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .69; TLI ⫽ .68; RMSEA ⫽ .04 (90% CI [.04, .04]). Stressful life events and rumination. Self-reported exposure to stressful life events was associated with rumination at Time 2, controlling for Time 1 rumination, ␤ ⫽ .08, p ⫽ .007. The relationship between stressful life events and rumination at Time 2 remained significant after additional controls for internalizing symptoms at Time 1 were added to the model, ␤ ⫽ .07, p ⫽ .030. Longitudinal mediation analyses. After documenting a prospective association between self-reported stress exposure and engagement in rumination, we examined the role of rumination as a mediator of the longitudinal associations between self-reported stressors and symptoms of depression and anxiety. We examined two longitudinal mediation models, one predicting depression and one predicting anxiety. Self-reported exposure to stressful life events at Time 1 was marginally associated with depressive symptoms at Time 3, controlling for Time 1 depression, ␤ ⫽ .06, p ⫽ .053. As noted above, Time 1 self-reported life events were associated with Time 2 rumination, controlling for rumination at Time 1. Time 2 rumination was associated with Time 3 depressive symptoms, controlling for Time 1 symptoms and rumination, ␤ ⫽ .19, p ⬍ .001. In the final mediation model, Time 1 self-reported stressful life events were not associated significantly with Time 3 depressive symptoms, controlling for Time 1 depression and rumination, when Time 2 rumination was added to the model, ␤ ⫽ .03, p ⫽ .393. The indirect effect of self-reported life events on depressive symptoms through rumination was not statistically significant (point estimate ⫽ .01; 95% CI [⫺.01, .03]). The final mediation model symptoms of depression and anxiety. Multigroup analyses were conducted to examine whether the process of mediation was moderated by gender. Each of the mediation paths was constrained to be equal for boys and girls, and the difference in model fit was examined using a chi-square test. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine whether the longitudinal association between stressful life events at Time 1 and rumination at Time 2 was driven entirely by those individuals with high rumination at Time 1. We evaluated this possibility by examining whether Time 1 stressful life events interacted with Time 1 rumination to predict Time 2 rumination. This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 343 Results Descriptive statistics. Table 1 displays the means and standard deviations of all measures at each time point, separately for boys and girls. Girls reported higher levels of rumination and symptoms of depression and anxiety than boys; no gender difference was observed in the number of self-reported stressful life events. Table 2 provides the zero-order correlations among selfreported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. As expected, rumination was positively associated with depression and anxiety symptoms, which were positively associated with one another. Self-reported stressful life events were associated positively with rumination and with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Measurement models. Three measurement models were tested, each of which included latent variables for adolescent depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and rumination. Of the three approaches to constructing the latent variables, only the domain representative approach (using four parcels for each of the three constructs) provided a good fit to the data. All fit indices indicated that the measurement model fit the data well: ␹2(51) ⫽ 173.8, p ⬍ .001; comparative fit index (CFI) ⫽ .98; Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) ⫽ .98; root mean square error of approximation Table 2 Correlations Between Stressful Life Events, Rumination, and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Measure Adolescent sample 1. LES-C stressful life events 2. CRSQ rumination Time 1 3. CDI depression Time 1 4. MASC anxiety Time 1 5. CRSQ rumination Time 2 6. CRSQ rumination Time 3 7. CDI depression Time 3 8. MASC anxiety Time 3 Adult sample 1. HDL stressful life events 2. RSQ rumination Time 1 3. BDI depression Time 1 4. BAI anxiety Time 1 5. RSQ rumination Time 2 6. BDI depression Time 2 7. BAI anxiety Time 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 — .18ⴱⴱ .29ⴱⴱ .10ⴱⴱ .18ⴱⴱ .16ⴱⴱ .20ⴱⴱ .14ⴱⴱ — .42ⴱⴱ .55ⴱⴱ .57ⴱⴱ .48ⴱⴱ .23ⴱⴱ .35ⴱⴱ — .28ⴱⴱ .39ⴱⴱ .35ⴱⴱ .54ⴱⴱ .24ⴱⴱ — .43ⴱⴱ .41ⴱⴱ .13ⴱⴱ .53ⴱⴱ — .48ⴱⴱ .33ⴱⴱ .44ⴱⴱ — .44ⴱⴱ .69ⴱⴱ — .33ⴱⴱ — — .27ⴱⴱ .21ⴱⴱ .24ⴱⴱ .24ⴱⴱ .14ⴱⴱ .20ⴱⴱ — .50ⴱⴱ .46ⴱⴱ .67ⴱⴱ .37ⴱⴱ .39ⴱⴱ — .60ⴱⴱ .44ⴱⴱ .60ⴱⴱ .50ⴱⴱ — .38ⴱⴱ .47ⴱⴱ .63ⴱⴱ — .50ⴱⴱ .46ⴱⴱ — .61ⴱⴱ — Note. LES-C ⫽ Life Events Scale for Children; CRSQ ⫽ Children’s Response Styles Questionnaire; CDI ⫽ Children’s Depression Inventory; MASC ⫽ Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; HDL ⫽ Health and Daily Living Form; RSQ ⫽ Response Styles Questionnaire; BDI ⫽ Beck Depression Inventory; BAI ⫽ Beck Anxiety Inventory. ⴱⴱ Significant at the .01 level, 2-sided test. 344 MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. Discussion Figure 1. Final mediation model for anxiety symptoms in the adolescent sample. Numbers represent standardized path coefficients (␤). All paths shown are significant (p ⬍ .05), except those drawn with broken lines. All constructs were modeled as latent variables other than stressful life events. Given space constraints, indicator variables are not displayed. accounted for the covariance between symptoms of depression, rumination, and self-reported life events. Fit indices indicated that the model fit the data well: ␹2(112) ⫽ 420.7, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .97; TLI ⫽ .96; and RMSEA ⫽ .05 (90% CI [.04, .05]). Self-reported exposure to stressful life events at Time 1 was associated with anxiety symptoms at Time 3, controlling for Time 1 anxiety, ␤ ⫽ .10, p ⫽ .002. Time 2 rumination was associated with Time 3 anxiety symptoms, controlling for Time 1 symptoms and rumination, ␤ ⫽ .37, p ⬍ .001. In the final mediation model, Time 1 self-reported stressful life events were no longer associated significantly with Time 3 anxiety symptoms, controlling for Time 1 anxiety and Time 1 rumination, when Time 2 rumination was added to the model, ␤ ⫽ .06, p ⫽ .183 (see Figure 1), and the indirect effect of self-reported stressful life events on anxiety through rumination was statistically significant (point estimate ⫽ .12; 95% CI [.02, .24]). The covariance between symptoms of anxiety, rumination, and self-reported stressful life events was accounted for in the final model. Fit indices indicated that the model fit the data well: ␹2(112) ⫽ 332.7, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .98; TLI ⫽ .98; and RMSEA ⫽ .04 (90% CI [.03, .04]). Moderation by gender. Finally, we examined whether the role of rumination as a mediator of the relationship between stressful life events and changes in internalizing symptoms was moderated by gender. When the mediation paths of interest (see Figure 1) were constrained to equivalence across male and female adolescents, the model fit did not significantly worsen for depression, ␹2(3) ⫽ 1.53, p ⫽ .68, or anxiety, ␹2(3) ⫽ 3.43, p ⫽ .33. Sensitivity analysis. We examined whether self-reported stressful life events interacted with rumination at Time 1 to predict rumination at Time 2 to evaluate whether the association between self-reported stressful life events and later rumination was driven entirely by those individuals with high rumination at Time 1. This interaction was not significant, ␤ ⫽ .04, p ⫽ .396, indicating that changes in rumination following self-reported stressful life events did not occur only among those with high levels of rumination at Time 1. Study 1 results indicate that self-reported exposure to stressful life events is associated with increased engagement in rumination over time in adolescents. Self-reported stress at Time 1 predicted increases in rumination at a 4-month follow-up, suggesting lasting changes in the degree to which participants were engaging in rumination following a self-reported stressful life event. Findings further indicate that increases in rumination, in turn, significantly mediated the relationship between self-reported stress exposure and subsequent increases in anxiety over a 7-month period. Although a similar pattern of findings emerged regarding the role of rumination as a mediator of the association between self-reported stressors and changes over time in depressive symptoms, the indirect effect was not statistically significant. We observed no gender differences in the role of rumination as a mechanism linking self-reported stressful life events to internalizing symptoms in adolescents. Study 2 Method Participants and procedure. Adults living in the greater San Francisco Bay Area were recruited using random-digit-dial telephone calls to households in San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland, California. These specific communities were chosen to increase the racial/ethnic diversity of the sample. One adult from the household was recruited for the study. Participants provided written informed consent. Of the 1,789 individuals identified as eligible for participation, 1,317 completed a baseline interview (22.6% declined participation and 3.7% agreed to participate but did not return calls to schedule the interview). The mean age was 47.0 years old (SD ⫽ 15.2) and the proportion female was 45.5%. The racial/ethnic composition of the sample was as follows: 72% non-Hispanic White, 9% Hispanic/Latino, 7% Black, 6% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 6% multiracial or other race/ethnicity. The majority of the sample (54%) was married or cohabiting, 18% were single, 16% were separated or divorced, 9% were widowed, and 3% were in a committed relationship but not cohabiting. The sample was diverse in regards to educational attainment, with 19% of respondents having a high school degree or less education, 27% with some college, 26% with a college degree, 8% with some postgraduate education, and 21% with a graduate or professional degree. The median income of the sample in 1994 was $40,000 to $50,000. Of the 1,317 baseline respondents, 1,132 (85.9%) completed a second interview 1 year later. Respondents who did not complete a second interview had significantly higher interview-rated and self-reported depressive symptoms than respondents who completed both interviews (p ⬍ .05). The analyses include only the 1,132 respondents who completed both interviews. Respondents were interviewed in person by an extensively trained clinical interviewer at both the baseline interview and follow-up interview 1 year later. Most interviews were conducted in the respondents’ homes. Interviews lasted approximately 90 min. Interviewers read the instructions aloud to the respondent for each measure and recorded the responses. Respondents were given a card with response options for all items that required the use of This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. STRESS AND RUMINATION a Likert scale or involved a choice between groups of possible answers. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Stanford University. Measures. Stressful life events. We used a revised version of the Stressful Life Circumstances Index of the Health and Daily Living Form (Moos, Cronkite, Billings, & Finney, 1986) to evaluate stress in adults. The original index consists of 42 items that each describes an undesirable life change event (e.g., “Serious illness or injury of a family member” and “Divorce”). Respondents are asked to indicate which events they, or someone close to them, had experienced during the previous 6 months. Six of the 42 items are specific to women. We revised the original index by removing 10 items that were inconsistent with our definition of stressful life events (i.e., undesirable social and environmental events requiring adaptation by the respondent). Items that were removed included events that would likely be experienced by most as positive and not require significant adaptation (e.g., “Income increased substantially [20%]”) or experiences that captured qualities of the respondent’s behavior rather than social or environmental events (e.g., “Alcohol or drug problems”). The remaining 32 items were summed to calculate a total life events score. Only events that happened directly to the respondent in the previous 6 months were included in the total score. Adequate test–retest reliability has been found for this measure over a 6-month period (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1994). Rumination. The Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ; Nolen-Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991) was administered to assess participants’ tendencies to ruminate in response to dysphoric mood. The Ruminative Responses scale of the RSQ includes 22 items describing responses that are self-focused (e.g., “I think, ‘Why do I react this way?’”), symptom focused (e.g., “I think about how hard it is to concentrate”), and focused on the possible consequences and causes of negative mood (e.g., “I think, ‘I won’t be able to do my job if I don’t snap out of this’”). Respondents rate each item on a scale from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always). The Ruminative Responses scale demonstrated good internal consistency in this sample (␣ ⫽ .90). Scores on this scale ranged from 22 to 76 at baseline and from 22 to 75 at the follow-up. Previous studies have documented acceptable convergent and predictive validity of this scale (Butler & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1994; NolenHoeksema & Morrow, 1991). Depression. Participants completed the 13-item form of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck & Beck, 1972), a selfreport measure of current depressive symptoms. The BDI is one of the most widely used self-report instruments for detecting depressive symptoms. The BDI demonstrated good internal consistency in this sample (␣ ⫽ .82). Scores on the BDI ranged from 0 to 29 at baseline and from 0 to 26 at the follow-up. A meta-analysis of the psychometric properties of the BDI documented good internal consistency and test–retest reliability across intervals ranging up to 1 month, as well as excellent convergent and discriminant validity (Beck, Steer, & Carbin, 1988). Anxiety. The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck & Steer, 1990) was used to assess anxiety symptoms. The BAI has 21 items assessing the severity of anxiety symptoms using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely/could barely stand it). Beck and Steer (1991) reported strong concurrent validity of the BAI with clinical ratings of anxiety. The BAI demonstrated good 345 internal consistency in this sample (␣ ⫽ .88). Scores on the BAI ranged from 0 to 52 at baseline and from 0 to 41 at the follow-up. Data analysis. We followed the same procedures for constructing the latent variables and testing the measurement models as described in Study 1. Subscales of rumination included brooding, reflection, and dysphoria (Treynor et al., 2003); subscales of depressive symptoms included somatic-affective and cognitive (Steer, Ball, Ranieri, & Beck, 1999); and subscales of anxiety symptoms included neurophysiological, subjective, panic, and autonomic (Osman, Kopper, Barrios, Osman, & Wade, 1997). Because the adult sample included only two time points, we followed the procedure for evaluating mediation in a halflongitudinal design (Cole & Maxwell, 2003). Specifically, we examined (a) the association between Time 1 self-reported stressful life events and Time 2 symptoms of depression and anxiety, controlling for Time 1 symptoms; (b) the association between stressful life events at Time 1 and rumination at Time 2, controlling for Time 1 rumination; (c) the association between Time 1 rumination and Time 2 symptoms of depression and anxiety, controlling for Time 1 symptoms; and (d) the attenuation in the association between self-reported stressful life events at Time 1 and Time 2 symptoms of depression and anxiety after accounting for rumination at Time 1. The significance of the indirect effect was tested using the standard bootstrapping method (Preacher & Hayes, 2008). Multigroup analysis to test moderation and sensitivity analysis were conducted using the same procedures as in Study 1. Results Descriptive statistics. Table 1 displays the means and standard deviations of all measures at each time point, separately for men and women. Higher levels of rumination, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and stressful life events were reported by women compared with men. Table 2 provides the zero-order correlations among self-reported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Rumination was positively associated with depression and anxiety symptoms, which were positively associated with one another. Self-reported stressful life events were associated positively with rumination and with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Measurement models. Three measurement models were tested, each of which included latent variables for depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and rumination. Of the three approaches to construct the latent variables, only the domain representative approach (using four parcels for each of the three constructs) fit the data well: ␹2(51) ⫽ 215.9, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .98; TLI ⫽ .98; RMSEA ⫽ .05 (90% CI [.04, .06]). Poor model fit was observed for the model constructed using within-domain parcels (three parcels for rumination, two for depression, and four for anxiety), ␹2(24) ⫽ 374.8, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .92; TLI ⫽ .89; RMSEA ⫽ .11 (90% CI [.10, .11]), and the model constructed using observed variables, ␹2(1536) ⫽ 8405.2, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .74; TLI ⫽ .73; RMSEA ⫽ .06 (90% CI [.06, .06]). Self-reported stressful life events and rumination. In the adult sample, greater self-reported exposure to stressful life events at Time 1 was associated with greater rumination at Time 2, controlling for rumination at Time 1, ␤ ⫽ .06, p ⫽ .012. The longitudinal relationship between stressful life events and rumina- This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 346 MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA tion remained significant even after controls for internalizing symptoms at Time 1 were added to the model, ␤ ⫽ .07, p ⫽ .032. Longitudinal mediation models. Self-reported stressful life events at Time 1 were marginally associated with Time 2 depression, controlling for Time 1 depression, ␤ ⫽ .05, p ⫽ .061. As noted above, self-reported life events were associated longitudinally with rumination. Rumination at Time 1 was associated with Time 2 depressive symptoms, controlling for Time 1 depression, ␤ ⫽ .40, p ⬍ .001. In the final mediation model, Time 1 selfreported stressful life events were not a significant predictor of Time 2 depressive symptoms, controlling for Time 1 depression, when Time 1 rumination was added to the model, ␤ ⫽ .02, p ⫽ .217; the covariances between Time 1 self-reported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of depression were also modeled. The indirect effect of self-reported stressful life events on depression through rumination was significant (point estimate ⫽ .05; 95% CI [.02, .09]). Fit indices indicated that the model fit the data adequately: ␹2(112) ⫽ 840.4, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .95; TLI ⫽ .94; and RMSEA ⫽ .06 (90% CI [.06, .07]). We next examined the extent to which rumination mediated the association between self-reported stressful life events and subsequent anxiety symptoms. Stressful life events at Time 1 predicted anxiety symptoms at Time 2, controlling for Time 1 anxiety, ␤ ⫽ .06, p ⫽ .010. Stressful life events were also associated with rumination at Time 2, as noted above. Rumination at Time 1 was associated significantly with Time 2 anxiety symptoms, controlling for anxiety at Time 1, ␤ ⫽ .18, p ⬍ .001. In the final mediation model, self-reported stressful life events at Time 1 were no longer a significant predictor of Time 2 anxiety symptoms, controlling for Time 1 anxiety, when Time 1 rumination was added to the model, ␤ ⫽ .01, p ⫽ .736. The indirect effect of selfreported stressful life events on anxiety through rumination was statistically significant (point estimate ⫽ .04; 95% CI [.02, .07]). This model included terms to account for the covariance between Time 1 self-reported stressful life events, rumination, and symptoms of anxiety at Time 1. Fit indices indicated that the model provided adequate fit to the data: ␹2(112) ⫽ 829.6, p ⬍ .001; CFI ⫽ .95; TLI ⫽ .94; and RMSEA ⫽ .07 (90% CI [.06, .07]). Moderation by gender. No gender differences were observed in the mediating role of rumination in the association between self-reported stressful life events and symptoms of depression, ␹2(3) ⫽ 3.47, p ⫽ .33, or anxiety, ␹2(3) ⫽ 4.82, p ⫽ .19. Sensitivity analysis. We examined whether self-reported stressful life events interacted with rumination at Time 1 to predict rumination at Time 2 to determine whether the association between self-reported stressful life events at Time 1 and rumination at Time 2 occurred only in individuals with high rumination at Time 1. This interaction was not significant, ␤ ⫽ .04, p ⫽ .698. Discussion In a longitudinal community-based sample of adults, selfreported exposure to stressful life events predicted increases in rumination 1 year later. Heightened rumination was a significant mediator of the association between self-reported stressful life events and subsequent increases in symptoms of both depression and anxiety in adults. The role of rumination as a mediator of the longitudinal association between stressful life events and depression and anxiety symptoms did not vary by gender in adults. General Discussion Although rumination is a well-established risk factor for emotional disorders, little is known about vulnerability factors for a ruminative response style. The purpose of this study was first to examine exposure to stressful life events as a vulnerability factor for rumination. As predicted, self-reported stressful life events were associated with increased engagement in rumination over time. Self-reported stressful life events were associated with higher levels of rumination in both adolescents and adults over follow-up periods ranging from several months to a year, suggesting that these life events are associated with changes in depressive rumination that are maintained for prolonged periods of time. The second objective was to determine whether rumination served as a mechanism linking stressful life events to later increases in symptoms of depression and anxiety, and our findings largely support this idea. Rumination was a mediator of the longitudinal association between self-reported stressful life events and anxiety symptoms among adolescents and adults and both males and females. In addition, rumination significantly mediated the relationship between self-reported stressful life events and increases in depressive symptoms in adults, but not in adolescents. Together, these findings highlight the importance of social environmental experiences in shaping responses to distress and the role of rumination as a mechanism underlying stress-related internalizing psychopathology. Our finding that self-reported stressful life events predicted increases in subsequent engagement in rumination suggests that events perceived as stressful may lead to changes in responses to distress that generalize to many areas of an individual’s life. The measures of rumination used in this study evaluated the degree to which respondents engaged in ruminative responses to feeling sad, down, or dysphoric, rather than engagement in rumination specifically in response to stressors. Given the length of follow-up between our assessment of life events and rumination, the persisting elevation in rumination among those who reported greater exposure to stressful life events suggests a potentially lasting change in characteristic styles of responding to distress. This finding is consistent with a previous study of bereaved adults in which greater stress burden following the death of a loved one was associated with later increases in rumination (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1994). Why might experiences of stress increase engagement in rumination? A variety of cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms are likely to underlie this relationship. One possible explanation is that negative events increase self-focused rumination as an attempt to reduce discrepancies between goals or desired states and current states (Carver & Scheier, 1981; Martin & Tesser, 1996; Watkins, 2008). Rumination on discrepancies following negative events may persist if it focuses on the causes and/or consequences of those events or on the distress/negative affect associated with stressful events, rather than on actions aimed to resolve the discrepancies (Watkins, 2008). Exposure to stressful life events might also hinder one’s ability to engage in active coping or problem solving (Baumeister et al., 2006; Inzlicht et al., 2006). Specifically, the cognitive and emotional effort required to manage the negative affect elicited by stressful experiences may reduce regulatory resources needed to engage in adaptive coping. Efforts to suppress thoughts about negative events may also increase ruminative This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. STRESS AND RUMINATION thinking (Wenzlaff, Wegner, & Roper, 1988). Stressful life events may also increase attention to negative thoughts and feelings, heighten memory for previous negative events, lead to negative expectations of the future, and activate existing negative selfschemas (Scher et al., 2005; Segal & Ingram, 1994). Activation of negative schemas may be particularly likely when stressors occur in life domains considered central to one’s self-concept (Hammen & Goodman-Brown, 1990). Each of these cognitive processes may contribute to increased engagement in rumination following stressful events. Finally, exposure to interpersonal stressors, particularly social rejection, activates brain regions that are centrally involved in self-reflection and emotion regulation (Eisenberger, Lieberman, & Williams, 2003; Slavich, Way, et al., 2010; Somerville et al., 2006), including regions involved in emotional awareness (McRae, Reiman, Fort, Chen, & Lane, 2008) as well as in directing attention toward salient environmental cues and monitoring conflict (Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004; Weissman, Gopalakrishnan, Hazlett, & Woldorff, 2005). As such, activation of these brain regions following interpersonal stressors may result in heightened attention both to the social and environmental changes associated with a negative life event, goal discrepancies associated with these changes, and attention to one’s emotional state. These processes may ultimately result in increased engagement in rumination. Our findings also suggest that rumination may act as a mechanism linking stress exposure to increases in internalizing psychopathology. In adolescents, rumination served as a mediator between self-reported exposure to stressful life events and increases in anxiety over time, and in adults, rumination mediated the association between self-reported life events and symptoms of both depression and anxiety. Rumination may be more strongly associated with anxiety than depression among early adolescents because they have yet to pass through the period of adolescence associated with greatest risk for onset of depression (Hankin et al., 1998). Previous studies have found that adolescents experiencing a negative event (academic failure or hearing that a parent was diagnosed with cancer) who engaged in more rumination had higher levels of depressed mood than adolescents who did not ruminate (Compas & Grant, 1993; Compas, Malcarne, & Fondacaro, 1988), but these studies did not test rumination as a mediator between negative events and depressed mood. More recently, Moberly and Watkins (2008) found that engagement in rumination partially mediated the association between negative events and negative affect in an experience sampling study. Our results expand on those of Moberly and Watkins, suggesting that rumination serves as a psychological pathway linking negative social environmental experiences to risk for symptoms of anxiety in adolescents and both depression and anxiety in adults. This pattern is similar to results observed recently in another experience sampling study documenting that rumination mediated the association between stressful life events and depressive symptoms among adolescents with low dispositional levels of traits central to mindfulness, including nonreactivity, nonjudgment, and awareness (Ciesla, Reilly, Dickson, Emanuel, & Updegraff, 2012). Rumination may lead to negative mood after stressful life events because it is associated with reduced capacity to disengage attention from negative emotional information (Joormann, 2006). In addition, rumination is associated with difficulties in generating good solutions to problems (Donaldson & Lam, 2004; Lyubomir- 347 sky & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1995; Ward, Lyubomirsky, Sousa, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2003; Watkins & Moulds, 2005; Watkins & Baracaia, 2002) and decreased willingness to engage in moodlifting activities (Lyubomirsky, Kasri, Chang, & Chung, 2006; Lyubomirsky & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1993). Thus, rumination after stressful events could undermine individuals’ attempts to solve their problems or to engage in other more positive coping activities, leading to depressive and anxiety symptoms. The role of rumination as a mechanism linking self-reported life events to increases in internalizing symptoms did not vary by gender. There are well-established gender differences in trait rumination and in the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptomatology beginning in adolescence and continuing throughout adulthood (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001; Nolen-Hoeksema & Girgus, 1994; Twenge & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2002). Despite these gender differences in average levels of rumination and symptoms of depression and anxiety, however, there is little reason to expect gender differences in the relationship between rumination and psychopathology. Indeed, previous research suggests a lack of gender difference in this relationship in both adolescents and adults (Hilt, McLaughlin, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2010; NolenHoeksema & Aldao, 2011), and such a difference was not predicted theoretically (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1999). Our results also show no gender differences in the relationship between stressful life events and rumination. Although females and males may be equally likely to engage in rumination following stressful life events, females may be more likely than males to experience certain types of stressors that lead to rumination, namely uncontrollable interpersonal stressors (e.g., sexual abuse, harassment at work; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1994). We found no gender difference in reports of stressful life events in our adolescent sample, but did find that women reported a significantly greater number of stressful life events than men in the adult sample (see also Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1999). The findings of this study point to several promising areas of future inquiry. Although rumination is typically conceptualized as a stable trait, our findings suggest that perceived changes in the social environment can increase engagement in rumination. Given the potent role that rumination plays in the etiology of major depression and anxiety pathology, identifying factors associated with the development of a ruminative response style is critical to facilitate the targeting of interventions toward adolescents and adults at high risk for the development of psychopathology. Some studies have found that rumination interacts with stressful life events to predict depression, such that individuals high in rumination are more likely to experience depression following stressors than those who do not ruminate (e.g., Driscoll, Lopez, & Kistner, 2009; Robinson & Alloy, 2003). Our findings suggest that the relationship between stressful life events and depression might be more complicated. Specifically, exposure to stressful life events might lead to increased engagement in rumination, regardless of one’s level of trait rumination at the time of the stressor, which in turn increases risk for internalizing psychopathology. Although risk for depression is likely to be particularly heightened among those already prone to ruminate, our findings suggest that increases in rumination are not confined to those with high trait rumination. In sensitivity analyses conducted in both of our samples, we found that increases in rumination following stressful life events did not This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 348 MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA occur exclusively among those with high levels of rumination at baseline. These findings are important because they suggest that engagement in rumination might represent a global response to experiences of stress that underlies the strong relationship between stressful life events and internalizing psychopathology. This possibility warrants further investigation in future research. An alternative interpretation of our findings is that the negative affect generated by exposure to stressful life events, rather than the experiences themselves, is the factor that results in heightened levels of rumination following stressors. Our finding that perceived stressful life events are associated prospectively with rumination even after controlling for internalizing symptoms assessed at the same time point as the perceived life events argues against this interpretation. Nevertheless, inclusion of measures of perceived distress following stressors will allow these relationships to be disentangled to a greater degree than was possible in the current studies. Identifying mechanisms linking stress and psychopathology is critical to develop interventions aimed at preventing the onset of stress-related mental disorders. Our findings suggest that rumination is a promising target for such interventions in both adolescents and adults who have experienced recent stressors. One example of a relevant intervention is rumination-focused cognitive– behavioral therapy (RFCBT; Watkins et al., 2007). The goal of RFCBT is to help individuals identify their ruminative thoughts and help them to shift into more effective thinking styles. Watkins and colleagues (2011) found that RFCBT was a beneficial treatment for persistent depression in adults compared with treatment as usual. Although RFCBT has also been examined as a treatment for adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder in a small pilot study (Sezibera, Van Broeck, & Philippot, 2009), the effectiveness of ruminationfocused interventions for the treatment of adolescent disorders remains unknown. More critically, the extent to which the techniques used in RFCBT could be applied in preventive interventions aimed at reducing risk for anxiety and depression following social environmental stressors has yet to be examined empirically. This remains an important goal for future research. Mindfulness mediation and other interventions focusing on emotional experience have also been shown to reduce engagement in rumination among previously depressed individuals (Jain et al., 2007; Kingston, Dooley, Bates, Lawlor, & Malone, 2007; Ramel, Goldin, Carmona, & McQuaid, 2004). Mindfulness is therefore another promising technique that might be useful in interventions aimed at preventing the onset of internalizing problems among individuals exposed to stressful life events. Study findings should be interpreted in light of several key limitations. First, our measures of stress in both the adult and adolescent samples relied on stressful life events questionnaires. Questionnaire checklists are limited both by recall failure and bias as well as misclassification problems (Dohrenwend, 2006; Raphael, Cloitre, & Dohrenwend, 1991). Interview methods have been developed that largely overcome these methodological problems with checklists (Hammen, 2008). Given their time intensive nature, however, we were not able to use this approach in the current study. The primary concern about use of a life events checklist is that individuals vary widely in the degree to which they experience negative affect in response to stressors, and those who are experiencing low mood or are already engaging in high levels of rumination might be most likely to perceive and report stressful life events. This concern is partially mitigated by the longitudinal design of our studies; rumination was measured between 4 and 12 months after the assessment of stressful life events. This time lag makes it less likely that the relationship between rumination and reports of stressful life events is explained entirely by greater propensity for perceiving or reporting stressors among those with high levels of rumination. Moreover, the nature of our statistical models takes into account, at least in part, the influence that both rumination and internalizing symptoms have on the perceptions/reports of stress because Time 1 rumination was a covariate in all longitudinal models and the relationship between perceived life events and rumination remained significant after controlling for Time 1 internalizing symptoms. Finally, the relationship between perceived stressful life events and rumination remained significant when we removed several events from each scale (e.g., items involving interpersonal conflicts) to ensure that only relatively objective events (e.g., divorce, illness of a family member) were retained. Nevertheless, the possibility that personality traits or other factors that are stable over time across individuals influenced reports of both stressful life events and rumination remains a possibility. Replication of the relationship between stress and rumination in studies that use more rigorous interview-based measures of stress exposure is therefore required. Second, our analysis focused on self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety. Although the association between rumination and onset of clinician-identified depressive episodes is well established (Abela & Hankin, 2011; Just & Alloy, 1997; NolenHoeksema, 2000; Robinson & Alloy, 2003), the role of rumination as a risk factor for the later onset of anxiety disorders requires further empirical examination. As such, future studies would benefit from the use of a clinical interview to establish the relationship between rumination and the onset of anxiety disorders. Third, we used a domain representative parceling approach to construct our latent variables. The issue of whether or not to use parcels to model latent variables in structural equation models is a controversial and hotly debated topic, with most studies noting both advantages and limitations of the approach (Bagozzi & Edwards, 1998; Bandalos, 2002; Coffman & MacCallum, 2005; Kishton & Widaman, 1994; Little et al., 2002). Drawbacks of using parcels include the possibility of model misspecification if constructs are multidimensional and items load onto an additional latent factor that is not included in the model and reduced interpretability of scales that have established norms (Little et al., 2002). As such, we empirically examined different methods for constructing the latent variables used in this study and found that the domain representative parceling approach provided the best fit to our data. However, because the constructs examined in the current study are multidimensional, it is possible that the lower order factors would have behaved differently than the higher order constructs used in our models. Although we did not have specific hypotheses about these lower order factors, examining the role of rumination as a mechanism linking stressful life events to specific types of anxiety and depressive symptoms is an important direction for future research. Fourth, although the longitudinal design allowed us to establish the temporal ordering of stressful life events, rumination, and changes in internalizing symptoms, the relationships between stress and internalizing psychopathology and between internalizing psychopathology and rumination are almost certainly reciprocal. Consistent evidence suggests that individuals with depression This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. STRESS AND RUMINATION and anxiety contribute to the generation of stress in their lives (Hammen, 1991; Rudolph et al., 2000). In addition, although rumination clearly predicts increases in symptoms of depression and anxiety, experience sampling evidence suggests that negative affect is also associated with later increases in rumination (Moberly & Watkins, 2008). A final limitation of the current study is the use of only two assessment time points in the adult sample, making our mediation analysis of this population more limited. A preferable approach is to use multiwave data to establish that the exposure predicts changes in the mediator that precede changes in the outcome (Cole & Maxwell, 2003; Maxwell & Cole, 2007), as we were able to do in the adolescent sample. To more rigorously test the conceptual model in adults, a prospective study with three waves of data is required. Rumination is among the most robust vulnerability factors for the development of internalizing psychopathology (Aldao et al., 2010). Although extensive research has examined the consequences of engagement in rumination, few studies have sought to identify vulnerability factors for rumination itself. Our findings suggest that self-reported stressful life events are associated with subsequent increases in ruminative responses to distress among both adolescents and adults. Moreover, results indicate that rumination is an important psychological mechanism linking perceived stress exposure to symptoms of depression and anxiety. These findings have important implications for guiding the development of prevention programs aimed at reducing vulnerability to internalizing problems and stress-related psychiatric morbidity. References Abela, J. R., Brozina, K., & Haigh, E. P. (2002). An examination of the response styles theory of depression in third- and seventh-grade children: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 515–527. doi:10.1023/A:1019873015594 Abela, J. R., & Hankin, B. L. (2011). Rumination as a vulnerability factor to depression during transition from early to middle adolescence: A multiwave longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 259 –271. doi:10.1037/a0022796 Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotionregulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217–237. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11 .004 Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45– 87. doi:10.1177/109442819800100104 Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications, Paper 65. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/65/ Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x Beauregard, M., Lévesque, J., & Bourgouin, P. (2001). Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, RC165. Beck, A. T., & Beck, R. W. (1972). Screening depressed patients in family practice: A rapid technique. Postgraduate Medicine, 52, 81– 85. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the revised Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1991). Manual for Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. 349 Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100. doi:10.1016/02727358(88)90050-5 Blagden, J. C., & Craske, M. G. (1996). Effects of active and passive rumination and distraction: A pilot replication with anxious mood. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 243–252. doi:10.1016/08876185(96)00009-6 Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539 –546. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003 Brown, G. W. (1993). Life events and affective disorder: Replications and limitations. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 248 –259. Butler, I. D., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender differences in response to depressed mood in a college sample. Sex Roles, 30, 331–346. doi:10.1007/BF01420597 Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York, NY: SpringerVerlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2 Ciesla, J. A., Reilly, L. C., Dickson, K. S., Emanuel, A. S., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Dispositional mindfulness moderates the effects of stress among adolescents: Rumination as a mediator. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41, 760 –770. Coddington, D. R. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children: A study of normal population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16, 205–213. doi:10.1016/00223999(72)90045-1 Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235–259. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4 Cohen, L., Burt, C., & Bjork, J. (1987). Life stress and adjustment: Effects of life events experienced by young adolescents and their parents. Developmental Psychology, 23, 583–592. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.23.4 .583 Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558 –577. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558 Compas, B. E. (1987). Stress and life events during childhood and adolescence. Clinical Psychology Review, 7, 275–302. doi:10.1016/02727358(87)90037-7 Compas, B. E., & Grant, K. E. (1993, March). Stress and adolescent depressive symptoms: Underlying mechanisms and processes. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA. Compas, B. E., Malcarne, V. L., & Fondacaro, K. M. (1988). Coping with stressful life events in older children and young adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 405– 411. doi:10.1037/0022006X.56.3.405 Connecticut Department of Education. (2006). Strategic school profile 2005–2006: New Britain Public Schools. Hartford, CT: Author. Craighead, W. E., Smucker, M. R., Craighead, L. W., & Ilardi, S. S. (1998). Factor analysis of the Children’s Depression Inventory in a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 156 –165. Dohrenwend, B. P. (2006). Inventorying stressful life events as risk factors for psychopathology: Toward resolution of the problems of intracategory variability. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 477– 495. doi:10.1037/ 0033-2909.132.3.477 Donaldson, C., & Lam, D. (2004). Rumination, mood and social problem solving in major depression. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1309 –1318. doi:10.1017/S0033291704001904 Driscoll, K. A., Lopez, C. M., & Kistner, J. A. (2009). A diathesis-stress test of response styles in children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 1050 –1070. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.8.1050 This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 350 MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003, October 10). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290 –292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134 Fresco, D. M., Frankel, A. N., Mennin, D. S., Turk, C. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (2002). Distinct and overlapping features of rumination and worry: The relationship of cognitive production to negative affective states. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 179 –188. doi:10.1023/A: 1014517718949 Grant, K. E., Compas, B. E., Thurm, A. E., & McMahon, S. D. (2004). Stressors and child and adolescent psychopathology: Measurement issues and prospective effects. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 412– 425. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3302_23 Hammen, C. (1991). Generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 555–561. doi:10.1037/ 0021-843X.100.4.555 Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938 Hammen, C. (2008). Stress exposure and stress generation in adolescent depression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema & L. M. Hilt (Eds.), Handbook of depression in adolescents (pp. 305–334). New York, NY: Routledge. Hammen, C., & Goodman-Brown, T. (1990). Self-schemas and vulnerability to specific life stress in children at risk for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 215–227. doi:10.1007/BF01176210 Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128 –140. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.107.1.128 Harrington, J. A., & Blankenship, V. (2002). Ruminative thoughts and their relation to depression and anxiety. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 465– 485. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00225.x Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Dovidio, J. (2009). How does stigma “get under the skin”? Psychological Science, 20, 1282– 1289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02441.x Hilt, L. M., McLaughlin, K. A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Examination of the response style theory in a community sample of young adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 545–556. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9384-3 Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17, 262–269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01695.x Jain, S., Shapiro, S. L., Swanick, S., Roesch, S. C., Mills, P. J., Bell, I., & Schwartz, G. E. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 11–21. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3301_2 Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Mitchell, K. J., Touryan, S. R., Greene, E. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2006). Dissociating medial frontal and posterior cingulate activity during self-reflection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 56 – 64. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl004 Joormann, J. (2006). Differential effects of rumination and dysphoria on the inhibition of irrelevant emotional material: Evidence from a negative priming task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 149 –160. doi: 10.1007/s10608-006-9035-8 Just, N., & Alloy, L. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: Tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 221–229. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.106.2.221 Kendler, K. S., Hettema, J. M., Butera, F., Gardner, C. O., & Prescott, C. A. (2003). Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and danger in the prediction of onset of major depression and generalized anxiety. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 789 –796. doi:10.1001/ archpsyc.60.8.789 Kendler, K. S., Karkowski, L. M., & Prescott, C. A. (1999). Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 837– 848. Kingston, T., Dooley, B., Bates, A., Lawlor, E., & Malone, K. (2007). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for residual depressive symptoms. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 193–203. Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765. doi: 10.1177/0013164494054003022 Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s Depression Inventory manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. Lane, R. D., Reiman, E. M., Axelrod, B., Yun, L.-S., Holmes, A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1998). Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness: Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 525– 535. doi:10.1162/089892998562924 Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Examining the question, weighing the evidence. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/ S15328007SEM0902_1 Lyubomirsky, S., Kasri, F., Chang, O., & Chung, I. (2006). Ruminative response styles and delay of seeking diagnosis for breast cancer symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 276 –304. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.3.276 Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 339 –349. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.339 Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1995). Effects of self-focused rumination on negative thinking and interpersonal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 176 –190. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.176 March, J. S., Parker, J. D. A., Sullivan, K., Stallings, P., & Conners, C. K. (1997). The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 554 –565. doi:10.1097/ 00004583-199704000-00019 Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts (pp. 1– 47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23– 44. doi:10.1037/ 1082-989X.12.1.23 McLaughlin, K. A., Borkovec, T. D., & Sibrava, N. J. (2007). The effect of worry and rumination on affect states and cognitive activity. Behavior Therapy, 38, 23–38. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.03.003 McRae, K., Reiman, E. M., Fort, C. L., Chen, K., & Lane, R. D. (2008). Association between trait emotional awareness and dorsal anterior cingulate activity during emotion is arousal-dependent. NeuroImage, 41, 648 – 655. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.030 Mellings, T. M. B., & Alden, L. E. (2000). Cognitive processes in social anxiety: The effects of self-focus, rumination and anticipatory processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 243–257. doi:10.1016/ S0005-7967(99)00040-6 Moberly, N. J., & Watkins, E. R. (2008). Ruminative self-focus, negative life events, and negative affect. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1034 –1039. Monroe, S. M. (2008). Conceptualizing and measuring human life stress. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 33–52. doi:10.1146/annurev .clinpsy.4.022007.141207 Moos, R. H., Cronkite, R. C., Billings, A. G., & Finney, J. W. (1986). Health and Daily Living Form manual. Social Ecology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Veterans Administration and Stanford University Medical Centers, Palo Alto, CA. This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. STRESS AND RUMINATION Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Ollendick, T., King, N., & Bogie, N. (2002). Three traditional and three new childhood anxiety questionnaires: Their reliability and validity in a normal adolescent sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 753–772. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00056-0 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). MPlus (Version 5.1). Los Angeles, CA: Author. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569 –582. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569 Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). An interactive model for the emergence of gender differences in depression in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 519 –534. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0404_5 Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 504 –511. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504 Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 173–176. doi:10.1111/14678721.00142 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion regulation and their relation to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 704 –708. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011 .06.012 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (1999). “Thanks for sharing that”: Ruminators and their social support networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 801– 814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.801 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424 – 443. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.424 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Larson, J., & Grayson, C. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1061–1072. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1061 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Morrow, J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1993). Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 20 –28. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.20 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994). Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 92–104. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.92 Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400 – 424. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03 .010 Osman, A., Kopper, B. A., Barrios, F. X., Osman, J. R., & Wade, T. (1997). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: Reexamination of factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–14. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199701)53:1⬍7::AID-JCLP2⬎3.0.CO; 2-S Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879 – 891. doi:10.3758/ BRM.40.3.879 Ramel, W., Goldin, P. R., Carmona, P. E., & McQuaid, J. R. (2004). The effects of mindfulness meditation on cognitive processes and affect in patients with past depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 433– 455. doi:10.1023/B:COTR.0000045557.15923.96 Raphael, K. G., Cloitre, M., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1991). Problems of recall and misclassification with checklist methods of measuring stressful life events. Health Psychology, 10, 62–74. doi:10.1037/0278-6133 .10.1.62 351 Reynolds, W. M. (1994). Assessment of depression in children and adolescents by self-report measures. In W. M. Reynolds & H. F. Johnston (Eds.), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents (pp. 209 – 234). New York, NY: Plenum Press. Robinson, M. S., & Alloy, L. B. (2003). Negative cognitive styles and stress-reactive rumination interact to predict depression: A prospective study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 275–292. doi:10.1023/A: 1023914416469 Rudolph, K. D., Hammen, C., Burge, D., Lindberg, N., Herzberg, D., & Daley, S. E. (2000). Toward an interpersonal life-stress model of depression: The developmental context of stress generation. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 215–234. doi:10.1017/S0954579400002066 Scher, C. D., Ingram, R. E., & Segal, Z. V. (2005). Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: Empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 487– 510. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.01.005 Segal, Z. V., & Ingram, R. E. (1994). Mood priming and construct activation in tests of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 663– 695. doi:10.1016/02727358(94)90003-5 Sezibera, V., Van Broeck, N., & Philippot, P. (2009). Intervening on persistent PTSD: Rumination focused cognitive behavioral therapy (RFCBT) in a population of young survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 107–113. Slavich, G. M., O’Donovan, A., Epel, E. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2010). Black sheep get the blues: A psychobiological model of social rejection and depression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 39 – 45. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.003 Slavich, G. M., Way, B. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Taylor, S. E. (2010). Neural sensitivity to social rejection is associated with inflammatory responses to social stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 14817–14822. doi:10.1073/pnas.1009164107 Somerville, L. H., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1007–1008. doi:10.1038/ nn1728 Steer, R. A., Ball, R., Ranieri, W. F., & Beck, A. T. (1999). Dimensions of the Beck Depression Inventory—II in clinically depressed patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 117–128. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10974679(199901)55:1⬍117::AID-JCLP12⬎3.0.CO;2-A Treynor, W., Gonzalez, W., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259. doi:10.1023/A:1023910315561 Twenge, J. M., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2002). Age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and birth cohort differences on the Children’s Depression Inventory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 578 –588. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.578 Ward, A., Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Can’t quite commit: Rumination and uncertainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 96 –107. doi:10.1177/0146167202238375 Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 163–206. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2 .163 Watkins, E. R., & Baracaia, S. (2002). Rumination and social problem solving in depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 1179 – 1189. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00098-5 Watkins, E., & Moulds, M. (2005). Distinct modes of ruminative selffocus: Impact of abstract versus concrete rumination on problem solving in depression. Emotion, 5, 319 –328. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.319 Watkins, E. R., Mullan, E., Wingrove, J., Rimes, K., Steiner, H., Bathurst, N., . . . Scott, J. (2011). Rumination-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for residual depression: phase II randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 317–322. 352 MICHL, MCLAUGHLIN, SHEPHERD, AND NOLEN-HOEKSEMA This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. Watkins, E. R., Scott, J., Wingrove, J., Rimes, K., Bathurst, N., Steiner, H., . . . Malliaris, Y. (2007). Rumination-focused cognitive– behavior therapy for residual depression: A case series. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2144 –2154. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.018 Weissman, D. H., Gopalakrishnan, A., Hazlett, C. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2005). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex resolves conflict from distracting stimuli by boosting attention toward relevant events. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 229 –237. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh125 Wenzlaff, R. M., Wegner, D. M., & Roper, D. W. (1988). Depression and mental control: The resurgence of unwanted negative thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 882– 892. doi:10.1037/00223514.55.6.882 Received July 16, 2012 Revision received January 22, 2013 Accepted January 24, 2013 䡲 Causes of Depression Issue Analysis Worksheet Causes of Depression Issue Analysis Worksheet Purpose: The Causes of Depression Analysis Worksheet’s purpose is to guide your steps in analyzing the resources from the resource list in the Unit 4 studies and Capella Library regarding the cause of depression from the perspective you have chosen to research. This worksheet will lead you through the research process by providing a systematic way to analyze the resources you have chosen to research. As you review resources, you will use the worksheet to analyze the authors’ positions on the issue and the arguments they present to support their positions. To fill out the worksheet, work your way down through the analysis components for each individual article and record your analysis for each component in the cell under the title of the article you are reviewing. You will submit your Causes of Depression Analysis Worksheet to the Unit 4 assignment. Learner Name: Francesca Wilson Name of Perspective: Causes of Depression.-Cognitive behavior Causes of Depression Research Articles Analysis Components APA reference for article: Michl, L. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Shepherd, K., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2013). Rumination as a mechanism linking stressful life events to symptoms of depression and anxiety: Longitudinal evidence in early adolescents and adults. Journal of abnormal psychology, 122(2), 339. APA reference for article: Ma, Z. W., Quan, P., & Liu, T. (2014). Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between self-evaluation and depression. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(2), 295-302. The main purpose of this article is: [State as accurately as possible the author’s purpose for writing the article. The authors wrote the article for two main purposes. Firstly, they intended to establish whether exposure of a person to stressful events increased their risks of The author seeks to find the mediating effect held by social support based on the relationship that exists between depression and self-evaluation. 1 Causes of Depression Issue Analysis Worksheet What is the author’s position or point of view?] The main arguments that the author is making are: [Determine the main arguments the author makes to support their position.] The evidence or facts the author uses in this article to support their arguments are: Identify the facts, data, or resources the author uses to support his or her argument. rumination. They also set out to found out if rumination mediated or contributed to the positive association between stressful life events and increases in symptoms of anxiety and depression. The authors viewed that exposure to stressful life events related to increased rumination response style and that rumination was a mediator of the linkage between stressful events and depression and anxiety symptoms. The author notes that the positive correlation between stressful situations and increased rumination cases can be attributed to various neurobiological sys...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hey there. It was great working on the order and I look forward to working with you again
Hey there. It was great working on the order and I look forward to work with you again. You can use this final document as its more refined

Learner Name:
Debate Preparation and Summary Worksheet
Section 1 - Debate Preparation


Your Position Statement


Description of the perspective

Many researchers associate the causes of depression to biochemical characteristics
like chemical, hormonal imbalance and medical condition or cognitive behavioral in
nature where depression is associated with low self-esteem, stress and social
support or influences of environmental, gender, socio-economic status. Although
both factors are associated with depression, cognitive-behavioral factors come first
and they trigger the biochemical imbalances associated with causing depression. A
dearth of research studies attribute depression with stress and rumination which are
cognitive factors influenced by social environment, social support and exposure to
stressful events.


Position Statement

I believe depression is caused mainly by the cognitive behavioral factors like
stressful environment, lack of social support, self-evaluation which then trigger
biochemical imbalances resulting in depression.


Summary of Arguments

The causes of depression are greatly cognitive because of three main reasons.
Firstly, lack of a strong support structure because affects self-evaluation which
subsequently leads to depression. Secondly, exposure to stressful events leads to
discrepancies between ones goals and reality which can lead to rumination and
depression. Stress can also interpersonal stressors affect brain regions responsible for
emotio...


Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags