Finish essay#1 and all requirement

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 7th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description

English 126: Essay #1 Paper Topics: Free Speech Analysis (15%)

Two draft versions of an introduction for essay 1 are due on Thurs. 2/14. The full draft of

essay #1 is due on Mon. 2/25. Submit your draft, and once you've submitted it, you will

be randomly assigned two classmates' drafts to peer review on that same folder. The final

essay is due on Thurs. 3/7. This paper should be 5 pages long (not including Works

Cited). Please type the essay in 12 point font, double spaced, with 1” margins all around.

•Limit the scope of you paper. You need to make sure you have a thesis statement, which

is a central argument in your introductory paragraph which you support throughout the

essay, and which you revisit in your conclusion.

•Close analysis of specific passages from the class reading are important. Use MLA

format for documenting sources (see handout). Include a Works Cited page at the end of

your essay, including the essay you analyze and any other sources you make use of

(sources not required).

•The purpose of this paper is to analyze the issue of free speech by demonstrating that

you have carefully read and understood in depth the readings we have done in class.

Outside information is not required; you may bring in current events, but all sources need

to be well-documented, and outside sources should only be supplemental to the focus on

materials I have assigned for class. Part of your grade for each essay includes the writing

process: turning in drafts, revising, and workshopping according to course deadlines.

Keep all of your drafts and comments from other students together in a folder to turn in

with your final essay.

•Note that Canvas has a plagiarism-checking software, so be careful not to copy

sentences from elsewhere without giving credit and quotations.

Questions taken from

Elements of Argument

page 597 ("Are Limits on Free Speech Ever

Justified?" handout). Also take note of the online resources provided in the book for

further research ("Are Limits on Free Speech" 598).

Please choose one the following choices for your paper topic. A significant part of how

well you carry out an assignment relates to following instructions, so carefully read this

handout and specifically, the topic you choose. Ask me if you are planning to bring in

supplemental information; however, outside research does not take the place of the

focused analysis I would like to see of readings we have done in class.

Choice 1: What are the limits of free speech? In “Bethel School District No. 403 v.

Fraser” (583-586), the US Supreme Court ruled that children in a public school do not

have the same rights as adults to use sexual speech in a public forum. What reasons did

the Court give for making a distinction? What reason did Justice Marshall give for his

dissent? The case was argued in 1986. Do you think the case would be treated in the same

way today? (583) Consider how key terms, such as “offensive” and “disruptive,” were

debated over and defined in the court opinions. You may also want to draw upon the

handout readings on free speech to see how free speech has been defined in various

contexts. Also note the web resources (598). Please pay close attention to and quote from

2

“Bethel School District” and other relevant texts.

Choice 2: In “Student Sues School District” (582-) and “Bethel School District” (583-),

we see public school to be a flash point for free speech controversies. Do you find the

cases discussed in “Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser” and in “Student Sues

District for Banning Anti-War T-Shirt” to be similar, or are there significant differences

between the two cases? Explain. (582-583). Consider how key terms, such as “offensive,”

“disruptive,” and “political speech” were debated over and defined. You may also want

to draw upon the handout readings on free speech to see how free speech has been

defined in various contexts. Also note the web resources. Please pay close attention to

and quote from “Bethel School District,” “Student Sues School District,” and other

relevant texts.

Choice 3: In “Student Sues School District” (582-), how do you feel the court should

decide in the case of the student who wore the anti-war T-shirt? (582) Consider how key

terms, such as “disruption” and “political speech” were debated over and defined. You

may also want to draw upon the handout readings on free speech to see how free speech

has been defined in various contexts. Note the web resources (598). Please pay close

attention to and quote from “Student Sues School District,” and other relevant texts.

Choice 4: In “Ice-T: The Issue is Creative Freedom” (586-), Barbara Ehrenreich argues

that “Cop Killer” is not seditious and creative freedom should be protected. Are there

circumstances where creative freedom should bow to social responsibility? What

evidence does Ehrenreich use to prove that “Cop Killer” is not dangerous? Is it

convincing? (586) Consider how key terms, such as “sedition” and “creative freedom”

are debated over and defined. You may also want to draw upon the handout readings on

free speech to see how free speech has been defined in various contexts. Note the web

resources (598). Please pay close attention to and quote from “Ice-T” and other relevant

texts.

Choice 5: In “Why We Need to Abolish the FCC” (589-), Robert Garmong criticizes the

FCC as violating free speech. Explain your position on how much control there should be

on what is broadcast over the airwaves, and who should control it (589). Consider how

key terms, such as “free speech,” “offensive,” and “indecency” are debated over and

defined. You may also want to draw upon the handout readings on free speech to see how

free speech has been defined in various contexts. Note the web resources ("Are Limits on

Free Speech" 598). Please pay close attention to and quote from “Why We Need to

Abolish” and other relevant texts.

Choice 6: While we may not see the do-not-call registry as controversial, in “Freedom of

Speech and My Right to Silence at Bath Time,” Patti Waldmeir explains that there are

two sides to the controversy. Write an essay in which you take a position, although this is

not a clear-cut case of one group being right and the other wrong (591-). Consider how

key terms, such as “privacy,” “free speech,” and “commercial speech” are debated over

and defined. You may also want to draw upon the handout readings on free speech to see

how free speech has been defined in various contexts. Note the web resources ("Are

Limits on Free Speech" 598). Please pay close attention to and quote from “Freedom of

Speech and My Right to Silence” and other relevant texts.

3

Choice 7: In "Under Attack" (handout), the editors of

The Economist

look at how free

speech is being threatened by repressive governments, non-state actors, and a general

idea that people have a right not to be offended. Do you think there are times it is right to

censor speech to maintain order or to protect peoples' feelings? Do you agree with the

editors' underlying premise that the protection of free speech is vital for a liberal

democracy? Consider how key terms, such as "offence," "hate speech," and "incitement

to violence" are defined. Please take a position in your essay and pay close attention to

and quote from “Under Attack” and other relevant texts.

Choice 8: In “A Case the Scouts Had to Win” (596-), what distinction does Johnson make

between the right to a job or an education and the right to associate with particular

people? Explain why Johnson believes that the Scouts are protected by the First

Amendment (596). Consider how key terms, such as “free association” and

“discrimination” are debated over and defined. You may also want to draw upon the

handout readings on free speech to see how free speech has been defined in various

contexts. Note the web resources (598). Please pay close attention to and quote “A Case

the Scouts Had to Win” and other relevant texts.

Choice 9: “Is Hate Speech Free Speech?” (handout from Texts and Contexts, 372-389)

Write an essay in which you discuss the issue of free speech versus hate speech on

college campuses. You may come to the conclusion that some form of censorship (you

should specify the form it should take) or some form of punishment should be instituted

to prevent the abuses of hate speech, or, conversely, you may wish to argue that we will

have to accept abuses of free speech in order to protect free speech. You also have the

option of shedding light on the issue rather than taking one position or another. Consider

how key terms, such as “free speech,” “hate speech,” “offensive,” “fighting words,”

“protected vs. unprotected speech,” “obscene speech,” and “harassment” are debated over

and defined. Include a specific thesis in your introduction that argues or explains your

main point, and focus your analysis on quotes and evidence from the handout, pages 372-

389

, focusing on one or two of the articles assigned for class in the packet, "Is Hate

Speech Free Speech

." Note that there is a particular definition for hate speech, so that

wearing a political t-shirt or making an obscene speech wouldn't be considered hate

speech.

Choice 10: In "The Free Speech--Hate Speech Trade Off," Professor Chemerinsky

addresses the issue of hate speech as free speech on college campuses in light of recent

incidents with controversial speakers. When should the freedom to say offensive things

be protected, and when should it be limited? Consider key terms, such as "harm,"

"offend," "free speech," and "hate speech." You may need to do some additional research

to find out more. Please take a position in your paper and pay close attention to and quote

“The Free Speech--Hate Speech Trade Off” and other relevant texts.

Choice 11: In "Free Speech in the Age of YouTube," Somini Sengupta looks at how free

speech policies are made by internet companies. What do you think their policies should

be in banning certain content? Consider how key terms, such as "hate speech," "inciting

violent acts," "free expression," and "public safety" are debated and defined. Please take a

position in your paper and pay close attention to and quote from “Free Speech in the Age

4

of YouTube” and other relevant texts.

For your information: More Free Speech Cases

•Schools may set codes to punish expressions of racism, sexism,

homophobia, and other kinds of bias, but courts may ask them to

modify these speech codes so as not to violate the First Amendment

right to free speech.

• Is the truth offensive to some groups? What should the attitude of

the university be, as an institution based on the search for truth?

• To what extent should feelings and arguments that could be

offensive be allowed in academic discussion? (Rottenberg and

Winchell, “Resources for Teaching” 65)

• The University of Massachusetts created a speech code that ensured

“freedom from harassment based on race, color, national, or ethnic

origin, gender, sexual orientation, age religion, marital status, military

service status, and disability” (Rottenberg and Winchell 66). The

Graduate Student Employees Organization wanted to extend this

definition to include “citizenship, culture, HIV status, language,

parental status, political affiliation or belief, and pregnancy status,”

but the faculty thought this went too far in terms of impeding

discussion of social issues in the classroom (Rottenberg and Winchell

66).

•Freedom of speech may be treated differently on campus than on the

street. The President of Emory University stated that hate speech

should not be allowed on campus because these are places that foster

“the habits and manners of civil society” (66). In contrast, New York

State’s highest court ruled that on the street, abusive language is

protected under free speech, in relation to an incident where a

retarded woman was called names by her neighbor (66).

•Teenagers in Miami went to jail for distributing a pamphlet that

contained racist comments, obscene cartoons, and a veiled threat

against the principal. Their defense claimed it was a satire, but the

superintendent of the school states, “free speech doesn’t give anyone

the right to use a word that would inflame” (66). The US Supreme

Court has upheld students’ right to expression but also allowed

schools to censor school newspapers and discipline students making

suggestive comments (66).

• Should offensive ideas, such as the denial of the Holocaust, be

allowed to be taught in schools?

5

• In Pennsylvania, a court ruled against a school’s antiharassment

policy that prohibited “jokes, name-calling, graffiti, innuendo, making

fun of a students’ clothing, social skills or surname” (66).

• Is labeling albums that contain offensive lyrics a violation of free

speech rights?

• Was it censorship for radio executives to ask their program

directors not to broadcast certain songs after 9/11 like “When You’re

Falling” by Peter Gabriel which could be taken the wrong way? (67)

•In 1996 Congress passed the Communications Decency Act which

outlawed “distribution of indecent material to minors on the Internet”

(67). But in 1999 the Supreme Court ruled this Act unconstitutional.

John McCain sponsored a bill to require that schools and libraries that

receive federal funding for the internet must install antipornography

filters.

•To what extent should schools be allowed to control school

newspapers on the web. What if they incite violence?

•Terrorists put up propaganda and plan attacks on the web. Should

they be controlled and censored, or does this violate their rights?

Sources:

Coles, Robert. “Safety Lessons for the Internet.” New York Times 11

Oct 1997: A23.

This articles asks for protection for children from pornography on

the Internet.

Hanna, Judith Lynne, “Wrapping Nudity in a Cloak of Law.” New York

Times 29 July

2001: E14.

Hentoff, Nat. Living the Bill of Rights. New York: HarperCollins, 1998.

Rottenberg, Annette and Donna Winchell. Resources for Teaching

Elements of

Argument. Boston: Bedford, 2006.

Tribe, Laurence H. “The Internet vs. The First Amendment.” New

York Times 28 April

1999: A27. This article argues that surveilling the internet is

unlikely to prevent violent crimes like the school massacre in

Littleton Colorado.

Tutor Answer

TaliaTech
School: Duke University

Attached.

Surname 1

Student’s Name
Institution
Course
Date
Reflecting on Essay 3
I have been thinking deeply on what I need to pick on when writing my essay 3. I had
several topics in mind but I believe I will settle for the topic that is relevant to the current issues
that are affecting our campuses. I see gun violence being a huge social problem here in America
and schools are not spared by this demonic phenomenon. Mass shootings in America have for
the past fe...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Good stuff. Would use again.

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors