annotated bibliography

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 8th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description

Need 3 references having to do with the attached prospectus

Subject this week " the cost of employee turnover at the front desk night audit shift in the Hotel industry"

Discussion 2: Annotated Bibliography

In each week of this course, you will research and select three (3) peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to develop an annotated bibliography that you can use in your Doctoral Study. You will need to take the three sources and synthesize the references into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports your study. For example, you may develop three references that will fit into the Nature of the Study (or any other component) and then the synthesized version will help you in developing your Prospectus/Proposal. Please see this week’s Learning Resources for the Sample Annotated Bibliography Template, which you should use to complete your annotated bibliography.

BY DAY 3

Post your synthesized annotated bibliography narrative that includes an explanation of how these references relate to onrospectus or more components of your Doctoral Study and incorporates specific references to the Doctoral Study Rubric.

Refer to the Week 1 Discussion 2 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

ELEMENT 1: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (POST AND ATTACH DOCUMENT)--

6.6 (30%) points

Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are thoroughly synthesized into a single, well-written narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A thorough and detailed explanation of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident.

6.27 (28.5%) points

Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are thoroughly synthesized into a single, well-written narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A detailed explanation of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident. One or two minor details are missing or lack clarity.

5.61 (25.5%) points

Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are synthesized into a single narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. An explanation with some details of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident.

4.95 (22.5%) points

Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are somewhat synthesized into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A cursory statement of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident.

3.3 (15%) points

Does not meet minimal standards and/or is posted late.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

ELEMENT 2: FOLLOW-UP RESPONSES--

8.8 (40%) points

On Day 5 and on Day 7, student's responses fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, and/or additional resources related to peers' annotated bibliography. Student demonstrates active engagement with more than one peer on at least two days in the discussion forum (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts).

8.36 (38%) points

On Day 5 and on Day 7, student shares some constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, and/or additional resources related to peers' annotated bibliography, but more depth and/or clarity around ideas is needed. Student demonstrates active engagement with more than one peer on at least two days in the discussion forum (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts).

7.48 (34%) points

Student did not post on Day 5 and on Day 7, but he/she did engage with at least one peer (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts) during the week offering constructive feedback related to peers' annotated bibliography.

6.6 (30%) points

Student posts to at least one peer (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts) but response is cursory and/or off topic.

4.4 (20%) points

Does not meet minimal standards and/or student posted late.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

ELEMENT 3: WRITTEN DELIVERY STYLE & GRAMMAR--

3.3 (15%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.

3.13 (14.25%) points

Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.

2.81 (12.75%) points

Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.

2.48 (11.25%) points

Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.

1.65 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

ELEMENT 4: FORMAL AND APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION OF EVIDENCE, ATTRIBUTION OF IDEAS (APA CITATIONS)--

3.3 (15%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.

3.13 (14.25%) points

Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.

2.81 (12.75%) points

Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.

2.48 (11.25%) points

Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.

1.65 (7.5%) points

Does not meet minimal standards.

0 (0%) points

Did not submit element.

NA


week8assignmentlima_gonzalez_c__

Tutor Answer

Tutor_JamesH
School: Purdue University

Attached.

Running head: HOTEL INDUSTRY.

Cost of Employees Turnover
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

HOTEL INDUSTRY

2

Cost of employee turnover at the front desk night audit shift in the hotel industry
Lee, C., & Way, K. (2010). Individual employment characteristics of hotel employees that play
a role in employee satisfaction and work retention. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 29(3), 344-353.
The Author suggests that variation of the employee’s characteristics influence their
feelings towards their working environment. The article identifies employment characteristics
which affect the employee’s satisfaction and their work environment which relates to employee
retention. Working environment determines job satisfaction and the preservation of employees
depending on their characteristics. These factors include; communication, location,
accomplishment, and the department, therefore, hotels industry should recommend to the
hoteliers to provide improved customized agenda which focus on the individual groups
according to specific group employment characteristics.
Debrah, Y. A. (1994). Management ...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back!

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors